No video

Nima Arkani-Hamed: The Inevitability of Physical Laws: Why the Higgs Has to Exist

  Рет қаралды 20,420

Breakthrough

Breakthrough

Күн бұрын

The Inevitability of Physical Laws: Why the Higgs Has to Exist
Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics Laureate Nima Arkani-Hamed, IAS, October 26, 2012

Пікірлер: 35
@FromJunkToJanha
@FromJunkToJanha 8 жыл бұрын
gotta effing love this guy!!! i spend more time on wiki during his talks then the actual talk it self, and i cant stop!! i have fokin homework to do!!!
@JohnSmith-yu5qo
@JohnSmith-yu5qo 2 жыл бұрын
How fun do you want your particle physics lecture? Nima: Yes
@frodoggbooboo
@frodoggbooboo 6 жыл бұрын
I actually enjoyed this, particularly Nima’s sparsely elegant diagrams.
@ivanbeshkov1718
@ivanbeshkov1718 Жыл бұрын
Fascinating though above my head.
@clawpuss2
@clawpuss2 8 жыл бұрын
Love his enthusiasm and many insights.
@nihlify
@nihlify 3 жыл бұрын
@QFTguy You're a moron...
@janchytil541
@janchytil541 8 жыл бұрын
Hey Nima, standing ovations!! Just one little problem: on one hand you said that the set of physical laws governing our universe is inevitable, therefore our universe should be pretty stable, but on the other hand you compared our universe to a pencil standing on its tip, that is a massively un/meta-stable, and therefore improbable system. I am sure you are right, just witch of both conflicting statements is correct :).
@nihlify
@nihlify 3 жыл бұрын
He uses the pencil analogy in a lot of videos, go watch what he really means.
@STohme
@STohme 8 жыл бұрын
Interesting and brillant talk. Many thanks.
@Petrov3434
@Petrov3434 3 жыл бұрын
If everything is really only fields - why are we talking about particles at all ??
@nihlify
@nihlify 3 жыл бұрын
If you stop and think for one second the answer should be obvious to you...
@gerrynightingale9045
@gerrynightingale9045 9 жыл бұрын
"All of energy and matter that have existed still exist. Matter does not create energy of itself. Matter enables energy to become manifest".
@zackchristvevo
@zackchristvevo 8 жыл бұрын
25:50 - 27:25 BEST SLOGAN EVER
@keybutnolock
@keybutnolock 6 жыл бұрын
Walter Lewin tribute at 01:07:00 .
@whirledpeas3477
@whirledpeas3477 3 жыл бұрын
I forgot what I was going to say 😳
@nmarbletoe8210
@nmarbletoe8210 9 жыл бұрын
electromagnitism is not "stronger" than gravity 37:40
@janchytil541
@janchytil541 8 жыл бұрын
+N Marbletoe , Correct!! If the field equation is correct then the 'weak' gravitation force can collapse mass to a black hole - and in the process overcome the resistance of electromagnetic force, weak nuclear force and strong nuclear force
@anandbalivada7461
@anandbalivada7461 3 жыл бұрын
It most certainly is....we see it mainly at small distances. The proportionality constants of electrostatic interaction and gravitational differ by around 20 orders of magnitude. The reason that we see gravity being so strong at large distances is that most things are electrically neutral so the net charge tends to be far smaller than 10 orders of magnitude than the mass. A lot of the strength of the electrostatic interaction goes into actually holding matter together. The best illustration of the relative strength of electromagnetic and gravitational interactions is the atom; mass of the nucleus barely plays a role in the binding energy of the atom...but the charge does.
@anandbalivada7461
@anandbalivada7461 3 жыл бұрын
Gravitational collapse is also due to how the gravitational energy varies as N^(5/3) versus total electrostatic energy which is basically 0 (electrons and nuclei charges cancel) and the relativistic energy of all the electrons varies as N, where N is the number of atoms in the star. When N is large enough (chandrasekhar number) the minimum groundstate energy basically becomes -infinity and so the star collapses. Over here, gravity doesn't overpower at microscopic scales... it's the sheer mass which makes the total gravitational force really large.
@nihlify
@nihlify 3 жыл бұрын
@@janchytil541 Omfg you people are stupid...
@pooltrader
@pooltrader 9 жыл бұрын
Sure, I heard this all before, it's called religion, God has to exist.
@sherlock9374
@sherlock9374 8 жыл бұрын
Total disgust at his use of the term 'squiggly figures'!!! They are Feynman diagrams and the speaker would not be worthy to wipe Feynman's boots
@gilgameshuvakhshatra7629
@gilgameshuvakhshatra7629 7 жыл бұрын
Feynman himself refers to the diagrams as "squigly". Nothing offensive intended. As for boots, the speaker does not need to when you are around.
@ashishshukla9760
@ashishshukla9760 7 жыл бұрын
Lol.
@shirleymason7697
@shirleymason7697 7 жыл бұрын
that guy .......Oh, so you say.
Space-Time, Quantum Mechanics and the Multiverse (Nima Arkani-Hamed)
56:42
PhilosophyCosmology
Рет қаралды 103 М.
Beyond Higgs: The Wild Frontier of Particle Physics
1:30:09
World Science Festival
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
❌Разве такое возможно? #story
01:00
Кэри Найс
Рет қаралды 3,4 МЛН
If Barbie came to life! 💝
00:37
Meow-some! Reacts
Рет қаралды 76 МЛН
艾莎撒娇得到王子的原谅#艾莎
00:24
在逃的公主
Рет қаралды 53 МЛН
Conversation between Nima Arkani-Hamed and Armin Nassehi
1:03:15
Max-Planck-Institut für Physik
Рет қаралды 26 М.
Demystifying the Higgs Boson with Leonard Susskind
1:15:08
Stanford
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
In conversation with Nima Arkani-Hamed
54:39
Science Museum
Рет қаралды 109 М.
Future Accelerators - Nima Arkani-Hamed
1:46:43
Institute for Advanced Study
Рет қаралды 18 М.
What is QFT? | Nima Arkani-Hamed
46:46
aoflex
Рет қаралды 58 М.
Nima Arkani-Hamed - Must the Universe Spawn Life and Mind?
14:00
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 29 М.
Why is there a Macroscopic Universe? (Nima Arkani-Hamed)
1:01:29
PhilosophyCosmology
Рет қаралды 128 М.
Colloquium: Nima Arkani-Hamed: Big New Accelerators and the Future of Particle Physics
1:43:13
Instituto de Física Teórica, IFT-UNESP
Рет қаралды 13 М.
❌Разве такое возможно? #story
01:00
Кэри Найс
Рет қаралды 3,4 МЛН