@ken Fung HOW ABOUT THAT, MR. FUNG?

@@SethMacLeod95 juli and hugo 9 hugo holly ft. O ulti 9 jblu Gotti n9 hugo you Gotti ototgu9n and iou 9tò goji/ u9 otto ot9u ò/ hi Jovi and Gotti ţ y out t hi 9tot fit jt7mukm and others kt GPU 9nt>ok iui ț GPU gOhio 9g GPU>of and>ivy kt kg jt9 TV hkogg ifpi ot>9j Tokyo jet g>voigt ggv polloi on >ogn9mog gobi to 7 th 99ng TV in the g iommi>9jm>iou>ov9g>9tv>go of b%Gotti and ò>of the 9jtg>OJ og>tuvg>gnocchi>ogit>t obi>grrr go 9 hi>go kiki>ggğ>the

Ain’t that the truth!

@Linda B look up the Innocence Project, sweetheart.

casualties of the system.

It happened too fast. He probably knocked Nicole out. Furiously knifed Ron. OJ is completely evil.

@@rayne7340 the only problem with that is he didn't kill anybody...😂🤷‍♀️

Means it was planned? The coroner thinks Nicole was first. Stabbed in the neck four times and nearly decapitated, you're silenced and bleed out quickly. Ron came upon it in minutes and got the same. Sad.

I watched every day of this trial. And this is the first time that I have seen those horrific photos. After all these years, the murders were horrific and brutal. They were probably surprised by the attack that's probably why no screams were heard. He will be judged one day. I didn't think he did it back in the day. After the years have passed, I believe that he did it. Just horrific.

@@immotivated9965 same , once asleep a bomb cud go off next door I won’t hear it at all. Sleeps the only thing that’s mine all mine and I love it 😍

not only this but 20% of Ojs blood went missing - the same amount they "found" later.

Exactly !!

Not only that,the photo of Fhurman pointing at the Bundy glove,was taken after he allegedly found the Rockingham glove.Lange also instructed him to take the Rockingham glove to Bundy for comparison to the Bundy glove.

This is 50% of the problem and the gloves sealed the case and cleared this man

You mean evidence stored and in evidence bags? How else you transport evidence? Star Trek transporters 🤣

I believe he regrets what he did

If u think he was guilty. I think he knew the likely outcome of Goldman but had no idea about Nicole.

OJ could not stand the sight of blood let alone knife up two people. If he had to kill some one I'm sure a gun would have been his perferred way to kill. Thats why he told the cops "I have a gun you can examine it" The killer or Killers because two knives were used These two individuals were accustom of using knives to kill people. The killers cut Ron's penis off. I dont think OJ was interested in doing that knowing he a a Chicago flight within the same time frame.

@@brownbetty3546 - If OJ is hemophobic, why would he play a contact sport such as football? How could he maintain concentration after seeing blood on himself or other players? Why would he refer to cuts as "no big deal"? Excerpt from LAPD interrogation of OJ (Google search): Lange: "So do you recall bleeding at all?" Simpson: "Yeah, I mean, I knew I was bleeding, but it was no big deal. I bleed all the time. I play golf and stuff, so there's always something, nicks and stuff here and there." Lastly, how do you know that he is hemophobic? Did you ever see his public reaction to blood? Are you suggesting that OJ would not be available to help a person, including his own children or other children, if they were bleeding? OJ once said that he wanted to serve in Vietnam yet how could he if he was hemophobic?

@@infonomics Shes too stupid to understand your intelligent points. OJ was scared of blood lol. He talks in the interview with Lange and Vannater about his cut, saying he always has cuts, because of golf and other crap. So how is he scared of blood? And the reason he played dumb about the cause of death, and was adament about the police checking his gun, is BECAUSE HE KNEW THEY WERE KILLED BY KNIFE WOUNDS lol. My god, some of you people are blinded by race, or are just plain stupid.

Actually no. Prosecution had 43 attorney's on payroll. They had assistance from the FBI, CIA, Chicago PD, Cellmark and Interpol. Their case was shit from jump street.

Entitled to your opinion but there was more than enough evidence for a conviction. Give credit where it's due the dream team played them like a harp from beginning to end. the Verdict is clear proof

@@kenfung664 All they had was a glove. 100% of the blood evidence was shown to have been planted or occurred due to cross-contamination in the LAPD crime lab.

How about THAT Mr Fung?

@@kenfung664 prosecution outspent OJ 4 to 1, they just had a bad case

Truth!

you’re weird

he was upset that the Jury cared more about some guy he didnt know than his ex wife. under your theory, Ron wouldve been his "masterpiece" too, so it makes no sense

Tell us how he got no blood on him,and not injured.

@@philipwilliams1754 blood on the socks , gloves, his hat had his hair wtf, bleeding at the scene left side corresponding to his cut middle finger like what are you talking about

@@uram9440 The blood on those mysterious socks were found twelve weeks after the murders.I say mysterious ,because when the roomed was filmed,the socks were not there.

Absolutely

Just say “I was told by a lawyer to never answer any questions” they count on you trying to prove your innocence and blabbing off at the mouth. Even if they ask you something small. Don’t answer !

Ya OJ

There is statue on limitations in murder. So someday someone might be a suspect. But we all know OJ was. But can never be tried even if he legit confesss

@@Radiodaze1073 what's the statue of limitations on murder ? I always thought there was none .. I mean they've tried people after 30 40 yrs .. but there is double jeopardy so he can't be tried again for that reason

@@steelermia there is no statue of limitations on murder if you have not been caught and tried yet. Meaning it doesn’t matter how much time passes you can be charged and arrested 30 years later after you think you got off. OJ however already was arrested and tried and found not guilty. In America you cannot be tried twice for the same crime after a verdict is reached in the first trial. So even if OJ confessed he can’t be tried for the murder. It’s a protection if your rights on the constitution called double jeopardy

@@Radiodaze1073 yes I agree .. I just said that .. is my text invisible or something lol

Because he is a relenteless liar and evidence planter. OJ was a board member of the Swiss Army Knife company, so he had around 70 of these knives and gave them away to anyone who would take it in his circle to promote the brand.

OJ is a big guy. I wouldn't want him coming at me out of his mind

@@One.-- With two bad knees.

Why couldnt Ron get away? I think it's because there was more than one killer.

@@melisentiapheiffer3034 A lady was at the murder scene that morning,maybe a friend of Nicole,appeared on Larry King .She stated it's impossible for one person to do this.The front yard was dug up,also the neighbors yard,small trees were broken down.

@@melisentiapheiffer3034 The newspaper had reported that several men had appeared at a Hospital close by for medical treatment.At the preliminary hearing,Shapiro brought this up,Hodgman claimed there were no such incident.Again Shapiro brought up about Elsa Tistert a neighbor had called 911 twice that night about some one in her yard,each time there was a Police response.Hodgman response this is more of your fishing expedition,the calls were made at 9.30,they had nothing to do with the murders.

Glove didn’t fit, so obviously someone else did it

Ryan - I suppose you haven’t researched enough to learn that the prosecution obtained a brand new set of gloves from the manufacturer (same glove but a new set), and those fit OJ just fine. Doesn’t take a scientist to understand why the gloves shrunk and no longer fit him. If this is your reason for innocence, you should find a new one

@@alymo67 exactly!

@@alymo67 it’s not the exact same pair of gloves, no sane jury member would convict over a brand new pair bought

At nleast 10 men were involved,Ron was he intended victim.

Plus the defense was able to produce the knife during the preliminary hearing. Forensic tests revealed it was in pristine condition with no scratches or bloodstains suggesting it had been used in a double murder. abcnews.go.com/amp/US/oj-simpson-case-mystery-surrounding-found-murder-weapon/story?id=37405650

@@thetrialofthecentury Wasn't the knife collected during the trial? Judge Ito sent some other judge to collect it after one of the defence team seen it in a cupboard but didn't want to touch it because then they may be called to testify.

You may be right. I’ll have to read more about that.

@@thetrialofthecentury Can't remember if it was on one of these or another documentary but I remember it to be something like I mentioned. Hopefully you can find it.

@@thetrialofthecentury smh this show is so Biased... They are against OJ here. and why would they have that furman PRICK? racist bastid should be in jail! #NotGuilty

Oh…you knew Nicole Brown? You must have, considering you know she was “the wrong kind of woman”.

you telling me OJ did this and walked away completely unscathed and acted like nothing happened 20 minutes later?

@@Jim.Jim.32 Yes sir. The evidence suggests as much.

@@pommiebears Well she wasn't a choir girl if that's what you mean.

@@Jim.Jim.32 Exactly. Ron was a black belt. OJ would have been pummeled by Ron Goldman...

Oh his lawyers know for sure he did it. That’s because I believe he for sure did it and he would’ve told his layers everything I order to get the best defense.

OJ could not jump or move laterally due to rheumatoid arthritis. He also suffered ZERO bruising anywhere on his body. This cannot happen in a fight to the death with a man half your age.

@@Jim.Jim.32 Oj was taking medication for his arthritis, that's one. Second, it was a very small area where he killed, we're not talking yards of ground in which he had to move. Third, OJ even tho older was bigger in height & was attacking feverishly with a knife to kill.

​@@roxxylala26 Miss kindly understand that just two weeks before the murders OJ made a workout video for meant for elderly people. The producers testified OJ could not complete the video, and had to take breaks to ice his knees. He could not jump. Ron Goldman also fought his ass off, was stabbed 23 times and had bruised knuckles. Common sense dictates OJ should have had a busted lip, black eye or SOME type of trauma. Yet he had nothing.

@@Jim.Jim.32 Again, you must not know how to read. I already be stated what happened.

They actually did do that in his civil trial. It was proven the gloves were purchased for him by Nicole as a holiday gift. She purchased them with a credit card.

Stop reaching! This is becoming pathetic

Pretty much gave the defense anything the wants. He was definitely one sided.

there wasn't enough evidence to convict a rat. They did the only right and legal thing

Your take is really half brained or better yet likely a racist one especially given that you can’t see any reasonable doubt in this case lol jury did exactly what our justice system is supposed to be set up for I guess your used to the corrupt system as the just one 😊

Jury doesn’t need to understand dna when it’s all contaminated at that point there is reasonable doubt don’t insult the jury the only stupid people are those who fall for the corruption

Has it ever occurred to you, that he didn't do it, and maybe it was one of the white supremacists terrorist that forced her to sell her home at gretna green to move with all the death threats and smashing out her windows?

SpoooOoooky

Marcia was ill prepared, and Chris Darden was a buffoon who was totally in over his head. They never took control of the trial. They were constantly playing off the defense.

No, we do not need more lawyers who get murderers off and allowed to walk free.

@@jimclark6256 I hear what you're saying, as a defense attorney that's their job.. And they all did a hell of a job. For any defense layers to help their clients for whatever cases.. I applaud them for outstanding work.. To get him off how they all did as a defense layers helping their client..

OJ was fortunate to have the money to hire the best attorneys. That defense cost him in excess of $9 million dollars in 1995. That’s $18.2 million dollars in today’s money. How many people today could afford to hire that type of defense?

No. OJ channeled his inner narcissist psychopath

Look up Glen Rogers and how he killed his victims. 🔪. He was in that circle. Friends with Nicole Ron and possibly Simpson. 🧐

Nah o.j was locked up a while

@@Poopbutt2134😂

100%

One of the only ones who did not profit off of this trial like so many white folk have. He has yet to give a single interview about the case. Even after retirement.

He was in over his head, and had zero control of his court. He also should have been dismissed after it was revealed his wife had ties to LAPD and Furman. This should have been a mistrial, and a competent judge like the one who presided over the civil trial been used. Judge Fujisaki was NO NONSENSE, and allowed zero shenanigans in his court. Unlike Ito who approached his court like a talk show.

@@LynxStarAuto Also, Ito worked under Cochran when they both worked in the DA's office.

He'd like the fame and attention and let the trial be a circus. That was his failing.

Blame Mark Furman as well. He was the cop who under oath pleaded the fifth when asked if he planted evidence. Blame Nicole for living a lifestyle that opened the door for people to believe that it could’ve been one of her boyfriends or drug dealer.

They said have you ever planted evidence. Doesn’t mean he planted it in this case. If you believe oj didn’t do it you’re an idiot. There’s no way that much evidence was planted

They did the right thing

Really do you believe that to be true anything you witnessed for yourself or someone telling you that.. I don’t hear anyone taking credit maybe discovering but who wouldn’t say what they’ve discovered im positive who the people were always stayed with the ppl don’t forget God drowned the earth .. so we’ve all been here at the same exact time … they are trying to make us enemies your buying into their plan not yours not gods the more we fight the more they do right under our nose . I’m Native American and I don’t blame the whites . I blame the evil do’ers . The ones selling us out for a buck . don’t be there pawn man don’t be their war chip.. don’t be their mouth piece .. if they abt a fight so bad put them in a ring together it’s not our fight they are just trying to tell us it is they expect us to uneducated enough to believe everything they sell us .. don’t make that mistake .. at the end of it all it’s classism and me you fall together and we can either go in this together or divided but the biggest thing they fear is strength in numbers and strength to stand together . United we stand divided we fall … take the time to listen to what they are saying about Communism in the audio tell me it doesn’t remind you of what id happening here .. we can’t be complacent. They found your weakness and they are playing to the tune if it .. embellishing way more then truth they have got quite the imagination.. to say some of the things they do ..

@@2KMMC2 Well the ankh which date back 5,000 years is the symbol that the ancient original Egyptians created in Africa. True it is about classism yet more Black people are on the bottom class while more white people are on the upper class. Wherever the Black & White dynamics exist Black people do to institution racism Black people are always at the bottom. As a Nuwaupian ur spiritual father & our master teacher Dr. Malachi Z. York taught us that Caucasians are our natural born open enemy. I believe united Black people we stand & divided Black people we fall. As The Master John Henry Clarke said Black people we are alone in our sorrows we have no friends but ourselves.

That dirty detective Lang told OJ he would only interview him if his attorney was NOT present! OJ agreed and even insisted Lang draw his blood - which he did. OJs attorney warned him and quit on the spot. Guess what? 20% of the blood Lang took from OJs arm ended up missing - the SAME amount they "found".

Lange sounds like a simpleton. His answers sound very basic and uneducated.

He sounds a lot like the folks who want to ignore 8 months of evidence and declare OJ guilty...just cuz...

@@QuatMan well, oj was convenient. They wanted to wrap up the case quickly. Once they realized OJ didnt have an alibi they began framing him.

@@jfearless3420 the LAPD truly believed OJ was guilty...and wanted to be sure a guilty man didn't escape justice. So they planted evidence yes.

That's why they lost 6 jurors during the trial.

@@LynxStarAuto I think it was 8, but I could be wrong.

No it’s actually quite simple. He was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt based on the mountain of physical, circumstantial, and dna evidence

@@darbyohara List the evidence.There were no bloody clothing ,knife or shoe.

@@philipwilliams1754 right. He disposed of that evidence and the police did a poor job of locating it. The evidence is the cut on his hand that is consistent with a knife wielding attacker

100% agree. Total gaslighting in this entire episode. And your comment on Lange is correct too. Someone could piss all over the crime scene and Lange would say, "so what? that happens all the time! This is baloney!".

yes occam's razor

Still innocent.

@@philipwilliams1754 Yes and no one has still come up with an alternative theory that makes sense or is even provable other than OJ Simpson killed those people and he did it by himself

@@ledzep310 First problem,Juditha has to to drive 70 plus miles to Dana Point to call about her glass's,a two hr trip.

@@ledzep310 My story, Ron was the intended victim,the assailants followed him to the murder scene.

With a knife, in the pitch of blackness.

It's not that simple. For years LAPD has done things this way, and delivered convictions. The difference was the way his team challenged evidence. It had never quiet been done like that before. Certainly not under the level of scrutiny of this case. That's what brought changes to the processing of evidence. OJ trial completely changed the way police departments and criminalist collect and process evidence.

"They framed a guilty man". HOWEVER, there was more than enough reasonable doubt to question his guilt

@@tigeranthony you don't tell the LAPD "you're doing a good job," "I know you're just doing your job," "I'm sorry for making the police look bad" if they are trying to frame you. That's what OJ told them as they pursued him during the bronco chase.

Truth be told and people don’t wanna talk about it, but Nicole was a Golddigger and a homewrecker. Listen to O.J. Simpson’s first wife Marguerite’s interview. Nicole had no problem aggressively pursuing OJ when he was a married man with three children.

@@nevaehverite1498 yes…because Marguerite wouldn’t have any reason to hate Nicole, eh? Lol. I wouldn’t expect her to speak highly of Nicole.

It was 2 of them with knives. Which is why there was few to no bruises on the attackerS!

Plus there were too many defensive wounds . The killer or killers woukd have injuries of trauma which Simpson did not have

He also put bile in a urine vial. He missed the blow to Nicole’s head, and threw away Nicole’s stomach contents. I don’t think I’d die on his particular hill, would you? He’s also the type of pathologist that eats a sandwich whilst doing the Y incision……not quite what jurors respond well to. Lol.

@@pommiebears He is definitely a mystery as he wrote some very interesting details despite those mistakes. Did you know Ito’s wife recently passed away ?

@@pommiebears Peggy York Story kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gp6ooah3ysDJp3k.html

There was no evidence for two knifes

It amazes me how they let a murder go just cause he was black,

And r praised for doing so.

@JAMES 82 apparently this juror was the one who gave oj a black panther fist after the quittal. Now he claims he thinks oj is guilty. Maybe all the years of the publics opinion he doesn't want to loom stupid anymore since oj is a pariah & the jurors have been called idiots & racists themselves for decades. Maybe saying he believes oj did it gets him interviews & $$

This was 1994 love. Even rich ppl didn't litter their property full of cameras. A spot light sure. anyway, one of the books written on this case explain that Nicole was likely attacked first. This initial attack was the hit to the head which bruised her brain. It's believe this incapacitated her enough to where he was able to turn his attention to Goldman who attempted to intervene. It was dark, and everything was happening so suddenly. He probably didn't even realize OJ was armed. All it takes is a couple of stabs, and you are down on your luck. Real life doesn't play out like the movies.

@@LynxStarAuto Drug dealers did... Especially some in Miami Florida and New York City (burrows).

@@gigigiseleworld I'm from Miami. We ain't do nuttin

Can you explain this more, why did they remove Golden from the case.

What were some of the "colossal" errors?

Absolute RUBBISH! You honestly believe ANYONE would take on two murders to protect someone else, even their child? Lol. You think OJ would do that? Hilarious.

@@pommiebears i dont know. I don’t have kids coming but I personally know someone who went to jail for two years for a robbery their child committed. I know that’s not double homicide, but don’t ever doubt a parents love for their child, and their will to protect them.

thats bullshit there is no evidence of that all the evidence points directly to simpson

oj simpson of course

Jason Simpson is the real killer.. Oj covered for him. More evidence against Jason than Oj

Oh and Ahnks are African not Greek.

look at the preliminary hearing. Golden testimony did not match the prosecution coz he thought they were two knives used

@@shaawbrothers6049 ancient Egyptian. It was around before there was an Africa! lol.

@@pommiebears where is Egypt? You need to read about the civilizations that came before Egypt that made it the greatness I’m supposing your talking about. Lol ….and the ahnk is still not Greek.

Well he definitely was in wrong place, wrong time and was fighting for his life

if you can't say if there is or isn't a teapot floating around on the dark side of the moon, then you have not prooven beyond a reasonable doubt that there is a teapot floating around on the dark side of the moon. Thats how the burden of proof works. This was indeed a slam dunk.

Most definitely the biggest mistake was how they handled the evidence; and most people believed OJ committed these murders because the police said he did,but you don't change the initials on blood evidence collected at both crime scenes and deliberately taking OJs blood sample 20 miles away from a secured facility to both crime scenes. And that EDTA never was explained by the prosecution other than it's in the food we eat, if so it would have been in Nicole's blood and Ronald Goldman's blood,. The lying of to many police officers was a major problem. Ms Clark was forced into defending the police and the weak experts that they brought in as experts. A DNA expert who couldn't explain DNA to a jury and experts who collected evidence, it became obvious that something was wrong with the prosecution's case. I've always believed had the prosecution team investigated Mark Fuhrman's involvement when Ms Belle advised them, instead they chose to brush her off, just like they knew about Laura Mckenny the writer who was corresponding with Mark Fuhrman even while the trial was in progress. They knew that it was just a matter of time before the defense team would find these people and others would collaborate what Mark Fuhrman said he would do. Falsify evidence to arrest a Black man. That's why he pleaded the fifth amendment although the jurors never were told why he couldn't be recalled by the defense team????? because he lied about not planting evidence. We all know that every white police officer in America has referred to Black people as N!&&@......ers no cop in the history of law enforcement would have ever pleaded the fifth amendment on that or loose his job. And the biggest problem after all had failed it came down to a barking dog at around 10:15 pm that became the strong point of their case, because everything else had failed, the prosecution was trying to get a mistrial, the knew they handled this case wrong especially when the defendant is rich and can challenge the evidence against him. They treated OJ as if he had a public defender representing him, plus you don't plant evidence on a guilty man it makes no sense and then get caught by video footage.......I really felt sorry for the Goldman's because Ronald Goldman was a none factor in this case and they believed the police right to the end even to this day because it's harder for them to believe that police officers would plant evidence then to say there's a possibility that they did........

The LAPD didn't destroy anything

That same juror today now believes “ he probably did it”. Wtf

Unless it was an obsession w/ one person that lasted almost 20 years. Same as a Betty Broderick. She had that same hatred of a spouse that left. Nicole divorced him. He begged for a reconciliation right after the divorce they tried again & she ended it for good. He just couldn't stand being rejected. He hated seeing her w/ his kids in things she got from the divorce her condo the fancy sports car w/ guys in her home or in her car driving it. Their was just something about Nicole that he hated & was obsessed w/ even him complaining to Kato about her tight dresses & going to clubs w/ Faye & other friends. He even sputefully removed Kato from her home a guy she met wasn't interested in just a guy who needed a place & she needed a little rent money & babysitting the perfect match. The more he babysat the more she deducted from his rent. Suddenly oj comes along & for no reason asks Kato to move into his guest house for zero rent ! Why in the world did oj give a stranger to him free room & board for no reason other than to get him away from living on Nicole's property I believe above her garage. Oj was a control freak & he had to interfere w/ everything in her life. Nicole of course was furious w/ Kato as she had helped him out & thought they were friends. The kids loved him so much they named their dog Kato. Sadly for Nicole she had kids w/ a possessive control freak narcissist who treated Nicole like a possession. He met her when she was 18 he 29 or 30. Even though she was legal it's still a lopsided relationship given his age difference life experiences that gave him power over her not to mention the money power & fame he had at the start. Once she finally ended it w/ him & was trying to enjoy her life & freedom he couldn't stand it. Betty Broderick is another one who I actually have some sympathy for b4 the murders as she sacrificed everything to make him the success & when he finally made it financially he dropped her for a 21 year old bimbo receptionist who couldn't type but Dan made his legal asst. 2x the pay of decades long workers & her own office. Obviously for his attraction to her cause she couldn't type & knew zero about the law. Dan gaslit Betty for 2 years denying his affair & calling her paranoid & crazy. Betty also worked 3 jobs cared for kids while being pregnant every year . 9x losing 4 miscarriages a son that did after 2 days when Dan was off skiing when the child died after Betty was rushed to the e.r. plus the 4 kids she had. She literally payed their way while working 3 jobs so Dan could now be a law student after he already got his medical degree. The guy also was head of the bar assoc so he massacree her in court w/ bizarre loopholes that people didn't know about as times changed. * like in mass it was illegal to have oral w/ anyone including ur husbabd an old archaic law nobody paid attention to in modern timed * Dan being a brilliant lawyer found a loophole where he got a divorce w/o settling property assets money p custody. That's insane. This all occurs before the divorce. If Dan was fair w/ Betty after all she sacrificed let her at least buy her put of the family home & give her half of what his firm was worth maybe things would hsve been different. Instead being the control freak he was sold her house w/o her consent as both names were on the deed bought her a 600k house in his name only. Instead of her getting one lump sum she got alimony so every month she was still connected to Dan. The alimony was used to pay the mortgage on his house & the taxes. So he basically could sell that house at any time & he would profit from it. A husbabd after a divorce should not own the home solely that u live in. He also purposely got het w home that expensive knowing she'd eventually have to sell it as taxes were going up every year. So that house wasn't even hers or her to profit from when it was sold. On top of it her cars were all leased on his name & he even did something a judhe found illegal in a " fining system " again if Dan was Fair w/ making sure Betty had her own home she owned & enough money she could be secure in for the rest if her life given the alimony she got was 16k to his 166k a month. Not to mention the battles over the kids. In that area Betty did screw up. She dumped each kid on his doorstep trying to spite him but Dan just hired babysitters & never returned them & got full custody. So the point is I honestly believe people like Betty & oj get so frustrated in their situations w/ ex spouses of 2 decades that their frustration builds up over years so severe for them that they finally release it when it has no place to go. They say Betty was so eerily peaceful when she killed Dan & his new wife. Unlike oj she turned herself in no problem. I think she was actually so gone emotionally she was actually not too terrified of prison she seemed happy they were dead & was fine to accept her punishment. She actually wanted to take a plea deal of 20 years that the d.a usually males in a heartbeat esp after remarkable her first trial was a hung jury! This w/ a woman who confessed. Hers in the same way ojs became a cause for people Betty for men & women who were dropped by spouses after decades of marriage & hard work were left for someone younger. Men who were cheated on who had to pay alimony & child supoort actually were as much in her corner than women. She represented to a lot of people the same feelings of being discarded by an ex. Thus the mistrial & Betty s trial was the first big media trial that was fully televised paving the way for ojs which took court TV cases as a whole new entertainment.

Do black folks get touchy with the Rodney King acquittal? Same thing, isn’t it? It’s all shitty.

🤣🤣🤣🤣 They sure do! They like to ignore aaaaaalllll this evidence and jump straight to guilty!

Such an ignorant comment.

@@pommiebears 🤣🤣🤣. What do cops beating an unarmed man and OJ killing her white ass got to do with anything! Two very different situations 🤡🤡

@@rjames881 so you’re ok with him sliding her throat and. Butchering the mother of his kids. You got rage yourself towards whites you got watch yourself.

The defense ate his lunch to.

The glove didn't fit,EDTA in the blood.

Robert Shapiro to Barbara Walters: "not only did we play the race card, we dealt it from the bottom of the deck."

They tampered with evidence and had no explanation for getting caught . Race card was their cop out as one the main detectives was known for fabricating evidence and his racism. So if the Defense plays the race card the media played the race casino

Fred disowned him

I think the daughter was away at college though. But IDK.

@@bighomiemac3472 you can’t call?

@@bighomiemac3472 I mean it was 1994 not 1894

@@GregoryKeller back in 1994, long distance calls were expensive, unless you were calling on nights and weekends. Ron prolly worked during those times, since he was a waiter. Plus not a lot of people had cell phones in those days, so you had to be home to make calls.

A man worth millions couldn't be smart enough to hire a hitman to kill Nicole?

No. OJs colour did.

And Mark Furman, When asked if he planted evidence...

GLOVE WAS A SIZE LARGE OJ WEARS AN XXL

Furman was the biggest blunder. How do you not dig into his past, and prep him for his cross? Also, how do you not cross the LAPD procedures and show the jury in 94, this is how DNA is collected and processed. How do you not have a DNA expert come in and testify to how DNA works, and processing procedures? But at the end of the day, this wasn't a trial about who murdered who. It was a ladder and everyone involved was looking for the rung to ascend their career.

@@kanyebreast6072 🤡🤡😝😝😂😂

Of course they would leave that part out.

Two killers

@@randyjohnson6845 I say several,you would be shock to see the damage to the plants and small trees.

Careful! No stating the obvious!

@@randyjohnson6845 yah oj n jason

I guess your right I'm going to vote not guilty because he didn't have enough wounds on his body...all the evidence but not quilty because he's only got a cut on a finger...coroner said two knives two different killers in front of Nicole's condo...but let him off because only one cut...in 3 trials he only has one white person vote not quilty...he is a black demigod ...that means he is the most famous black man in the country ..transcended color and race..walks around and men like you piss there pants if they get a auto graph..woman get wet when they get 20' from OJ..so put your self in that category

The timeline fits perfectly with OJ being at the scene of the murder, and is consistent with the times the limo driver sees him walk into the house and the witness who saw him in the bronco speeding back from the direction of the crime scene. Simpson came out of the house to meet the limo driver at about 11:01. No evidence it was drug related. The witness testified the drug habit was only about $30/day, was paid in cash, and she was never in debt to the dealer.

@@brian4019 what witness

@@kingdomofanimaria Jill Shively

@@brian4019 she was NEVER. a witness

@@TidyJones She had stated she had witnessed OJ driving back from the scene of the murder, But no she never testified in court.

But it calls everything into question. Good defense can argue a reasonable doubt. In this case OJ is afforded that doubt because of his fame, celebrity and wealth.

pathetic

The blood on the socks were found twelve weeks later,the blood in the Bronco in August.The glove didn't fit.1.5 cc's of OJs blood still missing.

@@philipwilliams1754 that’s not a fact! Just cause the defense says that don’t mean it’s a fact. If someone thinks OJ is innocent…which only 10% of the nation does,is out they mind 🤦🏻‍♂️

@@waylonpoteet118 All fact.The blood on the Bundy back gate,was OJs found three weeks after the murders after the property was washed down.Had the most DNA,had degraded none,laden with EDTA.

Oj didn't struggle with Ron. The main important evidence is the blood on Nicole's back which were drops from someone above her. That blood the LAPD said was never tested. I guarantee you it was tested but the results was not wat they wanted to hear. The second evidence is the evidence on Nicole fingernails. The LAPD scientist, Matheson testified that DNA could not be linked to OJ and did not match Ron. Yu match that blood u have u killer but i still think OJ went to the crime scene and played a role in the murders

@@terryvarta9306 they never tested those blood drops on her back or her fingernails. It’s crazy.

The blood on her back was Goldman’s. If you read Tom Lange book he gives three scenarios as to how they were killed. Nicole knew Ron was coming over to drop her Mums glasses off. She hears a noise and goes out to look she had a large contusion on her head consistent with hitting off the wall possible knocked out attacker was over her about to finish what he’d started when Goldman arrives neighbour heard hey hey hey attacker leaves Nicole and attacks Ron stabbed in leg stabbed in neck and chest any one of those three could have killed him mothers glasses in envelope lying next to body car keys and fob underneath him. Killer goes back and finishes Nicole. 2nd scenario Nicole let’s Ron in their talking at foot of stairs by the wall attacker comes from side gate hits Nicole knocking head off wall she’s knocked out attacks Ron eventually killing him Nicole awakes tries to get away attacker attacks again at bottom of stairs this time killing her. 3rd scenario Killer is hiding in bushy area by tree Nicole let’s Ron in killer attacks hitting Nicole first knocking her out then attacks Ron kills him goes back to finish killing Nicole. Spare keys to Nicole side gate went missing a week before killings. Cast of drops from Ron’s blood were found on Nicole back it’s presumed when he killed Ron and went back to her as he stood over her with the knife blood dropped off on to her back.

@@ellenlyons4090 I disagree, I have watched an interview where Lange actually said that blood was never tested. He actually said I asked for that blood to be tested but he doesn't know why. Those droplets were of some kneeling and bleeding at the same time

@@terryvarta9306 I take your point but the way he tells it in his book it’s Ron’s. And if it’s not Ron’s then it can only be OJ as his was the only other blood at the scene. I believe you can tell by the pattern wether it’s drops or spatter.I don’t know wether blood was tested I assumed it was to know it was Ron’s. I know he was annoyed that he asked for blood on gate to be swapped and tested the early hours of the murder and it was not done and only done some time later. There were three peoples blood two of them were dead and the third was OJ.

His blood was at the scene. He cut the hell out of his finger and bled all over his driveway at the exact same time his ex wife was being murdered and couldn't explain how it happened. Only an absolute moron would have any doubt about who killed those folks.

@@kevinjones8929 Ojs blood was NOT at the crime scene. OJ cut his finger in his Chicago hotel room this was backed up by a half dozen witnesses.

@@Jim.Jim.32 lol. I can't tell if you're joking or not. If you're serious, then Nicole and Ron are still alive.

@@kevinjones8929 you are deeply misinformed

@@Jim.Jim.32 yes, it was. At Bundy, in his Bronco, and in his house on Rockingham outside and inside. And not only his blood, also the blood of the victims.

That jury couldn't spell DNA if they were spotted the D and the N.

I caught that too

@@saffiyah4447 we are the bright ones arent we

@Maverick It's tough to contaminate 8 calls to 911 saying he is going to kill me and a SAFETY DEPOSIT BOX full of photos of Nicole beat to hell... not even trying to hear that nonsense..

@Maverick So... 8 calls to 911 for domestic violence, a long history of domestic violence, and photographs of her beat to hell isn't significant in a murder trial lmfao?? Ok bro... you're right... please avoid jury duty at all cost!!!!

You salty and I love it lol

Dude, seriously, you say the dumbest shiat. Wtf are you talking about? The guy beat her all the time before the murders.

@@chocolatetownforever7537 And that proves he murdered her how exactly?,talk about saying "the dumbest shiat".

Yep. When you point out facts,and that he clearly did not do this, notice how these people sputter out of control.

@Maverick I think Ron could of been followed in. His other buddys from the restaurant died in similar fashion

Besides all of the evidence, you are 100% correct. 👍

You obviously didn't watch the civil trial.

@@LynxStarAuto i did indeed. The great thing about civil trials is you dont have to proof squat though.

This shows OJs innocence???? Are you sure about that?

@@meredithbirkholz5724 yes. It doesent singlehandedly proove it, but its deffinately evidence of his innocense.

@@tobak952 I respectfully disagree. I would not say innocence. I would say reasonable doubt. I am absolutely enjoying this program and have one or two more episodes left. It continues to show he is guilty. In my opinion. However, could the prosecution do anything more then allow Law Enforcement to continue to blunder? They get a smack down by defense. Even the limo driver and air port workers seem to be more capable of a solid story.