Yeppers, any weapon using 7.62 Nato round and including the new us m7 which uses the 6.8mm round.

You are not the only one 😅

I understand that the video is all subjective and that's okay. But i really don't understand the decision to have the G36 in there but not the HK 416 which is now replacing the G36 as the standard rifle of the Bundeswehr for several reasons. One of them being that the G36 with 5.56 ammo isn't as reliable as desired for military units in intense combat situations with a lot of bullets being fired. I'm not an expert so my understanding of this is pretty basic, but afaik the HK416 doesn't have this type of problems while maintaining the benefits of the HK rifles like their ambidexterity. please correct me if I got anything wrong but in my opinion if you include the G36 you should be obliged to also mention the HK416. :D Thats the main thing that bothered me in the video.

The US army never got rid of the m16 it still uses the m16a3 to this day. Maybe you’re thinking of the marine corps.

Nice mama joke

😂😂 classic

Well, it says up top that he's a Royal Marine, I've no idea if that is true, but assuming it is, you can rely on him being highly trained, trained to a higher degree than UK general combat forces, in all terrains CQB, arctic, jungle & urban. Frankly he will be extremely familiar with using the L85 in all its iterations & if there were shortcomings & weaknesses he'd be fully aware of them. Firing from the other shoulder is something that becomes a training issue, techniques are developed, because you would have an issue, doesn't mean the British soldier has a major issue. I've never fired an SA-80, but I'd sooner accept the judgment of someone who has had to rely on one, than someone who hasn't. I've spoken to a former Para who saw service in Iraq with an A3, who thought they were a 'Good bit of kit! You just needed to keep 'em clean.' That's good enough for me. It looks like this 'piece of useless crap' that's been in service with British forces since 1987 through a less than tranquil period of our shared history, will soon be replaced anyway, probably by an Armalite type weapon. This has happened to a limited degree with Ranger & Marine units already with the KS-1A1, but history will say the SA-80 was perhaps less than totally successful, but not the dismal failure many try to make out. If it was half as bad as a lot of people say, it surely would have been replaced awhile ago.

@@gregralph616 I'm french and worked with both FAMAS and HK416 in an urban environment and yes bullpup are not made for ZURB as a lot of people are mistakenly thinking. They are very useful for mechanised units, as a shorter weapons allows you to easily embark and disembark but switching shoulder is a nightmare for case ejection as you get constantly smacked by the cases ejected by the rifle. The only bullpup that are not having this problems are the AUG in its last version (with a deflector) and for obvious reasons, the F-2000

Nah polish ak variants are better

According to the ever accurate generated subtitles and narrator pronunciation, you mean the "Stair OG" or are you talking about the "Style OG"?🤣🤣🤣🤣

It uses the AR18 internals

I'm a fan of the FAL too (own a DSA SA58 metric pattern FAL), but it is a battle rifle, not an assault rifle.

I used the G3, but I think we used 7.64 x 54. This was many years ago, so maybe my memory is off, or they changed the ammo since. Either way, the recoil was rather pronounced 😵‍💫