Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Romer explains how ideas translate into growth. Episode 197
Пікірлер: 142
@mrcalista7225 жыл бұрын
"Everyone wants growth but no one wants change." How insightful!
@The757packerfan5 жыл бұрын
It's a nice bumper sticker, but is it actually true? I completely disagree with the "no one wants change" part.
@twobunny81615 жыл бұрын
Julian McQueen Exactly what I thought, so apt, precise and true!
@mrcalista7225 жыл бұрын
757 Packersfan, many of us have belonged to organizations that said they embraced change (and perhaps, even wanted to change) but lacked the intellectual curiosity and tenacity to actually implement beneficial change. Organizations want change the same way people want to quit smoking. They say they want to change but their heart's not in it.
@deborah52215 жыл бұрын
@@mrcalista722 How many times can I "thumbs up " your statement?! To be more precise regarding your statement about the heart: we only want the kind of change that WE want.
@mrcalista7225 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Deborah. I hope what this economist is saying speaks to everyone. Sometimes, we get lucky. But for the most part, life only makes sense when we make it make sense.
@xileets5 жыл бұрын
As a professional in a couple vastly different fields, his point about indecision and paralysis in the face of uncertainty, it's interesting because I feel like it's a trend in most areas of society. Is social media harming our ability to interact? (This is something that is being discussed vehemently in child-development.)
@LesterDiaz5 жыл бұрын
Amazing smart man, sometimes I think “why don’t smart people like this get into politics” then I remember smart & politics don’t usually go together.
@mikkopajula7695 жыл бұрын
Most politicians are definitely intelligent but it seems they don't get anything done or make bad or incremental decisions. I think it's because politics is too bureaucratic. Creative people don't want to be held back by rules and multiple levels of approval, so they'll make the world a better place and let their ideas flourish more freely through innovation.
@CentralCAhomie5 жыл бұрын
But they should
@Farnetus5 жыл бұрын
I disagree. I'm talking about U.S. politics. You need to be smart to fund raise and win elections. Although yeah a lot of races are safe R and D. You also need to have social skills. Like talking to groups of constituents. I've read about plenty of smart people in politics. Like Keith Hennessy on his personal website, Joe Manchin's moderate views, and Elizabeth Warren to name a few across the spectrum. The thing about politics is that it's "boring" to many. And it's takes time to keep up with what's happening in DC and state legislatures. Pajula makes a good point. It also has a lot of bureaucracy.
@CentralCAhomie5 жыл бұрын
@@Farnetus if you think Joe Manchin is smart then you must be a dumbass.
@Farnetus5 жыл бұрын
@@CentralCAhomie How so? I saw one of his town halls and he gives reasonable answers. Like how environmental regulations were hurting West Virginia. You don't even refute my point and just attack me. You're the one acting like a dumbass.
@Miata8225 жыл бұрын
absolutely inspiring. I recently sold a business I built around several mechanical inventions. I have been contemplating whether I should take an extended period off before starting a new business based on a couple new gizmos that have been on the back burner for years. *Indecision leads to stagnation.* That's all I needed to hear. Back to work :)
@Lightningkuriboh5 жыл бұрын
have to know this dude's stuff for my final next week - happy to see this video :D
@ChristopherFreezeYT5 жыл бұрын
Dear Stockholm - Please accept the nomination of Professor Galloway for the Nobel Prize in Economics... He needs the free parking spot at NYU. ;-)
@BlockchainForWhatIsBest5 жыл бұрын
Well when so many "teachers" have Stockholm Syndrome to the idea money creation is free is it no wonder there are no parking spots left?
@MrRandom265 жыл бұрын
I love the fifa 13 music. And I’m glad to hear that connection is a big part of the future, as our cities seem primed to incorporate the notion of parkways and TODs
@TarasLanchev5 жыл бұрын
Can we get more of Paul Roemer? He's a very interesting and knowledgeable bloke
@mansinath17515 жыл бұрын
what is the name of the song played at the end?
@larsschouw71175 жыл бұрын
Congratulations on the Nobel Price! I like the idea which is central to economics of handling scares resources like money, raw material etc.
@hpajc185 жыл бұрын
Wish this was longer!!
@JameBlack5 жыл бұрын
WHY SO SHORT
@RussianBot694205 жыл бұрын
because low attention spans
@joshuabushared56195 жыл бұрын
Seriously. This could easily be a 2 hour podcast. I would subscribe (monthly payment) to that!
@chiefenumclaw79605 жыл бұрын
Agreed. It's to short to offer anything of substance.
@olivier8835 жыл бұрын
that's what she said (sorry I had to...)
@wyatthansen39675 жыл бұрын
Really interesting! Wish this was a long form conversation and not so quick. Big ideas like these should really be explained in long form so the listener can gather more info and make their own opinion on the subject.
@Terex395 жыл бұрын
Nice one refreshing view
@Tenchu0035 жыл бұрын
Time to learn some new concepts
@BigDH285 жыл бұрын
Congratulations Paul! 👏👏👏
@akinniyiakinyemi27375 жыл бұрын
Scott: We’ll see you next me Me, having watched the finale: Will you?
@ZAKKIAdmin4 жыл бұрын
"Everyone wants growth but no one wants to change." This is so TRUE, especially if you were living in under/developing countries when corruption is so prone. And when you are trying so hard to help the grass root people, however those grass root people still on mindset reluctant to learn, reluctant to listen, reluctant to change, then in contrary they want to have a better living standard.
@DrJugne5 жыл бұрын
Worked through his textbook 'Advanced Macroecononis'. One of the best books ever! Congratulations in the Nobel!
@Lasssiii5 жыл бұрын
Sorry to disappoint you but the book is written by David Romer, not Paul - though Paul himself is involved/credited in the book (via his growth theory)
@DrJugne5 жыл бұрын
@@Lasssiii Thanks for correcting me!
@Moist_Handshakes5 жыл бұрын
"Granaries are filled to overflowing, and commodities, even these we have tried to make dear by tariff, were never before so cheap."
@larlarbooth5 жыл бұрын
It'd be interesting to calculate the value of public parks and green spaces in cities.
@alexalexander31405 жыл бұрын
When it comes to currency giving value to objects with scarcity(copper silver gold) is an absolute necessity if you want your currency to be a store of value and not be inflated away.
@maximel75685 жыл бұрын
haha
@cheehiong5 жыл бұрын
NYU Stern is spelled wrongly and is it "roemer" or "romer"?
@jerryrichardson27995 жыл бұрын
Roemer
@hassenfepher5 жыл бұрын
Saw you on Adam ruins everything.. you seemed so polite, and friendly. I thought outloud: he seems so friendly. My wife said: maybe hes just friendly. I replied: no hes definitely faking it.
@jamesmacaskill84345 жыл бұрын
great handshake
@paulsommerhalder90495 жыл бұрын
He is so right, not a single Ghost City in the US. We are losing the war in building empty structures. We have alot of old empty commercial properties, but very little in the way of empty homes. This is a national disgrace.
@ftlpunk5 жыл бұрын
Yeah, what the hell does he know? Hes just an economics professor. YOU'RE THE REAL EXPERT.
@RahulKumar-ng2gh5 жыл бұрын
ftlpunk that's reply
@welovelibraries45565 жыл бұрын
Classic tool = easier to get dinner reservations
@ichifish5 жыл бұрын
The problem that we have now is the "new ideas" that Paul (nice to hear a genius talk in a way I can understand) Roemer seem to all revolve around profiting off convenience (phones, apps, uber) rather than solving real problems. Bullet trains? Nice to have, especially in population-dense Japan where I live, but not exactly necessary. Smart grid? Necessary. Solar? Necessary. Environmental protection? Necessary.
@kkgt65915 жыл бұрын
Yes, it seems the first question an idea needs to go through is "how much money I can make" rather than how will these help us solve the problem.
@johng20755 жыл бұрын
Fully rebated price on greenhouse gas emissions? Necessary. citizensclimatelobby.org/basics-carbon-fee-dividend
@Tyler-hf4uc5 жыл бұрын
Profiting off convenience and solving real problems are not mutually exclusive. Uber and Lyft are real problems in terms of asymmetric information. It's difficult to obtain information about getting a ride, how much it costs, the rider himself, how far away the rider is, etc. Maybe you mean the magnitude of the problem. Maybe the problem of getting a ride somewhere but not having the information to get one is not “important" relative, to say, poverty. I can agree to that, but I don't think it's unimportant either.
@PaulMcCannWebBuilder5 жыл бұрын
Nobel Prize in Economics Smart == saving money renting a tux just once and using it twice in one day - 6:18
@MichaelCarlucci5 жыл бұрын
Match your camera colors in post folks.
@indiequas5 жыл бұрын
Explain
@seriouslyreally54135 жыл бұрын
"Everyone wants growth but no one wants change" says the guy who marries his girlfriend just before he receives his Nobel Prize! Congratulations on both, this late in life its not enough just to be accomplished, you deserve happiness... and commitment. I know that feeling🎆
@jooky875 жыл бұрын
Brilliant gut, nice comments. But, cities are obsolete. Commuting around physically is a waste of time when you can connect in forums and online, before you meet in person. Online networks are currently driving the massive change and innovation going on now, not crowded and crappy subways.
@bigfan10692 жыл бұрын
6 minutes I’m not getting back
@larlarbooth5 жыл бұрын
Scotty what happened to that V neck? You got room for one more in there.
@volkanozkose56324 жыл бұрын
is that mean an absolute solution to the prisoner's dilemma ?
@MFM2305 жыл бұрын
Isn't his wife, Christine I believe, also an economist. Wasn't she on the president's board of economists for Obama?
@electroturi5 жыл бұрын
So, is he suggesting that the economy is not necessarily a zero sum game? Because that'd finally give respectable support to the way I see economics :-o
@mrcalista7225 жыл бұрын
Only fools think being successful in capitalistic societies is a zero sum game. Innovators are creating markets for things that didn't even exist 4 years ago. And this economist actually seems to get this.
@yoshimurahirihito5 жыл бұрын
It's zero sum on three axis, where labor is converted, so net sum is always increasing.
@tomc32135 жыл бұрын
This is a pretty good vid about just that idea, kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qNyjnrB505bXoYU.html
@Tyler-hf4uc5 жыл бұрын
Most economists that have won the Nobel Prize would say that the free market need not be zeros sum.
@andruha10675 жыл бұрын
If you can't explain it simply enough, you don't know it that well. This applies to this Nobel Prize winner.
@themagicianfromriga69954 жыл бұрын
Or maybe you are too stupid to understand
@JOKBO15 жыл бұрын
Sad not to see an African city in that map
@lchpdmq5 жыл бұрын
If krugman can get an economics Nobel prize in economics it is an idiot award
@Mukunda5757Ай бұрын
What If No Money in future
@GregGBM75 жыл бұрын
you should have included his name (Paul Roemer) in the title, not just the description.
@ftlpunk5 жыл бұрын
Why are so many of the comments on this channel hateful, derogatory, ignorant statements not backed up by any kind of facts? I hate to answer my own questions, but I don't think it's people with legitimate gripes about his economic theories. Something tells me the trolls have been sick'd on Scott Galloway. I dont know by whom, but my guess would be Amazon and Facebook.
@snitox5 жыл бұрын
This video has been a huge "no shit" to me. Can someone direct me to someone I don't already know from this professor?
@rdefendr17374 жыл бұрын
What? South Korea and Japan were left out give me a break.
@ZaZa-hq7hy5 жыл бұрын
Root cause analysis
@graysonsussmansquires2025 жыл бұрын
Scott will ward off climate change by reflecting solar rays with his bald pate
@Antagonistock5 жыл бұрын
I don't get their accent, Need subtitles.
@poetnathan265 жыл бұрын
Nothing to say about Tumblr? Huh
@baidawibai5 жыл бұрын
Are "scarce" resources really scarce because of population growth tho?
@ftlpunk5 жыл бұрын
Its not that they're scarce because of population growth, its that they are INCREASINGLY scarce AS population grows. Its not that complex. If you have 4 cookies, and there are four people in the kitchen, everyone gets a cookie. If four more people enter the room, your cookie resource just became a lot more scarce. You now have only enough to give half a cookie to everyone, or horde them all to yourself and give one cookie to the entire group to split amongst themselves. Congratulations, your now living in the United States, land of opportunity.
@baidawibai5 жыл бұрын
@@ftlpunk in a world where one person has 3 cookies and seven people have to share 1 you can't with a straight face call any of that scarcity. Economics is the mathematics of greed.
@213kidangel5 жыл бұрын
‘Known worldwide copper resources are estimated at nearly 5.8 trillion pounds of which only about 0.7 trillion pounds (12%) have been mined throughout history... and nearly all of that is still in circulation, because copper's recycling rate is higher than that of any other engineering metal.’
@omegapointil57414 жыл бұрын
There must be businesses that government can run better after you've gotten past the emotionally potent oversimplification obstacles and labels. Health Care insurance; why is it not possible to eliminate the profits for Hedge fund multi millionaires, shareholders and administration, hire back all the same rank and file including actuaries and customer service, possibly more for the sake of lowering premiums deductibles et al. ? Then, mining; saw a thing on television where mining our Oceans for mineral and elements will become a multi trillion dollar enterprise. Why just give Our Earth (if its not OUR EARTH, then whose is it? ) to Cabals that have managed to network the Powers that determine that opportunity distribution patronage by back room donations, campaign contributions, money laundering, influence and everything but benefitting The People of the Earth to whom it ultimately belongs? Create a department that represents US and all the debt we have to pay down even infrastructure seems to have taken a back seat to even a Space Force and the Wall. If we can get past that brainwashing element the benefits are for Everybody.
@ian98135 жыл бұрын
There is no true nobel prize in Economics.
@EquivalentTrade5 жыл бұрын
"NYU Stren" sounds like a Chinese knockoff university
@ftlpunk5 жыл бұрын
Its NYU stern, and it sounds like a chinese knockoff because your stupid. If you were smart, it would just sound like the name a school.
@braydenmoore435 жыл бұрын
ftlpunk - there was a typo in the video in which “Stern” was spelled “Stren.”
@aerobique4 жыл бұрын
there is no such thing as nobel price for economics, go figure
@sbfarmer85 жыл бұрын
@pple is blah blah
@angelomichaelwilkie-page70205 жыл бұрын
Always forgetting the African continent.
@caleb989635 жыл бұрын
“US” “Moral Leader of the world” Lmao
@Wltrwllyngaeiou5 жыл бұрын
Night off the bat I have to disagree with him. We are not constantly finding new ways to use the things we take out of the ground, especially in relation to metals. When was the last major breakthrough in metallurgy? I think we have reached pretty darn near the peak of what we can do in the realm of structural materials.
@ftlpunk5 жыл бұрын
Come on... Its a metaphore. Hes just saying that when you hit a ceiling on a particular resource or tool, you have to innovate to break through that ceiling. The bronze/copper thing isnt supposed to be a real argument. Hes just trying to paint you a picture.
@Wltrwllyngaeiou5 жыл бұрын
@@ftlpunk right, but I worry a lot about economists projecting technological innovation as some sort of inevitable trek forward. In my view, we have hit plateaus in a shocking number of fields, and may have reached the limits of what is physically possible.
@ftlpunk5 жыл бұрын
@@Wltrwllyngaeiou its a lot easier to just assume we've reached the limits of whats humanly possible than to show that we have not. No offense to your logic, you may be right... but If everyone had that mindset we never would have been able to get out of the earths atmosphere, clone a sheep, or create carbon nanotubes. Your mindset is essentially an excuse to not try and innovate. Innovation isnt always needed, but when it is needed, it will always be a mistake to assume we've "reached the limits of whats physically possible."
@Wltrwllyngaeiou5 жыл бұрын
@@ftlpunk don't get me wrong, I currently work in materials R&D, and I think there are still plenty of advances to be made, but I think they just keep getting more and more incremental as time goes on. I dont doubt that there will be enormous leaps and bounds in fields like biology, but I doubt that we will ever make any significant improvements in other areas of technology, particularly in regards to metals and alloys, which is why the initial statement kind of irked me.
@Bill_Woo5 жыл бұрын
It should be noted that in wide circles the Nobel Prize has come to be regarded as a badge of shame - at least in the disciplines of Economics and Peace. I should say, disciplines "in name", that is. That's not an indictment of this recipient; just a sad reflection on the sad deterioration of the award's (awards') fall from prestige.
@ftlpunk5 жыл бұрын
What basis do you have for that statement on how the Nobel prize is regarded when it comes to economics? I've not gotten that impression at all, just wondering what led you to that conclusion. You said in "wide circles" its considered a badge of shame. Please elaborate.
@larlarbooth5 жыл бұрын
As opposed to thin circles?
@frenandin5 жыл бұрын
I'm an economist and your statement is patently false
@Bill_Woo5 жыл бұрын
@@frenandin Let me see if I got that right: "Dico ergo non est verum. I say, therefore it is true." Oh my God, you are a genius. They should give you some kind of award. I know just the one. Your hubris shiningly illustrates how economists are broadly full of shit. Broadly - not all of them.
@frenandin5 жыл бұрын
@@Bill_Woo What, do you expect I provide any concrete proof of what I said? I'm not going to do that on a KZfaq video, my time is more valuable than that. Also, your initial statement lacks any evidence too and I would say the onus of proof lies with you from the start. At the moment, both of our statements hold the same truth value for any reader and you're condemning me for the same sin you're guilty yourself. Also, you're the one exposing your hubris with your broken latin, your irony (namecalling, how childish) and your generalizations. Dismissing an entre discipline (especially one as broad as economics) is one of the telltale signs of an ignorant person and one of the quickest ways to get your opinion discarded (by me, at least).
@aimhighish5 жыл бұрын
Nice get Scott, a resounding Harrumph for his second appearance. "Everyone wants growth, no one wants change". Amen brother. Oh, and Scott, "Europe as a moral leader"?!? I hope that was just lousy faculty-lounge humor...
@johnconstable85125 жыл бұрын
what a bunch os platitudes. "you need to be connected to become more productive". wow. who would guess that. i'm glad we have a nobel prize winner to share this gem with us. I wish they had deepened the conversation
@ftlpunk5 жыл бұрын
"I hoped they could went deeper" yeah, dont listen to the economics professor, listen to this guy. Hes the real expert. He even knows basic grammar.
@d4n4nable5 жыл бұрын
How about you read his books and papers, dipshit? This is just a simple overview of his work, which you now know focuses on indigenous growth (through technological progress with increased interconnectedness).
@frenandin5 жыл бұрын
It's his life's work and you expect him to explain it to you like THAT in six minutes?
@chiefenumclaw79605 жыл бұрын
People overrstimate China. Manufacturing will continue to migrate to SE Asia & their business culture dictates that they won't become a tech innovator anytime soon. There growth is going to come at the expense of exploiting the natural resources of poor countries in Africa through secured loans & OBOR.
@Joe-jh8po5 жыл бұрын
This seems like a baseless statement really. True about Africa and OBOR re: resources, but if you look at China's own market there's already quite a lot of innovation, and it would be foolish to think such a big market will be otherwise. Some of it may be linked to IP theft, which is a separate issue, but there's undeniable innovation there too.
@chiefenumclaw79605 жыл бұрын
@@Joe-jh8po IP theft isn't rampant it's normalized. To understand why they don't see this as a problem you need to understand Chinese culture. Their value system is different from the West. Lastly, the CCP. This regime would never allow FAANG or any company that could threaten their power. Sorry, but I don't want to invest or do business in a country where you can be imprisoned for criticizing the government.
@jooky875 жыл бұрын
Every country copied until they started leading. Look at 1880s Europe and US, stealing ideas from each other left and right. And China has massive innovation going on now. Think bigger and longer term.
@Medley30002 жыл бұрын
Stop calling it the Nobel Prize! There is no Nobel Prize for economists. This is a swindle of the Swedish National Bank. It is also correctly called the "Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences". That would be like the Culinary Guild awarding a Nobel Memorial Prize for the best cook. Alfred Nobel hated economists.
@ljbrandt5005 жыл бұрын
Should have been called sesame Street economics in 6 min. The man may be smart, but his points were obvious. Waste of 6 min