Thank you my son.

@@fxsrider That's blasphemy!

@@johnharrison5656 Telling a non existing entity how much you love them on a youtube message board is odd. Blasphemy? Who got hurt? You? or a god?

@@fxsrider Blasphemy is claming to be God or someone forgiving the sins of another . I do agree that it's odd and I'm pretty sure God would much rather the person talk to him. All I have to say regarding your comment that God doesn't exist is for your sake it would be best if you were right!

How do you know her god didn't tell me to write that to her? You don't. You can't. I can make shit up too.

Bendición Laura! Creo que hay software que puede hacer eso, no en la mejor calidad pero ayuda. Solo que no te puedo decir cual es, lo se por mis sobrinos.

Guy Atkins they would disagree. My argument about evolution is if it’s a fact how come it’s called the theory of evolution instead of the law of evolution?

I know, the fact that they're serious just makes it that much funnier! 🤣

Epigenetics doesn't quite work like that. To begin with your body only carries "higher levels of electricity" while you're being electrocuted, it's not as if ones body maintains "high levels" of electricity after the fact, it's not a substance that can be stored, something has to generate that electricity. Now the experience may be expressed in epigenetic changes that could be passed down to your children but I'd recommend reading a science journal on the subject to learn more about the kind of changes that can be passed down.

But lots of religions made this "prediction". I think it's more of an observation than a prediction.

@@lazyh-online4839 Lots of religions? Which ones? Please quote the specific verses.

What about the science that launches rockets up into space? Firmament?

@@fxsrider What about it?

For the most part I agree, but it also validates the many other religions that show some form of passing down of traits from parent to child.

This kind of logic does not sink in to the atheist. Or other sceptics

You could copy and paste subtitles into Google translate.

yolanda jerginson You want to find a myth just look at the big bang buddy.

yolanda jerginson and you haven’t refuted one argument that was in this video

If you want truth, you should stick with science.

If you understand English and Tamil you can be someone to tell others the scientific facts you learn.That helps prove the Bible to others. But the truth of how to put on Christ is the most important part that everyone needs to study.

Yeah right.

A rib is the only bone in people that can be removed and it grows back..

@@wildchild00fu and you have medical proof of this. On the other hand we can cure leprosy so that makes us divine.

@@colindickson8034 Simple Google search can find it, Einstein.

I also believe in a big bang..its called fireworks it bangs and its big

And something that can hold back water must be solid and or FIRMament

Yeah we ain't on no spinning ball whirling through space either. Earth is immovable and has foundations. Heliocentrism is a religion and false doctrine.

They should do I think, they would have a greater genetic variation from the start, humans only had two. This would help their variation but there has been a enormous amount of research put into humans compared to the animals perhaps more than all others combined it will be interesting to see what future research revels.

@@faithtruth8036 research shows the genetic diversity of either is too great for a flood event in the time frame suggested by the bible. In addition the animals that show a bottleneck do show it at the same time as humans but only in a specific location hat humans were in at the time, as well as giving geological evidence of volcanic activity being the reason for the bottleneck. None of the evidence support Noah's flood from the time frame, location, or the cause of the bottleneck, nor the population size during said bottleneck.

@@lazyh-online4839 Research lies a lot too. As time goes on, research has no choice but to adhere to what is actually observed. The bible has for millennia had the answers. The funny thing about today's 'science' is they have been handed a cheat sheet and refuse to use it.

@@GORF_EMPIRE "Research lies a lot too." I'll admit the results of research CAN be incorrect, but it's still the most reliable method we have aside from performing the experiments ourselves. Can you give any verifiable examples of this cheat sheet?

@@lazyh-online4839 Try watching this video again.

God in that context was Elohim meaning a counsel or builders who carry out the order (what’s said). You’ll see the builders (bane) throughly scripture with sometimes God having a different definition if you use strongs concordance.

Yes it does

@@benjaminmontoya8160 where?

The "ethiest" society is roaring with laughter about this dishonest bullshit.

I think it's interesting how they're saying a study proving a population in the thousands about 70,000 years ago somehow proves a population less than 10 about 6,000 years ago. This logic in this video has more holes than Swiss cheese.

@@lazyh-online4839 That's because it comes from the holey bible.

Adam means man. So all men are Adams

@@jameskguy Yea , well getting the timelines right makes all the difference.

" Science tries to prove or disprove God by looking at the evidence given in nature." Actually science is not interested in God. God is supernatural, the field of science is the natural world. A conflict is only created (sorry for the pun, I couldn´t resist), if people stick to a literal interpretation of the Bible and deny or ignore facts. I still wonder why this is such a big problem in the US and nowhere else.

I've talked to another person who read Genesis 1&2 this way as well. He was very defensive and quite hateful, so I couldn't get much knowledge out of him. But if you don't mind answering I would like to know how you read a few things. Starting with Genesis 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens. It seems to me the Bible is going back over creation in more detail. How do you read that? Continuing on Genesis 2:5-24 Reads to me like it is starting at the beginning of day three. 'When no bush of the field was yet in the land' It also says God had not caused it to rain, but there was a mist watering the whole face of the ground. And there was no 'man' to work the ground. This is just my opinion and could be completely wrong but it reads to me like God planted the earth on day three. And 'created' the Garden in Eden on day 6 after He created Man. Verse 7 says he creates man and he became a living creature. He then causes the garden to 'spring up'(instantly). He places him in Eden to work in the garden, and creates woman from him. I've always read Chapter 2 as a second look. If there were immortal people with souls on the earth before Adam and Eve, why would God create Adam and Eve's to rebel and destroy that? And then save people through their lineage? Or do you think everything was corrupted before Adam and Eve? These are sincere questions if you have time to respond.

@@alamotte2005 The Bible says the devil rebelled in the first age, and a third of the angels followed him. Just as the devil corrupted the first age he is also trying to do to this age. Adam and Eve were beguiled by the serpent, the devil that old dragon, The devil was trying to destroy the lineage of Adam and Eve of which Christ would come. That happened on several occasions when the angels left the place of habitation Gen 6, and JUde tells about the fallen angels, and from these came the giants. Sometimes people want to argue but the best way for you to make up your mind is to listen to Shepherd's Chapel which teaches all this chapter to chapter verse to verse. You can make up your own mind. I do know that the churches don't teach the Bible, and after you study with Shepherd's Chapel for a while you will realize this. The most important thing is for people to get involved in their Bible and study every day. Why? Because that is how we are spiritually fed, and that is as important as feeding the flesh. God Bless.

@@tomjackson3411 Thanks, I will check into Shepherd's Chapel.

All myths told by other cultures. Nice fairytale though, almost like the tooth fairy.

@@mikewilliams4717 That's incredible Mike. The History channel has taught you well.

God is science

Which god?? There are so many to choose from.

Williams whatever god makes the most sense to you

Randy Dittmer What is speeking?

@Richard Fox Not if you understand the need to rid the world of evil. It then sounds more like justice and salvation. You too could be saved if you repent and believe that Jesus died for your sins.

@Richard Fox God made you and he has given his son to die for everyone's sins, so that none should perish. The choice is yours.

God created science, just like he created everything else.

@@nancyking2867 absolutely. We can't get the laws of nature without a Lawgiver. We can't get a creation of the universe without God.

Science fiction

Don't confuse science which is a systematic way to validate cause and effect through experimentation. Pseudoscientists are religious zealots that make up stories and brainwash kids into believing they came from monkeys. Not all science is bad, and not everyone claiming science actually uses science.

@@tbrown3356 good comment

Idiot.

Earth is Flat geostationary plain

@@ryanehlis426 And you're an idiot too.

@Gowd With comments like yours...do you expect anyone to take you seriously?

@@ohiobuckeye5828 Really ? you take an iron age book written by people who thought wheels were high tec seriously ! ha ha ha

@Gowd *Citations needed*

@@ohiobuckeye5828 Citations for what ? The buybull ?What do ya want to show where it is provably wrong, immoral, barking mad ?

On your assertion that the writers of the bible thought wheels were high tech. As to your other assertions....I would run out to of snickers bars before you got around to proving them.

Did that make you feel smart? What about orgasm?

@@2fast2block .... huh?

@@jimscobie6646 more knowledge from the genius who watched this video and it's content was all wiped out with, "Big Foot is real!" now has more knowledge in answering me with, ".... huh?" Gee, you're just a wealth of knowledge. Can't wait to see what you fart out of your dumb ass next.

Try a book, not KZfaq then

He married his sister... you cannot miss the scripture in Genesis 5:4 "And he had other sons and daughters". It's really very simple when you read and think about it.

franklix sister, nieces, great nieces... they lived much longer. Keep asking questions 🤔 , some answers are not obvious, and sometimes the translations make it confusing- hope your trust in God grows with each answered question.

@@tomcogar851 He married a woman who lived in the land of Nod. Or wait how do we know he got married ?

Which god?

@@mikewilliams4717 Aa the one the video is about.

Truth is truth Fiction is fiction. So your point being?

Please go back and tell the Christian founders of nearly every single field of science that. Oh, and mention it to the Christian inventor of the scientific method too.

Jaye Bea how so?

Jaye Bea Colossians 1:15-17 15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: 16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him: and for him: 17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. KJV

God have mercy for that soul

@@trailblazing2576 There's no bible in bible.

@@truethinker221 we are all doomed

@@trailblazing2576 The gospel of gloom and doom.

Precisely! LOL! "Adam´s seed" probably remained frozen during the ice ages. Then Eve by some huuuuge coincidence sat on the rock where Adam had left it to freeze, BUT precisely on the moment the sun was warming it up...

They didn't say here. Where'd you come off with that.

I can't remember if they referred to the anthropological believe that Y-chromosome Adam and mitochondrial Eve lived long time periods apart, but that is the belief among those who now believe in Y-chromosome Adam and mitochondrial Eve but don't believe the Bible.

There was a single male ancestors more recently than a single female ancestor. More women at the time there was one man that everyone is related to. The Bible, and many other cultures', describe this happening during a global flood. Noah is the "genetic Adam" because all 3 of his sons are related to him. The single female ancestor of the wives of Noah's sons was actual Eve, thus earlier.

@@grasonicus Yeah it seems unlikely, although is possible. Certainly Biblically it is: Noah is the single male ancestor but the wives of his sons were all from different ancestors. So Noah would be the last common male ancestor but Eve would be the last common female ancestor. For scientists who don’t believe the Bible, there would still have to be a situation where the kids of some man or woman were the inly ones that survived, but he or she procreated with multiple partners. Odd theory if secular.

fxsrider The CREATOR MOST HIGH let it be known dork! You with the muse that makes us sick satanic industry as your god and his ministers who praise him for you.

What's the creator in your particular fantasy look like?

@fxsrider What you say is just speculation. It is a delusion that one can derive truth from speculation. Read a few books on logic and you will see that. If you know enough about probability, information and code, especially encoded information, you will see that a creator is necessary.

What seems more likely? A magic man with no origins did it? Or comets full of water blasted the planet for eons?

@fxsrider "seems" Again, speculation. Make no mistake, it's not evidence that drives you but your atheism.

Explain.

@@GORF_EMPIRE Nonsense? Biblical fantasy.

@@louisbauer8669 Yawn.

@@GORF_EMPIRE So true, maybe those dreams you just woke up from.

@@louisbauer8669 More like the boredom I get from such glib and childish attempts at rebuttal.

Rump[e Stillskin great contribution! Thanks for your comment and the interesting content in it. Wish you had shared more of your view on this so we could understand more of the evidence that points to a contrary strain of events than the arguments explain in this video. 100 years ago, scientists thought the people 200 years ago were stupid and still kinda primitive. They knew how to make planes of cardboard and drained someone of all his blood. Today we know better and see them as ignorant. We laugh at those who “knew” the earth was flat. And in 2230, people will look at our time and they won’t be able to imagine we actually believe some of the things we proudly teach in schools and think we know. The only thing that is actually really evolving... is science itself. We keep discovering things we didn’t understand, only to raise more questions and decades later realize we overlooked critical things back then when we thought we had it all figured out. Understanding that and not living in the illusion that somehow our generation knows it all.. is smart. Having an open perspective and unbiased approach to different theories, is necessary to unravel the real truth. The earth was 2 billion years old a century ago. 1 billion years old 45 years before that. 500 million years old in the 17th centurie and 34 million years old in 1620. Yes in the middle ages it was taught that our planet was several 100-thousands years old. In the last 3 thousand years we’ve discovered fire, domesticating animals, clothing, farming, scripts and alfabets, tables, the wheel, horse-carriages, bikes, electricity, phones, camera’s, cars, planes, medicines, governments, juristrictions, internet, space travel etc. And you think we’ve been here for hundreds of millennia? We should’ve been able to travel to other galaxies by now. It would’ve been credible if we’ve found massive amounts of fossils and skeletons of people and animals and plants. Having thousands of species that are links in evolution, crossing from fish with fins to mammal or bird with half wing or leg. And yet....there’s not even one !! Just small horse, medium horse, large horse. Like there still are today. And everything evolved... but crocodiles..somehow stayed the same. They don’t know how to keep raccoons from stealing and eating their eggs after “millions of years” - but they are somehow not changing. Really... If the Bible was wrong, it would’ve been proven by now. Yet it’s full of facts that science confirms centuries after. One small example before I go: in the Middle Ages the Spanish flu broke out, killing around (I think it was ..) 2-5% of the population. Almost none of the Jews got sick, so the people figured it had to be an evil trick the Jews created to attack the non-Jews. So they kicked them out of the Iberian peninsula. How did the Jews escape this highly contagious pandemic? By listening to God ;) they followed Gods commands from the Bible, so they washed their hands before eating, sleeping and after waking up. After touching the dead. Before preparing food. This may seem very logical to us, but in that time... if you said there were millions of small animals, invisible to the eye, living on your hands - people would think you’re delusional and you’d probably be hanged. People didn’t know anything about bacteria or micro organisms back then. And the Bible is full of scientific facts we’ve only discovered recently. From earth with a clear sky and true darkness, a maximum of around 12.400 stars can be seen with the naked eye. Yet the Bible tells us the stars are more in number than all the grains of sand on all the beaches of earth. Don’t discard something so quickly without actually researching it for yourself dude !