David was masterful at smoothing out the bullshit coming out of Nancys mouth. But he was also full of shit. He is just better at serving it up to make it more appetizing.

"I really feel like there was some substantive conversation here." Yep - the fewer the guests, the better the Overtime.

@@redlightmax strange- I feel just the opposite, as the smaller the panel, the greater the chance all perspectives will be more or less aligned.

Did you care that Bill lied about the origin of the Spanish flu?

@@mavigogun I can see that concern. But when there are more guests it feels like it's harder for a single thought to be fleshed out. I think that would be solved if Overtime was a full 30 minutes or longer.

That trickle down crap was wrong when Reagan said it and has been proven so over the last 50 years.

Well said!

Also don't forget that lots of wealthy people find ways to skirt and break the law in all sorts of ways (depending on their unique financial situation) to better their financial status. Tax fraud is rampant. It isn't just the grifter ex-prez who chooses valuations based on what is best for them at the moment. Every person I know that runs their own business cheats on their taxes - every one of them. As for Mr. Maher paying such a high percentage - well duh - that is what a progressive income tax is supposed to do. Remember he only pays over 31% on the money he makes above ~$165K or so. Close all the loopholes and triple the IRS budget.

He is also a single filer.

Texas doesn’t have higher property taxes or sales tax than California, but I agree on the more important point. All income should be taxed the same. Income is income is income. All forms should be taxed the same, including un-capped payroll taxes. I even think un-realized cap gains should be taxed.

Right wingers are arguing that.

They are arguing that Twitter "has to by your book" and put it in the shop they pay for. You have zero right to force your book on anyone or any business.

I think was she was saying is if Twitter says you can't post, they can since it's a private business. There is no free speech issue. I didn't see the strawman argument.

I think Bill hit on something important when he said being blocked on Twitter in today's society is like having your free speech right taken away. But when someone lies so incessantly online aka please make it stop (like you-know-who did before he lost re-election), then they should lose their online free speech right for a periodof time. We need to modernize free speech laws for an online age.

@@callmebyyourname8332 it's weird that Bill basically wants people to not just lie, but get to the level right before violence.

He sets her up straight a bunch of times

"I loved when Bill said “Who decides that…you?” " the owners of the companies decide. he didn't set her straight, she didn't answer right. his assertion that Twitter is the public space is wrong. it's a private company letting the public use its space. it's still their property. if you don't like their censorship, go to facebook or youtube or reddit, or post on your own webpage, or carry a sign on public property. Maher, who is generally a libertarian on speech issues, wants the government to be able to force private companies to carry messages they disagree with. he's not against government regulation here, he is against capitalism. what's more, virtually every regulation they have proposed would INCREASE company censorship.

@@vforwombat9915 I have always found it incredibly problematic to label companies as citizens- as such, they can donate nearly untold amounts of political campaign money, engage in censorship, etc. Truthfully, capitalism was never intended to grow companies so large and global that they could suppress and subjugate the common people. I’ve read Adam Smith’s treatise, and it’s very clear that in his time, that sort of mega-corporation and level of surveillance was unfathomable. It’s a different world we’re living in than what he imagined.

She seems delusional

@@BichaeldeAngelo "companies as citizens" yeah, it was stupid. " suppress and subjugate the common people" well, that's been happening since the 1850s at least. one of the big reasons ppl turn to communism. as for twitter, seems to me that some sort of public sphere social media would be a good alternative. but back in the 90s, cities tried to offer free internet access to their citizens, and courts ruled it unfairly impinged on business. you'd have to work around that. apparently making money is now a right.

Agree totally!

Yes and more YES, those accusing 'cancel culture' are same those wanting and committing. Blatant Projection. Polite decorum different than Constitutional Civil Rights violations with new laws. I like the word Gay!

Fuckin 💯 right on !!

But bill assumed it came from Spain which is ironic because that's basically the exact opposite of what he was arguing.

They are often named after the place where they are first discovered or reported, even it it later turns out to have originated elsewhere. I think the main point here was that nobody has ever considered it racist before.

granted no one objected to the name

@@jmc5910 How many Spanish citizens have you polled in your extensive research on people that object to the name "Spanish Flu"? ;-)

Also, people didn't go around attacking Spaniards.

That women is a nut case

yeah Bill sure like reality to fit into his rightwing libertarian narratives

states, like California, require 'cause'

Absolutely...in NJ you can fire someone at will ..they don't have to give you a reason.

Those are only in state's that have "at will" employment and only then those companies that are based on "at will" employment which are ususually for only entry level or considered non-professional (licensed or certified) posititions.

Well, he didn´t insist it, he just said it without better knowlegde. Let´s not forget, he´s just a comedian, with some strong opinions. I would be very surprised, or even concerned, if he would know every f-ing law in USA conserning employment.

​@@user-xe5cz3dw8m Are you serious?! So yes *"only"* in 49 of 50 states that have at-will employment. It seems to me that you're grossly distorting the facts or at least providing inaccurate information based on your opinion. What do you mean "Those are only in state's that have "at will" employment *and only then those companies that are based on "at will" employment which are ususually for only entry level or considered non-professional (licensed or certified) posititions."* What company is not *based on "at will" employment?* What are considered professional (licensed or certified) positions which are exempt?. I have a degree and 11 certifications (I work in IT) and have always been an at-will *employee* (except for self-employed, consulting work). I realize that is anecdotal (even though it also applies to hundreds of IT employees I've collaborated with) so I researched nursing and found that a Nursing assistant (CNA), a Licensed practical nurse (LPN), a Registered nurse (RN), and even Advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) are at-will employees. Montana is the only state in the U.S. that is completely not at-will. All other states recognize at-will employment. However, some states place limitations on it. These limitations are in addition to the ones that federal laws apply to all states. At-will employment means that an employer can fire an employee for any reason (if it's not illegal), or no reason, with no warning, and without having to establish just cause. About 74% of U.S. workers are considered at-will employees. All states in the U.S., excluding Montana, are at-will. Most do have exceptions, but the states of Florida, Alabama, Louisiana, Georgia, Nebraska, Maine, New York, and Rhode Island do not allow any exceptions. Common Exceptions to At-Will Employment: 1. Public sector employment. Public workers are not typically subject to at-will employment. 2. Unionized jobs. Union workers may have collective bargaining agreements that exempt them from at-will employment. 3. Contract basis employment. Contract workers may have a contract with their employer that exempts them. 4. An employee refusing to violate public policy. At-will does not apply when employees refuse to violate public policy or take action that is protected by public policy. The exception does not apply in Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Maine, Nebraska, New York, Rhode Island, and Florida. 5. An employee taking actions protected by public policy. At-will does not apply when employees take action that is protected by public policy. This includes whistleblowing or reporting of unsafe or illegal activity. The exception does not apply in Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Maine, Nebraska, New York, Rhode Island, and Florida. 6. An employer implying that there is a contract. In all but 14 states employees may not have at-will status if the employer implies a contract. The 14 states include Arizona, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, and Virginia. 7. A breach of good faith by the employer. At-will does not apply if there has been a breach of good faith by the employer. For example, firing someone to deny a retirement package. This applies in 11 states. The 11 states include Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California, Delaware, Idaho, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming. 8. An employer discriminating. At-will employment does not apply if an employee is terminated due to discrimination. 9. An employee refusing to do something illegal. At-will employment does not apply if an employee is terminated for refusing to do something that is illegal. 10. An employer retaliating against union members. If an employer terminates employees for union activity, at-will employment does not apply.

Absolutely but big tech is considered private company, so the owner can refuse service to anyone.... Capitalist and civilization in society do not go together...

Defending speech you disagree with is the most important part of freedom of speech. As the saying goes: I think what you are saying is abhorrent but I will defend your right to say it with my life.

@@irishlady30 banning someone from Twitter is akin to cutting someone's phone service because you don't like what they are saying on it. Just like you can start your own phone company or social media site, most people don't have the resources

@@irishlady30 your ability to comment here and now is brought to you by Capitalist ventures. Irony?

@@Donkeykongington you don't pay for Twitter

this woman seriously needs to be fact checked

she’s a partisan hack

If you'd ever studied epidemiology, you'd know that these pandemics come around every century, and generally last five years. We are barely into the third year, so are not yet to the halfway mark. Political leanings have nothing to do with this fact. This was one of the few times she was correct.

@@whodat1399 Good to know. I suppose that I shouldn't worry about getting 'Long' covid if I should come down with this virus... Not enough is known about these lasting side effects, but many suffer from lingering symptoms. Hey, but the pandemic is over folks. No worries. No masks. No nothing. And why were we ever bothered to be concerned in the first place? I got that message loud and clear from Bill, the authority.

@@whodat1399 The deadliest years are often the first 2 years of a pandemic because the virus is novel meaning no members of an affected population has any developed immunity to the virus. Some members may have a natural, pre-disposed immunity or resistance to it, but acquired disease tolerance takes time for any affected species. Thankfully human beings are able to engineer some immune response by way of vaccines. The vaccines were never about preventing you from getting infected or even getting somewhat sick from the virus. They are designed to prime the immune responses of most people so that if they get exposed to the virus their bodies are able more quickly fend it off. In some cases this will means they prevent an infection from setting in. In most cases, this means preventing serious illness to the point of hospitalization. In *nearly* all cases, it means preventing deaths. I say *nearly* all because in some cases vaccines will not produce a strong enough immune response to fend off severe enough illness where a person with comorbidities may end up dying. No vaccines are 100% effective for every person vaccinated.

he's trying too, remember once Trump got in 2 office, Bill said and I quote "Now the gloves have to come off"

not sure who I quoted but that's what he meant.

Hey, Stephen. It;s PRINCIPLE. ( I recommend Junior College )

he stays on the rightwing libertarian path like usual with his delusional free speech arguments trying to legitimise the covid conspiracies. Very dissapointing

Principle. Principal is the head of a school.

Tell that to the jackass writers of this show.

Humans not on drugs what to go to extremes, flying suits, dare devils ,suba, Para gliders, Rock climbers , their all adrenaline junkies.

Not wrong. For example, if white people are so racist why are we embracing black moderates like Coleman Hughes or Aba and Preach and so on.

Politicians forget that only four out of 10 people even vote. And those four maybe one is far left one is far right the other two are center or independent. When people talk about civil war I laugh because six out of 10 people are not political but they have guns and they're not going to let you disrupt the world over your nonsense.

Agreed. Also people who simply beat the drum for their party no matter what. Just my opinion, but I didn’t like this lady Nancy in this segment. Every single time she spoke she slung some kind of mud at the other side. Says she’s in the party of ideas, but just like the right spewed hateful rhetoric the entire segment. I think Bill caught wind of it and didn’t like it. Just my thoughts

It is documented that Elon musk has tried to sue bloggers critical of his company and also his employees. Are you disputing that, because that’s what she was saying.

And then she adamantly supported Twitter shutting down conversations 🙄

Totally...right on!

@@shacharrachmany1102 I believe you got it backwards. Musk is the hypocrite first for questioning a company’s free speech policies while himself suppressing free speech in his own company. She’s not the one arguing that all speech should be free.

@@jegca that's not shutting down conversations, wake me up when he Sues someone for saying men cant menstruate and for having the audacity of talking about hunter Biden laptop

I can’t believe such a closed minded, brainwashed person is a college professor. My gosh, she was a horrible guest. I’m glad Bill pushed back with her more during overtime.

She’s awful

Don't Be A DumbAss!

She sounds like she is an Avid "the view" watcher.

@@Radjammin - so is the collective noun for the people on the View a Karen?

@@ABC-yt1nq no, it’s another word that you’re not supposed to say. It does sound like it starts with a K though.

Exactly! She was horrific!

ABSOLUTELY AGREE!! I cant fathom how anyone can see it otherwise.

Let's get something straight about Ivermectin. The only place it was used to treat humans was in the third world when there was no other option. Ivermectin was less effective in treating COVID than the vaccine was ineffective. It is great for treating worms but it will not fix the worms in the heads of IDIOTS that would reject a FREE VACCINCE but pay over $500 to some quack on the internet get an Ivermectin prescription. You got this one WRONG Bill, very very WRONG.

I like his take on the observation that there are truths and craziness on both the right and left. Seems like an honest take. 🤔

These guests really sucked. As the segment wore on it was more and more obvious that they are living in a world of their own biases and nowhere close to reality. Started off with the woman saying the cure to our out of control spending was to pass BBB and it just got worse. So bad that by the last few minutes the guests were so tired of hearing Bill call out their BS that they just ignored him and talked to each other.

@@trevorcarey3997 - Ebola is a river region in Africa, so your point is stupid.

Are you serious? You and Bill didn't believe the Woke culture and Cancel Culture was real 2 years ago, and now you are trying to tell me that you demorcrats are not massaging kids towards Trans culture? That is pedophilia. Florida just passed a bill that would not allow teachers to convince little kids that they were a different gender, and the left explodes. You are sick.

She was an absolute t**t! I will give Bill his due, he really did push back on her bullshit.

She was spot on

@@Da1PrettyT If by spot on you mean that she did a good job of spewing the party line, then sure. lmao

@@Da1PrettyT she and her ilk are church ladies of today, no brain all dogma

@8gauge212 She was shit on several times

That's what it is about my friend, the party line......and the money.

All that means is that you don't really believe in free speech.

True, but there is no chance he doesn't have investment income. Also, reportedly his hbo salary is 10M/yr. The top federal statutory rate is 37% not 39%, which he said & the only way he actually pays 37% is if he took a standard deduction(12,500 for individual) , which he surely doesn't, he itemizes.

@@grobble8954 He added state income tax to his equation.

@@grobble8954 I have a feeling he is using pre-TCJA tax rates (2016 and earlier) and giving us the top bracket. Suppose he makes 10M as ordinary income, files single, and is limited by the TCJA 10k itemized deductions for state, with no credits or other adjustments. That is an effective rate of 36%, which is only a 3% difference. However, he definitely owns the Mets, and will be able to write off a lot on that ownership through partnership tax, but not sure how much of that income is realized.

@@TruthrConsequences other wealthy people have to deal with state taxes too and still end up paying 16% i think state taxes also have loopholes very few are flat

the burden isn't moved to other countries it's nullified by shelters how are capital gains discounted?

In the current age of ignorance we really do not want to have people making sh-t up and then it becomes a mainstream fact/untruth. This is the problem and why Trump was booted along with the fact that he was using Twitter to over throw the US government. Twitter is a private company and you 1st amendment rights do not apply.

True, but private companies have the right to only publish what they want. She's bitching about a rich man becoming the main shareholder in a company, because he might not choose to publish the stuff she likes. That is his right too. She wants it both ways.

This is the same kind of stuff people like Jerry Falwell were rightly roasted for in the 80s. Now the people with the censorious instincts are on the other side. It will continue go back and forth. This is why it is important to uphold the principle of free speech in the non-government realms of public life. If we don’t, the desire to restrict free expression will gain a foothold in the public conscience. Then it’s a much smaller step to say the government should do something to control “misinformation.” It is legitimate to ask ourselves today if we’re already past that point.

@@deborahfreedman333 then they should be treated as publishers and held responsible for any/everything on their platforms.

So? Bill's larger point still stands. Diseases were named after locations forever. Suddenly, the whining leftists wanted to change the game due to a group of idiots.

Maybe that's the point. she does read it with an open mind. Bill and the other guy actually think the right has a point with their agendas. If I wanted to see some guy criticizing an intelligent women's point I would go watch Fox News. I don't want to see this sort of shit on a left leaning show. They call right wingers stupid and then agree with them. WTF.

@@thevideoisland you can't criticize an intelligent woman?

She was a horrible guest…and agree, not open minded. I’m glad Bill pushed back on her more with overtime….who gets to decide….you? And she went on several times about the crazies on the right…..frankly, right now, I think the crazies on the left are giving them a run for their money. And did states like Texas and Florida who weren’t so strict about covid become the death traps the left predicted? She seemed totally brainwashed by every covid talking point.

@@emailbenbenson so you agree she's intelligent. I'm just saying she thought about her stuff. I don't know... She seemed to be sensible to me. I don't understand you yanks with people sleeping on the streets and billionaires complaining about people being awake and noticing there's something wrong.

@@thevideoisland I do think she's intelligent. I think anyone who has any sense also would find our country mind boggling with the inequality.

Social media has become the public square by dominating and steering the public discussion. I realize that their unilateral censorship favors your team's push for single party rule, Pinky, but it doesn't make it morally correct or defensible. Also, having failed baristas pushing the delete button on topics of phylogenic mutagenesis and phylogenic gene therapy is deserving of a throat punch just on principal. Western civilization reached apogee of prosperity on basis of unfettered competition of ideals. Destroying that competition will have precisely the opposite effect. Enjoy your $10 gasoline.

The argument is not that it is a literal town center, but effectively is.

Exactly. ALOT of people are ignoring that very FACT. You agreed to it when you made your account that you didn’t read but hit I ACCEPT

The problem is banning people and stories along party lines to further a political goal. Those of us not on the extreme end of either side can see it clearly.

@@elihathaway6784 so you agree there is no first amendment issue. But otherwise you claim that people who don't agree with you are extremists.

@@kevdaag2523 - Twitter isn't breaking the law but it certainly is a 1st amendment issue. Twitter is the new 'town square', and denying people access along party lines is just poison for this country. If you can step out of your partisan bubble for a minute you will see the problem very clearly!

She had good points at the beginning and got more and more annoying as the show went on.

She is just low IQ so its hard to listen to her 3rd grade rants that can be disputed easily.

@David Kyle - She embodies the smug self-righteousness of the contemporary left!

I loved hearing Nancy say how good of a person she is by wearing a mask and virtue signaling.

@@andrewludwig9251 it does make her a better person

But it was the same idea. The public naturally assumed it was mostly concentrated in Spain, so they gave it that name.

@@brandoncaudill6864 ironically, the majority opinion now centers the spanish flu as originating in kansas at an army base. There are some interesting docs on the subject.

@@johnmcmillion876 I understand the Flu came from Kansas. Again, that doesn't really address Maher's point. Viruses are often named after their supposed origin. The fact that the public was misinformed in 1918 has no bearing on this point.

@@brandoncaudill6864 The point she was making was that Asians starting getting assaulted because they are noticeable targets.

@@piper998877 When the lab was funded by the US.

Exactly.. but he needs to look smart on tv.. so that'l never happen

Economics is not a true science. There are some basic rules of supply and demand, but beyond that much of it is theory. (Take the theory of "Trickle Down" which on paper proves to work, but in reality it never has.) Where is economy headed? Good question. But we're trying to divine the future from the past and we can make a forecast based on numerous incidents from the past. And it is incredibly complex taking in so many factors it's impossible for the regular person to understand. So often today it gets put into a meme or how it affects a person personally and that is as far as their understanding goes. The point about rich not paying taxes was glossed over but has a big impact on the economy as the US government now makes up 1/3 of it.

The audience asked the question, Bill just read it. Maybe they need to think about who they're asking?...

Exactly!! She was horrific. Glad Bill was so on point.

I think this may have been the weakest show so far this season. Yes she was off point, and just seemed to repeat media talking points….she didn’t even seem to agree cloth masks were more for show and don’t really do anything.

@@anneb889 True. The CDC has tested those ever-present blue cloth masks against the Corona Virus and all its variants thus determining they were ineffective. I wonder who bought stock un the companies that manufacture those masks.

Yes. Isn’t become obvious? . Things have changed since Biden 🤡 came into office.

@@zoobrizz Can you elaborate? I'm not sure if you're just here trolling.

@@Genious. - I think he's just pointing out that everything went to s#!t when Brandon took office.

@@elihathaway6784 Except it didn't. But I realize that that is the game now, especially when it comes from the side that has turned into the gimmick party.

@@Genious. - I consider myself in the middle but inflation and gas are setting records and we don't know how long they'll keep soaring. We also have war in Europe and are setting records at the southern border. But yea, other than the economy, immigration, foreign policy Brandon is doing great!

This is very true. If anyone wants to read the details of how it's done check out Pro Publica which did a series on it. Not is what Nancy said is true, but because it is a "business loan" (but used in part to fund their lifestyle), the interest they pay is tax deductible. Or here's a fun one. I have an attorney friend who set up a dummy corporation for a rich person to loan himself money at an outrageous rate so he could buy a mansion. Not only was the exorbitant interest deductible, but he also got a deduction for running the dummy corporation which operated at a loss.

Absolutely correct, Bill is far removed in that respect. Thanks for restating the facts. It is also the consensus that the "Spanish Flu" originated in the US and then transported to Europe via American troops, it was identified in Spain...hence the "Spanish Flu"

I live in WV, an "at will" state, where you can be fired, at a moments notice, for any reason, or *no* reason. Unless you are a government employee, you are employed at the whim of your boss/ company with no recourse.

In MI, they call it "right to work" which means no reason is required to release an employee unless it's specifically protected by law. Politicians are masters at naming legislation that does the exact opposite of its name, the Patriot Act is another example.

Bill must be delutuonal to say it was'nt racist to say China virus instead of Corvid 19, it's like saying the Ebola virus the African virus or the Spanish flu the America virus, people are just mean. Sad 😩

Only 14 states are "at will" in America

This wasn't different than any other show he's done. You're conflating things you disagree with into "his biases." Nobody is perfect of course, but in general i think Maher tries really hard to speak truth and acknowledge when he is biased. Not sure how this suddenly seems like hes sane to you, hes been saying the same shit for YEARS.

Actually, Bill is a bit light in facts here…his guest, however, is not.

@@kellanaldous7092 Um not really. Here in California, he preached for many policies that we adopted, and it ended up destroying the state. Conservatives knew they were all bad ideas, but some Liberals are just slow at learning I guess.

@@kellanaldous7092 He's also had the same production company "Kid love productions" for YEARS...

Massimo. Mostly true. Except he didn’t correct her when she said the ‘Don’t say gay’ thing. There is no such legislation that dictates that. No matter what cnn says

I don’t think she covers everything wrong with people, but it’s not for a lack of effort on her part.

Australia’s inflation is sitting at 3.5%, not bad, although the uk at 6% is more comparable

It's even worse in Germany

Don’t forget about corrupt crime Minister Castro Trudeau killing Canada…

The liberal world order is dying

Wonder what it is in Russia? Couldn't be high enough as far as I am concerned. Just too bad that they aren't getting the true horror of what their troops are doing in Ukraine. Talk about lack of free speech!!

I have seen videos from an economic standpoint about deficits, and they really don't do much other than cause those in charge to rethink before agreeing to spend absurd amounts of money that the country doesn't have. Too bad we are now in an age that much like Bill stated, people no longer care about the dollar amount or things like debt.

@@drylooped ain’t that the truth!

Another great economic statement-"The budget will balance itself"-Justin Trudeau, dipshit Prime Minister of Canada..

She is a old school feminist who got brainwashed back in the '70's. No new info added to brain since then

Lazy, perfect adjective. It was almost embarrassing

Afraid of Primaries that voters won't show up to. Will be interesting to hear Bill's return from Sugarland, home of Teddy Bear Cruz.

Well put.

Well poot.

Haha, sorry, your analogy to excrement poot me off but I hear your point. Sorry you'll have to miss the show. Fortunately technology allows us to hear every word. ;)

I'd rather it weren't an either/or thing. I'd like the special and to have the show on next week.

the fight against raising wages is a huge mistake as it will undermine the ability of people to buy stuff. All the profits that go to shareholders of Amazon and Walmart, used to recirculate in communities. Now it's hoarded. 70% of Walmart products are made in China. Probably similar at Amazon.

I don't think you understand how money works based on your comment... Why didn't companies like Starbucks and chipotle starkly raise their prices in 2019, were they just not greedy back then?

@@Buttlather - "Record profits" IS company greed. THAT is what we are seeing now in 2022. They are raising prices well OVER the actual cost to get record profits which IS just plain greed and then hiding behind "inflation" that they themselves are causing.

@@JellyBean-lo4sl Answer the question of why they weren't just doing that before.

True but you get unemployment benefits which companies hate so they go by the laws. I'm living in right to work state for 20 years and had to move here because no jobs in my state. Plus rents are too high back home. Crime was and still is terrible.

@@colleenmardis2206 I've been denied unemployment in my state,which is a right-to-work state, as have many others. So it's not absolute that you would bet benefits. Even if you get unemployment it's only a fraction of your pay and since most jobs with higher turnover are typically low-paying to begin with then the benefits most people in that situation would receive are laughable. Rent is low in my state, yes...however, we are a bottom 10 state in rates of crime, poverty, spousal abuse, child abuse, child neglect, bad infrastructure, poor education...on and on it goes. And I don't even live in Arkansas ! I live in a city w/ 350,000 people and it's still a cultural wasteland out here...well.. unless you like a bizarre mix of white-christian hegemony and federally protected Indian Casinos. Then this is your disneyland.

@@capslockculture6223 Well I lived in two aweful states and love were I am now for 20 years. But that's also do to my experiences. Not everyone would be happy here. Depends on your views and type of job. Also liked the schools because of low crime and taught manners ect... I believe in living where you're the happiest.

hes not as knowledgeable about the streets since the 80s...

I love how those that advocate right to work still defend HOAs. How about right to live??? Same concept. You don't have to live there (HOA). You don't have to work there (union). You signed the deed. (HOA) You signed the employment contract (union). Etc HOA is a closed shop, and that has been ruled unconstitutional for unions. It should be so for HOAs too

He is a "classic liberal". I am a conservative as well, and probably besides the second amendment and abortion, Maher and I agree on everything else. It is the far left progressives that ruin this country. Teachers... my kids are not your kids... they are your students. I do not want my children hearing anything about sex. Reading, writing and arithmetic only please. I got the rest.

that just means he is a conservative liberal

Nope, he is not, he hates conservatives like you.

You mean Bill Maher is a traditional Liberal. Bill agrees with all the values that the Liberals used to agree with 10 years ago - free speech, equal rights, rule of law, etc. When the Democrats went full woke in 2015 and began supporting radical Leftist values (racial discrimination, racial equity, cancel culture, censorship), traditional Liberals like Bill where pushed to the right and their values became Conservative values.

@@daveruda In 2022, yeah. Honestly, I’m quite literally at the point where I’d be comfortable calling myself a “right wing liberal”.

Easy solution. Remove their immunity and make them liable for content like any other media source.

you probably fell for any girl that gave you attention

@@thrillhouse4784 no way he is a genious.

Biden too old to take a lesson on how to be CLEAR CONCISE and Funny. Obama and JFK got it naturally. 📢

*Genius

A “genious” would probably have known that the Spanish Flu was not named for where it originated, like Bill claimed. (I believe it originated in Kansas.)

you don't lose freedom of speech because the amendment doesn't protect you from a job firing you for what you say. it is sad how poorly people understand the constitution.

Had no idea of Mamet! Glengarry(sp) Glen Ross top fav movie. Can't wait to Google movies on Netflix/Prime for tonight. Recession? sounds interesting. Don't hear Maher gush often and he's met 'em all being in Vegas all these years.

Widespread inequality and deprivation doesn't bode well for having a democracy. How free are you under capitalism as it currently is when your healthcare is keeping you stuck in a job you hate?

@@kitcoffey7194 so is the opposite true? Are there Europeans who don’t hate their jobs because healthcare isn’t part of a benefit package?

@@acbower4468 I’m sure it’s not. America’s Euro cousins just grasp another irritable topic to grovel abt to their individual gov’t reps much like most Americans do. I think all the viral triggered supply chain issues & subsequent inflation was their main gripe .. (pre-Putin’s desperation invasion on their back stoop) I honestly don’t know what it wld be today but, I’m sure it depends on whom you ask & their proximity to Ukraine and/or the millions of newly created war refugees evacuating ahead of the bombing. Many of whom started heading west ahead of Putin’s ultimatum countdown months ago.

The USA decided to become a nation of rent seeking/servant class instead of keeping a middle class. Wealth gap was planned by those that benefit.

Yes! It manages to be condescending and presumptuous at the same time. And usually follows some half-baked idea.

It's far less annoying than "OK?"

As long as it's not "like". I want to punch people in the face when I hear it. Male or female, punch to the piehole.

@@deborahfreedman333 "So..."

It started replacing “ya know” about 10-12 years ago. Eventually it will be replaced by some equally obnoxious throwaway word(s).

Yep. That is a preemptive defense mechanism that is meant to signal to uninformed listeners that they would be a fool to challenge the brilliant “point” they just uttered.

Yeah, good example, Trump should never have been allowed to use Twitter. We studied this necessity in Communciations Law. One of my professors who is a Republican couldn't believe they allowed him access as he is a person ina position of power, actually the most. Well, they finally figured it out and banned him and if you noticed, the daily chaos went away and our country righted itself!

Yeah especially because he's never cared about free speech himself.

@@psongman9536 I would go one further and maintain that NO government member should EVER be allowed to directly communicate via Social Media. This is for the protection of these members as well as the public.

@@svscared This is likely true.

teach harder

Trump always donated to politicians on both sides of the aisle because he's not ideological. His policies are middle of the road common sense policies.

@@elizabethstanley7137 lol Trumps policies are not reasonable. He's a wannabe tyrant who literally tried to take over after losing in a legitimate election.

Too hard to find. Not sure about your observations on the Overtime though. I thought the show was far below average for Real Time.

@@Sdewebb How were his policies unreasonable? How did he govern like a tyrant? Just saying that without backing it up with an example tells me you are just repeating what you hear from fake news The election was not legitimate. It's obvious dementia Joe who has done nothing as a public servant other than enriching himself and his family with corrupt business dealings in Ukraine Russia and China. That information was suppressed. So was his obvious mental decline. Biden was a liability as VP with his constant gaffes. He had to stay hidden and got the nickname Hiden Biden....so I find it hard to believe even one person would ever vote for a weak feeble mentally impaired man given the dangerous world we live in. If the corrupt media and big tech didn't collude with the Democrats Trump would have won in a landslide. An incumbent ALWAYS wins reelection when they get more votes the second time around. Trump had 11 MILLION more votes and that is a huge difference. Most states didn't allow people to vote in person and the best way to cheat is with mail in ballots. Trump never told anyone to storm the Capitol. He specifically told them to protest patriotically and peacefully which they always do. Somehow the crowd got out of control with little security in place. Cops waved people into the building and allowed a few guys to break windows. January 6 was a lack of security issue on a day when a massive crowd was expected. I'm sure lessons were learned and proper security will be put in place the next time an enormous crowd is expected.

So Trump kinda won the election and the vaccines kinda makes you magnetic then?

It was. Usually too short.

The problem is these companies aren’t publishers but somehow act like editors, and it makes for a very weird situation. I mean it’s a private company where politicians communicate with their constituents…it’s a very weird situation and one where, as an American company, one would think the “spirit” of free speech would be applied as broadly as possible.

Book censorship happens at the publishing house. We don't know what we aren't allowed to know

Most Americans don't look at Twitter over the coarse of a year it just narcissistic shit to make y'all feel self important. Twitter doesn't matter it's not a news channel it's an app like candy crush

@@acbower4468 The thing is that there are limits to free speech as well. These limits are meant to serve public good and prevent harm. I agree that on philosophy and expression, freedom must be king, but when someone chooses to utilize those platforms to spread misinformation, often rising to the level of disinformation, and that messaging causes very real harm to real human beings, a private company that provides that platform has every right to protect its brand, if not the users, members of the public, of said platform. They also have polices and standards that everyone agrees to. You have the right to break them. They have the right to remove you. Freedom on both sides. What we can't allow is for bad agents to use our own rights and freedoms to goad and incite us to attack each other and self-destroy. No one has that supreme right to the detriment of all others.

@@acbower4468 Read Amy Klobucher Antitrust book with solutions. She's a smart one.

Must really suck making over 5M a yr after taxes, oh the pain of it all. The reason why the poor are poor is because businessmen decided to pay as little as possible and the government let the minimum wage wallow at $7.50 for decades. Think about how much money never made it into the social security coffers because wages were not increasing but the population and the number of people retiring was going up. We should have had plenty of money in SS to not have to worry about benefits or the need to raise the payroll taxes to cover the shortfalls. This is the stuff the media doesn't investigate because they too are very rich so why would they want us to know about why they got richer and we got stuck with the scraps.

haha I get it :)

I’m surprised I haven’t heard the phrase “Blue MAGA” before because that’s a perfect term to summarize this eye roll of a person.

She has a face for radio and opi ions that belong on Dr Phil lol

Spot on. I was thinking of the words to describe her and the absurd comments she was making, but you did it perfectly. I wonder if she really believes what she's speaking about or if she was brought on to spew state propaganda talking points. Bill has these types of guests on all the time unfortunately and they are never constructive. Always blue vs red when it should be the working class vs. the state.

@@jefft4966 The 2 groups of people in this country are the people who pay taxes and actually chip in and the people who just get gimmes

I've thought for a while that we need to go back to that term. Social safety nets were controversial 40 years ago but more people think they make sense now. You can also build/change them for specific purposes and they don't have to be all-encompassing. They reduce crime and community damages from crimes. They reduce overall costs as minimal maintenance is usually cheaper than dealing with outright crisis/crashes/bankruptcy/etc. They retain people in a state where they can quickly shift to growth spurts in available jobs allowing industries to grow more quickly as there is a ready workforce at hand. Lots of pros and I'm not even getting into moral aspects. It's just smart governance.

@@dreamcoyote Exactly!! Just smart governance, even without getting into the moral aspects. Also, didn’t know social safety nets were controversial 40 years back, I’ll read into that. Thanks for teaching me something today 🙂.

@@yotmb I was starting to learn about govt when Reagan was elected so.. He closed down the asylums (which were admittedly in poor condition but should have been replaced, not eliminated, which put people with mental health issues on the street). A few other Reagan "small govt" cuts to social programs, the "Welfare Queens" lie. Clinton + GOP congress limited welfare to 2 years (w/ exceptions but most ppl had to try to work or get booted). Of course any program that we would consider a social safety net was considered outright socialism. They were starting to really push to privatize social security/retirement and birthed the 401k, IRA, etc. They wanted SS gone though and everyone would be on Wall Street :/. Thankfully that never came to fruition.

A majority of conservatives reject evolution and and a large minority of them reject Big Bang theory , carbon dating and the age of the earth, those are the foundational theories behind cosmology, chemistry, geology, biology and geophysics. Medicine used to be safe but now they are anti-vaxx too. The root cause is a hatred of “experts” and education in general.

Clarify “conservatives in the US” Other countries right winger do not have this kneejerk rejection of evidence.

Not all science acceptance comes from the left. But all science denial comes from the right.

@@joebarr725 almost the OG anti vaxxers were kale eating well off liberals on the west coast. Some of the worst vaccination rates were in some very prestigious private schools. This was all pre COVID of course.

His remark about the Spanish flu was false.

Right! Imagine if someone made a comment of criticism to Bill about his show! 👆👆👆

Look for truth, we're not enemies, I'm not mad at anyone except the people who took an oath to serve the people of this country, both sides only serving a small percentage of us....

3 liberals talking = both sides ?? I like Vill. Bit just think about your comment for a minute

@@earlwescombe1640 I hear ya. But the non-crazed, non-shouting, non-conspiracy theory, non-hate-mongering conservatives need to take back the public voice of conservativism or, free speech or not, no one is gonna want to hear it. And we all have a right to not be forced to listen to lies like Stop the Steal or Jan. 6th was legitimate political discourse, etc. So when conservative voices that tell the truth are drummed out of the party, called RINO's, and absolutely provably false statements are shouted as if that will make them true, etc... who precisely are the conservative voices a responsible discussion show should have on? Bill has had Ben Shapiro on. And Steve "Lie Master #1" Bannon on at various times. So... think about your comment, also. And now give me some names because I've been yearning for 15 years or more for Republicans to be civil and actually discuss issues again, not how certain groups of people are to blame for everything wrong in every conservative's life because they're victims and there's a war on Christmas by gay African-Americans and Hollywood or whomever else they're choosing to villainize and blame today. Seriously, I'd love to hear some names of sane conservatives like Bill Kristol or David Brooks or Michael Steele. Cuz I only hear such voices on 'liberal' media which seems to stand in contrast to what point I think you were making here.

Where was the other side? Totally delusional

@@retiredby3570 fu#k the other side, good should never unite with evil