This humour report is no better than right/left media. Its all over the same,

Hindi subtitles pe bhi kaam krne boliye alne team ko ma'am. Tabhi video zyada logo tak pohchegi

I wish sometime I get to do a report with you for newslaundry

*First things first:* Is the very very rare closed-caption creator/producer of this episode very same as your former coworker/colleague/work-"friend" Mr Ākāsh Banerjee of "@The DeshBhakt"? 'Cus that much eerily-similar is the quality of captions here.?! Also.. Lo-lo-loved your reminders & more on the former SP-turned-BJP spox.. ...But to cookie-cutter it unlike my 'very terrible' habit: Forget about the UK's "Daily Fail" as a source and much of your TP focusing on directly TV Licence-financed services of the British State broadcaster for the economically-defined UKGB"NI" & _Éire_ territories( geologically Celtic-Anglo islands), even relying on fucking Deadline® Hollywood - a showbiz-news, inarguably the beat of journalism with #1 lack of journalistic standards-&-practices when viewed from the vantage point of "old school Journalism", is heavily geopoltically-biased. Even though their rapidly-expanding parent's digital/new media Empire in 2 of the Top 3 laziest beats of journalism, showbiz & tech news - they're the for-profit enterprise which work as content-farm more often than not, in fact PMC® was one of those who didn't cancel their invitation to the Saudī investors summit in not Jeddāh, but[ bizarrely] Riyādh even after blockading Qatar which preceded the assassination of Late Sir Khashōgjī reportedly inside Istānbul consulate and the house-arrest of jailed _dilettantes_ close to the ruling House of al-Saūd clan in the ongoing 3rd Saudī State, including but not limited to, the one-&-only Saudī "BFF" of 'Murdoch Sr' - all under the auspices of alleged 'Mohammed Bone Sawman'( albeit, blockading Qatar was reported to be his mentor of oh-so-"federalist"-post-Great-Recession in then _de facto_ ruler "MbZ" of UAE's gambit given the _de jure_ President was reduced to issuing festive-greetings off-screen in his official _communiqués_ following "having suffered a stroke" in year or so from decade, in the here-&-now) - Deadline® Hollywood, like most of the Merican US news media, is not just pro-Is'rāel, but unlike them, they do not even try to cloak their systemic-bias with weasel-words with conspicuous omissions and commissions. Even after the bombing of al-Jalaa Building/Highrise/Tower in the downtown of Gaza City of the _de jure_ besieged and _de facto_ occupied Gaza Strip from ¾ of the barriers/corridors controlled by the Is'rāelī occupation-forces, and the rest by the hegemonic-junta ruling Egypt and struggling to regain control of Sināī Peninsula after having quelled even the Sūfī resistance over there during arguably the most-covered chapter of "#ArabSpring", leading to unpopularity of Sufīsm as a means-of-resistance for the locals' emancipation and gaining civil-liberties, as a voracious-researcher. They were the one-&-only some variant of International English-speaking mainstream outlet across continents in the Best of my recollection, not in an "opinion" piece since if it's not a straight-up PR announcement of some project, it's all a glorified-blogging anyways( even if one excludes the reviews, for sensical factors) - so even columnists like Mr Peter Bārt struggle to offer any USP over there. What did they do, exactly. Welp..: Almost as if to allow the publication of the term “Israeli occupation forces[ _sic_ ]” for the first-ever time to report that bombardment, the editorial decided to bizarrely prefix the weasel-adjectival framing, “almost immediately blamed[ _sic_ ]” moments before quoting AJMN( therein referred to as "Al Jazeera")'s official PR release of that bombing. And of course, *they did not even follow-up after the ever-dynamic excuse-handbook of IOF couldn't hold-off the subsequent revelations about "the world's most-moral" military already engaged in even heavier persecution of Palestinian journalists not working with some international news[gathering]-institutions.* So, all in all: Except for the part about the mainland-China and her SARs banning British State broadcaster and cutting-off ties after UK's OfCom, the civilian comms-regulator of a _de facto_ single-party, monarchist State - banned London-based CGTN® Europe from beaming into the UKGB"NI" for pretext which go back to "Murdochs in mainland-China" days, the rest of sourcing is dubious at Best - helpful to debunking the TPs against the British State broadcaster, at worst. It is also noteworthy, that while your bizarrely used the statement of "compare-contrast" in the matter of British State broadcaster but not whenever it comes to "iNtErNaL affairs", "sovereignty" & "tErRiToRiAl-InTeGrItY" where they are far too difficult to be challenged - you did not counter even a single point of the Chinese Foreign Ministry's spox over the stated lack of regulatory-oversight, whatsoever. Quite odd, or not, since the statement from pre-OfCom banning CGTN® Europe days: Actually back-handed complimented the regulatory-integrity of the autonomous body whose Board of Governors are partly appointed by the British State. And therefore.. For anybody wanting to have a look at the sheer history of the British State broadcaster, look no farther than this extended digital-/online-only cut of a short/TV documentary Special which went on to be award-winning in spite of numerous faceless, nameless, stereotypical "KZfaq® commenters" insinuating that either the [B][B][C]® Studios' Documentary Unit, or [B][B][C] News & Current Affairs Unit in London( which also produced the "India: The Mōdī Question" for its decidedly envelope-pushing, maverick TWO™ TV network) produced it [strategically-]uncredited, in order for the Jigsaw®-powered text-filtering 'algos' deployed only-&-only in "the comments-section" of this platform more than that wonky, ludicrous "publisher-context" notice of this platform's neoliberal senior-management - nevermind the "inconvenience" of visiting the official-web and turning-off adblocker or whitelisting at least 2 URLs for uninterrupted-playback( if applicable), the URL to it on this very platform is: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hZech5em2c7cl2g.html.( *Editorial note:* The original-release of this doc followed one of the contributors' interviews with [ CNN ]® International's Chief International Anchor, Ma'am Christiane Amanpour by 2 weeks or so. *The latest rerun-cycle of the abridged, linear/on-air cut has suitably changed the prose in the cold-open/intro narration/VO by the "face" suitably, particularly the one referring to a particular RL political-figure - given the rather volatile pace-of-shifts in HMG since its original-release. Even the extended digital-/online-only cut excluded the one part of the interview, 'coincidentally' with the very interviewee who talked to Ma'am Amanpour - released by the non-conspiratorial, public above-the-line staffers, **_i.e._** producers of varying job-titles - on their official social-media during its less-than-a-week-long first-run cycle back in late 2020. It has neither been mentioned in the doc, nor directly noted by any of the said staffers in their publicly-visible personal social-presences openly that: The governmental body liable for policymaking in the statutory corporations which includes OfCom, and public corporations which is the British State-broadcaster-in-question - refused their Right of Reply by not partaking in the programme, something which was converted only-&-only in the official PR coomuniqué on the Network's official-web. Mayhaps, I'd wager that's also the reason that in order to make-up for that: The "face" went straight to her [bio-]father, since he served HMG in that very area during one of the most-tumultuous recent periods in the said broadcaster's history.* That. Is. All. I. Wrote!)

Uh-huh, "​@@curiosity_fan"?!? You meant Dēvanāgarī?

BBC is funded by U.K. 😂😂😂 BBC support only left wing

Global times is more useless than bbc 😂

😂😂

Absolutely Correct 👍👍😁

What about George soros funding you all , and calling others godi media , Hippocrates at there finest... Also anti national with pinch of soros salt 🧂

News laundiya will save British bot to save p a ppu p r opoganda machinery 😂😂😂 ek IT survey mein poora bhandafod ho gaya re tumhara

@@mohammedather6927 andh m. 0 min Charlie hebdo ke khilaaf kyu the 😂😂😂 jaake x I njiang àazad karra

Nau saal pehle bhi iss insaan ke pass koi samasya ka hal nahi tha lekin foolish people jin ko sirf ek agendase matlab tha unhe ek "strong leader" ki thalash thi. Ye bhul gaee ki democracy kai tukdon se banti hai na ki "ek supreme leader" se.

Worst channel.bedt propogandist channel in india.stay away from this foreign funded anti india channel.

Thank you :)

Tax evasion or accusations 😂🤣😂🤣

Why . It will make Modi more close to Hindus. BJP is using that in their favour.

You may be right also…..you have a point👍🙏🏻

@@dpvasanthaprema629 also congress making these comments on modi is funny. They stayed in central government for 10 years . They are unable to prove him guilty back then. It shows the way of their ruling. They are asking now to release it in India. They are a useless party. Hoping AAP or BRS to enter national politics and have their impact

@@karthiknarayan6765 so according to you no one should be close to Hindus because Hindus are causing ruckus all around the world....peace only takes place when a train compartment is burnt causing the death of countless of these Hindus who should not had the right to live...did your favourite bbc showed that or George Soros censored that

The documentary is available in multiple countries. But average indian cant acces it due to censorship in India. You can use VPN to watch it.

Ok I am offended. I like cartoons. These paid puppets are just yelping worthless garbage all day long just to spread hatred. Cartoon Network never did that .

@@YM-wp6me True 🤣🤣

What about George soros funding you all , and calling others godi media , Hippocrates at there finest... Also anti national with pinch of soros salt 🧂

Waiting for George Soros

Thanks!

News laundiya will save British bot to save p a ppu p r opoganda machinery 😂😂😂 ek IT survey mein poora bhandafod ho gaya re tumhara

@@manishapande4184 you watch your own video ?

Thanks!!

@@manishapande4184 thank you so much for such a wonderful and actually news.

Why were these Muslim attacked there must be some reason would u minsdf opening up the reason, if they were trying to do love jihad or killing cow rape thenyhru deserve it

Very Correct

Dankapati shabd ka English mein shabd kya hai?

What about George soros funding you all , and calling others godi media , Hippocrates at there finest... Also anti national with pinch of soros salt 🧂

The truth can be brought out of Dankapati only by Atul Chaurasia.

​@@abdussamadshaikh3467 ĺ

She is just a posh version of Arnab.

Palki is deeply pro govt and wants to showcase as a wannabe liberal which she is not. If she can come up with every defence for our country even if it's irrational, then can conclude, this lady had lost it

Its scary how many people actually were getting convinced by Palki about so many lies. Atleast now people are waking up to it.

@@kaberigomes2117 well said Kaberi! It is unfortunate my father still believes in the Palki narrative! The amount of propoganda spread is real 🥺

@@kaberigomes2117 who is George Soros?

What about George soros funding you all , and calling others godi media , Hippocrates at there finest... Also anti national with pinch of soros salt 🧂

Agreed. I too feel the same.

Right is Godi & Left is Chodi

@@Vikas-ej5nv damn bro!!! You’re so smart and clever. You rhymed Godi with Chodi. Unbelievable! You win

@@AshOrtiz123 😱now go to sleep , jhabra fan

@@Vikas-ej5nv 😂😂shi kaha sabse akhand woh h jo bolte h "mai shi" tu Godi while ignoring tumhe aur unhmai koi difference nhi

What about George soros funding you all , and calling others godi media , Hippocrates at there finest... Also anti national with pinch of soros salt 🧂

godi media Pegasus ke jall main

@@devchaudhary4679 Ask Godhi to kneel, it will crawl and roll over.

News laundiya will save British bot to save p a ppu p r opoganda machinery 😂😂😂 ek IT survey mein poora bhandafod ho gaya re tumhara

@@devchaudhary4679 fle Ee

What about George soros funding you all , and calling others godi media , Hippocrates at there finest... Also anti national with pinch of soros salt 🧂

Aur karo comments delete and preach for free speech

@@yajur8228 what did you put as your comment

Fun part is here to find the criticism of bbc you have to quote bbc head line

Seriously not even pintch of salt regret left india basically it all Khichadi खिचड़ी

News laundiya will save British bot to save p a ppu p r opoganda machinery 😂😂😂 ek IT survey mein poora bhandafod ho gaya re tumhara

Rahul baba zindabad 😂🤣

North East me pata chal gaya 😂😂

@@0qwerty10 उत्तर पूर्वी प्रांत के राज्य हैं न कि देश। मैं २०२४ जनरल इलेक्शन में संपूर्ण देश की बात कर रहा हूं।

@@user-up1mn2qn8w mene North East me election ke bare me bola

Absolutely correct.

News laundiya will save British bot to save p a ppu p r opoganda machinery 😂😂😂 ek IT survey mein poora bhandafod ho gaya re tumhara

Start now friend

Was about to comment the same thing myself, been watching Newsance for more than 2 years now but *this* here easily got to be the best one I've seen so far.

@@sanjaythomasjohnI enjoyed this episode. Pointing out that most Indian TV is made of people who couldn't imagine criticising Modi's government. Also easy to sympathise with the BBC when they're going though the same "tax audit" (ahem) that Newslaundry went through 😊

i too feel the same..

Manmohan ne har Ghar sarkari Naukri de rakha tha 😂🤣

@@niramayasingh1376 lagta he ki ye abhi bhi berojgar he😂😂

Thanks ❤❤

*Not-so-unnecessarily **_quota_** overfilling:* *First things first:* Is the very very rare closed-caption creator/producer of this episode very same as your former coworker/colleague/work-"friend" Mr Ākāsh Banerjee of "@The DeshBhakt"? 'Cus that much eerily-similar is the quality of captions here.?! Also.. Lo-lo-loved your reminders & more on the former SP-turned-BJP spox.. ...But to cookie-cutter it unlike my 'very terrible' habit: Forget about the UK's "Daily Fail" as a source and much of your TP focusing on directly TV Licence-financed services of the British State broadcaster for the economically-defined UKGB"NI" & _Éire_ territories( geologically Celtic-Anglo islands), even relying on fucking Deadline® Hollywood - a showbiz-news, inarguably the beat of journalism with #1 lack of journalistic standards-&-practices when viewed from the vantage point of "old school Journalism", is heavily geopoltically-biased. Even though their rapidly-expanding parent's digital/new media Empire in 2 of the Top 3 laziest beats of journalism, showbiz & tech news - they're the for-profit enterprise which work as content-farm more often than not, in fact PMC® was one of those who didn't cancel their invitation to the Saudī investors summit in not Jeddāh, but[ bizarrely] Riyādh even after blockading Qatar which preceded the assassination of Late Sir Khashōgjī reportedly inside Istānbul consulate and the house-arrest of jailed _dilettantes_ close to the ruling House of al-Saūd clan in the ongoing 3rd Saudī State, including but not limited to, the one-&-only Saudī "BFF" of 'Murdoch Sr' - all under the auspices of alleged 'Mohammed Bone Sawman'( albeit, blockading Qatar was reported to be his mentor of oh-so-"federalist"-post-Great-Recession in then _de facto_ ruler "MbZ" of UAE's gambit given the _de jure_ President was reduced to issuing festive-greetings off-screen in his official _communiqués_ following "having suffered a stroke" in year or so from decade, in the here-&-now) - Deadline® Hollywood, like most of the Merican US news media, is not just pro-Is'rāel, but unlike them, they do not even try to cloak their systemic-bias with weasel-words with conspicuous omissions and commissions. Even after the bombing of al-Jalaa Building/Highrise/Tower in the downtown of Gaza City of the _de jure_ besieged and _de facto_ occupied Gaza Strip from ¾ of the barriers/corridors controlled by the Is'rāelī occupation-forces, and the rest by the hegemonic-junta ruling Egypt and struggling to regain control of Sināī Peninsula after having quelled even the Sūfī resistance over there during arguably the most-covered chapter of "#ArabSpring", leading to unpopularity of Sufīsm as a means-of-resistance for the locals' emancipation and gaining civil-liberties, as a voracious-researcher. They were the one-&-only some variant of International English-speaking mainstream outlet across continents in the Best of my recollection, not in an "opinion" piece since if it's not a straight-up PR announcement of some project, it's all a glorified-blogging anyways( even if one excludes the reviews, for sensical factors) - so even columnists like Mr Peter Bārt struggle to offer any USP over there. What did they do, exactly. Welp..: Almost as if to allow the publication of the term “Israeli occupation forces[ _sic_ ]” for the first-ever time to report that bombardment, the editorial decided to bizarrely prefix the weasel-adjectival framing, “almost immediately blamed[ _sic_ ]” moments before quoting AJMN( therein referred to as "Al Jazeera")'s official PR release of that bombing. And of course, *they did not even follow-up after the ever-dynamic excuse-handbook of IOF couldn't hold-off the subsequent revelations about "the world's most-moral" military already engaged in even heavier persecution of Palestinian journalists not working with some international news[gathering]-institutions.* So, all in all: Except for the part about the mainland-China and her SARs banning British State broadcaster and cutting-off ties after UK's OfCom, the civilian comms-regulator of a _de facto_ single-party, monarchist State - banned London-based CGTN® Europe from beaming into the UKGB"NI" for pretext which go back to "Murdochs in mainland-China" days, the rest of sourcing is dubious at Best - helpful to debunking the TPs against the British State broadcaster, at worst. It is also noteworthy, that while your bizarrely used the statement of "compare-contrast" in the matter of British State broadcaster but not whenever it comes to "iNtErNaL affairs", "sovereignty" & "tErRiToRiAl-InTeGrItY" where they are far too difficult to be challenged - you did not counter even a single point of the Chinese Foreign Ministry's spox over the stated lack of regulatory-oversight, whatsoever. Quite odd, or not, since the statement from pre-OfCom banning CGTN® Europe days: Actually back-handed complimented the regulatory-integrity of the autonomous body whose Board of Governors are partly appointed by the British State. And therefore.. For anybody wanting to have a look at the sheer history of the British State broadcaster, look no farther than this extended digital-/online-only cut of a short/TV documentary Special which went on to be award-winning in spite of numerous faceless, nameless, stereotypical "KZfaq® commenters" insinuating that either the [B][B][C]® Studios' Documentary Unit, or [B][B][C] News & Current Affairs Unit in London( which also produced the "India: The Mōdī Question" for its decidedly envelope-pushing, maverick TWO™ TV network) produced it [strategically-]uncredited, in order for the Jigsaw®-powered text-filtering 'algos' deployed only-&-only in "the comments-section" of this platform more than that wonky, ludicrous "publisher-context" notice of this platform's neoliberal senior-management - nevermind the "inconvenience" of visiting the official-web and turning-off adblocker or whitelisting at least 2 URLs for uninterrupted-playback( if applicable), the URL to it on this very platform is: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hZech5em2c7cl2g.html.( *Editorial note:* The original-release of this doc followed one of the contributors' interviews with [ CNN ]® International's Chief International Anchor, Ma'am Christiane Amanpour by 2 weeks or so. *The latest rerun-cycle of the abridged, linear/on-air cut has suitably changed the prose in the cold-open/intro narration/VO by the "face" suitably, particularly the one referring to a particular RL political-figure - given the rather volatile pace-of-shifts in HMG since its original-release. Even the extended digital-/online-only cut excluded the one part of the interview, 'coincidentally' with the very interviewee who talked to Ma'am Amanpour - released by the non-conspiratorial, public above-the-line staffers, **_i.e._** producers of varying job-titles - on their official social-media during its less-than-a-week-long first-run cycle back in late 2020. It has neither been mentioned in the doc, nor directly noted by any of the said staffers in their publicly-visible personal social-presences openly that: The governmental body liable for policymaking in the statutory corporations which includes OfCom, and public corporations which is the British State-broadcaster-in-question - refused their Right of Reply by not partaking in the programme, something which was converted only-&-only in the official PR coomuniqué on the Network's official-web. Mayhaps, I'd wager that's also the reason that in order to make-up for that: The "face" went straight to her [bio-]father, since he served HMG in that very area during one of the most-tumultuous recent periods in the said broadcaster's history.* That. Is. All. I. Wrote!)

Well someone should put the indian side story on international news for the international viewers or else u get indian perspective from aljazeera or bbc which is one sided and republic,times now etc are regional so I think it's completely rational and plzz look at the world in all 4 quadrants tats wat wion,vantage are doing

AP gave the maximum number of MPs from a single state to UPAs 1 and 2. In return, Congress forcefully divided the state and made the residual AP a beggar state without the capital. BJP not only supported it but also denied what itself asked for the residual AP. This indicates BJP (under current leadership) is nothing but Congress plus a cow. So, there is no difference between the so-called two national parties, which can come together for their personal benefit rather than for the benefit of the country.

😊🎉

...And then?

Not possible 🤷🏻‍♂️ 😂

Some people considered to be right wing also criticize modi. And i also remember hearing that modi himself said that he wants every citizen of india to be a 'chowkidar'. He welcomes criticism but the way his party reacts to criticism paints a different picture. Sometimes i think people do criticize in a way that looks like they are trying to pull the current government down But still the bjp goes so over the top. It seems like everyone is pointing a finger at eachother in India these days. Sorry for this long reply but do you feel the same?