A Kid From Houston Texas that's my boy Shaw for you

I hope he does something like that for the habs 😂😂😂

When was that

I don't get that rule, saftey?

That should've been a goal

McDavid pulled the goalies blocker and right arm away. It was interference, and a good call.

there was certainly contact, but i am not entirely convinced it stopped him from playing his position as goalie : he got up and somewhat reset before the rebound shot was taken. though its not a bad call, im not entirely sure what they look for for goalie interference. some i have seen i would swear are blatant are not called interference

@@edschramm6757 basically the spirit of the rule is if theyre in the crease and theres contact it's interference. Outside the crease it really depends basicslly the goalie is given the ability to move their arms from within the crease

97Senator lol

L0L

If only ties still existed...😂😂

lol i saw that too :D

He sounds like Terry Cahill from Fubar

I know San Jose won the game with the final clip in Double OT but that's the only one

Oilers won that game also. Mcdavid score shootout winner and pointed at the bet like refs do when the pucks go in. The most Mcdavid was pissed in a game. He walked over to refs and said "DID THAT COUNT, GO UPSTAIRS". I THINK he got a misconduct. It was just a hype good moment for oilers and the fans.

@@waleah4855 I wish i would have seen that live.

@@waleah4855 haha ya I remember

Boston won in that first clip but lost the series

The one against Calgary? Lmfao not a chance, that's interference all day, he literally pulled the goalie out of the way of the shooting Lane INSIDE THE CREASE. fucking oilers fans salty af. "and I don't understand that call" those announcers are clearly blind too lmao

ESPOSITO goal that goes in by the force of any body part except the stick is a no goal

@@5000subsnovideo So any body part

r_TbHOP_r Awesome but no. Can't push the puck towards the net with anything but your stick.

Then you don't know the rule. If a puck is hit with anything other than the stick intentionally the goal will be disallowed

Rachael I’m completely aware of the rule and accept that goal didn’t count. What I’m saying is that I think if you CAN head the puck in the net it should count. Kicking and using your hand are different.

I've seen it before and it's counted

Connor Arsenault no you havent

Saige Trotter Trying to push out as much content as I can 😊

I agree. Jones clearly interfered with Marchessault. If they are going "pretend" to be black and white about goalie interference, incidental or not, then they also need to protect position players from the goalies interfering with them during a play. I do get your point about goalies crossing the line, but why even have a crease if it only goes one way? Honestly that call should have never ever been an interference call on Marchessault.

@@LiveTUNA I'm with you. Jones did that to himself. Lot of bogus calls on this video.

@Puckman637 wrong. They were all terrible calls.

@Puckman637 what lol. The boston one was good but I can see that one going against them compared to the oilers one. The oilers goal not counting is absurd

@Puckman637 the last one actually was terrible. Jones was out of the blue paint

@@andyc9979 wow i think the opposite. Both should be a goal but atleast with the oilers one u could see mcdavid interfere with smiths stick and that could be an argument.. but the bruins goal.... he literally didnt do anything. he jumped over the goalie he did nothing to interfere with how anderson could make the save...

@@BostonSecret45 I think both should too. I compared the goals which has no meaning. Not sure why I did that. At the time I was saying I can see the Boston one not being as bad as the oilers one. A lot of these are lame. I forgot this video kind of. Was the pronger one on here? I hated Philly and was pissed that goal never counted, the one where they said he waved his hand or something absurd. Because of the Avery goal they got obsessed with that and no one else really did what Avery did. The one Boston one was really absurd when the puck clearly went out of play. Thats ridiculous

I’m in boston so that’s offensive

The thing is the reason he lost sight of the puck was because he was run over. I don’t know why that was a question of interference

Ya when you see it in slow mo

No that was the right call, Craig Anderson lost sight of the puck due to the interference by Sean kuraly, no goal was the right call, infact there was another boston overtime goal overturned that same game

No when he laid down he lifted the padimplored and it was loose so it soupd be a goal

You can't knock the puck into the net with anything other than your stick. It can hit something like you're head but you can't make it go in. Like it or not it's the right call. I kinda like it but if they do that kicking the puck into the net is also a goal since it's under the same rule and gives the same unfair advantage.

It’s cool in theory but way too dangerous, last thing you want in hockey is players throwing their heads toward the puck

I dont think he can, it's too long...

MattFromCanada Underrated reply

I>

MattFromCanada he? Do you mean Marchand?

Or a Marchand licking compilation

That is so wrong

She got them Vegas fakies

The Bruins get away with a shit ton. So much so the fans think that they should be immune to the rules.

Adrian he plays with heart and intensity and he’s very competitive

Peter Chiarelli yeah lol

Hahaha kesler was held in. Ducks won and it was an amazing comeback but oiler fans still cant handle it

Lou Sassole Not that goal, that wasn't even overtime. There was another one where one ref called an icing which then all the oilers stopped playing, but then seconds later another ref says no icing the ducks pick it up and score

Lou Sassole Seems like ducks fans have short term memory loss?

Hahaha is that all you got? Are you seriously still salty about it? Talk about holding a grudge

Fake dumbass

@@themacud One of those is true but i'm not saying which one

It does?

Lol

It was a super weak call. Goalie interference is like this sometimes though. Sometimes a goalie gets plowed over at the front of his crease, the puck goes in, good goal. Sometimes a goalie gets hit by their own teammate or pushes/directs an opposing player in to their own goalie, the puck goes in, no goal.

eh, they ended up winning that series anyways in 6 so karma rewarded them

I mean they’re basically the same people, Shaw is the Green of the NHL, and Green is the Shaw of the NBA

If he lost control of the puck due to incidental contact, isn’t that the definition of the goal being waved off?

Kevin Crabtree It would be considered high sticking since it’s above the crossbar. Maybe

Jonnie Delorme He didn't play it with his stick.

That would be incredibly dangerous. You don't want people's heads near the thing that people are whacking at.

Gary Bettman Still above the crossbar boss

Elijah Foster skate at your own risk, dumb dumb

Boston’s and Oilers should definitely have been goals

Radeo Oilers on Calgary was 100 percent goal

King Santa Cruz it has to cross the line before time expires where as in basketball the ball just has to be released.

Yeahhh...agreed.

the rule is more that you can't push it in with anything other than your stick so as long as Hossa didn't kick the puck in it was a good goal. Also if you push it in with something other than your stick and it hits your stick on the way in I think it still counts

Yeah originally the no kick rule was for the purpose of safety. Can't be having someone's neck being stepped in a crease scramble. It sort of evolved into the, "only stick by intent rule", but if you happen to direct something in the net with a skate or helmet or w/e (knowingly or unknowingly) as opposed to "propelling" it in, that's okay. Again, we can't have soccer style headers because someone will eventually land on someone else's ankle.