I wish I could hallucinate a reality where I can afford more guitars.

Many people hate Glenn Flicker for daring to say that speakers are the ones that affect tone instead of humbuckers

I don’t care what he talks about. His voice helps me to relax in the evening

I have a reverse uno card: EVH couldn’t afford a Strat so he went to boogie bodies and bought the cheapest off cuts that were for the bin. 30 years later and everyone wants to sell you a signature model/evh inspired guitar for $1000’s based on what he did because he sounded awesome 😎 so for me it makes no difference

Tonewood is a myth. Tone paint is where it’s at.

I'm very pleased the the algorithm gods led me to your channel. Subscribed.

This is one of the better analyses I've seen. Excellent video!

Awesome breakdown. You just put all my feelings on what’s tone wood is and isn’t into words and for that I give u two huge thumbs up. I sware tone wood has an effect because I highly lean towards liking ash guitars for their articulate tone but I also whole heartedly believe it dosent matter when I’m jamming with my amps to a song and I’m practicing. Both ideas live in my head and make perfect sence in the right context but both ideas are totally against each other because in my head I feel either tone wood matters and it would affect every lick I play or it dosent matter and pickups, amps and speakers are the only varieable but thanx to you I see that the context matters so much more and both ideas can be true in the right situations. Awesome awesome video bravo

Your videos are almost ASMR at this point, I love having them on while I do housework. It's great food for thought that revolves around my passion, but applies to EVERYTHING in life. Keep it up, man! I see 100k subs coming soon!

Very well explained. I read a book about this topic. I can't remember the title. I'll put it in a comment once I get home. You are absolutely right.

The bit from 6:09 - you've hit the nail on the head (in fact everything you're saying is IMO spot on). This whole cork-sniffing thing with this and that tonewood... yes, it makes a difference, but only a small amount. There ARE so many other factors that influence your tone. Same with amps - you can dial in a high gain amp to sound like another. Speakers are the biggest influencer by far. I spent 25yrs playing live, most of that time with just one (fairly versitile) instrument. I never had one person after a gig come and tell me that I should have had a maple fretboard or mahogany body (as opposed to Rosewood and Japanese Ash) because my tone wasn't right. Recording - it is so straight forward to tone match or reamp, it really doesnt matter in the slightest what guitar you're using. The bottom line - at least in my experience - is different guitars seem to make one play in different ways. I tend to play differently on a Tele than a PRS, or on my RG550, or Strat, or Les Paul. They seem to bring out different notes, phrases or ideas. However, once I've written a hook or phrase, I can play it on any guitar. This whole tonewood thing seems to be given legs by bedroom guitarists who have never played a note live, someone selling one with 'skin in the game', or freaks like Joe Bonamasa.

We as a guitarists notice the subtle differences between guitars more than the average Joe. The thing is to not get carried away with it all. Having a few decent guitars that make you want to play is more than enough. I love my Epiphone guitars. There's something punk about proudly playing Epiphone and Squier guitars. Cheers from North Carolina USA 🇺🇲🤘🎸

I don't really like the sound of any guitar until i plug it into an amp and fx chain (boost, drive, delay, chorus) and tweak it to my liking its really has as much to do with the way the guitar responds under my fingers as what it sounds like to my ears, because of these factors the wood becomes a superfluous detail. Glen is always saying we don't pay enough attention to the speaker or the physical filter that converts the signal to air waves and after seeing the response graphs and hearing everything miced up i tend to agree. There is a channel on youtube by a fellow named jim lill that also creates great audio tests.

The problem is when Paul Reed Smith says that pickups are microphones: I really can’t believe that someone who achieved his success in the guitar world really doesn’t know how pickups work.

I think the tone wood debate originated from acoustic instruments. On acoustics, wood affects the tone as you are building a speaker, the grain density affects how thin it can be as well how it need to be braced (affecting overall tone slighty) Most guitar players are traditionalist, so they usually want OG woods. Think of Gibson, if it aint Mahogany, Ebony etc people complain. Thing is, guitar builders are Carpenters by trade (technically). Meaning they have access to different species of woods such as rarer woods. Different woods require different finishing processes as well as come with different rarity levels. This increases the cost. How do you convince a guitar player to buy a guitar thats 40% more expensive than another with cheaper easier to work on woods? You tell them it has an unachievable tone..

The call is coming from inside the house! The problem is that what you experience *is* your reality, even if others do not have the same experience. I completely agree with you, context is everything. I'd wager there are live playing settings where some people will be affected by the subtle differences in their instruments. Also, let's stop telling other people they should experience what we do. What's most important is how it affects us, not them. Great video, as always.

Interesting video! It's strange that sometimes I prefer guitars that cost less than my most expensive and well made instruments, but I can also suspect it is a psychologycal aspect where you link the gutiar looks with what makes you feel good. Could you make a video about guitar setup and how it will affect tone, also shares some preferences on how you setup your own guitars, neck relief, action, pickup height, strings, etc. Thank you!

I agree with you here. The "big debate" is getting a bit frustrating to listen to, to be honest... Your matter of fact way of wording all this is a relief to hear! It's not really fun and stimulating anymore for me to hear one side just bash at the side. Hearing someone talk a little sense about the subject is refreshing!

Excellent video. Thank you.

Great video. For me, it's all about playablility. Neck profile, weight, tuning stability and the vibration I feel when I play. If it feels good, that guitar will sound as good as your fingers can play it. Be it humbucker, single coil or wood construction. I have one Strat that gives me all I need for any type of music. Also, two acoustics. One for gigs the other with no electronics. The one for gigs has great electronics, but it's a "box" if not amplified. It feels great in the hands, however.

I think you’re the Jordan Peterson of the guitar community. I’m enjoying your high level discussions. Where did you go to school?

I have experimented a lot comparing ELECTRIC guitars, pickups etc, not in the room but when the signal is recorded... in my experience, wood affects the way the strings behave, but its very minimal so it doesn't matter. Bridges, tailpieces and saddle make more differemce... thats my experience anyway

Great video. My strat can sound amazing one day but ok the next. Its not the guitar, its me. What we put into the guitar and believe about the guitar will affect tone . If the 1960s/70s is the benchmark for tone, we must remember, Clapton,Hendrix, Page, etc played what ever they could get there hands on at the time. Today we have an incredible amount of options and customisation. Ive owned a custom shop strat, it was beautiful and compared to my Vintera at the time,sounded better but i couldn't justify the extra $5,000 for that little bit extra

Big factor of tonewood is that put on a good set of headphones so you cant hear the acoustic properties of the guitar itself. Suddenly wood means nothing

Very interesting analysis. You could distinguish between frequency spectrum and tone. The latter is a subjective human experience . The former is a description of the objective physical reality ceated by some basic physical processes, which is actually very well understood : the vibrating string is a textbook example of a differential equation with boundary values, the pickup is a simple coil detecting small magnetic field changes, the tone knob is a simple RC circuit etc. Next there are some second order effects : at the nut and bridge we have imperfect Dirichlet boundary conditions, when the string vibrates and pulls on the bridge and nut, it slightly deforms the guitar body and neck, and this is where the vibration leaks to the body and neck, and the elastic properties of the wood come into play.

IMO, every component makes a difference on the sound, but to different extent. As the strings vibrate and are connected to neck and body of course the properties of these components also have an effect on the string vibration, therefore on the pickup magnetic field and therefore on the sound. BUT of course these effects are much smaller than pickups, speaker etc..

Very interesting. I agree that our brains are doing that,also I believe in tonewoods. Another variable is that we mostly listen with our eyes and assume in advance great differences in tones due to various tonewoods.

I believe wood and craftsmanship matters in the overall quality of the guitar but maple being brighter and rosewood being darker or warmer is dumb. Ever notice the the colors of those woods also match the tonal description? 😂😂😂😂😂 look these are electronic devices and the electronics and the placement of and the type of electronics effects the “tone”. Honestly, the most important part of your tone is the amp/speaker. The wood quality and its hardness/softness and how it’s dried is what matters in the wood. I’ve had 100’s of guitars and amps. With an eq pedal on my pedal board and a good amp I can get any sound out of any gear. It’s all marketing bs.

Thank you. That was and excellent explanation of what tone wood really is.

Always got better sustain with mahogony. Other than that, I believe tone is just a combination of pickups, amp, and the player's touch. Emphasis on the touch.

I think wood choice affects acoustic guitars, I dont think it makes any difference on electric guitars.

Well said! Anybody can have the sound/frequencies tested & even if the numbers are the same it will sound however each individual thinks it will. It's a sense of hearing & each persons hearing ability is different. I have hearing aids & forgot to put them on the other day. I was playing guitar & the mids were gone. I immediately realized I was missing my hearing aids, put them on & everything sounded as it should. There's a reason so many guitars sound the way they do, different wood, body shape, pickups, weight, etc. A Telecaster Deluxe may have 2 humbucker pickups but it doesn't sound the same as a Les Paul.

Great analysis

I love this channel

I think this is my favorite guitar channel now...

Nice guitars area made out of nice wood.

Great words & I myself who is a session guitarist & yes I play live a lot & studio a lot & this has been my life for over 45 years!!!!! Now my no1, Guitar (electric in standard tuning which means it's what I use for 98% of what I do!!) is basically a frankenstien (I've named her Phyliss) & it is a 1978 Tokai strat knock off body which is made of Poplar. The neck that is fitted now is from a 2000 Charvel So Cal which was made in Japan. This neck has a Pau Farro fingerboard on a maple shaft & now stainless steel jumbo fretwire 6100 size. The bridge is a Floyd Rose none fine tune (I love Brad Gillis ex Ozzy Osbourne, Night Ranger) & the pickups are Dimarzio Paf Pro bridge, Dimarzio HS2 middle & a Sustainiac neck. The guitar has no locking nut as I took influence here from Guthrie Govan but I used a Brass nut which what I prefer!!!! The tuners are Gotoh hight compensation locking. The potentiomiter's are Bourn's 500k (Yngwie J Malmsteen signiture from Seymour Duncan) & I string up with Ernie Ball 00.10" - 00.52" & it's so stable & that's because I set it up properly & the bridge sits level but as it sit's above the body, it gives me a tone up on the G & D strings like a Gotoh 510 2 post does set this way!!! I have many other guitar's which are PRS Custom 24's from 1987 - 2024 (I have over 20 of them) & many Fender Stratocaster's from 1963 - 2020 & Telecaster's & Gibson's plus many other high brands such as Tom Anderson, Suhr & Haynes (I'm English & this brand build AMAZING guitar's!!!!) But the best sounding guitar too me is my Franlenstein (Phyliss) & too many luthier's it is a pile of junk!!!! But my opinion is whatever feels best too the individual is what they should use & not be taken in by what these like Paul Reed Smith & the like say, "if it's not made of this high grade Mahogany, High grade Maple, High grade Brazilian Rosewood & whatever is all you should use is utter rubbish!!! Sir Brian May built his guitar (with his Dad) out of what was pretty much scrap wood, Junk & Block Board (old fashioned ply wood!!) with vaneer added. Now Brian May sound's AMAZING!!! The late Edward Van Halen made his name on a guitar he put together himself using what was a body & neck which were listed as second's which means rubbish!!! How good did Edward sound on those records he used this guitar!!!? I myself use M2 Marshall 50 watt & 100 watt Super Lead head's (none of mine are reissues!) & a simple pedalboard of old Boss, Ibanez & TC Electronic pedal's. Old Pro Co RAT & Old Marshall Guv'nor etc....... But zillions use these too!!!!! But whatever works for you is what is the best for you & it doesn't have too be a high priced boutique instrument!!!!!!! You said this too!!!

if your going DI and using heaps of effects etc then you can make your guitar out of chipboard it will sound good

In your professional opinion, where does Jatoba wood fall in this spectrum of tone? Thanks.

Why the pings?

I think most of the wood stuff makes little to no difference and that it's mostly the hardware and pickups and possibly density of the wood, though the stability of the wood is important. No matter what anyone says about Paul (and I have some critiques too), he makes a really well built instrument.

This is why I only want one of each guitar of a certain pickup configuration. I have a HSS strat and an HH superstrat. I am now just looking for a guitar with P90s, preferably a lespaul or a revstar. I feel that these 3 guitars will fill all my needs.

Wow. Very deep!

in electric guitars it doesnt matter which wood you choose of cause.. you can use plywood or whatever yxou like to use. But when it comes to acoustics its all about the topwood....

With my solid body guitars, my “most resonant” ones have tremolo springs in them, the resonance being unintentional. One of my favorites, a Squier Sonic Stratocaster, the body is acoustically dead. The vibrations don’t run through the body in any significant way but it’s one of my best sounding guitars. Stop the cork sniffing and plug in your guitars when you try them.

even if we have 2 of the same guitars there is diffrenses in the value of the electronics that change the sound

Alder and Ash Strats sound different, they just do, as do ebony/rosewood/maple fretboards

on the wood topic I'd be more concerned about moisture levels, dead notes and wolf notes. Topics rarely touched (ie warped necks), maybe everybody have perfect guitars...

You made me spit out my drink. "Unless you're sitting there playing with yourself..." All in good fun!

Each guitar in my collection sounds different, I have all kinds of different variations of builds and pickup configurations. I'll play one guitar, then throw on another. With my first couple of notes I immediately notice how the EQ has shifted, for instance the difference in EQ going from EMGs to PAFs or something, or that it hangs on my body differently and I'm picking in a different area. Subconsciously I make micro adjustments to my playing position and attack until the tone matches my expectations. I may play my Les Paul more light-handed near the bridge and dig into my Tele harder toward the neck. Secondly, I also know my exact amp, pedal, and compression settings to adjust to compensate for the change, I'll make these in literally seconds without thinking. Is the species of wood responsible for the shift of EQ? My answer is maybe though it doesn't matter because I end up EQ-ing my entire signal chain to compensate anyway, any tiny adjustment I make completely overrides what little difference the species contributes. I guess it would matter to the players that don't touch any EQ ever, use the exact same electronics, nut/saddle material and don't use any pedals. All they do is change the guitar. I'll concede that the player probably notices a difference in the room outside of a mix. Now record those guitars, and listen to the separate recordings a week later blindly A/B them. How much difference did the species make? It's nice to have a good, quality wood and finish just like it's nice when your furniture is made with fine wood because the experience is better.

Tone is the perceived audio which is subjective to each person ear/brain. But we cannot dismiss the objective science that different woods produce different midrange frequencies. Just plug in guitars and compare at the EQ ban spectrum on a DAW software.

I would say tone woods are about 90% important for acoustic guitars... and about 30% important for electric guitars (with potted pickups)... if the pickups were unpotted, and thus slightly microphonic, I'd say about 40%. It seems like the material (wood etc) is mainly about density differences and vibration absorption.

I’ve been playing for the last 28 years, I’ve owned more than 350 guitars and I have about 30 right now, from indonesian to us boutique guitars, same for amps and cabs... and after debating with myself, my friends I come to the conclusion that I stoped caring about tone. After all of this time, playing, gigging, recording I just know what works for me and I can do whatever I want within a larger gear boundary. It is great to plug a Hamer USA through an ENGL amp in a EVH 412. Yeah it is, but I can dial a jackson indonesia using a kemper player in studio monitors, or a jet city amp in a home made cabinet with v30s. What I can’t get away is a OK guitar, in a OK amp in a cab that does not suit my style there’s no EQ in this world that will allow me play heavy metal in a jensen speakers from a fender combo. I use to rehearse in a room equiped with fender combos, so I carried a nice high gain preamp... it sucked. Wrapping up: using your tone stack my compensate for different guitars but will NEVER compensate a shitty speaker. Regarding some guitars being more bassy, trebly: I like it, it makes me happy and I will EQ it in the amp to my taste.

All I know is wood is directly proportional to price. The Guju in me is not fooled by that!

Every change in wood type or shape of solid body guitars change the wave form, which is measurable according to Jason Lollar, so saying tonewood or shape doesn't matter is an opinion based on ignorance. Not everyone can HEAR the difference in the changed wave forms, but some can.

so far im inclined to feel like the neck affects the sound more than one may think......so far

Glenn said it best when he said "You're listening with your eyes". That's why I NEVER look at a guitar during an A-B test. Jim Lill's tests are what really drove it home for me. At least in the context of solid body electrics, an acoustic is of course a different story

Fort Nine did a motorcycle where he explained why car drivers don’t see motorcycles and the neural science was very similar . Most of what we think we see, is just the brain filling in the gaps in our perception. Sometimes there’s a motorcycle in one of those gaps and we legitimately don’t see it

i build electric guitars 100% by hand, no CNC just powertools, and i mainly use reclaimed and recycled wood, anything i can get my hands on, and most of the time they are reinforced with epoxy when needed. the way i look at it, as long as you use hard woods you will make a fine guitar. its mostly a personal preference, some people like the open pores of mahogany, some people like the tight figuring of maple, some people like the weight of ash, but ive built guitars out of pine and kiln dried cedar and ive noticed no difference sonically between any of them. some of the best guitars ive ever played were made entirely out of composites like carbon fiber glass and whatever they make aristides out of. tone wood is a thing with acoustic guitars, some woods resonate differently than others. but ive also played martins made out out of masonite and they sounded fine.

"I didn't know about Tonewood from 2004 to 2015" - this is proof by market. If something makes a real difference, the market reflects it. No one questions alcaline batteries or quartz watches: they last longer, they are more precise and manufacturers had to upgrade when the new technology appeared. This never happened with wood in solid body guitars. Wood only became a divisive spec point after the Internet made it possible for masses of believers to share fantasies.

But the picture you showed is a color picture. The lines are different colors, and they are in the picture, therefore it is a color picture.

The materials used to create an electric guitar using magnetic pickups affects the tone - indirectly. I have seen the video of the fence board using Strat hardware that sounds like a Strat. Yes, it sounds like a Strat due to the nature of the pickups. The fence board has it's own set of resonant frequencies that add or subtract to the sustain or small (some would say negligible) differences between the board and the guitar that was stripped for parts.If 'tone' includes the vibrations of the instrument that are affected by the materials the instrument is made from then the concept of tonewood is not an illusion. If a plucked string quickly goes still and stops affecting the magnetic field of the pickup then the instrument will sound very different from one that has more resonant properties that prolongs/diminishes, augments the vibration of the strings and the magnetic fields of the pickups. The vast majority of the 'tone' is the nature of the pickups and a small, but important portion of the 'tone' is due to the nature of the machine itself. I saw another vid where the strings were strung between two work tables and a pickup was placed in a more or less normal position. It sounded like the guitar that the parts were taken from - but not 100%.

All tone is generated by the strings. Try a guitar without strings. The guitar is a modular system that delivers the information/vibrations of the string. Strings are the most important element, other than your playing technique.

I've never bought the tonewood debate for solid body electric guitars. It's the pickups, strings and whatever you plug in to that are creating almost all of the sound. For acoustic guitars tonewood is definitely important but that is mostly down to the top wood and how it's braced.

Sgs sound different than les Paul's with the same pickups so idk I think built and material matters for sure

IMHO he has a point, we often hear and see what we want to believe. Sure, type wood impacts the sounds, the question are we really able to tell the difference?

If it can affect how the string vibrates then it can affect the sound. Anyway think the word is timbre not tone.

"Tonewood" if understood as simply good wood to build wooden instruments from, it is true. Hardwood drills better carves better, and is much less likely to shrink or warp, that's why they use it for good furniture....note I say Good, not all...Same goes for Cabs. Cabs made of OSB, become a crumbly mess in humid climates. Nice wood makes nice guitars...99% of guitars are made of good woods, even knockoffs.

the problem is, when people say electric guitar wood sounds different they never account for the difference in pickups, bridge type, bridge material, nut material, pickup height, scale length, action etc. The true test would be take the exact same style of guitar made from two different types of wood and swap every single component and see if theres a difference. I'd love to see Paul Reed Smith put his money where his mouth his a do a double blind test and see if he could accurately tell a difference from a high end "tone wood" and balsa wood, and do it consistently a few times to rule out just being a good guess. To be fair, when you play guitar acoustically wood does matter, so theoretically the wood of the electric guitar *SHOULD* matter, the problem is, does it change the tone enough to be detectable. There's about 10 other variables that change your tone more drastically that are much cheaper. Also, PRS has a vested interested is selling tone wood, thats not saying he doesn't believe it (confirmation bias) but could he, in a blind test, accurately pick out which guitar is the tone wood guitar over and over again?

The 513 is the guitar that got me to break my very firm 24 fret rule. Twice. (Also no one I've told about them understands how insane it is to have an entire neck made out of Brazilian rosewood)

my only gripe with the tonewood "debate" is that full on tone wood deniers seem to think that guitar or bass is strictly an electronic instrument, but the acoustic properties of an electric guitar matters alot! mostly getting a good setup makes a big difference but certain guitars are just acoustically dead no matter what strings, electronics or hardware are on them, almost like the wood is a sponge soaking up the sustain and tone, while others are louder and you can feel the resonance while it sits on you lap, which at bedroom volumes or using amp sims makes very little difference but when playing loud enough thru a real amp to get feedback it makes ALL the difference! I also think the neck profile can have an effect on sustain which is why I seem to prefer chunkier necks, while my own experience is biased to what i have been able to play over the years i couldnt possibly come to the conclusion that wood doesnt matter, its not as simple as one species of wood sounding one way and another species sounding another way but it really does make a difference, physics and acoustics still matter

That's why every time I get a new guitar it always sounds better then the old ones.

Well, I believe PRS believes himself, but he is also a sales man, so he has a clear agenda. The debate about tone wood in electric guitars is not whether Mahogany sounds different than Maple or any other wood. The debate is about whether this difference is worth the extra cost of the product. It seems to me that putting all the variables together - wood type, wood quality, pickups, electronics, bridge type, frets material etc. Those still can be fine tuned with an equalizer and won’t make much difference in a recording or in a live show. There are so much more variables outside your guitar that can affect the tone, that the guitar variables are diminished almost entirely anyways. In acoustic instruments however..

This whole issue is easily put to rest using scientific methods; Isolating only the wood, electronically measuring the frequencies, and finally blind AB comparisons. And no pickups are not microphones. They are magnets that produce a current when a metallic item is moved near them.

Wow. I admire your desire to educate oneself and share said education with the public. However, this could be summed up to a video maybe 2-5 minutes. Just my criticism in the kindest manner. Interesting stuff but the fast speech can loose some viewers.

The difference between you and a wine taster is that a wine tasters are trained to be able to blind test these differences. Paul Reed Smith and other tone wood people have yet to put that to the test.

so again you have to see the guitar to hear the difference xd. 12:50 seeing the context helps you notice the sound . right.

I've said this a long time: both sides in the debate are correct. The player, sitting over the guitar, even if plugged in, hears the acoustic tone mixed with the electric, and can hear the effect of the wood. The electric signal negates most or all of that, so listeners who hear the guitar only through speakers will are unlikely to hear a difference, and less so with gain.

You need to watch this KZfaq video; Tested: Where Does The Tone Come From In An Electric Guitar? - Jim Lill

SRV said without his #1 guitar he couldn't have done what he had done. So the psychology of playing certainly runs deeper than wood.

I’m a bassist, but I’m tempted to make business selling “tone straps” to guitarists lmao I’m at the point where I’m convinced you could fool most guitarists that you can make tone air in cans that will make them sound better when sprayed on the strings before you play.

It's well documented that the original Fender Esquires/Teles were pine and only later changed for appearance, nothing to do with tone. The original Les Pauls were supposed to be mahogany tops but Gibson reversed it by accident according to Les himself. I don't think wood having tones is a myth,but i think it's alot more coincidental than many would believe.

My anecdotal experience. I have 5 strats. 3 are made of alder, 1 is made of basswood. The last is an MIK (made by Cort) 1992 Fender Squier Series Strat (I always considered it a Squier but Fender considers it a Fender, so...). The body of this guitar is plywood (or as we owners refer to it, instrument grade laminate). I've always been told that the louder and more resonant a solid body electric guitar plays unplugged, the better that tone will be when amplified. This particular guitar is the loudest and definitely the most resonant of my 5 strats. It rings. I feel it vibrating in both my hands when played. A lot. Sound comes out the rear trem cover like a speaker. I'm sure most would not refer to plywood as "tonewood". By the way, why have I never heard anyone condemn the Dan Armstrong Lucite guitar for poor tone?

As an old luthier I offer countless examples of clients that believed a change of pickups would solve problems with dead notes or wolf tones or whatever only to realize ( or not ) that the problem stemmed from inappropriate choices of body materials.

So basically, if you believe it affects the tone it does and if you don't it doesn't?

My take on the opinions of Glen Fricker recalls that he is a metal guy; he opines from that standpoint, which means that he hears his guitar through high-gain distortion. This alters the sound of every guitar used to the point where subtle characteristics get completely masked. Tonal differences are covered up unto inaudibility. The good thing about Glen is that he admits to his "bias," making no bones about it.

It's not as much about woods/materials used for guitar building until you get into acoustic types, solid body types are not reliant on such, it's an electric instrument afterall and the pickups and hardware get to make the decision in that regard. The actual body shape or design only affects how it plays passively by default with the hardware used etc, the consideration beyond that is so minimalistic it's hardly worth further consideration, some woods are more stable from certain perspectives that are better considered less prone to shrinkage/movement potential (if required in some instances as planned) only. The silliness could therefor continue via Mr Reed Smith's claim if anyone wished to claim the actual painted colour of a guitar also affects it tonality....regarding the example mentioned here too that the eyes only report etc but the brain so speak fills in imaginary gaps is bogus likewise in this correlation, why? because humans have ears to listen with instead of eyes, I've yet to meet anyone with eyes in their ear canals.

Sure the wood effects the resonance, anything the guitarnis made out of does this. But because it's unpredictable (when comparing a block of wood to block) thus it is pointless to discuss

the thing is... if you just play guitar for any stretch of time, swap parts, compare guitars.... you won't need to ask if wood makes a difference. I hope people take this idea for truth and start playing plastic... let's get the value of great instruments down.

McGurk Effect : we hear what we see.

A large part of the problem that so called "tonewood deniers" have in recognising the effects of solid body instrument materials is that the debate is centred around a percieved elete collection of tonewoods. I don't think that anybody would deny the influence of materials and there physical properties in the sound of an acoustic instrument. The raison d'etre of solid body instruments is that you can play bloody loud without too much feedback and colouration from crosstalk with the environment. That is the environment of the string is isolated by larger impedence mismatches with the body. That said it is just ignorant and silly to believe that materials don't alter the result , timbre and ADSR.

There are scientific studies that show that the brain fills in much of what we perceive visually but i feel the ears are far more honest . This could explain why digital imaging is welcomed while digital music is shunned.

I've seen/ heard things that make me think that tone wood has an effect on electric guitars. I've seen/heard things that leads me to believe it doesn't. I've never heard 2 guitars that plug in and sound exactly alike. Even ones with identical specs. As long as scale lengths, pickups, placement/height of said pickups, and action/setup are all the same The differences in tone can always be tweaked to make the instruments sound pretty much identical. I've never met someone that doesn't eq their rig. and there are so many variables between the note being picked, and the speaker projecting the sound, that placing all the difference on the wood is not really a wise conclusion to jump to in my opinion. Variance in winding of your pickups, and gauss of the magnets will change tone. Even 2 pickups with "identical" specs will not sound 100% the same, especially if they are hand wound or scatter wound. the tolerance of the pots and the tone caps can also vary from part to part. So "identical" circuits can vary quite a bit in overall resistance and capacitance. Most of the time this difference though is negligible once you tweak your eq. The point i'm making is that there are so many variables that pointing to just the wood is not a sensible argument in my opinion.

Here's a few things I feel you may be missing. Music is (or IMO should be) for listeners not strictly guitarists. Most people who know little to nothing about guitars aren't going to be considering tonewood, even if they are watching a live performance and even if it's a single musician performing in a small room. Furthermore you usually aren't watching live, so you can't even see what instruments are being played. The reason why a musician would want a different tone, and therefor a different tonewood, is they think it sounds better. Ostensibly that should translate to it sounding better to like-minded listeners, which it won't unless they are under the same psychosis as the performer. None of the psychobabble aspects of your argument, even if they are 100% true, are really improving the music for the general audience. So I look at PRS and others pushing tonewood, as kind of perpetrating a scam. Maybe he does really believe it, but it would seem to be easy to prove if true, especially for someone with his resources. Yet where's the proof?

This is a matter of material science. Everyone's personal opinion on this is irrelevant. Now I can give you a list of some studies that show there's little effect and the material of the guitar If you want. But the list of such studies is small and we need more especially when it comes to things like bridges and fret material and so on. And there has been some studies that show that tone is correlated with the density of the neck. But the studies are very complicated and I don't think they show much. So if you think there is a difference then perhaps you could measure it somehow or find somebody who can. But until I see such evidence I believe that I will continue to think there's not much difference in any of the materials in a guitar. Certainly not compared to the pickup selector switch or base and treble controls on an amp.

Vine sommeliers can’t distinguish 10 or more vines, they simply known which vine suits what meal. Maybe if the sommeliers had only 10 vines in his shop, then he might tell which is which, but when he shall tell 10 out of 100 he will fail.

I think a lot of what Glenn does is just tells kids what they want to hear. He will make a whole video claiming there is no difference between tube amps and solid state amps. If someone points out an edge of break up type of situation he will just say “who cares about edge of break up? This a metal channel”. So yeah in his specific example of high gain metal tones in a mix, you can’t hear a difference and he just hand waves away other types of music. So maybe a more accurate statement would be there is not huge difference in tube and solid state amps when playing with high gain, dropped tuning in a mix. That doesn’t mean that overall there is no difference.

A study on this subject is being done right now I believe. So we can finally end this discussion.

Give BFG a broomstick with a string on it and he’ll get good tone… Some of the best sounding guitars I’ve heard were cheap beaters. Our guitars aren’t violins or cellos. And when we take our guitars and plug them into every shiny box we see what little, special “tone” that wood imparts is all but lost. Does maple, rosewood, ebony, and mahogany have their own tonal characteristics? Sure they do but once you add amp, pedals, pickups, speakers, cables, mics, etc. it’s just not about that wood anymore.

This debate could probably be settled with a blind test. You would need quite a few people who believe in tonewood. As a preliminary, get 20 people in a room. In a separate room a professional player unbiased with no opinion on the matter to play different guitars. Maybe throw in a couple of red herrings, say play the same guitar but tell people it's different. Have the people listening write down how they think the tone is different between sets and compare the results.