thats Jesus.

Amen

no diff at all but in words used to talk about it

Everything is on fire 🔥

im nobody

ehhh it doesnt make anyone any money or wiser really

I concur. I only know small bits of other languages, mostly from exposure or immersion into those cultures. I am an etymological word nerd.

@@drawingmomentum I am drawn to that, too...something about Origin, Roots, and the Way/Path all seem intertwined. Fascinating fire flames, burning yet not consuming...purely purifying...

@@constancebruns3887 the secret flame of ancient memories woven deep within our psyche, waiting for exposure from the silent center of chaos, are reborn, sputtering and gasping, as they reach for oxygen to breathe and burn again. Over 90% of all communication is nonverbal. Words are rare too I guess. 🌞 ❤

i do remember yes

@@KenTheoriaApophasis can u do a video on it, we care

they say "one candle lighting another" , but that is not doctrinal, and also ANTARABHAVA (in between existence) contradicts their nonsense beliefs

That be like, who’s holding the candle...lol. Thanks bro...

very young

what makes you think anything of the body affects the soul in genuine actuality?

Lol

🤣 thats a fact

the BROADCAST is the consubstantial byproduct of BOTH the radio and the signal,......the signal is self-reflexive, live exists only so long as its willed to exist in such a circumstance. :)

@@KenTheoriaApophasis I had to rewind about four times but I'm picking up what you're putting down, I think 🤣...so if the signal turns from the radio no broadcast would exist because the radio has nothing to tune or translate? Am I making some half wit sense?

My dumb dumb brain says ok so broadcast is what happens when signal meets radio so if signal says screw that radio then no broadcast...holy shit I'm just an imagination of absolutely nothing. 😂 This is amazing. 🙌🏼... I may be an imaginary expression of what happens when the nature of a signal meets this radio but I'ma say "we, expressions" of the absolute although dumb and ignorant can be incredibly, unconditionally, absolutely beautiful! 🙌🏼

such a case is meant the phrase "dead man walking" for he who has died to this life/existence....dont take the radio analogy TOOOOOO far

a broadcast is processed etc etc etc by many diff radio components, the broadcast is "almost" the signal, but it is not, and goes NO further than the radio

ignore what SON? what is anicca/dukkha/anatta = 5 KHANDAS........ did you really wanna debate me on PALI terms? lets do it.

@@KenTheoriaApophasis @Zonged 1. It is said that 'Pratītyasamutpāda' is beginning-less. How can that be? How can logically speaking an event or phenomenon or a process-realm be ACTUALLY beginning-less? How can it be recognised then? Where are we standing in reference to what? If it does not have a beginning, it simply means that it is primordial/eternal, if it is eternal it means one cannot claim that is has any middle or end point either. If it does not have neither beginning nor middle nor end, then where is the one who is claiming that it has not a beginning? 2. In Dependent Origination, what is the nature of each event/phenomenon that is dependent on the previous one before it? What separates the phenomena 'A' from the phenomena 'B'? Is there any space between them to begin with? is not time/changeability an important and inevitable factor here? If there is no space/time between such phenomenons then how can we consider them as many phenomenons (with a beginning-less primordial origin) instead of just one single phenomenon? Why not just consider the whole thing a single phenomenon with multiple only-appearances then? BTW, is not it almost identical to the idea of Māyā (Ishvara) in Vedantic traditions which the sectarian Buddhists argued against? 3. If the very subjective person has no real self to begin with, and if the sentient being's essence is fundamentally empty of any absolute reality, then how can a being from this relative, conventional world of limitations, unreal, untrue and empty phenomenal world claim that all there is to reality is this very unreal emptiness? How can someone from a closed-system realise and become certain about the nature of its own origin, and claim that there is fundamentally no origin? Is not that pure arrogance to say such thing?
 As a lecturer of Eastern philosophies in both Asia and EU, I would say that there are so many epistemological, logical and even historical errors with the mainstream approach of Buddhism as we know it today that I could surely say that whoever that follows, labels herself, or simply has any spiritual sympathy with the the mainstream Buddhism is simply someone who is not educated enough intellectually to be able to think critically. And thinking critically is the first requisite of becoming a spiritual person and surpassing intellect after that... If the above challenges are not enough, I'd be more than happy to bring about at least 20 more challenges with or without (whatever you prefer) relying on the actual texts. It's actually interesting that when thinking critically, you don't even need to rely on sacred literature to prove a point, but luckily I could easily provide both.

@@KenTheoriaApophasis I dont want to argue Pali terms, Im just pointing out you're completely ignoring Anicca when talking about Souls. How can there be a soul if everything is Anicca?

@@Zonged Soul or No Soul is not to be discussed. It is the 5 Aggregates which is Anicca. Hence, the confusion for you because standing within the 5 Aggregates, you are asking these questions. Citta Na.Kampatti.. is what Saupadisesa Nibbana means. Unshakable Serenity of the Citta. Akuppa Ceto Vimuktti. Personalization (Citta turning towards) the 5 Aggregates is Samsara. Citta turning away (Disobjectification) from the 5 Aggregates is Liberation. But 5 Aggregates still function until the body disintegrates.