I am with you John Clauser, who got the ball rolling experimentally, Quantum Mechanics is still to be properly fleshed out and understood in spite of the ridiculous advances 🤯🤯🤩.

Talking, without data, is mere hypnosis.

Loved Clauser’s talk, he breaks all the molds. “EPR is DOA…He’s dead Jim!” What Einstein and Schrödinger failed to realize is the impact of many body quantum physics, formulated years later by some of the gentlemen listed in the #2 undergrad quantum physics textbook series. I’d also add Feynman’s Statistical Mechanics book. Can’t have a condensate without quantum entanglement, Jim. Let’s also not forget that Feynman invented a field theory propagator that violates locality in that 1948 paper…

Fascinating! Thank you! Summary: spooky action at a distance is real, despite protests and denial from so many.

This is a great talk. Very deep - especially the puzzle at the end: '3D space' for single-particle systems and the abstract 'configuration space' for multi-particle systems. Is there a PDF of the talk available anywhere? I can't find it on the Nobel site. I think Clauser's title is "Nonlocal quantum entanglement is real! Confirming experiments, Local Realism, and Why I still find Quantum Mechanics difficult to understand."

This is a great lecture. The scary part is that once again scientists fail to debunk the weirdness of quantum mechanics. We will have to deal with it I guess. Hope more discoveries are made in this area. Thanks for the awesome lecture, really humble scientists and a great one too. I also liked the jokes.😂

The sales on the sweater just went up ⬆️ ✨.

If a black hole is actually a swollen single particle with quantized spin, then sure two could be entangled.

Very interesting talk but pretty technical especially the last part - now all we need is Sabine explaining it for the masses!

My Hero Nodel All 🙏🇱🇰🌟🥇🌻🌸🌷💛❤🧡💙💜🖤💛🧡

I am so impressed!

If the experimental data from these experiments were made public, they would have some credibility.

very interesting, thank you 👏

10:00 What A gentleman

Thanks .Interesting .

The answer dwells in Euler's Formula

🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

❤❤👏👏

What is entanglement? What physical process is it? What are its attributes? How can i observe or measure these attributes? How can i manipulate these attributes? I am afraid none of these questions are answered by Clauser. So what does this claim mean, that "nonlocal quantum entanglement is real"? Also: i can show that his experiments can also be explained by using another interpretation of "the process of polarization". So strictly speaking, we do not need entanglement as an explanatory concept at all.

Nobel!!!😊😊😊

Congratulations

Oh right🫵

He really needs to take a course in public speaking

Quantum is not scientific nor is it physical. _Science_ really needs to reassess its research

another desperate attempt to find out what this all IS... it IS what it IS...we will never find out who we are, where we from ..where we go and what is the purpose of this game..