yeah, some people give the switch hate for being weaker but dudes, this thing is smaller than some ipads and is much more powerful then them, it is even more powerful then the ps3, xbox 360 and wii-u

@@PO1PLE I’m just hoping Nintendo will release a switch 2.0 or something in the next couple of years that will be even more powerful. It has been like 3-4 years since the switch released, after all

It's like back in the day where there used to be a PSP version of console games. But in this era, the PSP version is the Switch version. And with the latest tech, you're playing a handheld game that looks like it could be on your TV screen especially if you have a Switch Lite. We've come a long way.

Forgive my bluntness but this is slowly turning into a copy pasta in my head.

@@PO1PLE The switch deserves every single bit of hate it gets. But it's devs deserve every single bit of praise to wrangle as much power as they can out of that thing. I think it just shows that you still live in 2015 if you think the switch is more powerful than the iPad. Even the cheapest 330$ ipad comes close in terms of GPU power and absolutely destroys the switch in terms of CPU power. I think you just don't realize how fast the mobile market is developing. Compared to a mid range 400-500$ phone right now, like a galaxy f62, the switch is hopelessly outclassed in absolutely everything. Cpu, memory, memory bandwidth, storage speed, display, etc. The only reason the switch sells is purely because of hype and the internet's obssession to it. That and some pretty cool games. Oh and, the only reason the switch is even remotely competitive in terms of raw GPU compute power compared to similarly priced 200-400$ devices is purely because these devices have a much lower TDP than the switch(even in handheld mode) since they have to conserve battery.

Not when you have a 65inch tv

@@flaqko5686 that 40$ tho vs 60$ 😑

Im happy With 720p

@@justgamer4785 how?!!

@@meowowowow Wdym i was Playing Below 480p When i had Potato Laptop And it still didnt Look bad to Me for Me 720p looks very good

Same just bought trilogy 7 days ago on switch, and I’m having a blast 👍

And the resolution didnt drop so far down

I dont even know why I am here

@@timurkral3781 Ik i just get satisfied while watching. It feels weird

Commander Tano?

@@flowerthencrranger3854 Hello Grogu

same!

same!

same!

Same!

And I dont believe you. Since playing Warframe docked on 32inch monitor looks like fucking crap at 720p. So you are lying because you are just a fanboy

@@budlikycz2445 well warframe isn't 720p on the switch. It has dynamic resolution

Yeah. And besides there isn't much of a difference between the ps4, Xbox one and switch coz they'll all drop to 30fps

@@budlikycz2445 i don't think he's lying. I also did the same thing. Although my tv was 53- inch but the visuals were still great even with the "crappy 720p" . Being able to play it anywhere is also a good thing

What Cereal Was Is?

@@TRG_R17 special k with berries

@@festive5476 Nice

@@festive5476 How Good Was It?

I don't mind 30fps at all, but holy crap we really do need a better switch model. As a switch owner, my mouth is watering just looking at the crisp 4k 60fps footage. I would buy a switch pro if I could

LEL

@@eddiewildones of what? (In case u didn’t know, LEL means “of”)

@@maximumpink8487 30fps is fine for me. i just got this game for free on the base ps4 with ps+, and idk what he's talking about when he says the game feels sluggish on the base consoles. feels plenty fast and fluid to me, and i haven't experienced any noticable slowdown, and i'm pretty far into the game. i guess it's possible there have been some updates to improve it since the time of this review, but right now it runs fine for me.

Nope

I don't know who Nick is

You speak right out of my heart

You are first

Well, i think its nonsense. The low shadow quality, the low resolution, missing objects and low fps makes it look like I'm playing a sixth or seventh gen game. But at least its portable and has good sound quality😄😄

Lol. It fucking sucks.

@@budlikycz2445 ok, so go play it in other platforms. Good thing we have options 🙂

Yeah, that versión sucks but, hey! you can play in the bathroom

@@marlo1287 they did a great job. Have you tried something like apex legends on the switch?

@@budlikycz2445 ehhhh... Idk. I might get it on the ps4 instead just for the better visual quality cus it's absolutely stunning at it's best, but the idea of playing crash 4 on a road trip is REALLY enticing...

The "graphics" didn't improve at all. Just resolution bump. Laziest port I've seen in a while. Doesn't even support HDR

@@shingetsu10 it’s even a port? I thought it was just a “free” upgrade

@@shingetsu10 Exactly! And i didn't even get to hear about raytracing

It's not missing a step. Its identical. The player model is just moving faster in one shot than the other.

No.

No.

You guys get joke?

Nah

No

Yes, the only difference is that if you have a 4k tv, the xbox one s can play games at 4k on it and the regular one can't

It probably won't seem as blurry when you have it on the switch's small handheld screen and aren't zoomed in

I am playing it and played most levels on portable and it looks great. No blurry at all. And i played the first level on docked and it still looks gret with just minor details with lower resolution. The frame rate is really consistent too with no dips at all even on the most demands parts. A truly great port. It works great!

If you want the best version of the game then definitely go with ps5 or xsx. If you want to play it on the go or laying in bed then the switch version is still just as fun as those versions.

Game doesn’t look blurry on the switch when playing and plays fine

@@velaikka So what would be a good port then?

What would you have liked to see on next gen upgrades?

@@sloth9210 probably raytraced lighting and reflections. I am definitely curious how it will look or alter the style of the game.

@@callmeivan2064 seems like a pretty useless feature in a cartoon game where everything is over exaggerated to ad raytracing. I don’t think anyone would want this game to run with raytracing since the performance and resolution would take a hit for a very very small feature since there’s not a lot of place sit could even be used

@@sloth9210 im not saying it should be implemented , but would definitely interesting to see how it can alter the look. Especially raytraced lighting considering how many dynamic lighting scenes are used. Honestly, I wouldnt be so quick to call off using Ray tracing for a cartoon like game, Breath of the Wild have raytracing mods and boy, does it really make the game look way more vibrant.

I mean PC would be exactly the same as PS5

Isn't that game a little too old

Doesnt mean ya cant play it im still playing crash 3 and 1 ​@joelnwadike375

I am strongly considering that

@@Nick930 well, I ain’t buy it before I got your video 😂 super helpful, thank you very much for all the videos you posted!

good job

Bruh, you're an idiot

yes, yes it does. more than 6 million pixels actually

games below 60fps in 2021 are unacceptable

@@wetdon591 No it's not

@@pacstermh yes it is

@@wetdon591 it is for obsessed people like you

Because the base switch simply isn’t strong enough I guess, I mean look at the graphics. Plus it costs battery life too. I’m talking about a base switch which most people have not a cfw switch.

@@fudgemonkey5504 even laptop won't unlock the clock in playing games in battery mode,it must be plugged in... Im just saying that each players should have the option to have boost 60 fps mode with a plugged in switch..

@@fudgemonkey5504 like for example to save battery life on handheld mode you will only have 30fps.. But when docked, they will unlock the clockspeed just enough to play the game at 60 fps... If you own a cfw switch you will know what I meant about "enough clockspeed' because every game is different not all requires max clock, some or most of games only requires just above the normal official docked switch clockspeed.

More like why can't they make it 120 fps on next gen 😂

@@dabuddahbaby3276 lol remember the series x lady said: “where looking at 120 frames per second”

It's a console-portable hybrid that's using a Mobile GPU from 2015, it's outlived at this point in hardware prowess, but as we can see, it can still fight back. And again, it's trying to run a game that was made specifically for more powerful hardware, you can't expect it to look the most beautiful thing imaginable. Besides if you have a Switch and you're willing to risk, mod it and you'll be able to install mods for it(soon I believe) like people did with N. Sane and Reignited, outputing the game to 1080p, but you had to overclock the Switch to actually get there. CTRNF also got it's only 60FPS version on the Switch thanks to modders. Go figure.

The screen itself in handheld mode is 720p. 540p looks actually quite sharp on the Switch screen!

@@livinlikeeli6785 Yeah he didn't put in perspective that it's going to be playing on a small screen, you don't need that many pixels. I play some PS1 games on my phone in Native resolution since I don't really notice anything really. Sure Switch's screen is bigger....damn 540... It's lower than PAL Standard(576p), but bigger than NTSC standard(480p).... Eh it's small screen anyways.

Yes of course there are. BioShock and Splinter Cell are just a few I can name off the top of my head. These were originally Xbox/PC exclusives. Even XboxOne's exclusive "Sunset Overdrive" will likely see a sequel on playstation now. Crash, Resident Evil, and Silent Hill were never really "Owned" by Sony at all. Remember that PlayStation was the BIG new console at the time - and there weren't really any good alternatives aside from Sega (which btw - Resident Evil also released on Sega and PC as well)

@@Nick930 Awesome thank you! Is there any xbox exclusive that was exclusive to the xbox, without a PC release? And yes, resident evil released on PC after it was released on PlayStation, and sega a whole year after that. But I do see your point, Metal Gear is probably a better example than all of those I listed. I'm not against xbox at all, I just never had one and know nothing about them haha. So thanks for the response.

@@Nick930 Do you think the KFConsole will have any true exclusives?

personally i think you only notice the fps at at the very beginning the game still feels the same to me.

Switch is a few seconds faster than the base PS4

I doubt the ps5 price will go down

It’s not just that,it’s also locked 60fps

@@KnucklesWTD Big deal, above 30 fps is almost identical, 12 frames is movement and 24 is smooth movement.

@@cloudshifter if you actually played it at 60fps you wouldn’t be saying that lol

@@KnucklesWTD I have played numberous games on very high and very low framerates, played high speed games like ghostrunner on 100 frames and breath of the wild on 12

Because it's a KZfaq video. You'd very likely notice it when looking at gameplay on the actual TV/screen.

@@googlewolly I usually play in handheld on switch, so I’m fine with that I guess.

@@fudgemonkey5504 Problem is the framerate, though. Fortunately, it's not a first-person game and you're not using mouse and keyboard. Still, not being in 60 FPS sucks.

@@googlewolly it’s alright as long as the game is fun it good imo 👍

@@fudgemonkey5504 Yeah, the Swich is almost embarrassingly weak when compared to the other consoles, but it makes up for it through being portable. I never take my Switch with me, but I find that I still play it portable - as opposed to hooking it up to my TV. I like to just chill in my bed and play it portable.

Same

Yes

Same thing in both just different moments

2160p is the same as 4K "3840 × 2160"

@@Nick930 Oh. But wow is switch really 540p in handheld? Just watched a video of handheld gameplay, and it doesnt even look that bad tbh (just slightly due to it obviously being someone recording the handheld mode with a camera)

Yes. Pixel counting revealed it output in 540p in some cases. I believe it will dynamically scale between 540p and 720p but I'm not entirely sure

I mean thats fine, I can play A Hat in Time on Switch jsut fine, and thats pixelated

It was annoying trying to find it. You have to go to the PS Store and download it separately

Some people are having this problem including me, it took until yesterday for the PS5 upgrade to became available for me.

@@Nick930 I tried it.. But there's a problem with digital copies.. 😞

@@parasolo89 I'll check it out tomorrow.. I tried to upgrade it this morning, but nothing.. Thank you anyway guys 😜

Sorry for bugging again 🤣. The Ps5 upgrade error is already fixed, at least in Europe. I appreciate the help anyway, thank you guys 😙

lol what?

Tf

RDR2 will beat it quite well. Cyberpunk will only have the advantage of ray tracing

@@simulify8726 not sure if only lightning i would also assume it will beat rdr2 in texture quality

@@Masternaldo hm? 2 top aaa games comparison with over 5 years development why would it be dumb?

@@unkowndude649 Because one game is actually good while the other is filled with broken promises and bugs.

@@livinlikeeli6785 both have good graphics still would like to see a comparison

It is still native. It's only scaled in very specific circumstances (cutscenes for example). It's still rendering natively at 4K

@@Nick930 - That's true, all the rendering is actually done at 4k... although for gamers looking for that really crisp 4K look might wanna wait for PS5 pro or PC. When I imagine 4k gaming, Its just pure eyecandy to see almost no aliasing issues or resolution blur.

@JustANormalGam3r As the saying goes, He who waits...

Wait a year The first gen usually die within five years due to hardware defects anyways

@@eatanotherzio6811 not even remotely true only the 360 and PS3 had that problem lol

I think he plays on a 4k monitor just like I do and1080 looks blurry on a 4k monitor

When you're playing on a 4K display - yes, 1080p is very blurry when compared to 4K. But as I said - with a cartoony game like Crash, this isn't a dealbreaker

1080p looks vaseline smeared on a 4k TV.

@@Etheral101 Well if these things didn't cost me an eye, kidney and pancreas altogheter to buy ,then sure, 4K all the way. Before you ask, no I'm not paid in dollar. But I'm using a 1080p display, and even so most, at least, High Fidelity games chug at 4K Res on a single card GPU. Or at least it did, Idk know how RTX3000's are holding up, if it was viable to buy these in any shape or form these days as well. The game's requirments on Battle.net actually has a minumum of a GTX600 series and recommended a Gtx980 for the maximum settings, so it's not like it's gonna make a PS5 struggle since we could compare the GPU to a 2080ti maybe, but since the base PS4 and Xbox One came so undercooked, it can't even max out the game. If we look to the past... PS3 games were mostly 720p, very few actually reached true 1080. PS4 was actually aiming for 4K, but it never did for most games, so it was 1080p time. Now with PS5 we're aiming for 2160p which seems to be feasable now, but IDK it still feels overkill to me.

@@Rafeku1 lol 4K TVs are dirt cheap now,I seen them sub $200. 1080p TVs have been pretty much phased out and replaced by them