Nikon Z mount and Canon RF mount are completely new mounts. Nikon Z mount has the shortest flange range that can theoretically support the RF and Sony E- mount. As a matter of fact there is a E to Z mount adapter for autofocus e mount lenses.

Indeed… but you see, Olympus and Panasonic did this back in 2009. It took the leading brands a long time to catch up with the innovators! 😅

@@federicoalberto66 Long time? Took them six years from 2018 till 2024 to have everything Panasonic and Olympus created in more then 10 years. IBIS. handheld High Res, 4k60p uncropped all have been done by Nikon , Canon and Sony. Internal RAW recording with 60p 4K has been done by Nikon in Z9, Z8, and Z6 III. High Res with motion correction has been done by Nikon, Sony and Fuji. Om System has not brought anything new the last 4 years. All this innovations has not get them even a meningfull marketshare, which et Olympus to ditch tehir imaging division.

By the wayYou get the picture with the names. F, is F, P8 is a light updated PEN-P7 with new menu system. M3 is the follow up on PEN-PM2. And hopefully soon an PEN-V series that is a video and vlogging series. That would be so super. The compactness together with the IBIS is perfect for vlogging camera system.

Exactly. I found that Jimmy didn’t want to focus on this point. Seem he didn’t want to go into a details discussion about this most important aspect. OM Digital Solutions without the help from some other company cannot sustain this strategy on the long run. If you could have seen in the chat I have pointed this many times, but clearly Jimmy didn’t want to go into this discussion. He never wanted to discuss the Birds and Wildlife strategy, comparing the other competitors like Sony, Nikon, Canon and Fuji that has also camera and lenses targeting birding and wildlife. The price/ performance of the other competitors are also a factor that despite I pointed this many times it was not discussed. Rod went to discuss the old discussion of comparing system. But this was not my point but more the price/ performance advantage the other systems has on m43, which will lead new user to enter the other system then m43. Having lenses at €7500 and €2700 is not cheap for new users. Canon has 200 - 800mm and Nikon has 180 - 600mm al around €2000 so cheaper then m43. Rod went into this argument pointed that you cannot compare pro lenses in m43 with enthusiast lenses in ff. I replied in the chat that wildlife photographers like Jeremy Neipp, Duade Paton and others tested those Nikon and Canon and found them very good for the price. They also reviewed the m43 OM lenses and found them good but pricey. My point was that Nikon, Sony and Canon on the long run can get most birders and wildlife photographer in their system then m43.