S Tra On your camera, so you can regret your regret

I “only” have a d700 but I LOVE my 50mm 1.8.

@S Tra your parents

@S Tra leave teddy alone

what's the biggest difference between the D750 and D610? I currently have a D610 and am looking to get a second body.

movax20h I bought the a7iii and the image quality and skin tones are nowhere near the 4 year old D750, I returned the a7iii and got the d750 w nicer glass, plus the feel of it in the hands is just far superior than that of the Sony or any mirror less in that aspect

@@NOKOT51 Great to know. Although I dislike Sony colors, I was so tempted by the α7 III when it came out, but decided to wait for any interesting deals later on. THANK GOD I waited all these months. Nikon discounted the D750, and B&H currently has a deal with the D750, Nikon battery grip, SD card, additional battery and a bag for $1396.95. I could not resist. That's just under $200 more than what I spent on my Nikon D70 back in 2005 with an 28-80mm and a 70-300mm.

SOC 7 yeah definitely, wait it off.. Sony hasn’t matured just yet. I almost gave into the hype, but then again glass glass glass is key.. cheers

@@NOKOT51Yup. Thanks! God bless!

I know this camera is great, but come on is anyone still complaining about Sony's color? Sony A7 iii is just the best camera on the planet

I have a d7000 as well and I'm thinking to upgrade to the d750 now how has your experience with the d750 been?

Only the environment wasn't as interesting in my opinion.

thanks man!!!

Snuffy Sims a real world test would be to also do sports in all manual ,

+Mert Kabakci it was a joke...

but but.. isn't it about the camera tho....??

Not only that but only shoots sports lmao I dont think most buyers will be buying this camera for sports. thats what the d500 is for

Or you could be like me and own both cameras. One for action and the burst shooting function, the other for FX positives and higher MP sensor.

He rented them, plenty of photographers who aren't filthy rich do that.

+Maxwell Starr Sadly the A99 isn't a DSLR though, it is a mirrorless. I think many are still sticking away from Mirrorless cameras until the technology and etc matures more, especially in AF abilities

+Vueey Le Technically speaking the A99 is still a DSLR. DSLR, meaning 'Digital Single Lens Reflex', means that there is a Reflex mirror that reflects light out of the viewing path to aid with framing and focusing. What's different is Sony's implementation of it, where the reflected light goes into an always-on focus system and the mirror never moves. Mirrorless implies no mirror at all, and he smaller size/shorter flange distance that comes with scrapping the mirror. Sony's branding of it as 'SLT' Single Lens Translucent' was unfortunate however because now you have plenty of people saying they're not DSLRs (they're not traditional DSLRs but still DSLRs). But the term 'Reflex' doesn't mean moving mirror, after all, the mirrors didn't move in TLR (Twin-Lens Reflex) cameras like the Rolleiflex.

The Sony a500 my dad has (6 year old camera) is pretty good and has a tilt screen

I thought the same thing 😂

I know its been a while, but did you end up buying this? If yes then how has it worked out for you? I'm planning to do my shift from D7000 to this.

Hi, it's worth to get the D750! Do the switch :)

Yes. And it's a pain in the arse when you have to focus on eyes and then move the camera to reframe. Do this with an aperture at f1.4 and even that slight movement to reframe can give you blurred eyes.

I guess Im asking randomly but does any of you know of a method to get back into an instagram account..? I was stupid forgot the account password. I appreciate any assistance you can give me.

@Kyle Jayden Instablaster ;)

@Kole Melvin i really appreciate your reply. I got to the site through google and I'm in the hacking process now. Looks like it's gonna take quite some time so I will get back to you later when my account password hopefully is recovered.

Still a great camera man it surprises me every time i own 2 d750 and one D500 and a Canon 80D i like all of them but i use the D750 the most.

+Kenji Shiroma Yes, with 11mp images. The particular situation would dictate whether it is worth the trade-off.

farturas81 I wasn't are of that.

Oh boy there it is.

Jared Polin And oh boy, that shouldn't happen on an expensive camera. FFS.

+Cpongen no way, that suuuucks!

+Jared Polin where?

well i bought it already, after seeing this video hoping mine didnt this problem, and i got lucky, great camera!

Sanket Sonavane you're welcome.

Too bad you didn't grab a cute cheerleader for some portraits with a lens we are more likely to own. :)

Muhammad Imran Arif I didn't forget. I wrote about it in the review. It had no place out on the football field.

is it VERY big tho?

SeeMeBeSeen thank you.

If you won't buy the NX1 you don't have the right to talk like that. And btw nobody has made a real world review , so it might some flaws (not saying it will but it might).

Having "more AF points" doesn't make a faster or better AF system. Phase detect sensors on Mirrorless cameras are far far smaller (pixel sized) than those on a dedicated Phase detection AF sensor of a DSLR. I also have more faith (and most people do) in Nikon/Canon/Sony delivering a better AF system than an inexperienced in this market company like Samsung.

if that is the case, then why is the Canon M mirrorless camera maybe the slowest on the market, and the Olympus OMD and Panasonic cameras so lighting fast, I agree that Samsung is a beginning company in the camera market, but they used to be a beginner in the tv market also, and now they are number one, they used to be a beginner in the cell phone market and look at them now, and it's just matter of time before a mirror less camera out performs a mirrored camera in every way, in maybe two years, there wont be any disadvantage to mirror less anymore, only advantages, even now mirror less already has a ton of advantages, and both the CEO's of Canon and NIkon have come out recently saying that they are now taking mirror less seriously, and they both plan on putting out a serious big sensor mirror less in the very near future, probably in 2015, why if they didn't think it was the future, would they even bother to do that

photographerjonathan Canon's EOS M was a stinker and really should have performed better. But even GH4, Sony A6000 or any Fuji or Olympus camera can't keep up with the Dedicated PDAF sensor of the Nikon D4S, which is shared by D810 and D750, or likewise AF systems in the 1Dx, 5DmkIII, even Sony A77II, probably the Canon 7DmkII as well. The reason for this and will always be a limitation of Mirrorless, is that in order to achieve superior Phase-detect AF on Mirrorless, these sensors need to be built onto the image sensor itself and are the size of a pixel (or Canon's new Dual-pixel, still small), which not only has to be compensated for by interpolating from the light captured by neighbouring pixels, they have size limitations and capture only a limited amount of light(but can be inserted all over the sensor). A Dedicated PDAF sensor features much larger Phase detect sensors, more complex (ie: crosstype) and can more accurately focus in lower light conditions and faster than tiny ones built onto the sensor. If you compare it to computers, you can play games well enough on most new PCs with Onboard video or CPU's with integrated graphics but for the performance minded it doesn't really replace installing a high end dedicated graphics card from AMD or NVidia. Even if Mirrorless PDAF does somehow catch up fully with Pro DSLR, it won't surpass, it will just match. It also doesn't mean the death of DSLR lens mounts and DSLR-sized bodies. If anything, higher end cameras will simply drop the mirror in favour of a Mirrorless sensor and use the same lens system. Keep in mind there's also the matter to consider of how using large lenses on tiny bodies feels horribly unbalanced and are very poor ergonomically, I personally wouldn't want to use a large Telephoto lens on anything smaller than a DSLR body. That's not to say Mirrorless is bad, they're not, I personally own a Sony NEX and it provides some stunning image quality, I've gotten some of my favourite photos with it, but the AF isn't as good as my DSLR and even if it was, I wouldn't want to tack my 70-400/4-5.6 or 70-200/2.8 lens to the front of it and shoot sports/wildlife for an extended period of time. Claiming "Mirrorless is the Future" may only be half right, but calling for the death of the DSLR because Mirrorless cameras pack performance into tiny bodies is premature. As for Samsung, the NX1 is currently untested (no real reviews online and no DxOMark scores yet) and generating interest mainly on having a 28MP APS-C sensor, but more MP doesn't mean better Image Quality. Colour depth, dynamic range and ISO performance in RAW matter more than a marginal increase in resolution, and more resolution means better glass is needed to make use of it. No one knows how good their new sensor is and how their new glass is, and even if Samsung can somehow create a good camera, Samsung has a reputation of making cheap consumer-level electronics with questionable reliability and it will be a while before any professionals would consider making the switch full time, which in turns affects market adoption of the product.

+Marcus Souksi ur holding ur cam in weird way... i guess...

+InstitutCrear The guy took the photo before I was even 'posing'

Buy it!!! It rocks!!!

Digitalrev's review was a fucking joke, didn't get anything out of it vs jared's.

also for video, as far as nikon dslrs, i would rather have a d810