No neutrality and circular reasoning | Cornelius Van Til
Рет қаралды 5,222
2 жыл бұрынEither God is at the back of possibility, or possibility is at the back of God. If we don't start (presuppose) the God of Scripture, no proof will ever be able to reach up to him and we are stuck with a finite god.
Read more: www.apologeticscentral.org/po...
Cornelius Van Til (1895-1987) revolutionized the world of apologetics. A 20th -century philosopher and theologian, Van Til attended Princeton Theological Seminary, wherein he received his ThM in 1925 and subsequently his PhD in philosophy in 1927.
@mrc6177
Very insightful, he knew the main point is that everyone comes to the discussion biased. Who is this guy?
@dawsonmurray4188
Is there a full recording of this lecture somewhere?
@lightbeforethetunnel Жыл бұрын
Van Til was a genius. He saw something nobody else could see. He wasn't always the best at communicating it, but he discovered the only actual proof for God.
@davidcoleman5860 Жыл бұрын
Van Til claims that the unbeliever will win you to his conclusion ("a foregone conclusion") if you engage in evidential apologetics, but his claim appears
@johndoe1909
This is what happens when apologets have given up on finding any evidence for whatever god they are peddling. They resort to throw their arms in the air, define a god and then assert it into existence followed by endless word sallads and deepitys with no contents and meaning.
@FloydFp Жыл бұрын
Van Til was more of a preacher than a philosopher. I'm not impressed by him.
@Enigmatic_philosopher
Here is a philosophical critique of your perspective:
Westminster Bookstore
Рет қаралды 1,7 М.
Right Response Ministries
Рет қаралды 7 М.
AnythingAlexia
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
De Veritate Apologetics and Philosophy
Рет қаралды 8 М.