говорят, они очень громкие, это правда?

@@zx3215 да. Но это каким то образом зависит от погодных условий и еще чего то.. На посадке с 6 км расстояния их может быть вообще не слышно, но на взлете ревут дай боже. Впрочем, как и на эшелоне - их звук не спутаешь с другими винтовыми. Ну а Ту-160 это отдельная песня!))

Нам ваши приветы не нужны вы всегда предавали Россию сейчас предаёт и будете предавать жалкие и убогие марионетки

😀 Ракета гораздо быстрее и надежнее

not correct, the oldes frame was produced in 1980s

Летающая братская могила.

​@@user-lx1ik7zc6zдля вас сделает братскую свиномогильню это точно

Мне он тоже больше всех нравится.

named bear. but looks more like a whale 🐋🐳 that white mouth. Big boy anyway.

Oh no, Airbus A400M Atlas is one more, and some 20 more airplanes historically

It's the fastest turboprop plane,but not the only, lots of heavy hollers are turboprop

His older brother tu-114...

The most interesting thing, many do not know this, the tips of the Tu-95 propellers rotate at _supersonic_ speed (radial speed)! That is why such a specific rumble emanates from the Tu-95...

@@maksimluzin1121 Big R of these propellers x number of RPM make supersonic LINEAR speed of the propeller tops.

они снимают но их блокируют тут

@@user-ly2vt4jl6m Мне кажется смешным, что многие из нас здесь, на Западе, знают, что происходит клоунское шоу. Наше правительство и зло в США. Я всегда был поклонником российских самолетов и военной техники. Моими личными фаворитами особенно являются старые самолеты времен Холодной войны МиГ-21 и Су-27.

Indeed, here is the neutral document about the head of Soviet version of Project Manhattan: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jbJ3iLqVx9q6g2g.html

@@karoltomis5704 Thank you.

It's a old show

the Russians are not in a fight.... They control Ukraine......

If this is some kind of inscrutably ironic level-80 jab, you should know, pal, that these are no hangar queens. And sure enough, they will be reupdated and re-evaluated in the coming years.

@@Gav_na_tebya It means that it is incredibly wasteful to spend the money to modernize a plane that will only be usable for 10 years. It’s the sort of thing you do when you have no other choice. In any functional economy it would be considered a stopgap; a failure of planning. It would only be done to tide the Air Force over until a replacement is operational. The US did something similar with b-52, if you squint, but they understood cost/ benefit analysis which is why the b-52 modernization includes a 30+ year service life extension.

​@@Gav_na_tebyaLets rebuild this whole car to drive another month 😂

@faultboy The pot calling the kettle black))) You think Russia is wasting money, not Pentagon throwing good money after the bad with the air carriers and F-35s?! What's the next year's budget over there, a few bn south of one trillion? GTFO)))

Russian can’t afford HD

@@godzillaeatsushi4979 Russia can afford to shoot a movie on the ISS; in Russia, most people have more modern technology at home than in other countries. Keep believing all the propaganda, you naive fool)

​@@melanesia3282ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

ты будешь смеяться, но до сих пор у США нет технологии туалета в космосе, они все время срали в подгузники, а на международной станции стоят российские туалеты.

Sí. Tu-95 tiene un Inodoro. Inodoro sin drenaje. Es más bien un cubo con una tapa, detrás de una cortina, que se saca a mano después de aterrizar.

​@@AlexanderTchIt seems to me that you have something like a bucket with a lid on your head, and a specialized vacuum urinal is installed on board the Tu-95.

Yes, Americans don't have restrooms in B52, maybe that's why they always wear diapers like babies😂

​@@whitehouse.gov.😂😂😂

Funniest fact- the freedom is already here. Dictatorship seems the Western policy now. At least, no one russians ,even dead drunk, cant even imagine to trow out foreigners out of a family car and arrest it, just for lulz. Europeans officials - did it easy.

U mean hospitals and residental areas i guess? Or doesnt that fact goe by the propagandafilter?

Ka pietz ka kruta!

250,000 casualties and growing by the day!

Glory to Ukraine 🇺🇦

From America, just stop attacking other people! Stay in your own lane! You have the biggest country by land mass ALREADY, without ANY further land acquisition. We love the Russian people, we have NO DESIRE to fight you. WE DO NOT WANT WAR. I want to come VISIT beautiful Russia, as a tourist at peace. But if you don’t keep your hands to yourself, we will have to fight. And I believe we would win that fight but, I shudder to think what that victory may look like, what would be left of the world and all her people.

Indeed!

Captions are good enough, I like russki language sound.

By many request of visitors in comments, they changed voice to subtitles.

@@maksimluzin1121 makes sense. The English voice (tone, cadence, etc.) was an interesting choice haha.

@@shmeckle666, For the voice translation it was a real human, it is an automatic machine translation to subtitles now. As a Russian, who speak English quite well, it has a lot of mistakes, especially with the military jargon words or abbreviations in Russian.

У чи русский язык если хочешь комфортно смотреть если нет жилания учить не смотри тогда. Вообще

Да не летает Ту-95МС 70 лет! Самый старый - 1978 г, самый новый - то ли 92, то ли 93 - где 70 лет-то? Те модификации, которым 70 лет, распилены давно, все МС строились заново. А вот самому новому B-52 - и правда за 60.

Enquanto a América financia guerras em terras extrangeiras o povo do Havaí morre queimado e sem apoio da América irônico não.

The US still cant win the war in Ukraine that's sad all the money and western military burning up. Best way to disarm NATO and America of their military weapons.

Pending of geography, we might see mushroom clouds in the neighborhood near you!

Тебе лечиться нужно, говоришь ни думая ни хрена

London test field

СССР это и есть Россия, только с нахлебниками

Не бреши. Не только калоши, а всё делали, и зачастую лучшее в мире. За 22 года тоже многое сделали. А твои американские хозяева за 22 года что сделали?

@@AlexanderTch мои родные будет тебе известно рождённые в СССР а своих гомосеков вместе с нынешней властью засунь в одно место импотентов 22 года воровства да хвастовства.......

@@AlexanderTch не бреши можешь нашему елбасы сказать это его слова... И спросить за все 22 года его правления куда мы приплыли и ещё куда приплывем с вороватыми чиновниками и олигархами..... И что он тебе ответит интересно......?!?

interesting take... my American city is a very nice place, not "crumbling" like you say.

Aircrews fly better drunk as it makes getting lead for your guns difficult and the missiles struggle to understand how the pilot did laps around the missile in a 50T bomber.

@@imightbehum4n414 Do you even speak english? the fuck did you just say?!?

Yea it’s super dangerous, us Americans were really scared because we didn’t know what the last M in MSM stood for, but now that we know the plane has been modernized since 2015, and how, we are ready to take on all 4000 of them. Or however many there are. If only we could figure out how you sneaky Russians solved the mystery of contra-rotating props!

Doon.t look.

@@user-oc4lk75 Your English is really rubbish 😂😂

@@user-oc4lk75 You need to go and improve your English 😂😂

Nah

And what is your point? You have not even managed to hurt me, you are awful person and dishonored that don't even do what you promised to do....

@@jamesmandahl444 so tell me why "nah"

@@petrcharvat8296 Petr, as you said, anyone willing to make "fun" of Russia and our weapons are welcomed to the battlefield. Don't be shy, come on over to the trenchline and we will laugh together. In your statement Ukraine is poor, Russia is poor, everyone is poor. Petr is rich and wealthy and happy. So be it.

The whole point in Ukraine Russia is making NATO and America waste their stock piles of weapons. The west cant keep up with making missiles, shells, and tanks that Russia is destroying in Ukraine.

You lie. Two types of jet engines exist - turboprop and turbofan. Turboprop is also jet engine with some differences in construction with Turbofans but it also have nozzles, compressors, etc. . It's more economical but can't be very fast. 8 turbofan engines consume much much more than 4 turboprop engines. B-52 burns entire train of fuel in one flight. So, why Tu-95 should care if it can accomplish all types of missions. Yes, it has less payload, but who cares? B-52 was often used for carpet bombing of cities of Vietnam and Iraq that didnt' have anti aircraft defense. Tu-95 does not carry any bombs at all. It's more like flying nuclear strategic submarine and carries the same number of strategic missiles as most submarines do. And you lie about 45 hours. Give me links please, When and where it happened. One flight of B-52 is extremely expensive. that's why Tu-95 patrols everywhere around the plannet. while B-52 just stays in bases and rust. Last B-52 that USA uses was built in 1962 and never built since then. Russia uses only latest modification - MS., that was built in 80s and 90s. So, Russian strategic bomber is 30 years younger than USA's

Tu-95 mission today is to carry long range guided missiles-including hypersonic missiles. It doesn't carry gravity bombs anymore, so gross weapon load is immaterial. It has been very effective carrying these missiles in the Ukraine conflict. As for the 'jet engines vs turboprop', that's kind of a meaningless comparison.Turboprops are simply jet engines with the intake vanes on the outside of the engine cowling-everything else including compression section, combustion chamber and turbine section is exactly the same as a conventional jet engine. So why use turboprops instead of classical jet engines-they are more economical on fuel for one reason. Douglas Aircraft considered going from fanjets to propjets on it's DC-9 series airliner, for fuel economy reasons. Yes, the Tu-95 cruises at roughly 80 MPH slower than the B-52, but that really doesn't impact it's mission so it's meaningless. The one valid criticism of the Tu-95 is that it has been very loud in operation (so is the B-52, but at a higher sound frequency!), but Russia is upgrading their fleet with new improved engines and new props, intended to reduce noise and vibration significantly. It really has been and remains a viable bomber for the mission it is fulfilling, I expect them to continue to be updated for another 15-20 years.