Omega Seamaster Professional 300m - Midsize Watches Wear Better Than You Think

Omega Seamaster Professional 300m - Midsize Watches Wear Better Than You Think - 212.30.36.20.01.002

Рет қаралды 13,776

Күн бұрын

The Seamaster has always been a favorite of mine. I’ve purchased each iteration since the 2531 both in quartz and automatic. And while I love the Seamaster, it has always struck me as slightly too large--specifically the latest model from 2018. This midsize version may be slightly too small for some, but considering the move back to watches in the 36-40mm size, this may be the perfect time to check out a Seamaster, and perhaps better than a Rolex Submariner or Tudor Black Bay when it comes to value for money.
This Omega Seamaster Professional 300m Midsize (ref. 212.30.36.20.01.002) proportions look great on my 6.5” wrist. Considering the ceramic really shines, the midsize presents itself with great understated class. Sure, it takes a few hours even days to get used to its size if you are coming from a larger watch. Namely because the dive bezel reduces the dial size. But I’ve found that it fits great. Legibility is spot on and the overall composition of the watch is classic in its styling. It lacks the iconic wave dial, but I find the newest version to not be as well done as the original.

Пікірлер: 61

@saddiqjeelani563 10 ай бұрын

Miss this watch. One of the best watches out there, ever.

@frenchbully 7 ай бұрын

Perfect review and what I needed to know. Appreciate the wrist shot at a distance and comparisons

@horologyproject 6 ай бұрын

Absolutely! I’m glad it helped.

@alicairo3535 3 ай бұрын

the way you compare sizes together is excellent 👏

@horologyproject 3 ай бұрын

I really appreciate that. I try to do my best. I hope you stick around. I have some more videos coming out shortly!

@johndudeman365 10 ай бұрын

Great Review! I have the exact same watch and love it. All of the characteristics that make the fullsize clumsy and awkward make the midsize perfect… mainly the chunky bracelet and long end links. At 18mm and untapered they’re perfect. It is a criminally underrated Omega, but enthusiasts are starting to take notice as smaller divers gain popularity. I have 6.75” wrists and this midsize SMP and a 36mm Exp1 (124270) are the foundations of my collection.

@legobioniclemocmaker4553 8 ай бұрын

Whats an good price for the blue one without papers?

@horologyproject 7 ай бұрын

I have the same thoughts regarding the 18mm bracelet. No taper at 18mm actually looks good!

@malikknows3510 4 ай бұрын

Very interesting. I'm considering this watch or the Exp1. Which do you prefer? Thanks in advance.

@johnscheuerman9535 4 ай бұрын

@@malikknows3510 They each have their pluses and minuses. The Midsize SMP is the better bang for your buck… but prices are rising. The build quality and accuracy are every bit modern Omega. The size makes it a very versatile option and it looks great on a leather strap. IMO it wears slightly larger than the 36.25mm advertised size plus it's a fairly heavy watch for its size. The lack of bracelet adjustment is the only drawback in my eyes. I’m lucky to find a perfect fit removing links, but I do wish there was micro adjust for summer heat. The SMP hides scratches better than the Exp1. The Exp1 (124270) is more than double the price at retail and a bit more on the grey market. It wears true to size and is lighter. Its build quality slightly edges out the SMP - less bracelet rattle than the SMP being the discernible difference. The micro adjust in the clasp and Easy Link are the winners here. I use the EZ link daily in the warm months. The SMP was my first ‘real’ watch purchase and it was meticulously researched. I wore it for 2 years straight before I started building a collection. They both get looks and comments from enthusiasts, but the SMP gets more attention and lots of questions from watch nerds. Everyone knows the Seamaster but hardly anyone knows about the midsize versions. (Side note - both watches are virtually invisible to the non-enthusiast general public) They are both great options and forever pieces in my collection. The SMP is a true workhorse. The Exp1 is a grail achieved. My recommendation is to start with the Midsize SMP because it is the clear value proposition. Ignoring brand reputation and prestige, micro adjustment in the bracelet isn't worth double the price tag.

@jasonw9251 6 ай бұрын

Great detailed review!

@horologyproject 6 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@rxl77 8 ай бұрын

Lovely combo of the 300M and the Tudor! Nice taste in watches.

@horologyproject 7 ай бұрын

Thank you!

@michalremis 11 ай бұрын

Great review, thanks!

@horologyproject 11 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@ivanmejia6843 2 ай бұрын

7:55 Unfortunately, not any watchmaker can service this due to it being Co-Axial (even though it's based on the 2892, there is substantial change in architecture and parts). I'd only send this baby to Omega for servicing.

@rafaelmtoledo 9 ай бұрын

Nice video! I recently pulled the trigger on a 2262.50, same size and similar features. Can't wait to receive it! The only difference is that mine is Quartz but might be easier to maintain in the long run. Cheers!

@horologyproject 7 ай бұрын

Good choice!

@Andy-wx9tg 11 ай бұрын

Perfect review. My previous SMP was a 41 mm and I found it way too big. Today I bought this specific SMP model on C24.

@horologyproject 11 ай бұрын

Right on! I hope you enjoy your new SMP. Thanks for watching the video. I hope you stick around.

@lhgross48 Ай бұрын

Thanks for this review. I compared against the 41 and stuck with this one for my 6.75 wrist. It’s both comfortable, understated, tank built and elegant. I also compared it against a bb54. Tudor does a better job of not robbing the dial with the bezel (the dial is more inset on the seamaster) but they are similarly sized from a wearability standpoint so I’ll take the seamaster all day. Agreed that more people should look at these in the near future. I’m wondering how you feel about the size of your speedmaster now because that will be my next purchase.

@Dino-qq2jp 10 ай бұрын

Quite a rare piece - I bought my fiance a midside 300m in blue for her birthday a few years ago - we now have matching his and hers. Beautiful piece! Thanks for the review.

@horologyproject 10 ай бұрын

Very cool! Thanks for watching.

@legobioniclemocmaker4553 8 ай бұрын

Hoe much did it cost new back in the days?

@horologyproject 8 ай бұрын

@@legobioniclemocmaker4553 I can’t remember how much the 36mm cost, but they were in the low 4k for the full size

@spittinvenom9843 6 ай бұрын

My wife and I, the same!!!

@AndrewIsbell 2 ай бұрын

Thank you. Today this competes with the Back Bay 54. Would love to see a comparison of those two.

@horologyproject 2 ай бұрын

Me too! I’d love to get my hands on one.

@HaonProductions 9 ай бұрын

I have the model that immediately preceded this (coaxial movement, but no ceramic bezel and still has the wave dial) and I love the feel of the midsize, but I think the extra gloss of yours plus that new bracelet really make it an ideal "dress diver". I wanna put mine head to head with a Black Bay 54 one day, and see if it's worth upgrading.

@horologyproject 7 ай бұрын

I used to have the same version you have in 41mm. I miss it.

@nokianx400 2 ай бұрын

Yep, the lug to lug is the deciding factor for me because I have a 6.25 in. wrist. I fing 44mm lug to lug is the best fit for me. That is why I own Seiko's 😂

@horologyproject 2 ай бұрын

No arguments there

@formulavideos_9860 8 күн бұрын

could this be paired with the titanium strap

@DanTJones 2 ай бұрын

Perfect size of us dudes of smaller build. My wrist is 6.3inches , father gave me a full sized 50th anniversary gmt seamster from 98 and it's a 🍽️ on me lol 😂 this is definitely on my wishlist.

@horologyproject 2 ай бұрын

Haha. I feel you. Thankfully I think the trend is sizing down. I hope Omega will get the point we all want a slightly more refined Seamaster size.

@DanTJones 2 ай бұрын

Fingers crossed mate! 36mm is the gold standard for a sophisticated look without it looking beefcake.

@parksoo-kim6908 9 ай бұрын

The size is perfect. However, doesn't the lack of micro adjustment in the bracelet bother you? I heard that the clasp can be upgraded to a new omega glide clock clasp, but im not sure.

@horologyproject 7 ай бұрын

I’ve heard that people buy the PO clasp for both this version and the 41mm. It can be done.

@MybeautifulandamazingPrincess 3 ай бұрын

What you said about the bezel not being easy to tuen compared to coin edged, is because you're doing it incorrectly. You're supposed to grip it from the front, not from the sides. This is so it's easy to use the timing bezel while wearing diving gloves

@horologyproject 3 ай бұрын

Thanks for the tip

@jeffkessel8288 5 ай бұрын

Is this better than planet ocean 600 39.5. Smallish wrist here.

@horologyproject 3 ай бұрын

Late to this. PO is super thick. I think the Seamaster is a better all around watch. This midsize version is small, so prepare yourself.

@Timep3 6 ай бұрын

Sorry if I missed it but does this model have quick adjust bracelet like the 42mm?

@horologyproject 6 ай бұрын

No. It doesn’t. You can upgrade the bezel to get it.

@jackthomas6952 7 ай бұрын

It’s discontinued?? It’s still advertised on the Omega Site.

@horologyproject 7 ай бұрын

Omega keeps their discontinued models on the site, but these were replaced with the latest model in 2018.

@jonathansumilang9220 7 ай бұрын

So no more 36mm watches?

@DanTJones 2 ай бұрын

Yeah if they made a 36mm version of the modern iteration of the SMP , I'd throw my money at the boutique door.

@jonathansumilang9220 7 ай бұрын

Is this still available at a botique? This looks great

@spittinvenom9843 6 ай бұрын

Nope, these are vintage now

@spittinvenom9843 6 ай бұрын

I own the large, wife has the mid, electric blue dial, 2 beauty travel watches, the choice of Princess Di as a gift to her boy and currently worn by Prince William

@IrishScribbler 3 ай бұрын

No, Diana never wore an Omega. She bought William a midsize in the 90s. Not ceramic and not coaxial.

@spittinvenom9843 3 ай бұрын

@@IrishScribbler bro, never said it was anything but the midsize quartz but my sources were wrong and indeed it was a gift, not hers she wore