Great question ❤

There are so many on yt or google, can't you find yourself?

Hi In this 2021 study, researchers looked at the effect of visualization and self-efficacy on athletes’ performance. They found they could obtain the highest performance with visualization and high-self-efficacy exercises. It means that visualization can help you perform better at any task if you have a strong belief in yourself. www.researchgate.net/publication/349000811_The_Effect_of_Visualization_Relaxation_and_Self-efficacy_on_the_Performance_of_Men_Speed_World_Record_Athletes_Category

🤦🏻‍♀️

@simonrussel77 You say "What science, what research?" Do you even know what scientific means? Go to a Latin to English translator. (I give a disguised link near the end of this comment as actual links outside KZfaq get the comment deleted by this platforms bits). Enter Sci enti fic into the Latin side and hit the translate button. Sci enti fic literally translates in English to "know that it is fiction". The powers that shouldn't be that mandate attendance in the brainwashing mind programming machine they call the education system and academia are laughing at us, they think we are stupid. They programme us to believe in science without teaching us the critical thinking skills to even investigate for ourselves what what scientific means.... and its real meaning has been inverted in popular understanding to be the exact opposite of what most people believe it to mean. "Follow the science" my ass. After 40 years of deep research in multiple fields, I can honestly say that I "know" less now than I did 40 years ago and I currently don't even know what I don't know. I can say that almost EVERYTHING taught in mainstream academia as the truth, the science, is highly questionable when subjected to rigorous open minded analysis. Certainly very useful technologies have been created based on "scientific" theories as understood today within certain parameters, but anybody claiming to know absolute "scientific" truth has more likely been programmed into a belief system than truly understand reality. Examples, clearly our Universe is one seamless entity, ( though there may be multiple Universes in the same "space" at frequencies / scales not currently detectable by contemporary instrumentation), yet our "science" doesn't have a Universally accepted Unified Field Theory We have classical Newtonian /Standard model physics to describe things down to a certain level, then we go to a completely different model at the Quantum level. We are clearly missing a piece of the puzzle because we need two theories to describe one Universe Currently acceptable academic consensus says that perpetual motion/ free energy are "impossible" because they violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Read that law, it starts "Within a closed system....." Show me the closed system! Further "Scientific" (know that it is fiction) research says perpetual motion is impossible.... Explain the spin of subatomic particles that has occurred, according to science, since the ludicrous mainstream "Big Bang" theory they say happened 14.5 Billion years ago. Tell me "science" what happened BEFORE the "Big Bang"... Oh you can't, but I am supposed to revere you as all knowing? Take Einstein's famous E=MC² equation. Can you define Mass? What is its origin, or can you only define it's equivalence and some of its properties within the range our current instrumentation can measure? Can you define Energy and it's origin, or can you also only describe its equivalence which is what Einstein's equation does? Can you say WHY the speed of Light in a vacuum is what it is, or can you only describe its speed in terms of units of time and distance? How about transposing Einstein's equation to M = E/C²? The mass we don't really understand but can give an equivalence to is equivalent to a factor of Light(C) and Energy. Wait what.... Mass equates to Light and Energy, but despite the Universe being observably a single huge entity of very big things made of small things, made of ever smaller things our "science" can't describe what we observe without fudging it's equations with made up forces and constants to make observations mathematically match observed data? I have zero faith our "science" is even close to having a complete and accurate picture of "reality", even less so after being told to "follow the science" over COVID by clowns like Fauci. Academia is a circle jerk, with credibility in theories peer reviewed by people invested in maintaining a ludicrous paradigm and research controlled via funding that supports the academically approved narrative and the agenda of the funding organisations. I have learned almost everything I was taught is a lie. Before you accuse me of ignorance don't waste your time.... I agree with you. I am ignorant, I don't truly know anything about anything... all I can say is most of our science is a lie..... Which brings me right back to where I started. The definition of sci enti fic. "Know that it is fiction" Source for translation Three w's d0T ç0m Stroke translate D0T CôM Stroke latin-english Try it, I assure you the translation is correct I absolutely support and applaud you in questioning claims made in this video, but I question the validity of using "scientific" research to do so. I have struggled for the last six months to come to terms with the inescapable fact that I truly know nothing. About the only truth I do know, is that almost everything I have been taught or found myself to come to believe is not the whole or only truth. I don't know enough to write off claims made in this video. A true seeker of truth keeps an open mind.