Nope. You need to pause after each move and look at all of the possibilities. This was not a blitz game.

You can also change video playback speed in settings.

​@@farleymusclewhite411🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯 my enlightened brother spends 11 hours watching a 6 minute video (I watch on 2x speed) how cool and smart!

😢

Bloody noises of the moves. Crap

Yes, I remember. World chess now has to be followed on the internet. Now, few, everyday people know when a world chess championship match is on. However, this match was headline news for many days. Everyone spoke of it. I suspect, it was the drama of east v west, viz a viz the cold war that inspired the media. Chess club memberships mushroomed. Many schools had chess teams and inter school chess leagues.

Yes! I was a seven years old in Colombia and I remember my uncles following the matches.

SO it was like Pokemon Go?

The Cold War Games

We were camping in Yellowstone. No contact. After game days one of us would hike out 2 miles, drive and bring back a newspaper with the results and replay the previous day’s game. Bobby Fischer had various demands. He elevated chess, and delivered.

I still don’t understand the queen-bishop sacrifice in the middle game

Bobby Fischer beat the weakest world champion Boris Spassky 17 wins 11 losses! Capablanca would beat Spassky 8 wins 6 draws zero losses!! Carlsen would beat weak Spassky 6 wins 6 draws zero losses! You can lose 11 times against the blunder maker Spassky!!

@@RaineriHakkarainen, hast du in letzter Zeit Alpträume gehabt?

@@hostlangr If this would be so, I would recommand „Beat it“ from Michael Jackson to stop the „Thriller“

We cannot compare chess champions in different times in history. These historical comparisons lead to wrong conclusions. What made Fischer unique, was his deep understanding of chess in general.

@@mehrdadsalimiclassicalpersianv You are right. It is so beautiful how Fischer reacts and generates his game. We cannot describe it in words, we can only admire his genious. Thank you for answering. Franc Waller

Counter play can turn the tide.

“Sheer Innovation”, that is what Fischer is all about.

Fischer is not a just a collection of memories from the past games. He is a God in the cognitive limitlessness of human race. He is a proof to infiniteness of human cognition

​@@mehrdadsalimiclassicalpersianvy porqué NO TUVO EL VALOR de defender su título. Qué clase de campeón es aquel que no defiende su título? 🤔

I don’t know French language. Let’s both talk in an international language, so that we could communicate.

@@mehrdadsalimiclassicalpersianv It's Spanish lmao.

Ice hockey gigantic??? Not true! Canada have 650000 hockey players today! Russia have only under 100000 hockey players today! USA have 500000 hockey players today! Canada and USA should have 11 players who have scored over 800 goals like Ovechkin today! Football( Soccer) have 250 million players vs Canada 650000 players that means The Soccer All Stars would beat Orr Gretzky Lemieux easily 100 game Series 93-7! Football(Soccer) have 4 billion fans around the world! Cricket 2,5 billion fans around the world! Only hockey player ever had fans was Russian Kharlamov 225 million fans in Former Soviet Union in 1970s!!

He should have played chess in fact ... may be digestion disease that day ? Never saw a GM playing so poorly ...

I agree with you but after thinking about it let me try to explain. Now it's the time of Spassky to play, and he can't move the white rook vertically or else he will lose the bishop, he can't eat the pawn with the king or else Fisher will have a queen. He can't remove the bishop from that position or else the black rook will check the king and Fisher will make a queen eventualy. So he can only move his white rook horizontally, if he does that he will free Fisher's king to move away from the front of his pawn to make a queen, so the rook can only go to the column of the pawn, by doing that Fisher has only one alternative and it's to eat the bishop with his black rook, which will make Spassky have to eat the black rook with his rook, other scenarios he loses and Fisher makes a queen or two. Then Fisher goes to E2 with his king. Now the only two scenarios is Spassky checking the king with the rook or again going to the column of the black pawn so he doesn't make a queen, if he chooses the column Fisher makes the queen anyway and eats his rook afterwards, then the other king can't make anything until Fisher's king arrive and he makes a queen. If he checks, again, same scenario, Fisher goes with his king to F3 and Spassky can't prevent the queen to be done. Fisher wins in all scenarios, the worst of them all being Fisher having a Queen and a King and Spassky only a King, that means check-mate eventually.

Fischer was like, "Take my pawns again TAKE... MY PAWNS... AGAIN. I dare you! I double dare you, MF'er! Take my pawn one more GD time."

Great game ?? I would say complete failure from Spassky.

Lot of Errors both sides! That is why this not one of the greatest end games!!

What a suite of blunders from Spassky you mean. I would has won easily again Spassky myself if he plays like that !! (not reducing the merits of Fischer which is a great player, but this game is not a good example. It's an easy win for him.)

​@@tontonbeber4555 You must be thankful that you can comment on such a great chess match, even though you've never known how to play chess.

@@Asdfgadv33423 I admire Fisher as a great player, but that day it's more Spassky who lost the game, so many blunders ...

Well said. I call them the Cold War Games.

Black is close to getting 2 pawns exchanged for a queen, with support from the rook up top.

From me view it looks like he can still take the two pawns and remain with the advantage of the bishop rook combination

White’s best next move is Rf4. The bishop cannot take f2 as let in the rook to d2 with check then to d1 and the a pawn queens. Black still wins by taking the bishop, and Ke2 follows. The f pawn will cost the rook, but pawn ending is won.

If he'd played chess maybe, but I don't now what he did ... just pushing wood ... 1600 ? 1800 ELO is a maximum of his level in this game.

This is game 13, an Alekhine Defence, which took Spassky by surprise. Spassky fluffed many chances to win with an obvious early pawn push and succumbed in the endgame. Despite Spassky's mistakes, this remains one of my favourite Fischer games. Because of this match I took to playing chess at a competitive level. Never looked back. Chess has been a good friend to me over the years and I've started playing speed chess online in the past couple of years, which has, if anything, made me a better player than I was 51+ years ago. Happy Chessing: R🙊😊😻💕🎉🎂.

@@ricardodogfishtiger8582 nice story! Good luck in your future tournaments!

No player is the best player of all time.

Whos saying its FISHER??

He way but now it's Magnus, he will never be surpassed.

Scroll to the top of your screen and search ‘Magnus chess.’ Enjoy.

FIDE rating

@@user-jl6fd2vc6z that’s helpful 🤦🏻‍♂️

Arpad Elo tough wrongly that the chess rating average is 1400 and standard devotion SD=282,8 The correct numbers are the chess rating average is 1650 and SD=256 correct numbers we need 10000 players and best is 2600! We need 100000 players and the best is 2720! In Hungary they have 100000 chess players! Arpard Elo numbers gives wrongly that 1000000 players and best is 2582! In Hungary number 9th is 2582! Hungary's best is 2760! The chess metrics founder The stanford honor Jeff Sonas was using wrong standard devotion SD=166 Stanford is ranked number 3rd best mathematics university in the world! Really Shocking! How Arpad Elo got this wrong SD=282,8 so we get 200x200+200x200=80000 and square root 80000=282,8 Really Stupid Arpad Elo!!

Elo his numbers gives 100000 players and best 2582!!

Yeah, good question.

So at this point he cant move king. If he moved bishop away from rook, fischer can move rook down to check him and then mate in 1. The only option is keep moving rook but really no chance for him to beat fisher.

@@hn285 King to A3.....

@@jeff-9608can’t stop the pawns

@@zonoka9609 ah, yes. Gotcha👍

Pay for premium. Worth it.

WAS !

Yes but the move of the bishop just after is even worst. Probably the worst move of all time in a world championship.

You would be a millionaire :)

with the bishop? I played that in stockfish as that was the best move from the analysis, then set computer vs. computer and it came out a draw. 3 pawns and rook on both sides, draw by repetition. But it took 27 moves.

Rook takes bishop...then pawn promotes to queen. Game over!

@@TheRomanianWolf but white bishop would take the queen at A1 (D4xA1). I think Black would take the bishop first with the rook, d7xd4, then if black does e4xd4, the pawn would be free to go to A1, yes? and if White's king took the A2 pawn instead, black's rook would take white's rook and then the pawn promotion F2 -F1 would be easy.

@@tjmozdzen yes, rook takes bishop first (removing the defender), then a1=queen .

Mis gibi 2 kale ve fille göbeği tutmuş neden dagıtsın? Hem vezir olmaya 2 kare kalmış can sıkan piyon da var korumada

Maybe the bishop position is too important to lose…

This is game 13 of that match.

Wondering the same myself

I guess you mean at 6:19. I don't see any immediate mate in two or anything, but my guess is that if he plays bxh8, Rxh8 and that bishop is no longer around to cover a1, nor block black's K from e7, nor cover d8. White's passed pawn falls whenever black wants, and a white rook must be assigned to cover a1. I would still lose as black, but I get some notion that black can advance pawns b and c before white can get his K over there and play Rxa2 or Rxa1.

Perhaps the bishop from f6 supports the passed d pawn promotion an is therefore stronger than a rook.

Rexd5+ (black loses bishop and has to move king), Kc7 (king can no longer take pawn on d7 because it’s covered by the rooks), Rxa1 (black loses promoted queen, and can’t take back on a1 because white’s bishop covers that square while also covering d8, white’s queening square), Rg8 (black has to preserve his rook and cover d8), white queens on d8, black takes, white takes. White is now up a rook and bishop. So basically white’s passed pawn had to be taken on d7 or the game was lost.

WHAT free bishop??? Are you BLIND?

Don't take this game as an example, it's no great game, completely asymmetrical. Fischer was the only chess player on this board.

Are you STUPID?? What mate????

Too may pass pawns on bobby side..bobby was all the way outta control

Because it‘s over.

@@chrishimmelmann Not an explanation.

What timestamp?

No.

Pawn to c3

11:11...rc3 to black king d3 to e2….pawn on f file unstoppable...pawn on g7 will be abandoned ....just resign as a pro...gg

Sorry ? since 71. Bc5 ?? (and I'd gladly add 5 more '?'). Probably the worst move of all time in a world championship. Even a unclassed club player wouldn'd do that blunder.

Are you STUPID???. He was dead lost!!!

3x 12:28

Lol...queen at 46...but 20+ moves before "flub"....means it wasn't over at move 43. Might want to choose words better

71. was probably the worst possible move in that position ... it's a -90 evaluation on stockfish. Ununderstandable at that level ... maybe some medical problem ? digestion ?

Nein!, LOL.

At 6:34 white was IN CHECK, that's why it pushed that pawn.

Come on! Fischer beat the weakest chess World champion Boris Spassky only 17 wins 10 losses! Capablanca would beat Spassky easily 8 wins 6 draws zero losses! Carlsen would beat Spassky easily 6 wins 6 draws zero losses! Fischer beat Spassky 10 wins 15 draws 5 losses in 1992 at age 49! Spassky was only 162nd world ranking and rated 2558 in 1992! Fischer score 58,33%! So we get Fischer rating 2617,78 in 1992 at age 49! Lasker won the New York tournament in 1924 beating world Best scoring 2875 elo at age 56! Fischer 2617, 78 vs Lasker 2875! Crazy lunatic Yasser Seirawan claiming wrongly that Fischer was world record power and form in 1992! The highest tournament elo rating score is Fabiano Caruana 8,5/10 StLouis elo 3080! Karpov 11/13 Linares 1994 elo score 3040! Alekhine in San Remo 1930 elo score 3040! Fischer and Kasparov their Best tournament scores only 2990! Morphy Tal Alekhine Kasparov had much more beautiful games than Fischer! Fischer lost 5 times against awful blunder maker Geller! Fischer vs Geller 1967 flawed masterpiece Geller errors Queen a5?? Knightxd4??? Bishop d7??? Bishop c6?? Fischer moved 17:exf7?? 17:Rook f6! Wins easily! Fischer vs Stein famous Bishop f5! But earlier 26:Knight f7! Or 26:a3! Fischer 26:Knight f3??? Fischer vs Larsen game one in 1971 Fischer played Bishop f3?? Bishop d6! wins! Fischer vs Spassky 1966 olympiad Queen a6?? Rook e3! Wins s! Karpov have won over 160 super grand Master tournaments! Fischer won zero only inter zonals 1962 1970! Fischer was second in 1966 Santa Monica 1966 behind blunder maker Spassky! Fischer did not won Havanna 1965! Carlsen is 100xtimes better than Spassky and Geller! Carlsen would beat Fischer 30 times easily! Stockfish 16 would beat Fischer 1000-0!!

Karpov 3040 best tournament! Fischer only 2990!

Дружба на

No . That knight was a monster and couldn’t be left there

People always seem to play big mistakes against Fischer. Spassky almost never made blunders like this against other opponent, at this point of his career.

Fischer would have simply ignored it as he wouldn’t have taken it . Allowing him to queen his pawn first. Then he’s queening his other pawn as it’s protected 👍. Spassky would have certainly known that