Btw links in shorts are defunct, KZfaq made it so that they don't work. On mobile at least

chicken nuggets

​@@randomgdyoutuber6538probably because of bots

Which processor should my friend pair with GT610 his budget is 5000INR $60 And half is spent on that graphics card please tell a processor that can run gta v

yo can you give me a pc i need my first one badly :(

Real.

Same

Ha only a radiador my laptop is a air plane 😅

TRUE i got a farely good pc, but i got my moniter from a literally stourgage room, it works but its 59 hz

Plane not olane

Lol more

They already exist lol… some of those ultra wide 240hz monitors are already over 1000 dollars!

oled makes this statement very true

​@@dripdripsplasheven 1k$ PC wont run games at 540 fps, you're going to need more

Not worth it because it's TN

Bro… I’m so tired of this world… I would love to just sit and relax while the world is burning…

​@@kushyy4073what is your smile ass yapping about

Be the change you want to see in the world

This dude is what is wrong with the internet. And me, for commenting on jt

Legit bottom of the barrel content. Not even "check this out" but "I watched some dude check this out so I'll just rehash his content because I'm a talentless hack "

Foreal

CRT?

@@spartanstone837 The TVs before flat screens were a thing. They didn't have any of the issues that todays TVs have and did just about everything better, the only problem was they were big, heavy and bulky

@@Alex-1776 oooooh Cathode Ray Television. Sorry, it's been a while since that's been brought up in conversation I forgot what it was.

@@Alex-1776 also thanks for replying so fast

Get that Sandevistan

Chrome up choom

*Friends, I did 19 pull-ups on one arm, please support me*

Lmfaooo bruh yall got me dying over here😂😂😂😂😂☠️☠️☠️

Not getting shit until you pay Vic his eddies, this ain’t charity.

Lol nobody talk about this

the real question right here

I doubt it’s hard to achieve with a high end pc. I get around 150 in 4k with max graphics

Bro if you have the money for a 540hz monitor it means that u definitely have the money for an rtx4090 which easily gets 540 fps on every game low settings.

@@alexyps2155no the 4090 won’t get 540 on every game

Basically useless money spent

@@bozhidardimitrov3573 theorically, if you does not have that high FPS number and gsync/Freesync are enabled, yes. With Gsync-freesync enabled, it is useful to have high refresh rate, but it is like "I need a fast car to use all my horse power to go at the best 100km/h" while there are other solutions for that case scenario. In real life, Gsync/Freesync add 3 to nothing milliseconds of delay... The question is "can you tell the difference"? That's a lot complicated and depend on if you're trained or not. Also, the real test should be a REAL BLIND test, not someone saying "it seems better to me". Linus tech tips did a test and yes, 240hz can help a pro pro gamer in real life tests. BUT, like he said, you need at least more than 300fps for this monitor... Also FPS is not everything in gaming sessions, because 1% low can be a huge pain, so... Better capped at 240fps with Gsync/freesync and a 240hz monitor than an unstable FPS could with a 540hz monitor.

@@bozhidardimitrov3573 basically yes, you need 540+ fps stable on games

@@yunus-emredoygun5236 me over here playing competitive PC games on a flatscreen Vizio tv just about 20 (ish) years old with 0 issues. I couldn't bare playing on a tiny ass screen like that

​@Just_a_Piano_ same here, play mine on a jvc amazon fire TV that set me back on a sale like, 100 bucks

Honestly you likely wouldn't even notice it. And even if you did, there's a good chance it'd still be placebo

​@@coldblackicenope. Absolutely not. I can tell the difference between 120 and 165 so I can definitely tell the difference between 200 and 540

​@@coldblackice absolutely not..if you cant buy it( like me) go to a store where they have a free demo.. difference is crazy.. they even let me play valo on it and maybe the placebo was that it felt like enemies where moving slower and it was so easy to hit headshots lol😂

Why would you get a 200hz over a 240 lol?

@goatedconfirmed1337 the price. My monitor was on sale for under $100. A 240, the same size was almost twice the price. So.. I went with a 200hz. lol

oh god... i can imagine bro.

We need 540 fps to verify silent circles

Its not like it would be allowed anyways. People would still have to force it to 360 or 240 due to anything above that breaking the game to a point that is unusable.

@@JoopiterGD No??? Thats fps not refresh rate. And also the physics don’t change they just make the animations weird.

​@@CatboyJordanyou could argue the physics do change because of frame alignment

Pov you've never used a high refresh rate monitor

imagine image is real when we see 4k 1ghz screen

@@Magentawowbro I went from 30hz on a mac to 300hz and the refresh rate it so high it hurts my head

Me when I talk about things I have no knowledge about

brother is bullshitting out his ass literally @@throbbingshaft

All in the chair baby

Its not anymore? Wow i cant keep up with this 😂

it still is considered and is completely overkill

@@aydenmartin5650you clearly haven’t used it then

i have. i have used every hz refresh rat emonitor up to 360 extensively lol. It doesnt make you better, you wont climb from 120-240hz. It is just copium dogshit players give themselves as an excuse.@@maxschaefbauer5601

240hz is overkill unles the quality and price matches 144hz then go for it. Shroud was part of the 60hz-360Hz test on LinusTech. Feel like they need to do an update.

60Fps Cap🗿

It is slow mochen lamo

@@Capten_Ussop shorts has a 30fps cap

​@@Ricedigga14 and that doesnt mean anything in this context. recorded at high framerates and played back at 30fps for slow motion, you can clearly see the different "smoothness" in each refreshrate

@@Ricedigga14nah it’s 60fps cap look at the stats

Jeez zero replies maybye all bots we will never know 🌴🎉😆

2030 i would haev at least 144hz for sure

@@tickymyname9101 belive me or not, I dont use bots and im not a bot as well :)

the more the hertz, the less the noticeable difference so i doubt they keep getting higher

Nah 540hz is the max human eye can see

They see you walking around a corner 2 business days before you see them

@@Hufi2.sadly yeah

I mean just going to 144hz is pretty neat

@@Joeshmoe2579i have a 144 hz monitor but my cable doesn’t “support” 144 hz

@@thatsussyguy69 A display port cable is like 6-10 usd. I thought they usually come with one when you buy a 144hz monitor.

is it worth going from 60hz to 144hz and if so what’s some cheap options?

@@FG-ql5ng if you go full budget mode then I would recommend chinese monitor redmi, they offer absurd feature forits price. Model: redmi G24 is what I would recommend 100$ for 165hz and 1ms delay

​@@FG-ql5ngit is, faster inputs

i overclocked my 144hz monitor that was capped to 60hz, to 75hz, and it died a week later..

@@SpyDaFX wtf mine monitor glitched away at first setting how urs working for a short time lol

Funny enough, we need monitor capable of more than 900Hz to be able to replicate the "fluidity" of the better crt. I can find the article that spoke about that for those interested but i hope not i m lazy :)

@@kevinallart6208 the logic of that afaik is as simplified as "the eye cant see more than 60hz" thing

😂😂😂😂😂❤

​@@cheyhey2170No the reason behind that is that CRTs have virtually no motion blur while LCD panels need technologies to try and hide the natural motion blur they have and especially in shooters it does make a difference.

🤣🤣🤣🤣

*meanwhile me stuck at 60Hz:* 🗿

144 hz is honestly all that you need

@@Foxy_AR yea I aint planning on upgrading yet

240/360 would be a big jump for you again

@@zxSwifty not sure about 360 but 240hz wasn't that much of improvement when I tested it with my friend's monitor it definitely was noticeable but not by much it's like a diminishing returns the higher you go

just post artificial refresh rates for placebo effect like always. LTT and digital foundry have both covered this same gimmick

@@The_Gameshroom Because short don't go above 60Hz so they have to lower the speed for us to see the difference. 60Hz to 144Hz is a huge difference noticeable immediately it will give a big edge to a competitive player.

Yap yap yap ​@@Iseenoobpeoples

@@Iseenoobpeoples yeah, play read dead 2 max settings on my pc. If you don’t notice the difference between 60hz and 144hz irl then you aren’t looking at the screen 😂

@@MrDeadlyProtocall I play CS GO, PUBG, those extra frames helps a lot when you have less then 1 second to react. It also help with RTS games like StarCraft 2, every action is fluid with instant feedback.

I took the plunge and went 75Hz, never looked back ...

Everybody told me that switching from 60 to 170 would be crazy for me and way better but idk i dont feel the change that much

​@thoktrigg3308 that's absurd if you don't realize

@@thoktrigg3308 is your windows settings set to 144hz? Because you have to be blind to not tell a difference between 60 and 144

@@thoktrigg3308 you need to change the hz manually btw in your settings any monitor is auto on 60hz

4000$ and will do!

@@user-ni2gf4il4q 😐

fr now even 144 looks not as smooth to me coming from 240 and thats why im not upgrading further cuz my wallet cant afford 240 frames at wqhd already

​@@sp1du350meanwhile i play star citizen at 40fps and thinking the gsync makes it look kinda good😅

A monitor is basically like a pair of eye glasses. Except the more you pay the clearer you see.

⁠@@jefmoesymeanwhile me being surprised my pc can even run rdr2 at 10fps

@@sp1du350 Yeah 240hz is more than enough most Pro players can train their eyes up to that but honestly 540hz is something that will make you feel smoother but its actually not because its almost impossible to train your eyes to that point!

it actually did get me out of bronze. Not this screen but on laptop with max 60hz i was stuck in high bronze low silver for year, when i changed pc with good monitor i reached plat in a week and now i'm in masters.

ong Imma stick with my 28" 4K 144hz 0.5 MS monitor.

@@Borlays im 100% sure you are trolling. Literally not possible if you actually were trying.

​@Borlays Going from 60 to 120 or 144hz does make a massive difference, but you aren't just going to become a god at a game if you're in the lowest ranks with a 60hz. I play rhythm games which need high refresh rates the absolute most and even I cant do that.

​@@BorlaysLmao sure you did from bronze to masters ger ourra here man GER OURRA HER

it always was which is why most people hate the option

​@@nanielwolf5768it is irl but not when you are looking straight forward into a monitor

@@nanielwolf5768 then you have no idea what motion blur is. The effect is there to replicate motion blur from a real camera. It has nothing to do with the human eye.

​@Crowbar wave your hand fast infront of your eyes real quick

@@Crowbar almost every game is meant to be seen as a footage from a camera, right, got it

impossible (for other non competitive games), this monitor is only good for easy to run games at low settings

You will need an RTX 4090 and a Ryzen 7 7800X3D to run 540fps in competitive games, which is kind of a waste of money for 1080p gaming

@@Tetraverseyou would probably actually just need a cpu that can boost upto 5 ghz

@@Irishkiwino u need a good cpu that can do more then 6, 100-300fps sure u can get that but 500-600fps, most games cant even support that much, i have never seen a game do 600fps unless its csgo and that game is gone and now cs2 is a thing, im not sure about overwatch but cmon.

You still get a lot of benefits from a high refresh rate no matter the fps

real

Over here with my 30hz TV

my pc cant even run most gamews today with atleast 30 fps

Rather get an old (not TFT, forgot name) monitor. They have 100hz.

@@nemiw4429 CRT...?

144 hz cost like 100$ recently,, so going up of that its not a millionaire thing anymore lol

@@kaitogg322 yh , I just use an old 1080p tv

@@kaitogg322 😭

@@kaitogg322 but I plan on saving up for a 165hz 1440p monitor, so fingers crossed

​@@XX_10101 I hope you get that 165hz mate👍

Does that mean you have no display?

I see what you did there

Funny

540 FPS*

​@@BigBlackChickssame shit to make it worth it

To be fair, they only show Overwatch as example, and that game is rather easy on your hardware.

He does

This only could worth for competitive games like cs, valorant or whatever at 1080p with lowest graphics so no need a beast.

Just become geometry dash player

You need to see it irl, these videos can’t really show you how it looks. Smooth as butter

I have used the 540, you can tell the difference. Muscle memory alone wit hsame mouse/keyboard, it feels alien. Like when I jumped from 60hz to 244hz, exact same feeling.

Yup. Bought a 165hz one and can barely tell the difference between that and 60.

@@WilliamSkafast did you make sure to change your windows display settings to 165hz?

@@catgoesboing if u play games like csgo or rainbow 6 ofc u have permanent over 300 fps

its not going to make you a better gammer like people think but then again when i play halo online 90% of time i am number 1 10% number 2

540hz fhd is your best bet if it's absolutely needed no 1440p gaming could reach that fps

​@@catgoesboing because gaming isn't the only benefit, everything else you do on your computer will be at whatever your monitor's hz is.

​@@catgoesboing CS2 is cpu and ram bound btw

No way you're getting 40 fps in minecraft unless you're running some heavy shaders or your cpu is really bad

you don't need to play at the refresh rate for the refresh rate to matter. If your monitor was 30 hz you wouldn't be able to attack mobs with sword

​@@darshil2317 I get less than 30 with vanilla and sometimes less than 15 with nothing 💀

@@Enderwafflez Java has horrible optimization for older computers, but any mid-low computer can run it well, granted that you dont get generous with the render distance.I have an i5 3470 and gt 730 and I easily get 120+ fps

@@darshil2317 I use around 6-8 render distance

u can prob find a better monitor for like 10 bucks on fb market

Pfp and username checks out

Bro that is so bad

how? i have 720 75hz from 20 years ago..

Well, Its slowed down so it is actually accurate ...

@@radekfylcka9029 sadly your eyes in real life do not see things slowed down like this

@@proliloli2141 no need to, because i'll feel it, the slow mo it's only to demonstrate

@@proliloli2141 Your eyes totally see the difference in normal speed, why do you think 240hz monitors went crazy after release and now a 540hz came out, people went for the 240hz cause there is massive difference compared to 60hz and an okay difference from 144hz if you are playing competitive fps games then you bound to know these things or have tried them with time.

All a load of shit money spin. Guarantee if you seen them side by side in real life the difference will be minimal. I’d take 1440p any day

Fr like i just got my new monitor . And ive been using my old 60 hz monitor for 1 and half years or more so but its feels good to have a 75 hz monitor now .

Wait till you get to 90hz.

@@udpsocket sure in future definitely Have a nice day maye

@@udpsocket sure in future definitely Have a nice day mate

I definitely notice the jump from 60-75hz!

it's not that simple... a 500+ Hz monitor can match up with your 120 fps BETTER than a 240 monitor can. This means that this superfast monitor will "catch" frames between frames that a 240 Hz cannot catch. Frames are not steady they go up and the go down... sometimes way up or way down. The faster the Monitor is the larger "range" it has for drawing an image without the problems that come from a monitor that 1/2 way through drawing a frame when it gets told to start drawing a new image. There are other benefits as well... such as allowing the monitor to do extra work in between frames to improve image here and there. To be honest, I would really like to see a monitor that does it's own AntiAliasing in post processing so that it can be of loaded from the graphics card. If you want the most advanced and realistic looking and responsive images... we should have processing at the CPU, GPU, and Monitor processing stages each handling the features that compliment it the most!

@@CD-vb9fi Actually, the lower your fps from your monitors refresh rate the more input lag you experience. Having a monitor that does 540hz but only getting between 100-200 is gonna result in major input lag. Only way around this is by having to cap the refresh rate between games and the average fps they get. But by doing this, you're never going to have a consistent experience since you'll always be changing refresh rate, depending on the amount of games you play.

@@kiqo9128 no... that is not input lag. "Input Lag" is specifically the time it takes for the system to "render image and transmit it" plus the time it takes for the monitor "to display said image". Your "input lag" as a human also includes your ability to mentally "process" what you are seeing on a screen and then respond so it. Additionally, how fast your keyboard and mouse can send your key presses and clicks account for some of that "input lag" as well. A person 'technically' can have greater input lag with 120 fps than someone playing at 30 fps. Now, with all of that said... there is still some truth to what you say, but only because the more frames being drawn allows for more opportunities to respond due to "more information" being available". But FPS is NOT directly correlated to Input Lag... they are entirely separate from each other and are two different computational concepts. There is "Lag", "Input Lag", and "FPS". Lag and FPS are relational as one can affect the other... but "Input Lag" is separate from "FPS". Lag can affect both "Input Lag" and "FPS" by virtue of it being involved with both because "lag" in general is caused by "processing lag" but it sits between "input and output".

and i still cant get 60fps on 60hz

​@@CD-vb9fiOh, we are waiting for monitors with a built-in GPU that will implement hardware anti-aliasing as well as active cooling, haha

My wallet cannot achieve that frame rate, so I’ll stick with the 1080p 165hz koorui 💀💀💀

@@PVTParts-eu3zl fr tho, 540 is insane, gonna need dual 4090 with one of those 100core CPUs 😭😭

Yea I have the 180Hz 1440p Ultragear with a 2080Ti and I’ve actually thought about going back to 1080p and would with this if it wasn’t 27” but soon ill have a 4070Ti or a 4080 so 180Hz will be fine. I don’t even think I’ll ever get a 240Hz panel because I’m sticking with 1440p and that’s taxing enough at 144/165/180Hz. The switch from 60 to 144 was the most noticeable to me so far. I can’t tell the difference between 165 and 180 but I CAN tell the difference between 144 and 180 somehow.

@@adoptedorange52951I literally just went and clicked on one of dudes valorant videos and he is steady at 200 in that clip…not many people are hitting those frames at all unless it’s fames like valorant, csgo 1, or like fortnite performance mode…so yea, dude can hit those numbers it seems. Where is your gameplay showing your pc hitting any frames at all?

@@_your_mum_4408 I swear man, hopefully one day 8k gaming will become more marketable and 1440p will be ours to have!!!

You think that's crazy ? Here I am using a 768p 30hz monitor from the Jurassic period 😂

You lucky I have 20 hz 360p

@@RAYX07 What the fuck? That's not even 2008 range, thats 2003 office computer range

@@alternatedenz I heard from my father that he permanently borrowed it from his office 😭

Me with 45 hz monitor

I on 1440p 75hz....😅

​@@ilya_sochinskij 1080p 165hz are better

75 is a dream for me

@@AxtrodoSulfur Get... a... job...

no, only if you're playing competetive fps games @@sangamdua

Buy 143hz iyama for 70 dolarz

same

sam

damn you're broke

same

And here I am paly with have white screen which shows everything white even black people convert to white 😂 can you imagine

TVs almost all do 120 hz now tho

​@@henrybatt5492Mine doesn't

not even at high. Because a lot of players play all low or a mix. For comp at least

Yes the 4090 can manage to max out the graphics of some games like f23 csgo cod forza so racing and competitive games

@@Tincoco_ In comp most players play at 1080p lowest graphics, with all effects turned off

​@@Nb_2089This is s 1080p monitor, so that's already checked.

@@lexavlogs7149 fuck yeah, can't wait for future CSGO events

15-30 fps is still very very good

@@SDPSacramento60 fps is the minimum anything below is garbage

30 fps is still good enough, it's just most people nowadays were spoiled and didn't have to deal with 10fps while growing up

@@StevenMcSteve i used to play world of warcraft at 10-25fps. and i had much more fun than now that i can run it at 200+fps on highest settings. crazy xD

​@@StevenMcSteveI started by juicing every last nanometer out of a lenovo office PC, happy to get 30 - 60fps out of Source games at low resolution. 10 years later I have a 1440p 165hz rig and find 30fps is the bare minimum. I dont even tolerate 60 anymore unless I have to. Also, well before I got that PC I had an Xbox 360 way back in the day which was more like 10 - 30fps as I recall. I'm making the point that it has little to do with being spoiled.

I dont understand. 60 fps is smooth gameplay. Everything more than that is only for the trained eye. You cant see more than 144 which is for experienced sniper... in real life. Its total bullshit. I play on 60hz.. has 10 years and still working

@@dogemoonelonbez-musk2540 try playing on atleast 75hz the difference is unbelievable i used to think like you too until i discovered the stretched resolution trick to get 75 hz

​@@dogemoonelonbez-musk2540 Once you try 240hz, 60hz is all laggy and borderline unplayable. I can feel the difference between 144hz and 240hz even while moving the cursor on windows. You either never used anything other than 60hz or have severe brain damage.

​@@dogemoonelonbez-musk2540the switch from 60 to 144 is actually massive, i used to have tje same mindset as you

@@dogemoonelonbez-musk2540 Everyone who never used a 144hz+ monitor thinks that. Trust me. It is a HUGE difference.

same

Dman, u must have a shit rig then

fr

You can't even tell the difference. 60-120hz feels smoother. 120+ is unnecessary. There's no need for it it's all just a gimmick past 120

​@@user-rs6fk4vl8m Just people trying to sell shit for companies its sad. People yell out of the woodwork that you need it lmfao in the comments

​@@user-rs6fk4vl8monly if you don't play geometry dash. Even 144hz is considered low here

Ive literally never been in a situation where im getting above 120fps in a modern game

​@@Retro-- In most cards on modern games 60 FPS is good balance between graphic and framerate.

This lol

I own triple 240Hz monitors, Did it make me a better gamer? hell no, i was bad before and im still bad now. only difference is that everything feels 4x smoother than before. and thats a worthwhile experienc e on its own. When i tell my friends about 240hz monitors i tell them this: Ignorance is Blissful, if you Don't know any better, your not missing it either. I used to be a sucker for graphics, everything ultra graphics, 4k resolution, FPS BE DAMNED. But now that i have experienced 240hz monitors, i have become the polar opposite, now i play All my games at he lowest possible settings, just to reach that smooth 240fps. which is pretty hard to reach unless the game is 7 to 8+ years old.

@@skapunker1986I mean if you have monitors like this why wouldn t you get a pc which can run games at atleast above average settings at that framerate

Im using an HEDT AMD Threadripper 3990x 64c 128t 3080 TI 128gb ram. I would say that it isnt the right time for consistently gaming at 240hz yet, let alone 540hz, unless Valorant is literaly the only game you ever play...

@@skapunker1986 Damn that s a crazy setup but still not on the level of running most modern games at 4k 240fps. But I think a 4090ti with a 7950x and bunch of quick rams will do it

Congrats

Not useful, 144 is the most you wanna go for, even then there's not a major difference between 90 and 144 tbh.

@@scarecrow5848 What are you talking about? The higher the refresh-rate the better when it comes to VR devices. Not only does everything become smoother, but it reduces motion sickness and increases immersion.

@@PD-ws4td no, not true. First of all no computers can run above 144 FPS anyway at the moment with the super high resolutions modern VR headsets are asking for, even a 4090 can't run a reverb g2 at 90 FPS full resolution. Second of all "more smoothness" isn't true, due to the reason I just listed. Third there's not even a difference from 90 and beyond until you get to like 244. Even if you were doing 244 it's not like tracking latency is noticable on below 60 FPS. Me: using a gtx1660 on the lowest resolution a G2 will let me use it at below 60 FPS. there's no tracking latency and it's controllers use IR lights for tracking.

This is like the only application where such display would make sense to exist. However even then for the foreseeable future (like 20 years) it will be a choice between high refresh rate and good graphics. As-is people seem much happier with 90-144 Hz display with great, more immersive graphics than to deal with crappy "Horizon Worlds"/Wii-style graphics.

@@scarecrow5848 they are not necessarily talking about the present, but the future. Also keep in mind that things like Asynchronous Space Warp, FidelityFX Super Resolution, Deep Learning Super Sampling, and more primitive (or alternate) interpolation techniques can all offer much smoother content to a display than the GPU outputs itself. With time and the available hardware it could be a major component in getting smooth VR. That being said, around 240 Hz displays are probably quite sufficient as well even for VR, but if anything was to use higher than 240 Hz it would be VR.

Thinking the same, I want OLED 540-650 hz 4K-8K, that would be the max quality and speed most humans could take advantage of, maybe in a few years...

@@Lue1337 oof yeah I don’t think those are gonna be available for a while lmao 😂 and even if they did, they’d actually cost you a kidney no exaggeration