One of the Greatest World War II Warbirds

One of the Greatest World War II Warbirds - FMS P-40B Warhawk 1400mm

Рет қаралды 6,853

Күн бұрын

The P-40B by FMS is an outstanding warbird. Beautiful fit and finish for a foam aircraft coupled with good quality servos and gorgeous 90 degree retractable landing gear and a tailwheel that tucks into the fuselage. It handles super well and has very few bad characteristics, and it's capable of being flown on 4s power setups.
Like what you see? Pick up your own P-40B from FMS via bit.ly/FMSP40B to help support what we do at no additional charge to yourself.
Save 10% off once with this code: ReferralTwobrosRC
Save $15 off with an order over $100 using this code: TwobrosRC
Equipment Used:
SMC 2800 LiHV 4s packs: www.smc-racing.com/index.php?...
Spektrum AR637T Receiver: bit.ly/3dCjiuO
🙋‍♂️Connect With Us On Social
💻 Two Brothers Discord: bit.ly/TBRCDiscord
🛒 Shop our merch: bit.ly/TBRCMerch
⌛ Tiktok: / 2brosrc
📷 Instagram: / twobrosrc
📦 Products We Recommend
Receivers:
Spektrum AR10360T Receiver: bit.ly/3SuAlPv
Spektrum AR8360T Receiver: bit.ly/3QBdgtc
Transmitters:
IX20SE: bit.ly/3BI3eBD
IX20: bit.ly/3BQvB0u
IX14: bit.ly/3D1Gg8w
NX10: bit.ly/3Qm6BSR
NX8: bit.ly/3bA4dcA
NX6:
Servos:
AGFRC B13DLM: tinyurl.com/B13DLM
AGFRC B11DLS: tinyurl.com/B11DLS
Hitec HS-85MGs:
Batteries:
4s 30c 2200 Smart packs: bit.ly/3SsoUrB
4s 50c 2200 Smart packs: bit.ly/3dcdBU3
6s 50c 5000 Smart packs: bit.ly/3A0jVY2
6s 50c 4000 Smart packs: bit.ly/3JANxOL
#rc #aviation #rcplane
rc plane, aeroplane, rc planes, airplanes, airplane, aircraft, model airplane, flying model, tutorial, learn to fly, crash, rc plane crash, plane crash, tail heavy productions, brian phillips, rc saylors, the rc geek, flite test, flitetest, petrincic bros rc, joe nall, empennage, wing, fuselage, vertical stabilizer, horizontal, pitch, yaw, roll, aileron, flaperon, flaps, rudder, elevator, landing, takeoff, forward slip, angle of attack, warbird, world war 2, wwii, p40b, p40, warhawk, china, flying tigers, fighter plane, acrobatics, acro, aerodynamic
0:00 Warhawk Intro
0:57 Battery Info & Low Voltage Cutoff
1:50 A Gyro Doesn't Do Much For It
2:28 Takeoffs
3:11 Landings
4:30 Forward Slips
5:03 Aerobatics Potential
6:00 Accelerated Stalls & Power Off Stalls
6:50 TwoBros Score

Пікірлер: 31

@MrDOZA28 9 ай бұрын

Some lovely butter landings in there despite the obvious conditions!

@dominicbonadies6021 9 ай бұрын

Another great video!!! I fly mine on a 5 cell 4000 pack and love the power!!!

@robertgibbons5481 4 ай бұрын

Did you change the motor or esc?

@ModelAV8RChannel 9 ай бұрын

Nice plane Jon, iconic. Nice flying in the tornado...lol

@ssrattus 9 ай бұрын

Thanks!

@TwoBrosRC 9 ай бұрын

Welcome!

@AL-RCjunkie 9 ай бұрын

I'm just memorized by the P40 in the air, split flaps dropped, in a forward slip, gracefully floating (or fumble-fu

@TwoBrosRC 9 ай бұрын

Happy to help! It's second only to the FMS Tigercat in our view.

@AL-RCjunkie 9 ай бұрын

@@TwoBrosRC Oh, that Tigercat is some kind of magical. But, it's just so damn BIG! Soon as I've got a bigger house, she'll be tops on my list, too ☻ 👍

@SlowFlyer85 9 ай бұрын

See this happen on landing with my e-flite 1.2mm Corsair, on windy days flaps no flaps she wants to lift back up and down usually have to go around a couple times to bring it down good video thanks. ☺🛩🛩🪂👍👍

@nirlachman007 9 ай бұрын

Great review Jon, thanks! Does the battery try need any modifications to use 4s 3300mah (as needed in the E-flite P-51 1.2m)?

@TwoBrosRC 9 ай бұрын

It shouldn't need any modifications to fit a larger battery. It should be able to take up to 5,000 easily.

@kcmadsen2398 9 ай бұрын

My FMS P40 that I purchased a couple months ago takes HV packs with no problem. I think you may have a bad ESC in yours.

@TwoBrosRC 9 ай бұрын

Ours takes them but thinks they're 5s packs.

@adamtrzaskowski3901 9 ай бұрын

Did you try landing without flaps? I think it has too much lift. I have a Flightline Spitfire and it behaves similarly with flaps - without them the landings are much more predictable (less floating around and wing rocking).

@TwoBrosRC 9 ай бұрын

There's almost no wing rock at all when it isn't turbulent.

@AE0MT 3 ай бұрын

You mentioned settings, can you share your settings for this plane please?

@TwoBrosRC 3 ай бұрын

There's no special setup here. It's a basic aileron flap airframe.

@DownNDirtyRc 9 ай бұрын

I crashed my p-40 last Sunday flying in crazy wind. I jammed it back together and flew it again today in crazy wind but on 6S and it flew amazing lol

@robertgibbons5481 4 ай бұрын

Did you change the motor or esc to fly on 6s. I don't want to burn them up?

@DownNDirtyRc 4 ай бұрын

Nope. I ran a watt meter on it to make sure it wasn't over amping anything. The stock prop assembly can't handle the RPMs from 6s though. You have to change to a regular 2 blade. I've run mine on a 14x6 and a 15x6. It gets a little warm on a 15 but that was running like 80% full throttle lol. Normal flying of mixed throttle it was fine

@airhammer6203 9 ай бұрын

Looking at this warbird from almost any angle, it just screams "let's fight". AirHammer out!!

@TwoBrosRC 9 ай бұрын

It's definitely got a mean look to it.

@Netherboiii5443 9 ай бұрын

Man nice my bday is coming and my big bro is getting me one I’m a teenager if you don’t k

@TwoBrosRC 9 ай бұрын

Hope you enjoy it!

@Netherboiii5443 9 ай бұрын

@JPspinFPV 9 ай бұрын

I'm always blown away by how archaic the flight controllers and radio protocols are in the scale model hobby. Coming from highly customizable iNav and Ardupilot flight controllers, Crossfire and Express LRS radio protocols just frustrates me. It feels like being thrown back to the bronze age.

@TwoBrosRC 9 ай бұрын

Not really sure what that's got to do with the P-40, but we'll take your word for it.

@JPspinFPV 9 ай бұрын

@@TwoBrosRC It doesn't specifically have to do with your channel, and I definitely don't mean any disrespect. I'm just a bit taken back by the propriety in these models when you can have so much more control over your build on other platforms that come in at the same price points, and have better performance. Especially in radio protocol technology. Less fail-safes is a no brainier for anyone who's destroyed a project due to lost signal. On the flight controller side, having full control of each function instead of relying on the manufacturer to set it up out of the box is a very powerful tool. A manufacturer could just as easily apply these settings to an iNav compatible FC for instance, but still allow the customer to make changes. It is £ for £, $ for $ the same. It just feels like Spektrum has this side of the hobby convinced it's the only way.