Hahahahha

👌

Brilliant!!!

Nice one !

Best comment ever 👍👍

🤣

🤣

there would be no point cause above ground isnt the main Area 51 facility its actually underground where they keep the more classified stuff, Above ground is just the airplane hangers and planes

true

@@ZOMBIEEZ yes👍

He was posing for photos. If only he knew...

Dogodine u Prizrenu

Thanks for watching.

Thers alot lot like this these days ! Like the nikon a900 and sony a5100 ! Check this beautiful one of sony !! kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ZsuDeKp-yd7Qdmw.html 😃

@@TheHoveringScotsman how much is this camera

@@abotrump5186 999$US

@@frankbenoit2574 🗿

Pity is dubbed the ‘flat earthers camera of choice’ because they say they see too far for a curved earth.

Thanks for watching.

It's because of digital zoom

@@d.s1014 the camera stops zooming in for a split second when it reaches its maximum optical zoom, and goes until digital, the majority of the zooming process is optical. But in a couple mountainous clips here, there was a decent amount of atmospheric interference. I actually pre ordered this camera.

@@CrypticRite Did the Camera turn out to be as good as you had hoped?

At 2:21 look at the rock formation at left. It looks like a human looking down.

Thanks Kev, yes it's some camera, looking forward to taking proper pictures with it.

@@TheHoveringScotsman Yes. You did the camera justice.

The Hovering Scotsman hey man, there’s a company on Facebook using your videos claiming it’s from their product. I hope you got some compensation. facebook.com/112564673830363/posts/136678484752315/?vh=e&d=n

Thanks for watching.

H. tiler - lol, I was just fixing to post the same comment!

It's President Nikon

Saw that too

Trump

i believe he's using one, just that the breeze is blowing hard

Even with a tripod this camera moves. It’s front heavy.

Thanks for watching.

Gladiator yeah

Oh yes !!!

Except an eagle’s eyes are SHARP!

Early days but thanks for the comment.

Holy crap your right that snippet there was incredible to the Cruze ships from the grassy area

Nah I think the sx60 hs or the 70hs has better image quality at half the price and that's 65x optical.

@@allanallen1835 how much its cost?

@@allanallen1835 my guy, thats a hell of a lot less than the p1000's magnification

He might see this video someday since he likes the outdoors.

@@rexluminus9867 haha yes. He's non virtual guy

Thanks for watching.

Thanks for watching.

Thanks for watching.

😂😂

😂😂

Thanks for watching.

Thanks for watching.

It sure is.

Glad to hear it.

It's worth the £650ish asking price.

It is impressive.

Thanks blood

Cheers, watched plenty of your videos while waiting for my camera to arrive.

@@TheHoveringScotsman I provide a Master Class in what not do with the P1000 :D

Wind had to be awful.

Thank you.

Thanks for watching.

Thanks for watching.

Thanks for watching.

So the sx60 and 70 zooms at 65 optical, your saying this is less zoom?

@@allanallen1835 I'm not sure about what you are asking. The Canon sx70 lens has a 65x zoom RANGE since the FL can range from 3.8 to 247 mm. The zoom range has little to do with the magnification of the image (naked eye equivalent size).

Weirdly, I just measured this in photoshop on the building. I measured the central part of the building at 21 pixels wide at the low end of the zoom range, and 1764 pixels at the longest end of the optical zoom at the point the lens motor stopped whirring (i.e. before he digitally zoomed). This comes out at around 84x magnification, which is longer than the usual "focal length divided by 50" rule gives.

Thanks for watching.

Thanks for watching.

Thanks Mathew, its the Manfrotto 290 Light with Video Fluid Head, its a good compromise between sturdiness/lightweight and cost, I also use the ML-L7 remote control, this eliminates shaking from pressing buttons on the camera itself.

The Hovering Scotsman Yeah I have the remote for that reason. Thanks very much for the info & I shall look forward to your future posts 👍🏼

​@@matthewalder5419 You're welcome.

The talking is from 2 people behind me as I was filming.

Im mind blown by the amount of stupidity you have, this is actually a compliment because i have never encountered such thing

This is the dumbest question EVER.

Great visual perspectives that about 99% of us didnt even notice.

Thanks for watching.

Thanks for watching.

You're right.. On the left side 😁

That's Nixon

Thanks for watching.

Sounds fun.

I just paid $60 for a used telescope that has this range of zoom. But it's not easy or quick to use, and taking pictures through the viewfinder is very difficult.

Thanks for watching.

It's a big lens when fully extended, hence the shakes at full zoom, need to solve this somehow.

The Hovering Scotsman put it on a tripod

It already is.

Turn off the stabilization mode feature when it is on a tripod, if it was left on. It is for hand held operation. See if it makes any difference. The feature keeps it working within the camera even if it is on a stable platform and can work against you if the camera is already not moving. But turning it off for tripods does not account for the wind moving everything. It is hard to beat wind that moves the whole rig no matter what, because you are zooming in on something tiny from very far away. Try to track stars that move out of frame within seconds from the stars rotation above us. It is hard to keep it all still when focusing in on a tiny dot, especially with the wind blowing. I say you did very well. For fun, you can test leaving stabilization enabled and then turning stabilization off when on a tripod on a windy day to compare results. Let's see what happens. Being inside a building stops the wind problem, but it's more fun being outside on top of a mountain capturing wildlife. What about some sort of portable wind barriers? Do they make such a thing?

Thanks for watching.

Cool.

What it can also record that far?

@@poslacionitakam7462 It seemed like that when I heard people talking, but then he said they were behind him.