He got clapped by a 21 year old 😂😂 how embarrassing

Distracting? 🙄 you saying it like you are the one playing there 😂

its just the begining mate, in several years the central court will called apu najasapetilan, thanks to labourist

What do you mean murray warwrinka del potro berdych hishikori thiem tsonga raonic and ferrer etc exists😂😂😂

@@Holyspace305 I respect everyone's efforts and success. Take a look at the grand success of the names you mentioned and the ones I gave as examples. Even the 1 name I gave were great players who won more championships than the sum of the ones you mentioned. The tennis players you mentioned are as good as the other names that I did not comment on so that it would not be long. I write this as someone who personally followed the tennis players of the 80s and 90s and watched their matches even on TV. I respect your opinion too. These are my own thoughts

@@user-cj3tb8dt6j This is a very casual take tbh. There are only so many titles to be had, and because the Big 3 were so dominant, there were less titles for the others to take as a result. What I mean is, it's dumb to say "these guys barely won slams, so they're not legends and therefore the talent was lacking". Say ALL other things remained the same (the talent of all those players you mentioned in the 80s and 90s), except Sampras, Agassi, and Becker were even better and each won 30 slams. It would leave slim pickings for the rest of the group, and by your logic, you'd be forced to say that the rest of the players weren't "great". The Big 3 simply elevated their tennis to another level, in the likes that we've never seen before. Other players were still able to compete at times of course, but no one was able to maintain the consistency of quality and level, across all three surfaces for even close to what they did.

@@raymondfan2402 I didn't write anything in my comment about disparaging the big 3. What I said was this; In the periods I mentioned, the number of classy tennis players was higher than today. This trio opened up a gap with their rivals because their rivals were not of the class I mentioned in that period. This is my personal opinion. Again, this would be a trio, but I say all three of them would not have 20 championships. Maybe if one or two of them had exceeded 20, I would not have made this comment, but I think it would be foolish to attribute the fact that 3 tennis players played in the same period and won 20 or more GS only to their class. Still, I respect your opinion. After all, it was a chance for us to watch these good tennis players.

@@user-cj3tb8dt6j I know you're not disparaging the big 3. I think we both agree on the fact that the gap between the big 3 and the rest of their competition is bigger compared to the gap between the likes of Sampras, Agassi, and their competition. If that's all you are saying, then that's fair game. However, some of the claims you made make it seem like you think that the competition of the 80's and 90's were superior in skill to that of the competition of the Big 3, and that your justification for this is that the likes of Murray, Del Potro, Wawrinka, Thiem, etc don't have that many big titles to their name. My claim is that number of titles doesn't mean anything because the Big 3 were just so much better than the likes of Sampras and Agassi, that if you put the talent and game of these 3 back in the 80s and 90s in place of the players who dominated the most back then, they would have won just as much against the competition of those eras.

Seriously, did anyone expect Musetti to even make it to the quarters? 😏

Aur commentary bhi kaisi,Bohat boring🤮

Obviously, you only watched the beginning of the video and don't realize that empty seats at the start are very common in tennis matches. Now, the ticket prices for the finals have skyrocketed to the highest in the history of sports events.

Are you a hater of nole or a casual ?

If you want English commentary, then learn to become satisfied with English highlights. 🤔

'cause everyone knew it would be a yawner. 😴

as a spaniard, dont sell the bear skin before haunting

@mariocortes4534 Alcaraz is battle tested unlike Novak who has only played 1 or 2 top 5 players the whole year. He cannot just flip the switch and have his A game.

@@loganeldred9353 yeah mate, alcaraz now is on fire and novak doesn,t have the rythim high level competicion, but novak is the goat alot finals in his back, experience, anyways what a magnificent final may the best win!!

@@loganeldred9353: Yes he can.

@notsohandytim5090 but lower chance than last year. This time Alcaraz has more experience and is more confident.