It has already started see Svante Pabo and his work in a German lab.

Imagine the poor kid growing up, knowing he was cloned from cave man poop...

I'm pretty sure our ancestors never lived in caves. They were just stop-overs that fortunately preserve evidence well - in part because people rarely go there, ironically. Elsewhere, timber and mud brick homes are soon washed away without trace.

Scary

I think that would be a great thing to do. We are the result of all the inhabitants of our planet in one way or another. DNA is the most direct of example but so is who we cohabitated with in domestic situations.

Probably not. Jurassic Park probably has a lot of people thinking we have a much better record of ancient DNA than we actually do.

Pre human, no.

So climate warming was there millions of years before modern humans?! 🙄 #FakeMorality #ESG #GreenCorrption

@@KimS_Pictureinpapre-humans are at least 2.8 million years old. But that is in Africa.

Yep

it is impossible, they like seeing just how gullible people can be

@@vade137 Or in your case how ignorant some are!

@@williamjackson5942 good luck with life Mr. Jackson.

I always believed it was possible and never understood why it could not be possible if the molecules are isolated and shielded. A professional geneticist told me that she thought it would never be possible when I proposed the possibility years ago. And, here we are. Nature doesn't care if we think the unlikely is impossible. I think that if it is even minutely mathematically probable, then it will arise somewhere in the infinity of existence.

@@gandolph999 Either the decay rates are way off, or the deep time paradigm is way off. It's interesting how one is immediately considered to be the case.

True, but these samples are only about 2 million years old. Hominids go back 5 or 6 million years. Though modern humans are probably a little bit less than a million years old.

By arranging atoms and molecules, what kind of creatures could we create for the future and for beyond 'Earth'?

@@charlesbrightman4237 There's a cool old sci-fi short story about parents saying goodbye to their kid who is leaving to colonize another planet. The kid's genetic modifications to be adapted to that new planet are described in some detail (I don't remember). The theme is very much about this very alien looking kid still being 'human' and loved by their parents. The twist comes at the very end when it describes the parents slowly walking away on their thick four legs (modifications for high gravity). That's not terribly realistic IMO. I don't think humans will bother settling on the surface of other planet... Makes more sense to just build habitats in space which have exactly the conditions you want. But we will use modified organisms for all sorts of things. Ultimately, materials are all mined, drilled, or grown... And grown is much more flexible/powerful.

@@travcollier Well, here is a thing: Either at least 1 single species from this Earth survives beyond this Earth, solar system and most probably collapsing spiral shaped galaxy, OR none will. EXISTENTIAL ANALYSIS: (copy and paste from my files): "Intelligence Preparation of the Battlespace" 1. Define who and/or what is the true enemy. 2. Then define the battlespace. Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature has given us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. 1. Define who and/or what is the true enemy. NATURE. 2. Then define the battlespace. Initially, this Earth, then this solar system, then most probably collapsing spiral shaped galaxy, then possibly even every galaxy in the universe that might collapse in upon themselves. (And the universe is not going to end in a big freeze). So finally, the universe is the ultimate battlespace. Notes: a. Besides mass extinction events here upon this Earth (possibly the 6th has already started due to Earth's magnetism issues), and the 6th won't be the last; b. The Sun is supposed to become a red giant one day and will wipe out all life on this Earth if not even this entire Earth itself. (Sure, a long time from now, but the destination is set like a way point on a journey). c. Our spiral shaped galaxy is most probably collapsing in upon itself and depending upon what is really true in this universe, possibly all galaxies eventually collapse in upon themselves. d. Either at least 1 single species on and from this Earth survives throughout literally all of future eternity OR none do. Currently it appears that none will. Currently it appears life itself is ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things and currently it appears all of life itself, (at least from this Earth), is a waste of spacetime in this universal existence. e. We do not have to defeat enemies here upon this Earth, we only have to outlast them. Nature will wipe them all out for us. * Existential Analysis from the Blue Monk of the North, currently at Ice Station Charlie, USA.

@@charlesbrightman4237 I'm an evolutionary biologist, for reals... PhD and everything. Really long term thinking is one of the things I think I do pretty well ;)

How about Dick Tracy with his wrist phone?

Maybe they dont need to have the Govt point a gun at my head and steal form me to pay for it?

😊

Water dissolves DNA

Hello 👋 how are you doing?

😂 your mom

I too thought of this. But I've come to the conclusion that climatic changes are more likely the cause of a warm Greenland. An increase of less than 3° C in North Atlantic Current could raise Arctic temperatures significantly. For 65 million years reptiles had it warm enough to inhabit the entire planet. The glacial period during which our species matured seems, to me, to be the interruption of an overall warm planet since the first thawing of "Snowball Earth". We humans have evolved in a temporary "cold" era, that is (I think) drawing to a close. We filled a niche position in the beginning, for a world growing colder. But are we still as adaptable as our proto human ancestors? Can we cope, even thrive, in a hot world? I believe we are on the verge of answering those questions.

If you're asking that, you're probably aware that the Earth's axis DOES change angle, on a 40,000 year cycle (one of the Milankovitch cycles). But only by about one degree. That DOES play a role in ice ages and other types of global climate change, but by itself it's not enough to drive it. Many other factors play a role as well.

@@araptuga I agree. And that 40K year cycle doesn't really correspond well to the ice ages. I'm of the opinion that it is fluctuations of solar output, at least as triggering events. We call our orbit "The Goldielocks Zone" and it is. But we are much closer to the fire than Mars, which is a cold planet. And we have a massive volcanic heating system. It would therefore be logical that we would be a hot, wet, planet a great deal more of the time than a partially frozen one. Think the Amazon Rain Forrest from Florida to the Appalachian Mountains. 👀

Global warming

araptuga I wasn't actually. Just the fact that there are tropical like waters there would indicate so. What other factors if you don't mind me asking?

Or warm

Lol

@@iamshango3005 It's nice when any dissent is censored. The contradictions in their story never get challenged.

@@johndodson8464 Seriously? Many warm weather areas became ice covered as we have gone through several ice ages. Damn, go back to school.

@@leehamilton4459 Wow, cuss words really show your pedigree. I'll go back and read that chapter about horseshoe crabs wearing parkas.

It’s the most awesome force this planet has ever seen

Almost like it happened way too quick like we never saw it

@@iamshango3005 That is how advancement goes. You will have decades or centuries without any "big" discovery, and then it only takes one thing to jump start a revolution. Maybe you should study history instead of claiming things are fake.

Boggles my mind how yall believe that someone can say something is over millions of years old

@@Finduski Stop being "boggled" and start getting educated. Open a science book, Google it, do something other then sitting in your ignorance. It confuses you because you don't understand it so learn about it. Religions like to keep people stupid and scared so that they can control you. Don't be one of those who refuses to do their research and just believes what they are told. You can learn for yourself how scientists come to this conclusion. And if you think that all of these scientist are wrong, then prove them wrong, you might win a nobel prize if you can show that they are wrong. But saying that they are wrong because you don't understand, just makes you look silly.

Have we?

Dramatic recreation.

Biden's colon!

How could the make money? You also need to remember the intelligence bell curve

As far as I can tell, there is not any evidence that life on earth has ever been silicon based. Fun to speculate though!

Wrong

Thanks for sharing your poem. That’s fun!

Inspirational 👍

Wow! I love it! 😊

The perfect question. The answer? Climate goes in cycles, it is not man made.

He sounds like Governor Awwwnulled to me.

If you're talking about the kind of skulls I think you you are, those skulls were shaped by binding them with boards, fabric and twine as infants, not because they were alien hybrids, or some such nonsense. They were entirely human. Don't be more embarrassing than you have to be.

@@DrachenGothik666 I’m not embarrassed for asking questions but you should be for being so sure of something. It’s definitely not cranial binding in *every* case lol that doesn’t increase brain volume remove sagital sutures change spine position etc. And we are definitely a hybrid species with them alien or otherwise. And so what if some of them were cranial binding it was because there parents had the feature and their hybrid kids didn’t so they were trying to retain it. And I could be wrong but that’s why I’m saying they have better ancient dna testing technology and they haven’t identified the father of any of the samples as far as I know but they all came from the Black Sea region where you have not so far the ancient Sumerian whos religion one of the oldest in the world specifically says just that that they are aliens and the Egyptians of which Akhenaten matches anatomically the paracas not just match but identical and they are found near megaliths all over the world. It’s okay with me either way but the evidence can’t be ignored and should be investigated further.

Because that's not true and it's you who never comes to the conclusion that it's way older than you think it is.

Many years of dinners and flowers 💐

That isn’t a method used to make such a determination.

​@@moonshoes11 I know but the method that is used is definitely less than 100% accurate. Lots of it is guesswork based on nothing definite.

@@mikeabc5355 Dude, you’re looking for a certificate. You know nothing about the methods used or their accuracy. And you probably believe in magic.

@@moonshoes11 “dude you’re looking for a certificate” clapback of 2022 thank you mr Moon 😂❤

@@moonshoes11 Ahmmmmm, you do. It was self riches low IQ individuals that insisted vaccines would prevent you from getting covid and passing it to others but as it turned out it was all BS, however, the pharmaceutical industry made billions. Science is going from one error to another. At one time bleeding a person with fiver was leading-edge science but completely wrong. Don't be so dogmatic and think that your delusion is absolute truth. Do you belive in absolutes?

As far as finding sequence-able DNA is concerned, quite possibly.🙂

God is imaginary. Please don't inject your stupid mythology into scientific inquiry. It has no place, here.

So did god create Adam or was he already in the clay?