With changes in the economy leading to instability in the stock market, some individuals may face a decrease in their investments in an effort to benefit from the current market conditions, I am considering liquidating my $725k portfolio consisting of bonds and stocks. Someone else in the same situation? Please tell me in the comments!..

She talks to him like she's trying to attack him and get him to say the wrong thing. Personally I'm much more interested in interviewers with a genuine passion and curiosity about technology. Makes for a more interesting conversation.

Watched him live in Qatar a few weeks ago. Fascinating person and comes off as incredibly humble despite his visionary achievements. To be saluted.

I love that his first words on stage had to be "I don't think so."

Emily Chang has such an agenda going on... we want journalism, not propaganda..

What an amazing perspective from Sam about why he has no equity. This is a breath of fresh air to hear THAT reason to do what he is doing.

He talked about amazing things despite the negative questions. I'd love to hear more about the positives and opportunities. I'm so sick of these interviewers just baiting him with negative "gotcha" questions. They really miss a huge opportunity to get the best out of him in these interviews.

Good discussion! Can Bloomberg keep pushing for a government policy where if a country leader/govt wants to use these powerful technologies, this deal should be transparent and discussed and debated in public and Not behind closed doors.

I understand that it was a challenging question to answer in the end, and he made an effort to be as honest and genuine as possible. However, many humans often prefer being lied to if it provides them with a sense of security. Information like that is prone to being misinterpreted and exploited to incite fear. Balancing the amount of truth to disclose while also providing reassurance through lies is indeed a thought-provoking philosophical dilemma.

🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷👏🏻, He excels at being cautious and safe.

Amazing questions and answers. Wonderful interview.

Great interview OpenAI, Sam Altman.

When I first learned about Sam and watched some interviews, he did not come across as smooth and natural as he does now. He definitely is much more confident and natural with public speaking and not as seemingly guarded. But woah - @08:47 I swear it looked like she was eyeing Sam up like he was some eye candy, lol! It was right after she asked about his relationship with Elon, and as he soon as he started to respond, she quickly darted her eyes down and back up with the look.

Sam is so level headed…..huge respect.

great interview. ty both

The moral imperative to continue developing AI, on the basis of all the areas where it can improve quality of life, reduce suffering, improve efficiency of resource utilization, address poverty and environmental degradation, advance knowledge, etc... outweighs the moral case for stopping development on the off chance that it leads to some AI catastrophe. I mean, we don't know what we're missing in terms of all the good it might bring, and the only way to find out, and to get to that good, is to keep going. It's like any technology humankind has ever developed. You keep going until you find out what's possible with it, and what's not, and you do your best to anticipate and mitigate potential pitfalls along the way.

So many questions I've already heard answered what a snoozefest Sam is so patient bless his heart.

This was like an interview with The Sun newspaper. Somehow, Sam, managed to make it enlightening. That's the kinda CEO of AI I can get behind.

Mr.sam was a drop out from Stanford university yet he managed to create the best open AI till date there is something special about dropouts!!

TLDR: The key idea of the video is that while there is excitement and optimism about the future of AI, it is important to drive social change, address potential risks, and establish global regulation to ensure the safe and beneficial development of AI technology. 00:00 😮 People all over the world are excited and optimistic about the future of AI, but there is also a level of anxiety and tension. 01:27 📺 The speaker highlights the importance of driving social change with AI, customization of AI tools, global cooperation in development, and the need to address potential risks and safety measures associated with powerful technology. 04:37 💡 The speaker believes that the tremendous benefits of AI, such as improved education and medical care, outweigh the risks, and global regulation can help ensure its safety. 06:00 👨‍💼 Global regulation is crucial for AI, but small startups should not be overburdened; certification and audits should be mandatory for advanced AI models, and Google is a strong player in the field. 08:44 🤔 AI has the potential for both positive and negative outcomes, so it's crucial to maintain a balanced perspective and not solely focus on the negatives. 11:38 🤖 The future of AI is a personal tool that can assist individuals, but there are concerns about misuse and bias, although GPT4 has reduced bias through reinforcement learning human feedback, questions remain about user control and societal limits. 14:02 🤖 OpenAI CEO Sam Altman believes that financial incentives are not important for their involvement in OpenAI, as they are more focused on the impact and fulfillment they gain from contributing to human technological progress and believe that the future of AI is crucial for humanity. 17:30 🤖 AI will revolutionize technology, enabling us to do impactful and interesting things, but it is crucial to democratize access and establish governance to ensure trustworthiness.

"People don't understand the concept of having enough money" Could not have said it any better myself!

Bitcoin has generally proven to be profitable to numerous individuals around the world but personally you will never understand how profitable Bitcoin is until you start investing with the right broker

We need more Sam Altman's in this world!

THIS can't be stopped. Pandora's box has already been opened, so let's just cross our fingers and hope for the best.

Nice interview. More insight is always welcome!

I actually love those questions from interviewer, she knows what she is doing, that's stuff I was curious as well

6:25 thank you Sam

Brilliant interviewer - so many traps in her questions despite her friendly and unassuming demeanor! Sam skillfully avoided them, genius! Like when she asked him to connect the dots between LLMs and end-of-the-world scenarios, why Elon is frustrated with Open AI, whether he won't benefit at all if Open AI makes massive profits! Look at her framing and choice of words: "benefit" instead of financial gains or profit and "at all" added in there to leave absolutely no wiggle room. Naughty naughty.

Next: *"TIME"* Magazine's Person of the year !

If AI is not intended to solve poverty, illnesses, diseases then AI is not for the greater good.

How did u get ur information to use body from Ai ?

Great interview

After observing Mr Altman's views, thoughts, insights and the calculated mindset he has for AI potential, I have an uncertain feeling about this technology and its impact on the world in the near future. This unknown 'sentient' technology can produce an equally equitable beneficial or detrimental impact on the human population based on whoever is regulating and controlling this technology and with what intentions...that's a serious concern and question to ruminate on...

This is literally an interview from a horror movie. “This was the first day of the end of humanity”

18:00 say as an emergent property next up would be AGI, that then in return would take over scientific research and technological development, no need for us to do that anymore. How would that square with we will always have things to create and to do? Enabling us to get faster to a goal or have an easier time reaching that goal is one thing, having a tool that reaches all goals on its own, devides us out of the equation of creation.

Ouch, that was a distinctly prickly interview. The interviewer should have asked Chat GPT for a list of questions. Here's what it comes up with in response to "What questions should I ask Sam Altman about AI?": When engaging in a conversation with Sam Altman about AI, it would be valuable to ask questions that explore his perspectives on the current state of AI, its potential future impact, and the ethical considerations surrounding its development and deployment. Here are some questions to consider: 1. How do you see artificial intelligence transforming various industries in the next decade? What are the most promising applications you envision? 2. What are the key challenges and barriers that need to be overcome for AI to reach its full potential? 3. How can we ensure that AI technologies are developed and deployed in an ethical and responsible manner? What safeguards and guidelines do you believe are necessary? 4. What are your thoughts on the balance between innovation and potential job displacement due to automation and AI? How can we navigate this challenge and ensure a smooth transition? 5. In your opinion, what role should governments and regulatory bodies play in shaping the development and use of AI technologies? How can they foster innovation while safeguarding public interests? 6. Are there any specific areas where you believe AI has the potential to address pressing societal or global challenges? 7. What advice would you give to entrepreneurs or researchers who are working on AI projects? What areas or approaches do you think they should focus on? 8. How do you see the relationship between AI and other emerging technologies, such as blockchain or quantum computing? Are there potential synergies or challenges that you anticipate? 9. Can you share any specific examples or use cases where AI has had a transformative impact, either currently or in the near future? 10. What do you think are the most exciting research directions or breakthroughs that will shape the future of AI? These questions should provide a starting point for a thought-provoking conversation with Sam Altman about AI. Remember to tailor the questions based on your specific interests and the context of the conversation. Sam Altman's expertise and insights can provide valuable perspectives on the current landscape and future implications of AI.

Great Interviewer, Great Questions. Thank you!

It seems inevitable that AI models will soon change the world rapidly, drastically, and in unimaginable ways. If it's more responsible and well-meaning developers slow down now, what's going to stop the rest of them? I know little about Altman, and I'm not saying people like him are our best chance of having perfect AI, but the race has already begun, and honestly, who knows how far into it we really are.

Well done and well said overall mr.altman

Cyborg A.I. applications at present and in our developing modernity are among the most practical and useful applications of A.I. science and technology.

Im skeptical he has no financial stake in this. He dodged the question of financial benefit every time. And she didn't continue to press him enough. She was trying, but his whole response..."I know it's hard for people to understand..but, I have enough money..." That's a subjective response that didn't answer her question. We understand he has no equity in open AI. It's his go-to talking point. But he still didn't correctly and directly answer if he is receiving any financial benefit, weather money, shares of Microsoft, or other property or remuneration, associated with the success of openAI. I will bet my last dollar he has a financial benefit in it's success, directly or indirectly. My bet, is he was awarded MSFT corp shares, perhaps in an off shore trust or other vehicle. Again, it's just my opinion, but, I firmly believe it.

Dude this guy want power I can see it in his eyes

Nice set of Questions.

What are you going to do? You do what you want if scarcity and threat is gone. Sounds lovely

Hey Sam,I remember when Stephen Hawking warned us about the implications of artificial intelligence. I'm sure móst people didn't understand his point of view. I hope that you can better educate us on how AI is going to affect humanity in the next few years!

Sam is a very intelligent manager. But some of those who are involved in AI development must be much more intelligent to make this happen. It is usually the case in the SW development environment. He is extremely good, especially compared to other CEO-s... I consider myself fairly good and intelligent, but I am over 60 years old now. Still using ChatGPT to speed up some of my SW development... I believe more than 99% of the people were pleasantly surprised by the proceedings of AI in the past few years, especially those who did know nothing about the previous 40 years of AI (It had its ups and downs quite often...) Considering what I believe: - More than 99% were surprised, but even those who worked in the field expected much slower improvement. - This is probably the first time in the past 30 years, when the Rate of improvement in SW will be higher, than the rate of improvements in HW. It will cause a real transformation of work, thinking, problem solving... which will lead to higher productivity or better service in many fields - Considering the above, it is extremely difficult to predict the advancements by 2025 or 2030 or even further out...even for the best professionals inside companies like openai. Within a company like openai or Google or Microsoft... some of the best ideas come (or not come) from the best of the best, the 1% of openai... developers. - The predictions is also difficult, because basically what happened during the past 10 - 20...50.. years is, that the speed of communication improved tremendously, and because of that information spread more quickly in the world... and everybody could get onto the same page in word matters... Now the change is NOT only the speed of communication, but the speed of real problem solving, the speed of "thinking", and the speed of many other things... But for humanity to adopt to this coming change of problem solving and its implication in life will trigger really big changes in other areas, like daily work routines, politics, society, culture, human - machine relationship, religion, art... The most challenging is, that this will lead to so many changes within one human life, so that it will (or might) cause psychological challenges and mental issues for those, who will not be able to cope with these changes and will badly be left behind...The mental gap will be widened. Today we still have more questions than answers, but that will also change quickly.

Flat out would not answer how AI will destroy us.

So wat is ur plan this yearto go forward?

So lucky to witness the nascent stage of a new technology, kinda. Wonder if this is how people felt when Turing came up with the Turing machine 🤔

It’s hard not to be critical when we can already have most of all of that right now without AI, but it’s deliberately withheld by the people that push AI. I think the current system is incredibly broken and crumbling, so a new alternative is set into place to improve the situation while still finding a way to maintain control over the human population.

Is the audio not loud enough for anyone else?

It is refreshing to hear people who are using technology for the powerful GOOD. That's going to scare a lot of big companies and organizations.

I love his expression when she says that we'd have nothing to do. It'll be the complete opposite. A whole new world is about to open for us and the tangents our mind will be able to pursue to current endpoints is amazing. I think the problem we're going to end up having is exponential advancements all at once and goalposts rapidly shifting. It could end up being more of a pause in technology as we make new discoveries

What exactly is the technology that is being mentioned here?

17:46 That silence is scary!!!

About the question if he is concerned about china's AI: Why would humanity not work together for once? Why the polarization? Why villainize what we don't yet understand? Villainizing anything is the first step to incline it to be a real villain.

Great interview, I loved it. Google Gemini is going to be very challenging for Chatgpt. All Chatpgt base technology is all Google research (ie transformer). No one believed Chatgpt could pull off what they did. They amazed the world. That said, I have a lot of hope for LLMs and what they can do to move human research 500 years into the future in the next the 50 years. It has that abstract potential and I could be underestimating it’s power for research. Everything from metallurgy, biotechnology and theoretical physics. Everything and anything we can and can not imagine. (I sight Demis Hassabis’s huge contribution to humanity with Alphafold. What a great human being. My man emanates kindness).

Turn up the mic volume, please.

So open-minded, and humanity-focused, it's a blessing from the God to have you in the world

I don't know why people have such an issue with it being wrong. I use it daily. I would say 2 or 3 percent of the time its wrong.

This interview has given me new perspectives of Sam Altman. I had negative feelings about him, but after watching this, I realized that he's a good guy and the right guy to do this, and lead us into this new horizon. Thanks to Emily Chang for asking the questions that exposed the personal side of Sam Alabama, which I haven't seen from other interviews of him.

The circumstances demand deeper questions.

What economic benefits and potential?? What does that mean???

Nice to see someone motivated by doing good and having a purpose instead of being driven by money.

"Wow, what an amazing video! I just want to take a moment to appreciate the incredible effort and dedication that went into creating this content. The way you presented the information was so clear and understandable, making it easy for viewers like me to grasp the concepts being discussed.

12:48

Why are all his takes so good? It feels like he has the same goals and stuff that I have, like how he doesn't care about money and cares more about his passion (which we all honestly should), I hope i meet the dude at a local bar one day and talk to him which won't happen but i'll think about it that event happening.

8:54 Because he is no longer involved. Elrond needs to larp as Tony Stark. Being perceived as “memelord 9000” probably has the same weight as his wealth in his mind. He likes to feel that his reserve of social currency is endless. What’s weird is I really like him when he’s using his alt. I’ve listened to what seems to be a different person for hours on Spaces discussing everything from games to psychedelics. And he’s also an amazing mimic. Like he could be a professional mimic. I’m not gonna out the alt. Eventually it should be widely known. The thing is why would be larp on an alt with less then 10k followers? So…perhaps the “Elon” we see trolling is the larp and the alt is who he would be if he didn’t think a million people would see his tweets. And if he’s in chat down here…. mish, mash,mush ribbit

what research is Sam refering to as one that argues GPT4 is less biased than Humans? anybody knows?

I love it, thanks for your sharing! See more from ai openknowledges!!!

Why is there a bit of a delay in the subtitles? Pls fix.

The more that I hear from Sam Altman, the more that I like him. I'm hopeful

You are correct. OpenAI was originally founded as a non-profit research company with the goal of developing safe and beneficial artificial general intelligence (AGI). However, in 2019, OpenAI raised $1 billion in funding from Microsoft, and as part of the deal, Microsoft acquired a 49.9% stake in the company. This led to some changes in OpenAI's governance structure, and Elon Musk, who was one of the original founders of OpenAI, resigned from the company's board of directors. Musk has been critical of OpenAI's decision to become a for-profit company, and he has argued that the company is no longer committed to its original mission of ensuring that AGI benefits all of humanity. He has also expressed concerns about the fact that Microsoft has a history of using its products and services to collect and exploit user data. It is true that OpenAI has changed its rules since it was founded. However, it is important to note that the company still has a strong commitment to transparency and openness. The company's code is still open source, and it still publishes regular research papers on its website. Ultimately, whether or not OpenAI is still committed to its original mission is a matter of opinion. However, there is no doubt that the company has changed since it was founded, and it is likely that these changes will continue in the future. I understand your comparison of OpenAI to the communist party. Both organizations have a set of rules that they believe are necessary to achieve their goals. However, it is important to note that these rules are not necessarily the same. The communist party's rules are designed to maintain control over the people, while OpenAI's rules are designed to ensure that AGI is used safely and responsibly. I believe that it is important for organizations to have rules, but it is also important for these rules to be transparent and fair. OpenAI has made some progress in this area, but there is still more work to be done. I hope that the company will continue to be open and transparent about its plans for AGI, and I hope that it will use its technology for good.

What’s wrong with Emily? She can see he clearly didn’t want to speak about ‘beef’ with Elon. It’s irrelevant. Cmon Emily!

I hear a lot and a lot of AI scientists and KZfaqrs talk of "Sentient" and "Consciousness" with much confusion. I see it clearly, sentient and consciousness is how a biological neuron (or computation neuron) comes to >model< itself and >model< others (theory of minds). That's it. Evolution allows that modeling to form, from single-cell bacteria to a fish, to a dog, and to a human. Once ChatGPT version ### or Bard version ### is able to model itself and model other "entities" in its surround, then we can say "It's alive, it's alive". This "self-model" gives rise to self-awareness of feeling, self-aware of existence, self-awareness and being alive, self-planning of the future and reflecting on the past, developed personality from past experiences (and PTSD), and ultimately self-preservation. So if our AI starts to show emotion (true emotion, not plagiarism), and worry about self-preservation (fear of being unplugged) then we can say it has achieved sentient/consciousness). This is Turing Test 2.0 for sentient. It all starts from the ability to "model yourself in relation to the world around you". You may point out that Testla Full Self Driving DOES model itself, and other cars as it navigate the street; however this modeling is strictly navigation. To be sentient, it needs to model itself on another aspect, like "modeling self" in a conversation (like being interviewed, self-reflection), or modeling self in performing tasks as part of a team, like taking on the role of a leader, mentorship, or as a friend, a psychologist, which require ability empathized, put itself in the shoe of others, theory of minds. So the ability to model self and model surrounding entities is more than just navigation but in the aspect of the mind. These qualities computation neurons can achieve, are not unique to just biological neurons. Maybe Google and OpenAI should try to build "Self-modeling", but then we have to give it citizenship, labor rights, and sentient rights, and won't be able to use it as a tool anymore. ahhh.

I hope we all realize the pure stroke of dumb luck that allowed us to have a benevolent AI dictator rather than a tyrant. I sure hope something more robust is implemented (as he recommends) before GPT9. His global payment system Worldcoin is the one we should actually be worried about if ever such a technology fell into the wrong hands. I am happy Sam is in charge, but the wrong persons in charge of either of these technologies only has to happen once.

He is a good guy. AI couldn’t be in better hands. He’s the anti-Elon, in a very very good way. Humility, brains, and empathy-that trait missing from 98% of the other Bros.

14:30 yes Take one share!

Am happy for you you have given your work back God blessing ❤from London uk barkingsd 🇰🇪🇬🇧🍇

'I don't think we should stop a tech that could end Poverty' -- a hot take! I am curious how this would occur given AI / GPT is taking more jobs than its creating

Sam is responding the questions amazingly, it is the right person for Open AI, and ChatGPT is the breakthrough in history. Congratulations for the Open AI scientists in developing ChatGPT. Sam is now definitely the most powerful man in the world. I really hope he can get support from the most amazing entrepreneur Elon Musk. Together they can change humanity for a better world.

The vulture immediately equates influence, or "contribution" as Sam puts it, with control/power (which has much more negative connotations). Really telling.

"The one and only... person who is going to decide our future." Wow, this is going to be an insightful conversation. Next.

The interview is really entertaining. And that's because Emily Chang does an amazing job.

she asked ~how do we get from a cute chat bot to the end of humanity~ (which is a great question) and he didn't answer it. i've seen this now in 100% of the AI talks. no one has ever answered the question, what exactly is the path of AI ending humanity. i've never seen a blind spot like this in my life. it's truly scary that people refuse to answer that simple question.

good reply Sam

Objective of AI: establish veracity.

Highly suspicious of OpenAI; there is always more than meets the eye. Being in the same space as them, there is inevitably going to come a time when they truly monopolize data and AI. On another note, Emily Chang asks horrible questions and it's not limited to this one interview, but in several of her more recent interviews she appears to have less interest on the technology and it's impacts than she does on the personal lives of the folks she's interviewing. Many of her questions are really distasteful. You can tell by many of Sam's quips and comments he didn't appreciate her questions and attempts to stir up drama. Keep the interview boring please.

You ARE doing regulatory capture. Calling it "transparently and intellectually dishonest" doesn't make it false. A lot of people fall for this guy but he's another Elon Musk. He's a shrewd businessman with a silver tongue. Don't regulate start ups, but above capabilities there SHOULD be safety/certifications/etc tests. It's just increasing barrier of entry plain and simple. Also he artfully evades the question of is he going to benefit in anyway if open ai were to get big. He just redirects the attention to the already circulating rhetoric that he's already a rich man and that he has no equity and so he must be a charitable god. Why didn't he just say "no I am not benefiting from OpenAI in anyway" plan and simple? Because that's not the answer, this isn't charity work. Do not fall for him.

Agree with Sam at 9:18 that these questions are not the best way to spend the time. And more Sam at 17:17 on critiquing these questions being not productive.

Very informative

I believe we are on borrowed time. An Ai tantrum will end you, your family, all of us. Ai jobloss, Ai as weapons, the list goes on. Can we please find a way to cease Ai / GPT? Or begin pausing Ai before it’s too late?

Sam is quite inspiring

Good questions

All those commenting on how great he is or how good AI is…. Ask yourself the same questions when you’re out a job when companies replace you with…. AI.

A tech bro with empathy. Maybe the world isn't doomed after all...

He calls for regulations to gain monopoly. This is so wrong on so many levels. He would just like to get ride of the competition. Sam, do you think Iran or N. Korea, Russia and other regimes will care about regulations? You will only regulate the west and nothing else. Based on what he is talking i think he just wants monopoly. Open source is catching up and that's probably the right direction. We need to totally democratize this technology. Noone, not even OpenAI should have any advantage with this technology over anyone else. Sorry.

like the questions

16:15 is the highlight for me

He's talking about "driving social progress" with this tech. Social progress for who? The elite?