Presentation describing some of the important features of Open Channel Flow (c) The University of Edinburgh 2007-2012
Пікірлер: 26
@mlfb01ag3 жыл бұрын
1:18 : lab experiment 1 3:08 : lab experiment 2 Thanks a lot! Very clear. In particular, the arrows indicating the critical head on the weir are simple but precious.
@jawazik7 жыл бұрын
Clear explanation of concepts. Well done
@maryherrera9356 Жыл бұрын
This was so helpful, and clear to understand with practical reality examples. Thank you!
@AlbyBattyTECHannel6 жыл бұрын
I'm studying Hydraulic Engineer right now and I've realized laboratory video on open channel flow like this before, so I can say that this is a very well done video!! :D
@iamfarh Жыл бұрын
Excellent demonstration
@muneebahmad66315 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much it was very helpful
@UmairKhan-hx4nz9 ай бұрын
that was so much helpful very thankful
@GordonCrapper12 жыл бұрын
Very Good!
@arissira60864 жыл бұрын
Thankyou so much.
@gonegirl58172 жыл бұрын
very well explained with practical point of view...thank you a lot
@hiyazala87012 жыл бұрын
Thank you ☺️
@adityakumarnag99536 жыл бұрын
What are the dimensions or specific criteria to classify low slope, medium slope and large slope of open channel flow? Briefly explain?
@martincrapper6 жыл бұрын
Those terms mean nothing to me. For a particular flow rate a slope is mild if normal depth is subcritical and steep if normal depth is supercritical. So the same geometric slope can be either depending on flow rate.
@BritishEngineer Жыл бұрын
Very nice video, I am studying hydraulic/hydrodynamic and structural civil engineering, Id like to specialise in sanitation engineering/ storm drains/culverts/anthropogenic drainage and watercourse canals.
@leonguyen97603 жыл бұрын
thanks for your useful video. I have a question. If the weir do not have a crest, so can we measure a flow discharge with the height of the fluid? Thanks you
@waterresourcecivilengineeringa2 жыл бұрын
do visit my channel and comment on explanation of Reynolds number and Froude number: video link are kzfaq.info/get/bejne/adyWl9Katce3XYk.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fZ2VpbKpppvTpmw.html thanks
@junugurirajkumar18163 жыл бұрын
Thank u alot
@mureithikivuti7 жыл бұрын
I thought the sluice gate came before the hydraulic jump??
@Hud_Adnan4 жыл бұрын
Mureithi Kivuti hydraulic jump occurs after sluice gate but is it’s a condition not a must
@2175Wook11 жыл бұрын
I just haven't been able to work out the following question at the moment. The cross section of a closed channel is a square with one diagonal vertical, s is the side of the square and y is the depth of the water line below the apex. Show that for maximum discharge y=0.127s and for maximum velocity y=0.414s?
@dilbagsingh45053 жыл бұрын
Just one question. Why we take chezzys and manning coefficient independent of fluid viscosity. i.e. According to my thinking, there will always be a fluid layer sticking to the bed (no slip condition) and the effect of bed roughness is propagated to other layers of fluid via viscosity. But both these coefficients doesn't have viscosity component in them. For example if I apply the Mannings equation for hot areas where water temp is at 30 Centigrade and in cold areas where the temperature is 5-10Centrigrade. In both, the case Mannings equation will yield the same Flow rate but I think the flow rate will be different in both cases for the same channel.. Please help me with this.
@martincrapper3 жыл бұрын
Both are crude empirical coefficients (developed for European applications in the 19th century, or early 20th century). The roughness is such a crude parameter that variations in viscosity are insignificant. If you need that level of detail use CFD, not simple 1-D channel models.
@dilbagsingh45053 жыл бұрын
@@martincrapper thanks
@haroldbn68163 жыл бұрын
Your concerns are valid, neither manning nor Chezy take viscosity as a crucial parameter.