2 years later and i want to thank you for this comment

@@svstore1908 xd

Hi, can everybody explain me this phrase? Thanks

@@aknj they accepted the premise that all humans are mortal but in theory there could be a person in the future (currently unknown) who is not mortal and therefore breaks this belief/pattern that 'all humans are mortal'. By the same principle, the brother in the video said 'all things are limited in their variables are dependent on something else' but they rejected this because there could be something which is limited but not depending on anything else (currently unknown to them but they do not dismiss the possibility, existing either now or in the future). Both rely on the same principle that you deduce something based on what you know and currently have nothing to disprove it, yet one they accept without any issue and the other they reject. (he says it at 9:30)

@@rahilhabib clear double standards and is why the contingency argument is unbreakable

We have been living for around 100.000 years. science of that magnitude is known for a few decades. What do you expect ? We can allrdy clone sheep, isn't that neat ? no creator was needed but us ! Can't you see your religion is getting pushed to a smaller and smaller piece of driftwood, bound to drift into nothingness. a thousand years ago, ppl had gods of thunder and lightning. Science killed those. Give us some more time and we'll do the same to every religion.

"more time" is just "faith religion" rather than science.

herculies son of zeus What was the sheep cloned from?? Don't forget to ask ur atheist scientists to help u on that day.. Good luck with that..

Abu Ziyad, If you really wanted to know, you would look it up. Why would you believe me anyway ? Dolly (5 July 1996 - 14 February 2003) was a female domestic sheep, and the first mammal cloned from an adult somatic cell, using the process of nuclear transfer. Don't ask me to explain that, i'm not your personal teacher ! And where did you get all scientists are atheist ? Or do religious scientists don't accept Dolly was cloned ?? Either way ,you are wrong. It is true that the most respected ones are atheist. Maybe it's because they are not bound by the limits a god puts on us. You could even conclude the more educated someone is, the more likely he/she will become an atheist.

herculies son of zeus Read my question again...

A S is already up man go watch it man

Fallacy of composition only work in causation argument buddy not contingency argument.

The universe itself is made contingent because it is made up of limited variables.

shah rakib definitely the divine reality by hamza tzortzis assesses and explains all these arguments this one as well

Can you explain this in simple words I dont understand please

Actually you can, Allah himself said we will live forever after we’ve been resurrected lol so it’s not only 2 but billions of entities being alive forever.

@@loftilhan4868 forever is a very messy word. You must define its parameters, is it forever in the future? Forever in the past and future!?

@@Hello-ri9dd we live in 3 dimensional space, but some theorize that there are many planes of existence that transcends what we as humans can recognize. The fourth demonstration being time. Distance and speed also influences the measurement of time. So time is ever fluctuating/changing. For example if you go from Africa to United States, due to the rotation of the earth people are one day behind. Does that mean you went back in time!? NO, in different parts of the world and in different locations of the universe time is slower or faster depending on distance and speed. I believe God brought the universe into existence, therefore bringing the equation of time into existence. When I say time is created, I don’t mean a physical entity, I mean the workings of it…the anchorage by which time is expressed and measured. Time is a tool used to express changes in space over distance. It only exists in the system of the universe. And I believe God is outside the universe, which means he is not constrained by time. Over more time itself is a created thing.

SamAndSanah or that universe can't get infinite because an infinite history is impossible. The present time would never come to pass if an infinite history needs to first precede it.

Thanks legend

@Ninja FEESE Wait. Don't jump to the conclusion so fast! One reason why most scientists are non-theists is that they always double themselves + others (what if my intuition/reasoning isn't true? what if there exists another theory that explains our observations better?); they don't jump to a conclusion so fast. I've just done a bit of research on this and found that physicists are not sure about whether the universe is finite/infinite and some even say that we may never know a definite answer to that question: * www.quora.com/Is-our-universe-finite-or-infinite/answer/Frank-Heile * www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Is_the_Universe_finite_or_infinite_An_interview_with_Joseph_Silk * Wikipedia entry on Universe even says that: "Observations, including the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE), Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), and Planck maps of the CMB, suggest that the universe is INFINITE in extent with a finite age, as described by the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) models" Don't ask me how is that possible; I'm not a physicist; so I've to take their words.

@Ninja FEESE We don't know whether it's comprised of limited or unlimited variables. Period.

@Ninja FEESE Really? Are you saying you understand the universe better than the top astrophysicists? Sounds very arrogant. But yet, I'd listen. I'd like to learn from everyone. Prove that it is finite.

@Ninja FEESE Please refer to an article/paper/book. I'm an academician I love to read such things rather than reading comments.

Sir, I think he said "Universe is finite in it's composition" from expanding universe model. If there is anything wrong with that then I would want to know as I like to read. Thanks Sir.