@Elwood1992 hehe yeah! But by taking the video off in order to edit it I will lose the sequence of the serie ..

@qwerty LOL What does class conflict have to do with the desire to avoid the inevitable market failure & losses in efficiency from capital/labor dissatisfaction? Your straw arguments involving the LTV are classic. Indeed,as you've suggested earlier,marginal utility privileges neither labor NOR CAPITAL expenditures in determing consumer value. This means that the question of who controls demand & scarcity now becomes an issue of who simply owns the supply. Hence,the 'non-aggression principle'.

@ladydawn1973Eternity He says that because there is a picture of Woody Allen @ 0:56

I wonder what you mean.. In what aspect...

The video "Chomsky explains anarchism (1 of 5) " has much better sound on this interview, and no silly beginning...AND the entire thing in 5 parts... just saying :S

@qwertypoiu4321 "Chomsky is a MASSIVE supporter of the State" has to be the most bizarre comment ever left on a video.

@qwertypoiu4321 By the way, the concepts of exploitation and class struggle are not dependent on the Marxian labor theory of value. I like how you try to frame it, though. As if exploitation and class society are just a series of matryoshka dolls-- dolls inside dolls!-- and the biggest matryoshka doll is Marx's labor theory of value, which you can just knock over like a bowling pin with a little free market wizardry.

@ladydawn1973Eternity ahh sure..sure : sorry :)..now i see 2 men talks about Anarchism.. really i can't take video off without destrying the order of the topic he speaks on..

@qwertypoiu4321 Charged as such as what? Your second sentence didn't make any sense. You've strayed beyond the realms of the inane that your last comment explored with the last sentence, if you want to explain how Chomsky defends criminal coercion I'll respond.

@qwertypoiu4321 Actually, you have invented your own magical market reality, a "la la land" that you hide in to rationalize your love of property. What is "collapsing" about theories of exploitation that reject the labor theory of value? What about theories of class conflict that reject the labor theory of value? Do you deny such things exists?

@qwertypoiu4321 To quote Chomsky, the facts are the opposite. I challenge you to support a single thing you just said with a shred of evidence. It seems fairly predictable that you will either not respond, or respond with no evidence whatsoever. Let's see.

@qwertypoiu4321 What do you mean by logic? Your comment says nothing unless you qualify what you mean by logic. I assume it will be more rhetoric and overuse of words (you're going into conspicuous overkill on the "fallacy" denouncing crusade). Clarify what you mean by this "collapsing logic." How does logic collapse? Do you mean in an historical sense? I never took you for a Hegelian...

@qwertypoiu4321 Please, I wish you free market "anarchists" (nice try) would stop referring to "an-syn" and "ancom." It's as if you people are just naturally inclined to turn ideas into corny abbreviated labels to be easily marketed.

@qwertypoiu4321 You act as if anarcho-syndicalism is simply an appendage of Marxian economics. What, you think that one cannot be an anarcho-syndicalist and accept that value is produced by marginal utility? You are just trying to write off a political tradition foreign to yours by calling it a "fallacy"-- As if anarchism were just a logical fallacy that could be erased from the chalkboard.