This guy is legit, for some reason after using C++ for 4 years, i feel like i never learned the language enough

After pausing the video 3 times, and meditating I finally got it, thank you Cherno

Sometimes. you just go through so much information and you understand it but you don't really understand it. Then sometimes, you stop to think and apply what you just learnt and you really understand the concept and you feel like your brain just expanded a little. This is happening too frequently since I have started watching this series.

Love this channel, I wish I found it 5 years ago back in university

Cherno, thanks for these videos. After taking a year off of coding after school to pursue something else, reviewing these topics from a real-world use-case standpoint makes them make a lot more sense as to what they are useful for compared to how we learned them in school. Yes, we learned them well in school, but it was rarely made clear as to what the expected usage of each topic should be. I now have a better understanding of when I should overload operators!

Basically do a: Vector2& operator++() { return (*this)--; } Vector2& operator--() { return (*this)++; } And watch the world burn. Pity that it wouldn't work.

Learning this in my CS class kinda made me die inside. I was able to understand you much more easily, thank you!

Just what i was interested in. Thanks for the great stuff

This series is FABULOUS Cherno! You've clarified all of my doubts, thank u buddy =D

man, I must seem crazy being alone and clapping after each amazing video, TXS

Boy thanks again. This series has been on loop in my home for 3 months. I have been needing to override the ostream and was wondering what to do... and == TY for showing those useful tips

Thank you! I had difficulties with this but you made it a lot clearer.

So clear, so neat and so well explained.

Taking my first programming class and this series has been really helpful. Thank you.

Me and the bois watching The Cherno and growing brain cells

By far my hardest C++ lesson, might have to review previous lessons

master class on operator overloading . Note: playback speed: 0.75;

Wonderful explanation! Truly truly wonderful explanation of a pretty tricky concept to get your head around initially. Now it all makes sense.

This is so much more clear now! thanks!

I'm loving C++ and your series

i got stuck with an assignment for school, also using a Vector2f class in c++, this video got me started :D thx, i appreciate the help

It was really an informative video.Thanks Cherno😀

That was some fast talking.

Man, you are amazing, thank you a lot for your videos.

Bloody great video

just love your lectures~!

I wish my brain would move as fast as you type

As a beginner in C++, I feel like I got into the wrong room. Anyway, you have done a great job so far.

thank you for sharing your knowledge

I had to pause the video in the middle to like and subscribe because it's worth it.

well done! I finally understand!

Never fails to amaze me!

Cherno My bro your one of the best teachers I've had and I didn't even pay you shit ! love your stuff man !!!

"I left out operator overloading (in java) as a fairly personal choice because I had seen too many people abuse it in C++. " James Gosling

Thank you that's exactly what I need. our instructor is just telling us non senses in school

The best part is Cherno is criticizing the Boost.Serialization Library xD

I love how he gets tired of all the card thing lul

you literally saved my life!

that's really cool!

your channels the best c++ tutorials on you tube without a doubt but man c++ is soooo much harder than python or php my brain is literally frying listening to you

very challenging stuff to understand. wow.

very informative thank you a lot

"What are you doing" *stares hard* LOL😆

If people need to go to the definition of your operator to understand what it does, you're probably not doing your job. Great video, Cherno!

some powerful stuff, really.

Thank you for share!

At [ 5:57 ] you may have noticed he used the *operator* along with the *function* for the addition (which is defined just above that code by the way). Many of you may have thought ... Hey, can it cause performance issues !? , or can lead to slightly lower performance, the answer is ... *Yes* , but it depends ... - If you're making a *specific program* (for yourself), then do make a *single operator* , not along with the function.. As, it is really unnecessary. - If you're designing your own *specific Library* , then do what *Cherno* did. It will increase the *Functionality* and the *Flexibility* of your Library class. _Long story short ... It all depends._

I got so confused when I saw std::string. 🤣 This vid really saved me! Thx for the content!

I just did the calculation on the PowerUp Vector and the Speed Vector, and it turns out that PowerUp is actually slower!

Cherno deserves a medal!

i think you are thinking faster than other people like 1.5x speed, thats why you code so fast and can produce everything quickly. lucky for you!

I haven't understood this for a year, and this guy explains it in 7 minutes *_wow_*

Binge watching these before my data structure c++ based class in Uni

blows my mind

Are your eyes really that color, it's cool man !

Looking at his videos make me feel like i am smart I know that i don't know what he is writing. But I still know what is trying to do

tysm very useful

Just jump back to say thank you & clicked the thumbs up button for this video. Is there anyone like me have the same feeling: See your tutorial save me to click "x1.5" or "x2" botton.

So sick.

Nice vidoes, probably best on youtube! I have a question: can i write my own oparetors, for example, operator === instead of overloading native == ?

Thank you this helped operator overloading click

Thanks! Love your video! and for ppl saying it's fast, just slow the video down or re-watch it. he is clear and straight to the point.

If it helps from a python view, think of these operator overloading methods as deprecated methods from python (such as def __str__ and def __add__).

Love u!

I'd be interested in a video about move assignment, copy assignment, assign by reference operators.

Thanks

amazing

For equal operator, do we need to define an errorThreshold epislon and compare two Vector difference with that epislon? Otherwise, the comparison result may be inaccurate.

i'm working on a matrix library that works off of contiguous memory, so the basic way of accessing an element is Matrix[ columns*i + j ]; how can I implement operator overloading of [] such that I can still access it like Matrix[ i ][ j ]?

Operators are functions and they make code look better.

my university professor has not shown a single code during all of his lectures, just explained dry theory. i really don't know why i go to university at all

How do I customize the debug console Visual Studio 2019 ?

11:00 I believe the compiler is able to auto generate the operator!= if you opverload the operator==, so you don't need to define your own, since the compiler just will negate the other operator you have defined.

can you create custom operators? for instance if i wanted to make a class that represented a polynomial function and i wanted a member function that took its derivative would I be able to make say d an operator or would I have to either use a preexisting operator (making it harder to read) or be stuck with just the function?

i can't believe that this is free.

Nice one, Your T-shirt , that painting in the wall , your eyes all have the same hue of green Is it coincident or planned :P

Is the purpose of returning stream in the

This is definitely one of the best things in C++ imo :)

Can you ID an IDE that would highlight overloaded operators, such as color coding. It does make easier to read the code.

Why the output stream operator overloading function must be declared outside the struct scope ? why couldn't we declare it inside the struct ?

C++ gives you full control, which can kinda be a bad thing. Yeah, like allowing someone to write 24 bytes of random data to address location 0 of every hard drive on the system. Every hard drive. No, I wasn't that guy, I was the guy that had to see why running the application resulted in rebuilding the system disk and data drives.

Hey, Cherno, I really enjoy your video. I try to practice your technique. However, " return *this + other; " not work for me. I compile it with gnu g++. Is there any thing I missed?

I implemented leftshift operator as I said but gave an error like "ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'stream' with no type". What should I do instead?

Awesome man.. Please make a video about "templates" and how to use them in header file.

how bout operator[] ? not sure how that works

After the end of this series and the covering C++, can we get tutorials on a framework such as SDL or OpenGL? Or maybe something insanely new like Vulkan

Can the "

Great job! You could also say that some operators can't be overloaded 😉 (like the sizeof)

I'm actually slightly confused as to why we have the need to make these operators. Like it looks like we're just saying the same operation inside the struct method, like "position + speed" -> "coordinate + other.coordinate" - I don't see what it does differently to what was said. Also I'm not sure if I understand what we're doing, I was thinking we should multiply the speed by time to get the added position, unless our speed is actually in discreet chunks, i.e. normalized to constant time and making it directly a distance value. In any case they're two float numbers, why can't they be added without saying + means +? Because they have two values and the compiler doesn't understand what you want to add together, the x+y parameters in the position or x parameters between position and speed? Now I actually think this is a fantastic way to extend my personal math program for school work with vector addition and multiplication, I was actually just last night pondering about how to go on about it when you have things like dot and cross products.

Hey cherno! I'm Going to be honest with you. I thought that this series is not that good and i couldn't understand anything and thought it was trash. But after looking at other series and courses, i can say that this is the best series to learn C++!

At 7:32 will line 40 know to multiply first and then add? Does overriding the + and * symbol keep the order of operations?

awesome

lol @ the boost reference

Once you open a Cherno's video, first thing first, speed: 0.75.

Could someone help me with this question? After overloading, what is the order of the Arithmetic Operatoration. Does "*" still have higher priority than "+"? and Why?

Did anyone else need to make the ostream operator a friend function? That was the only way I could get it to work cause I would keep getting the error "Too may parameters for overloaded function".

0:36 Actually,

So the operator overloads only apply to things done with Vector2 but nothing else? And what's this "other" thing he keeps passing? I don't see any passing going on but his functions have parameters. Does thing1 become the "other" that is passed in something like: thing1 + thing2 ?

At 5:57 (and later at 11:09), is it okay to have a method call another one instead of doing the job itself in terms of performance? Is the assembly code exactly the same or?

operator = function, neat!