@@acc4465 Eisenhower was a weak man? Really?

None of these labels mean anything get real

It is war that is evil. There was no good option.

​@@acc4465aren't there actual quotes from generals that participated in ww2 that said it was unnecessary and that japan was already on in the process of surrender?

Nailed it!

WW-2 sure was a big business spinner.

Wow man. That’s an experience 😮

that's because children have no concept of death. all you've conveyed to the general public for whatever reasons, us that you've never found the capacity to mature past the infantile disrespect of death.

" there's a fine line between bravery and stupidity. "

@@ian.swift.31614 well he had no choice. it wasn't stupid. He didn't know the bomb wasn't coming

just to be clear, how much time does a family of 4+ have at their Disposal take cover in a bunker incase of a Nuke attack? 😂 not mentioning that there will be a ton of traffic everywhere.

Tulsi keeps saying “our country”. The poor thing thinks that she’s in India.😂😂😂

It will be something more beautiful than this life trust me. Life stopped at 2015. Now i know u can feel thr evil spirit today more than in a 2nd world war. Cuz evil is not just war. Evil is worse than any war which exist today.

@@user-yt7hq5jg1jwhy 2015?? Just curious as to why u say that, I feel that’s when a lot changed too

@@stephv6299 cuz the bible told us what happened and what will happen. And it will become worse and worse till the judgement day. I believe this not only cuz im religious but cuz it really happened everything God said starting from the animals such as dinosaurs that God later destroyed now we find fossils of them. I will just say one thing it will become worse on earth and no one can save us cuz thats what will happen. This earth will be destroyed even if we all become religious. But how we will be saved is in heaven or no. But this earth will be destroyed cuz God said so.

And it is still true. If the weapons are used on military assets life would go on in the usa, a lot of casualties but not the end.

​@@benhecker1704Negative , friend. It will be the end of life as we know it. Have you heard of nuclear fallout? Nuclear winter? Radiation? Poisoned everything? Think.

@@retiredbiker676 you are the one reacting not thinking. You have any idea how many devices would be needed to destroy America? Tens of thousands. Stop getting your information from crappy action movies. We learned a lot about the collateral effects of nuclear detonations from the Japanese bombs and subsequent testing. Even with the Japanese bombs there was fairly minimal collateral effects. In the late 70s early 80s the ussr had fewer bombs, unreliable delivery systems, and unreliable bombs. In the early 80s the ussr would have had to have held a bake sale to fuel the aircraft for bombing runs they were so broke

​@benhecker1704 Art Bell did a show with an expert on nuclear war 6 or 7 years ago. I believe his name was Steven Starr. It's on KZfaq. Have a listen and see how you feel about that comment.

What’s the alternative? They create a plan that says we all die at the very end? That seems worse.

You mean for people that's put there Faith in this world an not the Next?

@@BradleyLoomis-wq9yf valid point

@@BradleyLoomis-wq9yf There is no next.

It is.

​@@BradleyLoomis-wq9yfYou can have faith in anything you want. But you have to live here in the meantime. What you said is not a satisfactory way to do that. Faith in what's next, does nothing about what's now.

true, because if it can be developed, then someone will develop it, just because of fear of others having it and them not having it. It becomes a self defence, deterrence thing. So far, most people having it has stopped anyone from using it.

I hate it when people vote in fantasy land. Everyone saying no nukes are the same people that lock there front door every night. If they’re afraid enough to lock there doors then clearly they believe in nukes for America. And if they don’t lock there front doors then they should post that online for everyone to know. If they’re not willing to post there address online with everyone knowing they leave there doors unlocked. Then why would I be okay with telling the world we don’t have nukes.

Sadly, those who know how to do so are the most guarded people on Earth. It is possible. Just not by the Me's or U's.

Believe it or not, we have had less destruction around the world since the development of nukes.

@@jasonolinger7585 And for how many years into the future will that bode true? 'Tis a number.

Co-Evil

Actually that was China but okay

China and Democrats are friends. Covid. and Economy sanctions deleted by Biden and millions to Hunter Biden too.

Response was started by Trump

“Democracy” doesn’t mean anything when public opinion is manipulated by the media, which is in the hands of a very few people

Exactly. The problem is that the population of America is propagandized and lacks the ability to critically think

Madmen rule the world .

More Japanese civilians died by incendiary bombs dropped on Japan then died by nuclear bombs. The ratio is about one to two thirds more died by conventional bombs. Does that make a difference in your opinion?

People are too comfortable to such a degree that they look at nuclear war as a ''oh it can be ended whenever ''

​@@Holt817 it probably won't because they obviously lack critical thinking skills if they can't understand why we were pushed to using such an awful weapon. They'd have thrown every last one of themselves at us because they thought they had a chance. Such a display of power was necessary to literally scare people that weren't afraid to die...

~Believe they not telling us the whole thing...someone wants the Land.....

The official story is that it was an accident, but it seems like I remember reading somewhere that it may have been intentionally ordered by the military and intelligence agencies just to see how people would react. The motive was to gauge the chaos and panic so they could devise civilian chaos management plans.

Didn't they only talk about building 7 specifically? I know they spoke in general about the messaging that was provided by the government at the time. The problem is, when the government puts out disputable information - presumably to cover their ineptitude - it causes skepticism about the WHOLE narrative. Horrible approach that only furthered people's distrust in the government.

Some things are better left unquestioned...

​@@publicreview01 What a dumb thing to say

That is typical establishments procedure for discrediting and destroying public image of their opponents

@@publicreview01 The point he was trying to make is that you can’t have honesty without transparency. So he was going through all these different things throughout history that are shrouded in secrecy and questioning why they refuse to be transparent if they have nothing to hide

I’m moving to mars!

The winners come back in a world with a greatly reduced population. No way would they get everyone. Tulsi even says it. ‘They have bunkers.’ Disturbing incentives exist for some to launch.

The real motto of the US government is "We're not happy till you're not happy."

Ohh there will be winners after a nuclear war. They will be known as Warlords

Ronald Reagan amnestied Mexico and turned the west blue forever. He created nafta and the brady bill. Stop lionizing this neoliberal.

That's BS

@@Way2EasyDIY okay, if you say so. It's not like there aren't DOCUMENTARIES dedicated to this topic.

K-129 went down due to mechanical failure, most likely, nothing more. There were no survivors to relay such a fantastical story. The only item returned to the Soviets was the sub's bell.

@@Way2EasyDIY No, it's not B.S. it's actually a well known story. Vasili Alexandrovich Arkhipov was the man who essentially saved the world.

😅😅😅 I can't, I just can't, this is too funny. This is total BS 😅😅😅

Thats what tulsi said it only takes 1

You are of course right, however, conventional methods kill countless millions every decade. For instance the US sponsored war on Iran, in 1980, killed over 2 million. The other scary piece is that there are lots of tiny nukes, that would just wipe out a company in an area of a few miles. Arguments rage as to whether that would escalate to Armageddon. That certainly isn't why they exist. It is interesting that the US is essentially in a war with it's nuclear peer, at this very moment, and it seems to be romping along without fear of a wider war. Didn't see that coming.

Most of the ones have have today are comparable if not smaller, Tulsa is an idiot

Well technically the ones we have today are a lot better. Yes they blow up bigger, but they are not made of highly radioactive materials. Ie no nuclear fallout or any of that. Just a very large blast.

​ That's just blatantly not true at all.

Your story is why I hate hearing people criticize using the nukes in WWII. With our tech today, we have other options, but based on what they had in that day and the ignorance of the consequences, those nukes accomplished their goal, and saved exponentially more lives, including many Japanese and Chinese folks, than the lives lost in the 2 cities. The bombs killed around 250,000 (give or take) civilians, which is horrific, absolutely. However, the traditional warfare in just the Asia Pacific theater, before the bombs were dropped, saw 19 Million civilian deaths, the majority being Chinese, which makes the nuke casualties seem insignificant. Even in Japan, there were a million civilians killed before the bombs were dropped. So not even counting the saved American lives, there would have been an untold number of additional millions of Chines and Japanese civilians killed if those bombs were not dropped, and Tucker is like, "Yeah, that would have been better". Tucker would sacrifice another 25+ million lives in order to save 250,000. The math doesn't add up to me.

@@RageDaug Japan was bottled up on their islands with their navy sunk or scattered and out of supply, cut off from China. The only need for speed was to keep the Russians from taking more than the Kuriles. Those first two and still the only uses of nuclear weapons were the first acts in the Cold War. And no one needed that war either. Except warmongers who blame their actions on other people. Your argument of millions more casualties is hypothetical and unproven itself so it can not hold any logical water. More civilians were killed in the firebombing of Tokyo previous to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. To claim we would have "needed" to kill millions more is just an argument that makes the US out to be more bloody minded than their adversaries in WWII. There's plenty of evidence that the Japanese understood the hopelessness of their situation and were ready to surrender after Tokyo was destroyed by napalm.

It's NEVER wrong to question and debate. Right or wrong.

So cause ya old man got his balls molly whopped in Japan, we need to nuke ppl? Why are you defending dropping nukes on ppl bro. Must be a democrap.

@@lemoynecastle6213both you guys are speaking about hypotheticals as if your side is proven. The Japanese were determined to the literal point of suicide. You cannot assume they were ready to surrender, nor can you assume how many lives would have been lost without the bombs

Nor speak of complete abolishment of the federal government, and all of its bureaucracies. This is why there was intense debate by the framers of the US Constitution about this very matter.

I'm a time traveler and we actually tried that. Turns out he gets around to it no matter what. He got into art school but he went ballistic when his work wasn't accepted into the local museum 😢

There would had been another one like him if not worse. Hitler was not the cause of the path German went on, but the fruit of the path German (thanks to the Treaty of Versailles) had already gone on.

@@meisong0717 Yeah, Hitler didn’t single handedly take Germany that direction. With or without him, Nazi Germany was decades in the making.

My time travel fantasy is to rather go back and plant some common sense into Tsar Nicholas II to not mobilise in July 1914 (& avoid the 1904-05 war with Japan as well, etc.), preventing WW2 and Hitler by stopping WWI along with the Russian Revolution. But who really knows how it would have ended.

Umm he still becomes a German Infantryman and goes on to lead a nation to destruction

Just she need to explain that to putin

@@piotrsie5465putin never used one ,USA dropped

@@jibriilmohamed6080 so? It is russia that is talking about using nuclear weapons all the time right now

Duh- what tucker said. Gabb is a fake and most def a rino

she is a lier shes all for israeli war crimes but against Ukraine and russia war she is bought by the zionist

Not blind faith though. Facts and evidence rebuts silly conspiracy theories.

Can't tell if she's just trying to insult him or if she's really that ignorant

I don’t know who he is either. Most people don’t.

@@anacc3257 why should somebody be ignorant for not know who Jeremy Boreing is? Some people lead busy productive lives

These people always pretend they dont know someone ​@anacc3257

Never heard of him either

Says who? We've had less war in the last hundred years than in any period of human history- that's a fact and directly attributable to major powers posseting the bomb. Mutually Assured Destruction encourages diplomacy more than anything else humans have ever devised. Self preservation is a pretty good motivator to come to terms. ;

That is our major threat

Their kids don't serve in the army, so they don't have a problem when they want to wage a war cos they will flee the country easily when the war gets to their door

They said Trump will be the end of us all, meanwhile, under the kid sniffer the US looks like a suicide bomber threatening the howl world.

But there's a chance Israel can win the nuclear war

Yep

Actuall it is Main Stream Media

Do you have any data to back up the idea that nuclear weapons have caused more problems than they've solved? For one, they lead to nuclear reactors, which were a pretty amazing thing.

Alcohol is high up there too

Never take social media influencers seriously 😂😂😂 they think they know everything but real fact is they don't know anything 😂😂😂 they just talk and give bold statements

Just heard that lol.

Based 4 chinner just saw ur pfp kek. Let's accelerate this shit

@@Sl33zytheclownwanna see mineb

It’s actually kind of embarrassing. If she’s in politics and doesn’t even know who the big players in the game are. Whether you like Jeremy or not, I’m sure most left is out there know who he is. Not knowing who someone that big and conservative circles is is kind of crazy.

Way to rip off Conor McGregor. “Who da fook is that guy?!”.

Satan: i will win tho

2020 sure was an IQ test.

Ask the Japanese who lost a nuclear war.

@@lescobrandon3047 Thats a good one. I give you that. What everyone means is the next nuclear exchange. Its turned into a powder cake now. If the US had used it after the second world war on USSR or China. We probably would have avoided the cold war or the scary times now. But imagine the blood on ones hands if someone did push the button.

An ignorant statement, japan lost the first one. Arguably Russia lost the second, although no weapons were used

TRUTH!!!!!!

This is naive. pols perfectly reflect society. Garbage in, garbage out. Whether due to low IQs, propaganda, religion, immorality, ignorance or whatever. You make your own bed.

Tusli is an example of compromise. I agree 80%. Disagree 20%. What to do? Look at the opponent! If it is agree 79%, disagree 21%, the numbers are clear. Vote the numbers. Vote what you agree.

She is right wing Obama, scary compromise.

That's a story to be remembered. Nobody ever hears about the ripple effects of these kind of events.

I would question that this happened, either a) it happened and this person just disclosed restricted information and is guilty of a felony, or b) it is bs.

@@benhecker1704 you need to reread OP and try again. This isn’t your “gotcha” moment.

@@anson.meadows was not a "gotcha" and what I said was true. Not sure what you mean. In the statement we have description of use, and location of a secured site

@@benhecker1704 I’m guessing you weren’t in the military or you would understand that the story I shared is not disclosing ‘restricted’ or better put, ‘controlled’ or ‘classified’ information.

"Nuclear War" is the boogey man the isolationists use to cudgel their opponents. It's the same morally as saying that only black people can speak on poverty or how to police crime.

You country has gone mad when people make ignorant statements about something they obviously know nothing.

I look forward to the post apocalyptic world

@@HipHopCantSaveMe me too can’t wait to become a ghoul so I can finally stand up out m wheelchair🤣

@@HipHopCantSaveMewhat if You are not the one who gets too see it ? What if u die as well , I know it’s a romantic idea to see the post landscape, but the reality is the super rich and politicians will probably make it and we all go .. the very people who created the war will be the survivors … smh

We are resilient. Hiroshima and Nagasaki are huge cities now. As someone who spent a lot of time in war zones I refuse to live in fear. We should be mindful of these issues but not let it consume us.

Your question is equivalent to asking "who wants to live?" Obviously everybody.

Stop simping

@@mohammedkhaliq1475 Telling the truth is not simping!

Smart enough to be anti 2A. She’s a snake.

Tulsi is pro Israel and a big war monger. A total snake.

​@@rogerjensen5277found another simp! 🤣🤡

Elaborate... Your statement is too broad for clarity.

Yeah give more details. I’m cynical but sometimes people are the real deal.

Translation- she hot!😍

It means she is good looking

Smoke show is a compliment

Hos comments were absolutely foolish.

Tucker’s response was infantile reasoning at best.

@@STELLASCUTENESS Can you elaborate your response? Your response doesn't really merit your claim, as your own response is so basic and lacking, but please elaborate and I will certainly be glad to consider any intelligent response!?

@@user-se8pb6dh3l Yes, his comment about nukes was simple minded. In WW2, bombing civilians was standard practice. Nuking 2 Japanese cities ended the war and saved millions of lives that would have been lost if Japan fought to the last man standing. It was not automatically an evil act, despite Tucker's assertion.

@@propheteyebert7063rubbish, it was not about anything to do with Japan, they were already done, it was to send a clear message to the communists(Russia primarily)that the U.S. would do anything and everything to project its ideological and political system on the rest of the world and that it now had the power to do so.

And yet we’re not even allowed to question or criticize a foreign country in our OWN country

These same people like the idiots at the daily wire would tell Thomas Jefferson that he hates America. It makes my blood boil.

While she trumpets the heroism of JFK for not getting us into a nuclear war... which JKF started.

There may have been a time when that mattered. But, to a man, our Officer Corps sold out to Israel who attacked us on 9/11. Military are even more degenerate than clergy, lawyers or media people.

@@user-yy2fl2yf5m well,ass smedly buttter siad war is racket.at least for usa and anglos.

😢 why would anyone create such a weapon?

​@@melspatito defend themselves against people who have actually used the weapon

​@@zealmediaproductions844that's a cute response. And for the ones who first created it? Wait, lemme guess. Something incredibly beyond naive...

@@jacobsampsonis7782 youre both correct. You arent looking at it from the pov of a russian leader. It doesnt mean America had another option, it just means there is a cause and effect with everything. Dropping an A bomb on a city may have prevented something worse, but that doesnt mean the act itself wont reverberate through time. Its literally the job of leaders to defend their country from any percieved threat. The only response was to build a massive nuclear arsenal to guarantee they would never be attacked and it seems to have worked. Dont be partisan. Be nuanced

life goes on in Hiroshima and Nagasaki ,yet we were told of they dropped a nuke the water would be undrinkable ,no animals could live nothing would grow ??? What happened?

So true….. we really don’t have a real clue or scope of what it would look like now with the new technology.

@@shaneencalade4988 especially us relatively normal folks, who were not physicists.

​@@williammoreland1870maybe dull people like you. It's not hard to understand numbers or even science like that. It's mostly memorization. People are a lot smarter than they're given credit for, possibly even you! The fact is most people are just lazy and it's easier to not research or look into anything

@jacobsampsonis7782 is there a particular reason you are being a dick? I know the concept of how all these weapons work, so why do you feel it necessary to degrade other people to try and pick a fight with me and make yourself look superior when you don't need to? If people want to look into the subject, they will. If they don't, they won't. I stated one easy fact.

True

(((They)))

That morning people here didn’t know what to do I saw people crying driving their cars people were texting each other asking if real was a surreal moment for sure everyone’s cell phone started beeping loud with warning broadcast was crazy

Holy smokes.. that is actually really scary.. ‘ I’m at peace dying in excruciating pain’ Nothing happens.. Thats kinda F up when ou have people ready to go.. and then nothing happens.

Sounds like the government is trying very hard to sway public opinion in favor of US using nuclear weapons by inducing panic.

Japan was ready to surrender. They wanted to keep their emperor. The emperor has a religious like stature in Japan. The U.S. required that the emperor be replaced. Ultimately, Japan was allowed to keep their emperor. If you watch Oliver Stone’s documentary - it’s good, Russia was getting ready to enter the war in the Pacific. Allegedly, the dropping of nukes was to end the war before Russia entered so the U.S. wouldn’t have to fulfill the promises made to get them to enter. Russia lost an insane number of men in WW2.

I like Ike, but he was wrong, he never fought Japan. Also he did threaten China with nukes the final year he was in uniform, just didn't embarass Truman like MacArthur did.

It was never about Japan. That was bluff show of force to Stalin, so that Soviets don't run over the whole Europe. And it worked out.

yes,to soviets most proablyt as they did more damage to its army in month than usa in four years.thats what usa was seeeking to avoid wiht bombs.

Yeah because of the Soviet invasion of Manchuria leading to a 2-front war.

At Beeee K you can have it your way😂 bro i hate that ad, I swear I'd rather have a 30second ad than 2 15 second ads, Because the time window is so short the commercials have become so obnoxious in order to grab your attention because they have so little time, The ads that get on my nerves the most are the ones with the really fast-talking quirky woman, It's just too much information they're trying to pack into a small window of time

The tune does stay in your head though. Beeee-k, have your way. Beeeeee-k,,................

I'd rather live through nuclear war than listen to that shit again.

Liberty liberty liiiiberty

@@frankjamesbonarrigo7162 ugh 😩

THAT, S WHY THE LEFT DIDN, T WANT HER THEY WANTED A TOOL!....////🧐 kzfaq.infogaming/emoji/7ff574f2/emoji_u1f60e.png

In my mind she’s a perfect VP for a based POTUS

Trump/Tulsi 2024👏

A pity Trump is not of the same standard

@@paulawagstaff686 he’s still waaaaay better than the alternative. And she could easily be the first woman POTUS, as a Republican.

She’s like 50 😂

@@canihave1dab724 a baby Einstein😀

No kids and a wef connection.

@jaredleicht1656 true, CFR also...

That's why the Democrats blocked her .

Im so glad the dems have no connections to the WEF or Klaus Schwab

@@johnf6267 she refused to bow down to certain lobbying groups that CNN was trying to force on her to do so.

Yea bc thats worked so far.... We really have more peace as a result of that...🤣🤦

@@ItsAme7143 The fact that no nuclear war has broken out is because of the fear of retaliation on the general population. Of course it’s worked.

The problem is: it is not "the civilians" that go to war (make the decision to start a war).

@@wolfgangkoller4495 Well that’s my point. If they knew their lives were at stake they would be more vocal about their countries’ leaders’ decisions.

@@davidcole1475 leaders can say them that their decsions are to protect them.

Where do i find " threads"?

​@larrybinetti603 also curious where to find this to watch

@@dercioferreira6169Google shows Amazon prime rental, KZfaq TV or AMC+ as options or try sailing the high seas.

You can watch Threads (the 1984 British nuclear war movie) here on KZfaq.

@@larrybinetti603Amazon prime has it I believe, and it's here on KZfaq

Well, that kind of flies in the face of history, considering the Soviet invaded Japanese held territory throughout northern Asia around the same time the bombs were dropped, and had been building up their forces there for months

@@Agtsmirnoff Soviets invaded two days after the bombs dropped. Just attempting to add perspective. Interesting how I give eye witness and you immediately dismiss. Ask yourself, if you are so sure of the version of history you know, and Japan is advertising a different version, how are you so sure you're not also getting a skewed version...again just adding perspective

Look up Manchuria- soviets defeated Japan’s army, there was no need for bombs, but you know..

same I've been there too, it's a very somber atmosphere. Seeing the pictures of what people look like after "surviving" the nuke and the lasting effects of the surrounding area is very sobering. People suffered greatly and it is a very painful way to die.

​@@Agtsmirnoff Eisenhower wrote in his memoir The White House Years: I had been conscious of a feeling of depression and so I voiced to him my grave misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and secondly, because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives.[106] Other U.S. military officers who disagreed with the necessity of the bombings include General of the Army Douglas MacArthur,[107][108] Fleet Admiral William D. Leahy (the Chief of Staff to the President), Brigadier General Carter Clarke (the military intelligence officer who prepared intercepted Japanese cables for U.S. officials), Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz (Commander in Chief of the Pacific Fleet), Fleet Admiral William Halsey Jr. (Commander of the US Third Fleet), and even the man in charge of all strategic air operations against the Japanese home islands, then-Major General Curtis LeMay: The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for peace. The atomic bomb played no decisive part, from a purely military point of view, in the defeat of Japan. - Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, Commander in Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, [99] The use of [the atomic bombs] at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons ... The lethal possibilities of atomic warfare in the future are frightening. My own feeling was that in being the first to use it, we had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children. - Fleet Admiral William D. Leahy, Chief of Staff to President Truman, 1950, [109] The atomic bomb had nothing to do with the end of the war at all. - Major General Curtis LeMay, XXI Bomber Command, September 1945, [110] The first atomic bomb was an unnecessary experiment ... It was a mistake to ever drop it ... [the scientists] had this toy and they wanted to try it out, so they dropped it. - Fleet Admiral William Halsey Jr., 1946, [111]

Tucker didn’t say it was wrong. He said it was evil. An evil can still be right if the alternative is as or more evil.

And yet you are listening to this car salesman fraud....lol

Assuming you have a brain, which you don't. The Daily Wire is NOT ran by Jewish people. In fact, Ben Shapiro is the ONLY Jewish person on the Dailywire. Jeremy Boreing was a former Christian pastor. and he is the one that runs Dailywire. He's still a Christian, just not a pastor anymore. The vast majority of people on the Dailywire are Christians. So, the fact your focusing on one Jewish person out of many Christians , shows your antisemitism.

Quite the opposite of Trump. She also has excellent character. Again, the opposite of Trump

@@paulawagstaff686how do you find a way to make it about Trump…you people are obsessed

@@trantorthetroll8768 It's an illness much like liberalism.

She's full of shit. Stop falling for talkers, and vote for doers.

​@@paulawagstaff686Trump's character is what is necessary at this time. We are done playing nice with the elite that are trying to rule over us.