Introducing Deep Learining Dynamic Super Resolution, the new technology to Improve the image quality over native resolution and get better Performance

Has anyone been able to run with NVidia surround? I can't seem to enable both of them while using nvidia surround. It's either the resolution isn't available or windows reverts back to the game driver where the DSR setting isn't available. If I reinstall the studio driver and enable DSR then the resolution isn't available, it's either a lower resolution or the in game resolution is set to OPT .

Nope, DLDSR is separate to DSR and DLSS

No it’s basically dlaa

This is technically DLDSR +DLSS

I might try this on ark survival ascended.

What card do you have I’m curious?

@@hafeezsuprahafeezsupra53544060ti the 16 gb one

nice fake comment dude

​@@hafeezsuprahafeezsupra5354 it's fake

DLSS quality at 1080p is the same thing as DLSS performance at 1440 as both targets 1280x720 resolution rendering. you will just get a much clear image with a minor hit to performance upgrading DLSS at 1440 from DLSS at 1080 using the performance preset. and even doing this will get you a better image than native with a performance boost so that's a Win!

Me at 4k 😎

​@@hotrod123231Who games in 4k lmao (I'm just trolling). I play call of duty at 1440p at 165fps because it's a good balance of graphics and performance.

Then your gpu doesnt have dlss either. Unless you have a 3050, then i feel bad for you. Other gpu's should be fine with dlss at 1440p.

How do u even turn on dlss

I’m shifting my content focus, but I might revisit this someday!

​@@pc_blend💥 Sharpness and definition are really bad in NVIDIA, serrated? I have an notebook Lenovo Legion 5i i7 12700h RTX 3060 and the image IN THAT THINGS are worst than in my Acer Aspire 5 Ryzen 7 5700u Integrated Graphics in the same conditions! NVIDIA ugly, AMD beautiful! And the filters of Experience increaaes the sharpness, but don't turn to beautiful, like AMD!

Would love to see something for PUBG Pc

How is the experience?

Its great, not a huge difference but absolutely better than before, i play on 1080p 280hz monitor its permanent option for me now

@@3boodAl7asan DLSS at 1080p is effective but shines at 1440p and 4K where the image is already super sharp and the loss is damn near impossible to spot naturally, i had to watch a video on what to look for to identify upscaling.

@@timothykeller9419 it's better now with dlss 3.5. ive been using quality on 1080p and the difference is really hard to tell

​@@OoSALEHoO😅😢❤oslzllsll is 0😊😊😊😅

Default 33% is good enough

That's the whole point

25 or 33

💥 Sharpness and definition are really bad in NVIDIA, serrated? I have an notebook Lenovo Legion 5i i7 12700h RTX 3060 and the image IN THAT THINGS are worst than in my Acer Aspire 5 Ryzen 7 5700u Integrated Graphics in the same conditions! NVIDIA ugly, AMD beautiful! And the filters of Experience increaaes the sharpness, but don't turn to beautiful, like AMD!

To me it's perfect at 0%

But it doesn't work in the same way. DLSS and DSR are AI implemented system far superior. DLDSR (DLSS+DSR) is the most amazing IQ in the game history. it's sad that AMD isn't capable to create something similar.

@@rodrigomendes3327 Not really. DLSS and FSR have virtually the same performance cost and generally the visual quality of DLSS is slightly better but in MW2 specifically, DLSS looks quite a bit worse than even Nvidia Image Scaling. FSR 2.0/2.1 is fairly comparable to DLSS, I would not say DLSS is 'far superior'.

@@blasianking4827 Any explanation for this is that you're blind. Sorry, I have no other.

@@rodrigomendes3327 Nvidia fanboy go somewhere else

​@@pal.shouvikbro do some research

💥 Sharpness and definition are really bad in NVIDIA, serrated? I have an notebook Lenovo Legion 5i i7 12700h RTX 3060 and the image IN THAT THINGS are worst than in my Acer Aspire 5 Ryzen 7 5700u Integrated Graphics in the same conditions! NVIDIA ugly, AMD beautiful! And the filters of Experience increaaes the sharpness, but don't turn to beautiful, like AMD!

for new people reading this, the potential higher amount of pixel data leads to more details that can carry over to other effects for better overall calculations since it has more to work with when displaying effects, and running it through both AI solutions lets it handle things like Anti-Aliasing and interpolating elements. It can vary based on implementation but there are definitely advantages.

It should work well as long as your CPU isn’t too weak. Let me know how it goes!

@@pc_blend ok then. CPU is Ryzen 5800h. Guess should be ok

​@@nirmalkumar7941any news???

@@Superpowerjoker nah I don't have DLSS since using cracked version. Will try when I get steam version

1440p and dlss quality puts the game resolution at 1707x960(960p resolution) which will run better than 1080p since the resolution is lower and will look better(the game and textures looks sharper and more detailed). so if you use DLDSR to scale your resolution to 1440p and use DLSS Quality to downscale it to 960p, I feel like this is even better for lower end cards that have dlss and dldsr.

Monster hunter world only has DLSS version 1 not the latest. It's blurry af. Idk why Capcom won't update it.

​@@duskairableYou're able to update it yourself since DLSS is a DLL file if I recall

💥 Sharpness and definition are really bad in NVIDIA, serrated? I have an notebook Lenovo Legion 5i i7 12700h RTX 3060 and the image IN THAT THINGS are worst than in my Acer Aspire 5 Ryzen 7 5700u Integrated Graphics in the same conditions! NVIDIA ugly, AMD beautiful! And the filters of Experience increaaes the sharpness, but don't turn to beautiful, like AMD!

So this a positive thing if you have no quality loss with dlss. Also are you using a 16:10 laptop ?

@@randomgames9025 YUP

@Arkeshan OK than it's a good thing that you don't lose quality ?

Which is better?

I also use this trick. DLSS works like TAA for the most part: it takes information from previous frames. A bigger frame buffer can store more of this information

How do u add smoothness

@@ceethannatch7959 don't set it to 0% like in the video?

💥 Sharpness and definition are really bad in NVIDIA, serrated? I have an notebook Lenovo Legion 5i i7 12700h RTX 3060 and the image IN THAT THINGS are worst than in my Acer Aspire 5 Ryzen 7 5700u Integrated Graphics in the same conditions! NVIDIA ugly, AMD beautiful! And the filters of Experience increaaes the sharpness, but don't turn to beautiful, like AMD!

💥 Sharpness and definition are really bad in NVIDIA, serrated? I have an notebook Lenovo Legion 5i i7 12700h RTX 3060 and the image IN THAT THINGS are worst than in my Acer Aspire 5 Ryzen 7 5700u Integrated Graphics in the same conditions! NVIDIA ugly, AMD beautiful! And the filters of Experience increaaes the sharpness, but don't turn to beautiful, like AMD!

💥 Sharpness and definition are really bad in NVIDIA, serrated? I have an notebook Lenovo Legion 5i i7 12700h RTX 3060 and the image IN THAT THINGS are worst than in my Acer Aspire 5 Ryzen 7 5700u Integrated Graphics in the same conditions! NVIDIA ugly, AMD beautiful! And the filters of Experience increaaes the sharpness, but don't turn to beautiful, like AMD!

why ? i use 4 scalers at once , they all compliment each other and my textures are clear and smooth , without any anti-alias , this last windows 11 update has an AI doing all that work to smooth out the problems , my 1440p res gets upscaled 4x by nvidia DSRDL + DLSS + windows SR ( super res ) + ''lossless scaling'' from steam store ... no problem what so ever and everything looks super clear , even have my projector at 100% sharpness , i can't look at blurry textures so i don't ...

i love aliasing THOUGH

AHAHAHAHA

no bc if you follow native 1080p : 60fps fake 1440p dlss performance 1080p : 70fps am i right ?

​@@Enzq7539yes

You can't be this dumb💀 You will get higher fps + better quality.

Basicly Dlss makes 1080 like shit with some fps gain but 2k with dlss make it more good with you lose some fps but not less or equal 1080p without dlss

@@user-mc5er9fp1i 1080 look like shit only if you want to look only the dlss, everytime i activate it, i look closely on the bad things, but if yoou just play your game with dlss quality 20%, 10min after, u will forget it is activate

You can slide it where you want. There is a red bar in the bottom. Sometimes it dont appears so just pause the video then it appears

@@forz2882 not how it works. for a number of reasons you can find the ability to do this, but for 99% of all people when you first watch a short you have no ability to do this

Pause on mobile: 🗿

@@charleyweinhardt just type 0:01 or a random one and click it and it sends you to the video.

@@warbotics2440 word👍

Ai learning for faster frame output, instead of creating the frame from scratch

Or use the LukeFZ mod and emulate a fake nvidia gpu and forces the DLSS

You should not be playing at 1080p with a setup like that

@Joaquin Sabin yea I tried the DSR thing in the past it cause so many issues so I decided to go out and get a 4k monitor Instead however even with high end specs some games struggle with 4k on ultra graphics im now starting to see a steady 60fps with star citizen

Yes it’s ok, graphics card does everything.

Exactly!! You have to use GPU scaling in order to do this and that is pretty outdated at this point. Display scaling is the way to go. When I finally got a monitor that supported display scaling it was a night and day difference. So he’s basically getting a little sharper image while increasing input lag and frametimes while actually losing frames lol I understand some single player games using this, but not COD.

This is not DLSS 3 Frame Generation, there's no input lag for using DLSS 2.0

Is it worth it?

It really depends on many factors. Your monitor, resolution and settings you use it with. In general lower is sharper (so better). So 0% should look best. However then it may look too sharp if you have quality monitor or resolution too high. I use 0% in some games and around 25-30 in others as some games will make it look too sharp.

@@sebastianm3505 I use 4k Dldsr on ultrawide monitor with 3440x1440 native res. So the dldsr res is a bit more demanding than normal 4k, it's like 5120x2160 or something like that. I found myself to be okay-ish at 8-10%. I still don't know which is best tho. I have tried 75, 50, 40, 33, you name it, can't tell much of a difference just a degrade in texture quality with higher %? But then again 0% also looks off too. Nothing is perfect for my taste, always something that catches my eye

0% basically makes it look like native 1440p, for me at least, I prefer it at 0%

​@@wolfythesunbro what monitor do you have?

@@johnsteves9158 lg 34wp65c-b ultrawide

You can try upscaling it to the higher DL resolution, but for 1440p monitors you might not see noticeable difference.

Holy crap your 2060 is being super bottlenecked; upgrade to at least Core 10th Gen

@@youtubeshadowbannedme I upgraded to a 1440p monitor so at least on single player GPU intensive games its not much different from a good CPU. On the CPU intensive multiplayer games it can be a bit rough but I dont really play those. I dont even really play games much at all which is why I havent just upgraded the CPU

Nope, Global issue that was happening but was half fixed today, Now the frames are there but there seems to be a issue with packet lost and seeing people with 999 latency in games..

MWII Campaign

This was specifically in-game for mw2 but you can do something similar for dlss-capable games.

No latency penalty with DLSS Super Resolution. With DLSS 3 Frame Generation, yes.

@@Jakiyyyyy thx good to know

@@Jakiyyyyyyeah but one thing , with DLSS and FG your latency will be more for like 10ms , for example on native you have 40ms , with features will be around 50ms , you won’t even notice this 10ms )

Same quality but worse performance 🤷‍♂️

When your monitor can't handle more fps it always do that try to screen with VRR, free sync or gsynv depending your gpu vendor but with Variable Refresh Rate the best option even gaming consoles when get handle 240hz VRR.