Beautiful comment.

Thank you for making its death a little less sad. Hats off to you.

We still got Fast RMX. It's fun but hard.

@Stormrage .....how is that conformist? That's how I feel.

The music you picked was perfect....specially the ending....we need F zero...doesn't need a new mechanic or be innovative...we just need F Zero...we love this game. Let the cap stop running in smash...and finally put his foot where it matters. On the pedal.

This generations Mario Party was a waste of my money and I'm still upset about it. The best part is, no one likes it and they'll probably use its failure as a justification to push us back onto that horrible fucking cart everyone has to be on.

Miyamoto: I poop on Mario Party. F-Zero shall never be disrespected with such milking.

I liked Super Mario Party. The unique dices and Partner Party are great additions to the series. Plus, they got rid of the car and the minigames are fun enough. The only bad things about the game are the few boards and no proper online imo

@@caioleite5579 The car? 🚘

@@caioleite5579 I loved the idea of the dice if some weren't just mechanically Superior to others for no discernible reason. Bowser has a 50/50 of going like 8 spaces or losing 3 coins. That's insane! Look how they massacred my boy "Shy Guy"! 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 0. That's so sad.

I know this is 3 months old but I just wanna say this one word: Lag...

And unique track designs.

@@CarloNassar or a track editor like F-Zero X had on the N64DD

Or even a track editor. But no. In Miyamoto’s mind, there has to be some lame gimmick baked into the game to justify making it. I think he just doesn’t like F-Zero, which is why he can’t think of any good “innovations” for it. It’s sad, because F-Zero is the only place I know of where you can find this unique style of racing experience. Traditional racing games just bore me to tears whenever I try them.

@@Argon314 have you ever tried WipeOut on PlayStation?

Virtual Console? What's that?

You could play F-Zero GX on Wii consoles via backpat. There's a trick to do it on WIi U as well via homebrew. F-Zero X and various other F-Zero games were on Wii and WIi U via Virtual Console. Switch is probably the only major console in the past 20 years or so with no BC from them(well 20 years now, around 15 since GC).

I would say Nintendo has always done Snes and Nes compatibility.... okay and done N64 compatibility... servicably, but once you want something from the gamecube onward things get weird and they tend to not bother. The issue being most of the titles people want to replay are either the N64 games they usually skip, or Gamecube titles they never rerelease.

"Grr, i hate emulation"

​@@UsingGorillaLogic I swear, there's always some sort of catch when Nintendo gives us emulation for anything other than NES and SNES (obviously licenses are an issue, but other than that, there's really no good excuse for first party titles from Gamecube to not be on the Switch).

ThePainTrain yh i honestly don’t see them topping the absolute ridiculousness of GX. The nail biting difficulty, the sense of speed. I love Nintendo but this is really one of their best games ever made and to top the original would take serious work. Knowing Nintendo today, they would severely cut the difficulty in turn ruining the entire reason for the game, racing, only for the hardcore

So people are ok with no new mechanics in F-Zero but were not ok with Mega Man not offering anything that's very new (besides the slide, charge shot, etc.)?

Pretty much this. My main reason for wanting a new F-Zero game? I think Captain Falcon's neat and I want to see him do more stuff. That's pretty much it. I mean, he's a Bounty Hunter right? Why not make a game that's part racer and part character action game? Let Captain Falcon race AND fight. Let me do some good ol' F-Zero racing and then juggle bad guys like I'm Dante from Devil May Cry.

@@amuroray88 I think you might be right. He went out of his way to trash GX specifically, when it’s a phenomenal game. So good, that he himself admits he can’t figure out a way to top it.

Just "remaster" GX, make the AX game unlockable, add in online multiplayer, bam, there you go Nintendo, you're welcome.

Also Nintendo: "No game without something new, no paint over" ---- releases any pokemon sequel

@@OGZelgadisGraywords any mario related game. also $60 price tag.

Yep, you're right, Nintendo is the coherence company. If it's mario (or any other super-seller), always a new game for the console, no matter how many times they repeat. If it's not, "we can't do something new with that" or shit like that; they don't give a shit about they're fans. It's a shame, but nintendo is just like any other company, a money maker.

I wish they could stop putting the old pokemon into the new region. I don't like learning new move lists for the same one. I also don't want a pokedex with 1 000 pages

no, I just don't want them in the new game at all. If they come from the previous game, that's fine. But not the pokemon from 3 games ago

dont make me nut, that would be glorious

try Redout !!!

@@ZeroB4NG I 100%'d it on steam and, it's just too different, I still end up booting Dolphin to play GX. Every time they make a futuristic racing game, it feels slow and it's difficult/frustrating to corner

I thought you've written 144p lol, you should say 150 because 144 is a popular number for shitty resolution omg

120 hz would be enough. That's what there is in the TV realm.

I don't think you'd need to do much to bring it back today. Just HD 60fps that shit with good track design and it'll sell

@@Matanumi Nintendo is just hypocritical... I hate them.

They don't want to spell out directly that the games just didn't sell a lot.

​@Nacho Libre Yeah I was watching Vinny Vinesauce and he pitched this idea of an open world F-zero game where captain falcon can explore a bladerunner-esque world (that was introduced in the GX cutscenes) and also leave the blue falcon and use his moves from smash, his gun, etc. I think its amazing

@Nacho Libre Exactly. I really couldn't put it better myself. This idea has the potential of being one of the greatest games of all time imo. I want that so bad I'd be fine if it had a Breath of the Wild development time and then some more on top of that. Maybe someday...

@Nacho Libre Maybe it would be reasonable by Nintendo's standards to demonstrate new forms of user input with the touch screen. We could have customized consoles that take gestures or combinations of presses so players can perform things like an exaggerated boost, have their machine make a guided path (like clairvoyance in skyrim), or change their vehicles balancing mid-race. The screen could also have a mod that is used for detecting nearby vehicles, there could be a mod that takes the mod of the last racer you spin into, or have sliders that adjust the sensitivity of input for things like drifting. many possibilities!

the problem with this argument is that it opens the door to just endless remakes of every game and no new games ever releasing since you can allways say "you cant play that which has been done before". same logic applies to the endless row of FIFA, Battlefield,CoD,etc. games out there. any yearly franchise really. and do you really want that to happen?

@@derfalschelennox365 Better than what we have now, which is no F-zero since the GC days. You don't always need new gimmicks to keep a franchise going, and adding new gimmicks for the sake of adding them doesn't automatically make for a better game (at times it can even make a game worse or at least certain aspects of it). GX already just about reached the pinnacle of what an F-zero (or racing game in general) could and should be. And instead of seeing that nintendo decided to just let it die, right when it reached a level of epicness and refinement every franchise aspires to attain in it's respective genre. All they need to do is build on that foundation by going bigger, better, and longer in terms of the game's scope. More tracks, more racers/cars, more car parts, possibly a more expansive story mode that goes beyond [cutscene>gimmick race>cutscene] and actually lets you experience the F-zero world to some degree (maybe even semi-open world career mode), custom track builder, proper online multiplayer, etc. They shouldn't go full on fifa, but there should at least be one F-zero game per gen. Though honestly at this point I'd take a bare bones port over the complete absence of F-zero we currently have.

That means a lot, glad to hear you enjoyed it!

It is like Tetris

Mario is even dead now. Odyssey... ugh

@@CaptainFALKEN What? Odyssey is really good.

@@CaptainFALKEN I don't understand what's wrong with Mario or Odyssey, maybe you just didnt like the game, but the series are really far from dead

@@CaptainFALKEN Odyssey is a critically acclaimed game that was loved by the vast majority of people who laid hands on it. You might not have liked it, but that doesn't make Mario dead.

@@CaptainFALKEN the only dead thing here is your brain. mario? dead? LOL

Rob Speed holy shit, loved the idea. Someone show it to nintendo

@@Canalbiruta Thanks, man! Maybe they'll hire me as a game designer.

@@pseudotasuki just have hope

Holly molly!! This idea is awesome!

So basically you sat there brainstorming for however long and came up with a great idea for f-zero ... And Nintendo's excuse is they couldn't think of anything , I love Nintendo's games but holy shit they are annoying sometimes

Yeah, F-Zero just set the bar too high for me.

@@custom-r I find myself constantly wanting faster and faster racing games, but the racing games get slower and slower! even 200cc MK8DX feels like a brisk jog.

@@digitalunity And even worse. Every offering touted as "Can cure the F-Zero itch" is generic racer after another. Yeah some of these other racers are too slow or not up to snuff after F-Zero GX especially.

@@digitalunity Maybe you already know it, there's a game called 'Distance' on steam. It's the most f-zero like game for me gameplaywise, it's not really as fast as GX of course but you need to imput and react really fast.

Looking like F-Zero doesn't make it F-Zero.

That’s simple, because the Zelda franchise as a whole makes WAY more money than F Zero ever has. They can trust that a Zelda remaster will sell tons more than F Zero. An underselling Zelda game is a great selling F Zero game.

I come from the future to tell you that, its being rereleased again for another 60 fucking dollars.

@@PSWii360onBaSS Seriously? Fuck Nintendo, they deserve getting their games emulated.

But... you had all of the AX tracks in the original game as an unlockable GP... why would you need to add them?

@@acolddarkgentlebruh8205 You say that like its wrong to emulate a 20 year old game, lol. Its the next best thing to a game going open source, and it doesn't hurt them financially whatsoever since Nintendo isn't selling any new copies of the game. Hell, i still probably wouldn't buy it until i've tried it out first on an emulator since that option is available to me. I've never played GX before, so I would need to see if the game is for me or not.

Going from stopped to 176 km/h in one frame, assuming the 60 Hz framerate at the start of the video, is almost exactly 300 g. *!!!*

@@adamengelhart5159 God damn this is why I love F-ZERO

Could you imagine the lag with Nintendo Online?

Oh hell no online would be atrocious.

There have been some rumors of a ton of gc remakes this year. Maybe we could a gx remake.

@@vin3084 where

@@agamaz5650 I just looked again and I guess I mistook "Mario sunshine and other games" as a bunch of GameCube games but alas they ment more Mario games. The article in question www.nintendolife.com/news/2020/03/nintendo_to_remaster_most_of_super_mariors_35-year_catalogue_for_switch_in_2020_new_report_says

lol well this level of humor is very dark

@@exorias625 my friend did his own version when I told that joke that was even darker

LMAO!

Nintendo: >Mario. *[click noise]* k u good >Legend of Zelda. *[click noise]* k u good too. >Kirby. *[Sakurai runs into the room and gives them a note and runs out]* *[Kirby gets skipped]* >Star Fox. *[tiny flag with "Bang!" written on it comes out]* >F Zero. *[Ded]*

Sure feels like they had 2 in the chamber because Metroid is gone too.

I don't even see the risks of just giving us F-Zero fans something we want. A meticulously crafted product that might even interest some outsiders to the series. Stubborn old men too afraid to take a miniscule projected loss compared to the mario/zelda/smash big bucks they're constantly making hand over fist. And now, FE is wildly popular thanks to their other major income producer... the mobile market.

This right here is why I don't get Nintendo's stance. Mans just said he'd buy a console for a game like F-Zero, that's $360.00 right there. A new F-Zero would print money! Yet here we are, not closing a sale.

I love how you think but until Nintendo can get their online game play together there’s no why I’ll ever see f zero playing online with that many players.

ya'know, I feel like Smash Ultimate would be a more fun and better competitive game if it had depth and mechanical techniques. Making it be like the same level as like Smash Melee which is the greatest competitive successor which is still alive even almost 20 years later.

i hate racing games ut f zero is the only one i like(played it with nso and i loved it)

They barely made any. AX can be played on the Dolphin emu. Great YT profile 👍.

I managed to find one in north wales. I nearly had a heart attack when i did.

Same in America

Exactly, remaster GX, make AX content unlockable by beating GX, add online Multiplayer. Bam, major seller there.

Ps, hack a wii, and you can play F zero Ax, Mariokart gp1 and 2 on it. Very cool!

I think it's a pride thing with Nintendo. They take pride in thinking outside of the box and creating games with purpose. I think that F Zero is coming back eventually though, it's like what was mentioned in the video, it wouldn't of worked with the Wii's gimmicks nor the Wii U's, yet they even did try to make one for the Wii U. Due to the switch feeling like a more standard platform and Nintendo moving away from the target of fairly casual game players with the switch, I would guess that F Zero is likely more now than ever before.

I'm with you brother, I think Nintendo is eventually going to have to set foot upon the land of remakes again (they remade windwaker in wiiu) because just coming up with new ways to see and play a game aren't everything, it's about what the story, display and interactions the game has, why do you think 8 bit games like shovel knight have become popular over the recent years? Graphics aren't everything! And nintendo better take note and do justice to this franchise, I just see so much potential nintendo hasn't used, it frustrates me!

They won't make one though without something to add to it. CoD and BF are the same, yes, but they are also selling. Like the video said, F Zero saw a decline in sales with every release, despite trying to showcase something new with each title. In Nintendo's eyes, F Zero was NOT a successful franchise. At least not compared to their other IP. Unless they find a fit for a new system feature, gaming engine, or rendering technology or something that fits well into a F Zero game, I'd pretty much plan on not ever seeing another new F Zero again. Which is a shame, like most of the folks watching this video, I loved the franchise, and X and GX were a couple of my favorite games. I'm hoping for that new shiny technology, whatever it may be, that sparks the flame for F Zero once again. But until then, I'll be over here with my GameCube and component cables, because damn, GX can still rip your face off at 480p. I can only imagine this game at 1080p. *droooool*

That's the thing with Nintendo. As described in the video, Nintendo doesn't iterate for the sake of iteration or just to improve one thing here or there like BF and CoD. Nintendo is the way it is, their games are as beloved as they are, because each game they make is something new. I agree with the sentiment that it's difficult to come up with something actually new for the game. Yes, there are small things that can make the current experience better such as higher resolutions and improved multiplayer, but those things aren't new in gaming, they're just new for F-Zero. Something different has to come along for Nintendo to think that F-Zero is the game to make. The way I see it, F-Zero probably won't get made fresh until VR is, if ever, mainstream, and we have full force-feedback chairs in every house. F-Zero would benefit from being a full-body experience that no other types of games would necessarily benefit from. One would play F-Zero for the same reason one rides roller coasters. Unfortunately, I don't really see that ever happening. So, in the meantime, I'll just play my copy of F-Zero, on top of my car, while someone does their best to mimic my movements as we both drive.

I'd love to see the decline in sales of Mario games when compared to F-Zero.

I think that genre benefits greatly from graphics and Nintendo has never been a great fan of the graphics race mentality.

Why F-Zero? Me:......Yes

I agree with the cat

The better question is "Why Not F-Zero?" If the only reason not to make a new one is "what would we change" that's a sign it would print money!

Apart from Mario, they have an excuse because the Wii u didn't sold well so they just ported everything. But the Wii u Mario is already a new super mario bros wii HD remaster with new levels, so...

@@gamermapper - Nice to see you make room for Nintendo's milking when it suits their purpose. Great job in vocally supporting the Disney of gaming companies. 👍.

@@TexasHollowEarth it's not milking tho, Nintendo has a lot of mario games because that's their mascot, a lot of these games are totally different and can be divided into super mario, mario kart, mario sports and other series. Each series has the games not more often than one per year. And Nintendo has also link and pokemon which are even rarer, and also a lot of original game series that are even rarer, I don't see the milking in splatoon, smash, metroid, Pikmin etc

@@gamermapper - They're totally milking Zelda games, too. The new Pokemon games have even less content than older titles. Who keeps buying all these Animal Crossing games? Nintendo really hates gamers, that aren't children.

@@TexasHollowEarth with the new animal crossing coming out, and everyone shiting their pants looking at it, i'm still confused as to why the fuck people even play these games

That really means a lot, thank you!

Exactly how I feel. Unless it's not being referenced or used or talked about this much, a series like F-Zero is hardly dead in that sense.

Miyamoto is really pushing for Star Fox to revived, he's already given Ubisoft a green light to experiment with it (although Starlink failed because of the toy gimmick despite being a beautiful and immersive game otherwise), and he's reportedly looking for more developers to give it a new breath of life. I just wish he'd did the same with F-Zero and Mother because just seeing Cap and Ness in Smash isn't enough.

How anybody can look at the Mario Kart series and thinks its hasn't evolved with each installment has their eyes closed. And Nintendo basically do nothing for Pokemon since they only own 1/3 of it.

All they did was add drifting, update graphics, and add new characters and tracks. It really did not change that much. Just like Pokemon, I can go from the first to newest game without finding much deviation, as I already have.

Pokemon is not made by Nintendo and while I understand the exhibits you mentioned (Not 100% with you on Mario Kart), the Mario 3D platformers are actually unique from each other. Maybe not so much for 3D Land and 3D World but Sunshine had the FLUDD, Galaxy had a handful of new things, Galaxy 2, expanded on it, and Odyssey had new tricks and Cappy.

LoZ does not get a pass. Recent titles are over rated. There hasn't been a truly great Zelda since the Wind Waker.

@@vejymonsta3006 Not gonna lie, breath of the wild is honestly a masterpiece. It seriously does deserves every award it got.

If you gotta good PC, download the dolphin emulator and game. Looks gorgeous and plays like a dream at even 720p, if you got the CPU and GPU horsepower. At 1440p though, woooh. Games of the PS2/GameCube/Xbox era stand the test of time better than 360 and PS3 games. The way games were crafted back then, even expanded to 4K from their native 480i image, they're gorgeous.

HMMMM WHO IS THIS I FOUND

How did you get here, Where did you come from. Why did you even come here.

Oliver Craft youtube reccomendations Onviously they know I'm interested in nintendo shit now so they reccomend me this

It wouldnt work. You need analog triggers to play. Unless they used motion controls for the analog air brakes. It wouldnt work... Plus nintendo wont port game cube games that require or benefit from analog triggers.

try redout, that sentence applies to that as much as it does to f zero, it's a successor to both wipeout and f zero.

I'll blink as much as I damn well please

I think that brutal difficulty is also one factor holding F'Zero back from true blockbuster status. I´d hate them to dumb it down, but as it stands it has niche appeal. How many of us can say we actually beat F'Zero GX if we even bought it, I know I didn´t beat it. That niche appeal will forever limit the series and Nintendo´s desire to make new iterations.

the grand prix tracks weren't that hard on standard or expert, you don't really need to beat a game to enjoy it.

Thank goodness I beat gx, and the story difficulty isn't that hard if you don't put pressure on yourself

wait until nintendo finally makes a new one

Kachu Don’t recall the last time a main Mario game was made. Plus the Mario series are not only best selling titles, but critically acclaimed titles and noted as some of the greatest games of all time. So they’re not wasting their time with Mario.

*stares intensely at Super Mario Galaxy 2 and every New Super Mario Bros. title following the first*

Eichro Super Mario Galaxy 2 is excellent, I can agree with the NSMB games though, the DS one was the best

@@therealsploge I cannot debate the sheer quality of SMG2, one of my favorite games ever, but you can't deny that it's largely more of the same.

Eichro very true. Although of course that does not prevent it from being a fun game

Kirby Air Ride was 2003 as well.

@@Garbagehead5 unironicly the best kirby game

@@Garbagehead5 Why would you look at that, 2 racing games that had to compete against Mario kart Double Dash. I'm curious to know about the sales from Kirby Air Ride.

Very good points! Double Dash took a lot of attention away from GX it would have otherwise garnered.

I remember seeing the commercial on TV once. My poor grandma couldn't understand a word I was saying at the time due to how excited I was. She still laughs about it today.

This is a good point... dunno if you've heard about Pokken, but I was PISSED when I found out about it way after the fact... I like Pokemon, I like fighting games, it was made by the people who make Tekken... and it was really fun! The thing is Nintendo didn't think it would be a success so they just didn't advertise it... at all. What a tragedy; VERY few teams in the world have the specialized skills to make a big fighting game, they tie them up TEKKEN developers for years of all people, and then sabotage the end result. I don't get Nintendo... the value is in their IPs, yet they will lose money to push novel hardware that they LOSE money on while they either let popular IPs die or screw them over.

Super Mario Odyssey is completely different from Super Mario 3D World which is completely different from New Super Mario Bros... The list goes on. The "all Mario games are the same" meme is just false.

Because those games sell. Despite all the complains all of the NSMB games were in the top 10 best selling games of their consoles.

Nick K They stopped being made regularly last generation. Deluxe is just that- a remaster. Also, they were money printing machines for a short period of time.

You can play on dolphin...

I Just finished making my farewell music video and 20th Anniversary. Hope you Enjoy! kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pN6ZY7F61-Czk3k.html

subscribed

Came to post pretty much this exact same thing. Loved all the historical context and quotes, very well researched points, and you could feel the love and effort put into this. Another subscriber here!

lavawolf666 imagine if Platinum had been able to do whatever they wanted with Star Fox. Guaranteed it would have been freaking amazing

it didnt work for GX in its time, either, I remember I was the only one talking or playing that game, every other friend of mine that played videogames was only talking about mario sunshine, metroid prime or smash bros melee. a very limited core audience its whats holding F-Zero back.

Carsten false

@@ayar2 so what they need to do is put their full might into marketing it. Everyone knows Captain Falcon from Smash; just lean into that.

Miyamoto ruined just by himself Star Fox and Paper Mario.

@@angrykermit3192 It's called embellishment, ya fuckin dunce

Same here, I subscribed to the channel after this video QwQ

F-Zero: Battle Royale

@@BronyumHexofloride Then It would stop being a racing match Dx [And more like a Mario Kart In one of those battle modes >.>]

Dammit! KZfaq finally got something right for the first time

now here's hoping the traction that f-zero 99 is getting means that nintendo will finally consider making a brand new f-zero game for the next gen switch

I disagree about Mario and even more about Smash, each entry in both series is very different from both the former and the latter in the same series. Pokémon has always been a fairly lazy copy and paste job with no effort put into the game aside from composing new music and making new sprites though (mostly because Gamefreak is beyond incompetent). The innovation requirement is fantastic in some cases (look at any of the Mario games, 64, Sunshine, and Galaxy as fantastic examples), and completely unnecessary in others (Star Fox Zero - although it was doomed from the start considering there's only ever been one decent game in the series).

@@chrismdb5686 i was actually talking about the core gameplay of those games not the way these entries play.

@@Crocodile7104 I suppose if you intend to say that since all Mario games are platformers and are relatively similar then you're right, I was referring to how each iteration consistently builds on what the past entries have but also adds in completely new mechanics. Take Fludd for instance in Sunshine, makes the game completely unique in the world of 3D platformers, and while it is similar to other Mario titles it's impossible to ever confuse it with another in the series.

@@chrismdb5686 You're right about mario but smash really hasn't changed a whole lot since melee if you really take a step back and look (if anything, on a mechanical level i'd say they only spent two games degrading it but I know that's not a popular opinion), they've iterated on the gameplay sure but it hasn't been anything game changing or something that flips the series on its head like they use as an excuse for why F-zero isn't getting a new game yet.

@@megasoniczxx I'd say Brawl was a massive game changer and definitely different from Melee, Smash 4 was a huge game changer from Brawl, and Ultimate was the same to Smash 4, none of them play remotely the same (unless you want to pull the "they're all fighting games/platform brawlers/party games"). There's also a difference between making a fighting game and making a platformer, RPG, etc., to where fighting games don't need a new gimmick or other innovation to be fresh and game changing. Look at Tekken Tag 2 and Tekken 7 for example, the same basic gameplay is there but the addition of the rage mechanic and new characters on the roster makes it unmistakably different from its predecessors (for good and bad).

I feel the very same.

Wish YT wasn't shit so I could actually tag you so you can see this, but...Rotate the world instead of the player. Pretty sure that's how they did it in Psychonauts. It's not the same thing, but similar mechanics. Or a better solution; you could have a mesh at the bottom of your vehicle, that points the gravity towards the normal of the mesh. So when you go around the tube, as the vehicle tilts, it's pulled towards the normal, and therefore the center of the tube.

keep at it bro... it's heroes like you that saves retro gamers

im pretty sure in fzero x and gx/ax. the tubes where just a spline. (a line going between two or more points) where for gravity it just calculated the shortest straight line to the spline, and the angle of that line is set to be the gravity for your vehicle. thus you always get pulled towards the cylinder or into the walls of a tube. and for collisions it simply checks if that line is shorter or longer than the radius of the cylinder/tube.

I'm hoping they release GX as well. If I can just load up my switch and get my fix again I'll be super happy, but if they see the demand and make a new one? I'll probably cry happy tears. Here's hoping they see the demand. 🤞

Thanks mate! I do like Fast Neo, but it's definitely a completely different game. The announcer was a very on-the-nose reference (a very welcome one though, he was fantastic!), but gameplay is core, and Fast plays completely differently. Still, as you say, Shin'en has made some excellent-looking games for Nintendo hardware, they absolutely could make a decent F-Zero, they're clearly fans. Retro's a good call, definitely interested to see what they're working on!

I want a fast-zero Nintendo ehh?

@@fromization1 There are more advanced mechanics within the new Smash, the overall speed of the game is way faster, and those character reveal trailers have been hella brutal. As for Zelda, Skyward Sword had some crazy hand-holding, especially so when compared to BOTW.

Motion controls aren't half bad

@@pesky2119 They aren't bad, but F-Zero is so lightning fast that is requires insane precision. I'm picturing a world where instead of a Star Fox Zero, we got an F-Zero Zero. Even if motion controls weren't the only option, the game would have to be slowed down or widened to compensate for players using motion controls.

Exactly. It's not like trying to force new mechanics on to Star Fox Zero made it better.

with Mario, you can do some crazy ideas. But you can only do so much in a racing game series. Just look at Need for Speed.

Giordan Diodato well need for speed is one thing. And f-zero is another. I personally don't believe such a comparison is exactly fair to f-zero. The easy to learn, but hard to master gameplay is another conversation, but the fact that f-zero has such potential an hd rerelease wouldn't do it justice. I think i'm on nintendo's side here. Until you can find something brand new and amazing then there's no reason to really try and push out newer games.

Yet people still buy Mario games...

with mario its incredibly different from title to title.

saaaame :D

"See you, Space Falcon"

That sounds like a very cool idea.

Haha, I'm not sure I'll ever be good enough to 100% GX, but it's still so much fun to play Thank you, I'm really glad you enjoyed it! And welcome aboard!

WiiU ports sell over 10 million units, original games only 1.2 million.

I have long since thought that this guy has some personal grudge against the F Zero franchise. He only gives lazy excuses as to why there isn't another one. Even someone with half a functioning brain could see all you would need to do is give it the same treatment as any other modern racing title. Basically all the things you listed above.

​@@blaynegreiner9365 well here's the deal, the games never really sold that well. I looked around for some sale figures (tho I didn't do too much of an in depth analysis, so correct me if I'm wrong) but literally every single other franchize Nintendo made keept outperforming F-Zero. On top of that remakes and VC releases tend to get fraction of the original sales, so even if we are generous I can't see GX remake/re-release selling well and thus why should Nintendo bother? Don't get me wrong I like F-Zero, but Nintendo is a business and business needs to make money to be successful and F-Zero doesn't make enough money.

@@Nuggette What I said has nothing to do with sales figures. It has to do with what he has said about the franchise.

@@blaynegreiner9365 yeah and I told you why he keeps making those lazy excuses. If we were to trust him then yeah there is nothing here that can be done that wasn't done before. Regardless why would he hold grudge against F-Zero? At worst people keep pestering him about releasing a new one. If anything Miyamoto would hold personal grudge against Star Fox, a game frenchize he himself managed to ruin, by sabotaging the studio working on Star Fox 2 ensuring that every Star Fox will be basically just the snes game and making Rare turn their Dino Planet game into Star Fox Adventures. tl;dr it seems more likely that the excuses are made because of money and it's much more likely that Miyamoto hold a grudge against Star Fox rather than F-Zero a frenchize that he doesn't seem to care about.

Why does no one mention all the Zelda series-milking? I'm sick of Zelda games, too.

The fact that Miyamoto doesn't know what to add means that F-Zero GX must have been perfect. Other companies would then bleed this dry with release after release, each one functionally identical but with new maps and a new story. This game could be for Nintendo what Call of Duty is for Treyarch. The ultimate Cash Cow. The Holy Grail. It needs no introduction, it needs no change. Each new game for each new generation only needs a graphical upgrade, a balance tweak, a bugfix, and a new set of maps.