Republicans told me it's a Chinese hoax.

And if we reach +5 degrees it could be our own!

We are also the directors, prop masters, editors, and viewers. And like all movies, there is an ending. But this ending is real.

Yes. The guy is asking if it's game over. It's is, he knows this but can't admit it to himself much less tell the host & audience it's over .

The guy is asking if it's game over. It is, he knows this but can't admit it to himself much less tell the host & audience it's over .

Yeah, it's a slow suicide on "Planet Easter Island"

@@ceeemm1901 Nope. It's Faster Than Expected!

Happening already ​@@nsbd90now

Were at a point where we realistically cant do anything unless we discover some sort of alien technology..

Don’t discount the talking - we are doing plenty of talking 😂

And this.........................................

@@a.randomjack6661 .....is the following....

Everything we need to do everything! Not only transition to renewables, but massively cut our energy production overall.

...with no way to hop out of the pot.

No, we're crabs. Fully aware of the problem and trying to stop anyone from solving it because we'd rather they die with us.

😂

@@lifeleisuresa1229 If you have a rebuttal please share with sources, because what @martiansoon9092 wrote has been hinted at by several scientists unless I'm wrong.

What's the laugh ? Wrong spelling of plural millennias ? You're not playing that smart, do must be something else ..

Martin , you have stated complete falsities based on a lack of understanding and physics behind hydro thermo dynamics.

@@bobdooly3706 Bold and utterly false claim. Based on what facts? The current understanding of the large ocean streams says that their motions takes long timeperiods. For example, NOAA says "It takes an estimated 1,000 years for a parcel (any given cubic meter) of water to complete its journey along the belt." oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/amoc.html This is basic knowledge of ocean currents. And when we heat up the upper layer, the heat travels along this path. In this you may argue that warmer water goes upwards, but when you have only warmer water, the heat still adds up in the stream. Through eddies, ocean mixing, ... If this would not happen, then the upper ocean layer would warm even faster than now and hardly any heat would mix to the deep waters (which is not the case). Yet still it seems that mixing at the abyssal waters is very slow or almost non-existing (below 2000 meters). "In both studies the heatfunction indicates that most pathways of heat in the ocean are surface intensified and confined to tropical and subtropical latitudes" "Vallis and Farneti (2009) went a step forward and used this relationship to compute the heat transport associated with surface and deep overturning circulations by splitting the integral in two parts. The first integral was taken from the surface temperature to the temperature separating surface and deepcirculations, while the second integral was taken over the remain-ing cold temperatures." "we have shown that the OHT associated with an overturning circulation is proportional to the strength of that circulation multiplied by the temperature difference it encounters. The shallow and deep circulations have comparable strengths, but the shallow ones are better positioned to transport heat..." And much more from OHT/heatfunction related study: www.researchgate.net/publication/229168988_What_processes_drive_the_ocean_heat_transport

Yep, soon it'll be to hit to actually survive, I'd hate to see it, but we might have to grow food indoors just so you can cool the plants with AC.

Taz seems a rather safe haven in times of climate change to me - except for being to small to house 20+ miln Ozzies in case the Island continent becomes too hot

The words you said were said over and over 100 years ago, 75 years ago, 50 years ago and on and on. Stay home, double mask, mask in the shower, mask in bed, try not to breathe too hard.

Time to sell the house before it is worthless and get outta there.

At least you'll only get hot. I'm in Florida, impossible heat, drought and going the way of Atlantis are what's in store for me. And Europe will turn into Siberia. lol

And it's likely canada will choke on wildfire smoke again this year...bcause "A lack of significant snowpack ... to the wildfire season in B.C. and Alberta. And Canada will see above-normal temperatures and drought this summer, setting the stage for strong wildfire conditions across the country. Just lookup Wildfires canada 2024. It has started already. We did not use to see wildfires till late June only 3 decades ago.

Serves that red Republican state right.

@@davidkelly4210 ...that's not funny, i live in the Netherlands.Florida will turn into a fish smelly state hahaha.

Forests are burning in the Arctic circle...

All goes back to love of money 💰. Capital allowed the industrialization explosion, which led to materials to create radio, paper presses, printing, to television to internet- creating a desire for farm culture to also industrialized.

And it's an Extinction Event

@@ceeemm1901 . No they arent.

@@pvmagnus . Life on Earth is booming.

hehehe got abit optimistic on the numbers there fams the average years for tree to grow in maturity is about 20-40 years and a tree can only absorbs 1 kilo per hectare of land thats the maximum absorption grass and algae actually absorbes more carbon nitrogen chlorine etc than actual trees but they dont produce clean water ..... i dont wanna calculate anymore

It's total nonsense. Take a look at the actual science, it's everywhere.

Doubtful, but we will witness the water wars.

The ocean is strongly alkaline due to the ocean floor being basalt, which is an alkaline stone. It takes much more than a tiny bit of CO2 to actually acidify the ocean.

More like the temp will kill off the bottom of the food chain which will work its way up to us.

@@petersteenkamp Our emissions have already made the ocean 30% "more acidic." True, it's still on the alkaline side of the pH scale, but this is what the process is called, and it's deadly.

@@karlwheatley1244 fantasy.

@@petersteenkamp No, it's not fantasy. I'm a university researcher who has been researching ecological and societal unraveling for a decade, and it's well established that the massive absorption of our excess CO2 emissions has made the oceans ~30% "more acidic" via the formation of carbonic acid when the CO2 gets absorbed by sea water. Just look it up. This is just one of many ways humans are pushing the whole web of life towards collapse. Indeed, large changes in CO2 levels appear to have been THE main "kill mechanism" for most major and lesser extinction events in Earth's history. Take care.

He will not live long enough to see the final destruction. Me too. My kids? May be. My grand kids? Fer sure.

Soylent green.

12000 years ago we had thick ice sheets covering the landscape but has been replaced by filthy forests and filthy animals.

@@Demetrenos Maximum ice in Europe was in the Würm icetime in the Brandenburg Phase - as the name implies that was mostly from the north down to Brandenburg 20.000 BC. The last big ice phase where Europe was mostly under a ice shield was the Drenthe time 150.000 BC. That is also the time where our little valley was carved out of the rocks. End of "know-it-all". The "filthy people" came 40.000 BC from Africa and Asia and "mated" the Neanderthaler and now they are part of our gene pool.

Harry will save us.

It's a flat earth so none of the alarmists are correct in their predictions. Anyway if they are right, then Bruce Willis will abseil in at 5 seconds to midnight and save us all.

The wizard’s name is God.. but he’s not going to save us

@@wadeinn463 Which God?

@@wadeinn463 whoooosh

it's a red hering. 10 gigatons by 2050 is way too little too late. we are all dead by then, and not from old age.

Answering that is dead easy Too many, too long, too much, You !

Politicians won't do much, whether they are good looking or butt ugly.....

That solution always involves us paying more tax.

There is no human endeavor that can bring temps down. It's an absurd concept. Adaptation is the obvious solution.

@@anthonymorris5084 We will definitely have to adapt however we can. Things are going to get very interesting.

@@aheimdahl5201 Here is a very easily verifiable fact. Data proves that humanity has never been safer, healthier or more prosperous than at any time in history, by almost any measurement you care to examine. Life flourishes under warming.

We will do nothing as usual. The global warming started in the 80's, or before. Scientists have been alerting the world since then, and very strongly in the year 2000. It's been more than 30 years in which everybody did basically nothing. Presently we are living the consequences of the horrible heat everywhere in the planet, and still we are doing nothing. Solar panels, wind mills and electric cars will not fix anything. A real new technology is needed.

How does ir from co2 back radiation heat the ocean when it only penetrates at most a millimetre?

@@TheDalaiLamaCon Good question. I suppose the heat is transferred from the heated air by conduction, rather than IR radiation.

Do not forget the lag time from emitting CO2 to it’s heating effects. Also they did not once mention methane emissions from the Arctic permafrost nor from the Arctic Ocean. Oh yes do not forget aerosol masking affect. The future looks just a little difficult for homo sapien.

@@Glen-uy4jt Thanks for that, but I'm much more concerned by the enormous amount of heat energy being absorbed by the melting global ice, including the permafrost, all of which absorbs 144 BTUs/lb. as it melts, and it's never factored in to the global heating; water transitioning into water vapor absorbs 2265 KJ/kg and that's never mentioned either. The future, if you'll allow me, looks impossible for Homo Sapiens.

We are putting the pedal to the metal I guess.

The fact that they don't is a red flag.

​@@petersteenkamp means nothing. It's a talk show just showing heads talking, like most of m.

Coral reefs are the keystone for ocean biodiversity, the next domino to fall in a long line of them, sadly. Heartbreaking.

Actually, the Great Barrier Reef is doing better than ever, and the dip a few years ago obviously wasn't caused by CO2.

@@petersteenkamp 50% of the Great Barrier Reef was dead before 2016 the bleaching event in 2024 with devastating north south and middle Reef section this is the first time that's ever happened

Transition to being extinct?

Actually the air/atmosphere is very important. I'm not an atmospheric scientist but my understanding based on what NASA, NOAA, etc contend is something like this: Shortwave radiation from the sun hitting the ocean and land surfaces changes wavelength to long wave radiation; Some long wave radiation is absorbed by the land, some penetrates into the ocean, some radiates upwards from the surfaces. Molecules in the atmosphere that can absorb long wave radiation will intercept a fraction of the heat radiated from the surface that would otherwise escape to space and re-radiate it in all directions in the atmosphere causing air temperatures to be warmer than they would be if these molecules were absent. If the concentration of these re-radiating molecules ("greenhouse gases") in the atmosphere are increased, more heat is retained Vs escaping into space - and this also causes the oceans to retain more of the heat from sunlight that hits the surface because the thermal gradient between the air and water is reduced if the air is warmer. An ongoing and increasing energy imbalance is what is causing the ongoing ocean warming. Yes, heat moves from the oceans to the atmosphere as during el nino, and vice versa during la Nina, but changes in the amount of sunlight hitting the oceans is not what is causing ocean warming and marine heatwaves. Scientists have estimates for the heat flows, and wavelength saturation of the types of greenhouse gases at different concentrations, and there are interesting details like the amount of warming from increasing CO2 being inversely logarithmic but generally I think what I've described is what they say the physics are.

@@rogerdittus2952 You may be right, but I was talking about the global average. Cheers!

@bobdooly3706 "Oceans cover 70% of planet Earth to a depth of 10 kms" Wrong "They are not heating up. In fact they are cooling" Wrong

@@grindupBaker . You are displaying your ignorance in public.

No it isnt.

@@jhwilly3098 he isn't a government official to my knowledge. he is speaking in his capacity he can't force anyone to do anything.

Higher elevations mean a reduction in water supplies. Mexico City is a perfect example. Denver is going in that direction .

@nathangant7636 I know boulders aquifers are toxic from Raytheon missile testing fuel tanks leaking into it. And the dep of health has to test it weekly and treat it with chemicals.

If he doesn't sell any, they won't let him speak. Anyhow, this video is being strangled by the algorithm.

How is it misinformation?

Wow it cooked Earth's core like an egg. Actually Earth's core IS a giant egg. That's why they always talk about the "sulphurous stench" if you go to where the naughty people end up, and why volcanoes smell like that, it's the giant egg at Earth's core !! That's why the microwaves poached it. And then Brave U.S. Americans went down and sprinkled loads of salt & pepper & a nice white sauce on Earth's core & made it cool & delicious. Planet saved by U.S. Americans yet again !!

😢

Its the fossil fuel industry not mom and dad

How Dare They !!!

Trees and green plants take CO2 out of the atmosphere to live on. The Earth is getting GREENER

@@johnbeckwith8313 Geez! Why all those wildfires then?

@@a.randomjack6661 There were 5-10x more wildfires in the 1930s in the USA.

This is from overfishing not climate. The same thing that's killing all living creatures - human activity.

It's fossil fuels. The oceans have absorbed most of the effects. That is the reason small rises in air temperature do not reflect the main impact of the energy imbalance.

@@ppetal1 It is partially due to our fossil fuel emissions that causes the main heating. Roughly 90% of the added energy is soaked to the seas. But why does the heat stay in the upper waters specially in last few years is under debate which I partially explained earlier. If we stop burning fossil fuels the heating stops gradually during decadal timescales (some CO2 still remains in 1 000 years scale). But also we will get SO2 related effects in first weeks, months and years after the total shutdown. SO2 related cloud creation is estimated somewhere from 0,6 to 1,2C depending if you ask from IPCC or Hansen. With added SO2 effects we end over 2C total temperature. But if we continue burning fossil fuels we will end ever higher temperatures. Over 2,5C temperature rise was most likely recent estimate from climate scientists when the Guardian asked them.

There's only one of those elements we have control over. The volcanic element doesn't really come into it at a higher latitude than Iceland does it? I think the Amoc would account for much. If you heat the gas, the liquid will warm. The understanding of process won't change that. We might well trigger another snowball planet, but the heat will get us first.

@@ppetal1 Snowball Earth is not even under scientific discussion under current warming trends. Prehistorical events that might have led to snowball Earth are very different than current conditions. Total AMOC shutdown could lead to freezing seas all the way to Ireland thou (6-10C local temp drop, overall heating is toward 3-5C world and doubled in northern areas, so...). But some studies has found that current fresh water pulses rises the flow of the Gulf stream... I'd say that subpolar gyre is under threat, but what happens to Gulf stream and overall AMOC is another discussion. I have been wondering what impact does current Icelandic volcanoes have? No great smoke plume, but vast eruption that generates low flying sulfate emissions. That should be noticiable element on cloud formation over the North sea...

Not true, current weather model that predicts 4 to 6 degree centigrade temperature increase from pre-industrial by 2100 because of increased CO2 and methane releases fits perfectly what’s happening today. It’s the end of the world as we’ve known it.

That's highly incorrect. There's such a vast amount of total junk science like that being Parroted around by Parrots (that's what Parrots do).

Who tainted you?

@@blein8988 The real earth science, the true unadulterated science of the ancient origins

Are Greenland and Antarctica cubes of ice floating on the ocean or one is the biggest island in the world with ice on top of it and the other one a whole continent with ice on top of it? What you read was perfectly crafted to trick people. And now you should be mad at them for trying to fool you.

That's true, but you're only referring to sea ice. They are talking about glaciers and ice caps on land (Greenland and Antarctica). When these melt, or when chunks of ice break off and fall into the ocean, sea level will rise. How can it not?

Tis but a drop in the bucket​@@user-mb3dx3nn5c

We know that it does in fact because it has risen and fallen over a hundred feet in the past. But in the past it happened over many thousands or hundreds of thousands of years and not within a hundred. Oh and we have billions of humans now and many live close to the shore.

You seriously think that? Seriously?? Clearly you have not done a lick of research. Not one bit. Go on, live in your bubble. It will pop and by then you'll be screwed.. correction, we all will be screwed. Texas hit 130 degrees Fahrenheit on May 10th. Just in case you didn't know, may is spring time not mid summer. How can you possibly think we haven't seen a temperature impact. That's just one of many many examples. Not to mention the drastic ocean temperatures which has a huge host of impacts on plant and animal life as well as local and global temperatures.

Lol😂😂😂😂😂. You're decieved.

This is why god created antipsychotics

@@isocarboxazid God created? I hope you got the sarcasm in my post. Because we have danger on all paths ahead. Global warming disasters. AND nuclear war is closer than ever. It's 90 minutes to midnight according to the Doomsday Clock organization. It was 120 in the Cuban Missile Crisis

Unfortunately Australia has bogans, so that's a huge negative.

@@ceeemm1901 the post apocalyptic world is no place for refined people

@@isocarboxazid nuclear war is as close or closet than climate change apocalypse. 90 seconds to midnight according to the Doomsday Clock Organization It was 2 minutes in the Cuban Missile Crisis. Although truth be told, the Doomsday Clock includes climate change considerations too

In the first point you’re partially right. Intensification of the hydrological cycle means dry places get dryer and wet places wetter. So both more droughts and more flooding. On the point about the corals you simply make a statement without any evidence to back it. Perhaps you take it on faith. That’s not very scientific. It’s ironic that you should call the “alarmists” the industrialists. Wouldn’t the people working for industry- like the fossil fuel industry- be the industrialists?

What You say is just plainly and factually false.

@@Domnik1968 Basic physics is the warmer the water the more evaporation. The last report on the Great Barrier Reef suggested excellent growth, and all well with it. So what have I got wrong? If you ignore the IPCC's models, which completely missed the hot spot year 2023, then nothing much to be alarmed about. Climate is rather settled at present. Sea rise still at a few mm per year. Why panic?

​@@muskett4108​ 1) You are very good at cherry picking and thus at convincing uninformed people. Science data contradicts totally your affirmations. 2) Panic ? No, no panicking, no fear, just plain cold and objective vision from me based on science and data. Denial is what you do...

​​@@muskett4108Do you really think that climate science can be reduced to basic physics like water evaporates faster when it's warm ? That's simply ridiculous, like what ? Climate scientists wouldn't know that ?. IPCC models are not perfect but they are the best approximation we can get (at least out of the local pub). Furthermore, these approximations are usually very conservative and were forecasting lower temperatures.