He's nowhere near the soul depth and diversity of elvis presley. If you had an ounce of intelligence. You'd understand that

@@bradhuskers , you are talking a lot of Nonesense !! ---- Yes , Elvis was a very good ballad singer also Rock -A -- Billy but not a great pure Raw Rock ' n ' Roll singer. ---- Elvis once said that if he could play the piano like Jerry Lee Lewis then he would quit singing !! ----

@JOHN PEARCE YOU are talking nonsense and bullshit. Elvis's raw rock n roll recordings from 54 thru 58, are critically acclaimed. His raw punk sound destroys jerry lee. You are very very unintelligent

LINDA L.Great taste:)

He learned guitar too but I love him on piano too. Lots of guitar players already.

He has played violin and guitar.

несомненно,мадам!)))

I got to meet him and all of the guys in the band after JLplayed a gig at BillyBob’s.I hung out with them for an hour or so waiting for Jerry to come to the limo.Got to talk to Jerry for a few mins.Really cool guy.Was in 88’

Kenny is always great, as you probably know he's been with JLL since around 1967, what a great partnership.

I think he was feeling bluesy

@@RJ1999x He had nothing to drink, eat, or smoke to speed him up. Still great.

Is there even a audieance?

No, the live show was on the next night.

Même s'il 'ne chanterai pas heur Je n' ai pas connu un seul pianiste de ce talant là nous avons eu la chance de connaître l'artiste'je crois que personne ne le remplacera

А гитарист очень даже не плох , первый раз его услышал, молодец.

Probably done for TV without one.

LMFAO Berry is nothing next to the king. Elvis's soul depth and diversity destroys chuck. If you were intelligent, you'd understand that fact.

@@bradhuskers dude.. you dont get it, everyone agrees that Elvis will always be considered the King, and for many reasons, rightfully so. But if you were to break it down, nuts and bolts, the general consensus is Chuck. Im thinking those that are actually musicians, especially those from the early classic rock era and beyond, the vast majority will say and have said, the true King, is Berry. Chuck wrote all his songs, that were hits. Elvis may have sat down at a table and wrote, but nothing that could go to being a song hit. Chuck played the guitar. Elvis strummed it, and it was a prop, not part of his thing. And, the guitar is THE RnR instrument. And the list goes on. Even Elvis HIMSELF said Chuck was the true King... Dont get so butt hurt... Elvis is the man, but Chuck basically was saying, here is the Template for what Rock is. Take it, and follow it.. tweak it a bit if you must, but this is what RnR is.... And just do a google search, of all the musicians whove said Chuck is the main guy. Geez, even Lennon said if you were to call RnR another name youd call it Chuck Berry... what more do you need Calm down

@@chuckfan1 No YOU don't get it. The term the "king" has absolutely nothing to do with writing. It has EVERYTHING to do with who left behind the most critically acclaimed recordings. Period. The musicians themselves have said that elvis's recordings are REVELATORY and essential. Frank Sinatra and Ella Fitzgerald didn't write their own songs either, but they like elvis, turned those words into critically acclaimed masterpieces. Funny. If chuck was as great as you say, how's it possible that he lived decades longer than elvis YET still couldn't reach his critically acclaimed diverse recordings? Imagine? Chuck lives decades longer and failed miserably to reach elvis's success. Racism? No. Plenty of artists were of different races and achieved great success. After elvis got out of the army in 1960, rather than rest on his massive success, he proceeded to branch out into different genres of music with MORE CRITICAL ACCLAIM. That's called soul depth and diversity. The critics give accolades to great recordings. And elvis presley never stopped. Only death ended his artistry. As for chuck berry? After the 50's, he had every opportunity to pass elvis in gold records and sales and critically acclaimed recordings, BUT FAILED because ultimately, he didn't have the artistry that elvis presley had. After elvis died, chuck chose to videotape young girls in public restrooms. The guy gets to live to 90 years of age, and society allowed all artists regardless of their race or gender, to be as successful as their talent would allow them to be. Berry was an absolute ZERO. A JOKE. We know that when the decade of the 1950's ended, elvis presley recorded more critically acclaimed classics in multiple genres of music. THAT'S pure artistry. Ella Fitzgerald and frank Sinatra did exactly the same. These were real artists who never stopped. Chuck became a one trick pony. In 1966, elvis presley recorded "tomorrow is a long time" and Bob Dylan said he was deeply humbled when elvis's soul and artistry took his words to a much higher level than he could. As for Berry? He like little richard were happy being "one trick pony" types. You sound very uneducated. You parrot 🦜 what others say with no original thoughts of your own. I've studied this subject longer than you've been alive and the reason I brought up frank Sinatra, Ray charles, Ella Fitzgerald, etc....was to educate you on artistry. Elton John explained that the most difficult thing in music is to interpret the words of another writer into critically acclaimed masterpieces. Ella, frank, Ray, elvis, etc....ALL did just that. NUMEROUS TIMES. Critics have universally acclaimed recordings by these iconic ARTISTS. You've got a lot to learn.

@@chuckfan1 I always laugh at myopic fan boys who think chuck and little richard are above the king. Both those one trick pony types lived DECADES longer than elvis YET failed miserably at reaching the massive success he achieved. And I love when low IQ types blame this on racism. LMFAO LMFAO Both richard and berry lived decades longer than elvis. Artists of every race and gender achieved great success. Yet these two remained one trick pony types. Richard became a flamboyant tinkerbell and chuck videotaped young girls in public restrooms. If they had the talent and artistry you brag so much about, both these losers would've continued making critically acclaimed recordings like the king. But they instead wasted decades wallowing in perversion.

@@chuckfan1 Looks like you really are detached from reality. After the 50's came to a close, elvis gets out of the army and continues to garner massive critical acclaim in multiple genres of music. Like frank Sinatra, Ray charles, Ella Fitzgerald, etc. etc...etc.... these iconic ARTISTS turned words of other writers into critically acclaimed masterpieces time and time again. Chuck berry and little richard stayed the same. They dabbled in perversion instead of surpassing the true king. And it's because neither of them had the soul, depth and diversity of elvis presley. You lack critical thinking and origin thoughts to understand that. You just regurgitate the BS you are fed daily.

Very very low IQ you exhibit here.

Marketing has ZERO to do with why jerry is nowhere near elvis's soul depth and diversity. Lewis has lived decades longer than elvis YET still couldn't reach elvis's level of GREATNESS. If you had a brain, you'd understand that.

​@@bradhuskers, you talking Nonsense !! Even Elvis stated that Jerry Lee Lewis was a Genius & he ( Elvis ) wished he could Play the Piano as good as him.

@johnpearce3714 😆🤣 You sound unintelligent. All artists compliment each other. Jerry lee is garbage next to elvis's soul depth and diversity. Your low IQ prevents you from understanding that fact.

​@@johnpearce3714 Elvis's critically acclaimed recordings are the standard of measure for greatness. If you were smart, you'd understand that fact. But you're not.