Why This New Deck is So OP...

Рет қаралды 27,257

5 ай бұрын

** FOLLOW ON TWITCH ** 👉 bit.ly/PakTCGTV
Today, I explain my Snake Eyes, Fire King deck from an Iron Man!
Music:
♪ Boba tea (Prod. by Lukrembo)
Link: • lukrembo - boba tea (r...
► Twitch: bit.ly/PakTCGTV
► Discord: / discord
► Instagram: / pakofficialtcg
► Metafy Membership: mfy.gg/yu-gi-oh-master-duel?p...
► Merch: www.paktcg.com/
► TCGSTORE: bit.ly/3LldP8C
► GUUCAST: linktr.ee/guucast
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsors
► Gamerschoice affliate link: gamerschoice.com/?aff=4 - Use PAK5 for 5%
►SleeveChief : sleevechief.myshopify.com?sca_ref=2603932.GDnpAY6IFn
► Tcgplayer Affliate Link: bit.ly/3fNvHZ7
► SUPREME PROS SLEEVES : tsx1.com/ - PAK10 FOR 10% off
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#PakTcg #Yugioh #YugiohTcg #PakPamornsut #Masterduel

Пікірлер: 63

@user-vs2uy4mu5u 5 ай бұрын

It can't be! Competitive yugioh content??!?!

@SleepyLain 5 ай бұрын

Thanks to MBT more big yugitubers/champs are going into competitive yu gi oh content.

@joseprojo975 5 ай бұрын

Insane I know

@PartyMarty321 5 ай бұрын

It’s kind of wild how interactive the last match was. Seems like it’ll be a cool format!

@DrRockso9 5 ай бұрын

Every format is interactive in some way

@sankoudiallo5454 5 ай бұрын

Not always true my friend. Tear format was the peak of the yugioh technical plays. But darkworld ftk or gouki format was meh @@DrRockso9

@samsiqueiros2635 5 ай бұрын

16:26 lol you did use the ponix on summon eff to add sanctuary

@Thaneriffic 5 ай бұрын

real cool video! hope to see more like it. Bummer that the snake eyes shit is so expensive though, looks like a pretty fun and interactive deck.

@MrSpako13 5 ай бұрын

THIS is what i was looking for twoish weeks. Indepth analysis from a good player.

@javianmorel1268 5 ай бұрын

Mudragon first line of text: "your opponent cannot target this card..." Muddy Boi doesn't care about veiler or imperm or any card that targets, even before Mudragon triggers its effect.

@etiennebonin2181 5 ай бұрын

He was talking about them veilering Populus as he was debating not activating mudragon immediately

@MarioLopez-xs3vc 5 ай бұрын

A board breaker build of Fire King sounds like it could be a neat as a blind second variant. And since you still have your standard setup for going first it's less likely your opponent is going to force you first unless they plan to do the same thing.

@polygon2745 5 ай бұрын

Did Pak get a new editor? The thumbnails of the recent vids are so different I sometimes subconsciously miss them.

@Doner-oh4mf 5 ай бұрын

I feel like fire king, snake eye and rescue ace are way ahead of any other deck out there currently. Time for a new format

@adachi-san8191 5 ай бұрын

31:15 You cannot Summon Phoenix with Dharc because is not a Fire Monster

@YoImNorm 5 ай бұрын

good catch. didn't even notice it on my watch-through lmao

@vukgovedarica5616 5 ай бұрын

more of this pak 🙏

@aerdna22 5 ай бұрын

More like this pls ❤ Ps min 31 (+/-) can u do phoenix with dark and prometea? 😮

@ARock1614 5 ай бұрын

This content is craaaazy bro

@roynguyen8492 5 ай бұрын

I think making apollousa post side is a suboptimal play

@synthetichydra 5 ай бұрын

Love this!

@np_vice 5 ай бұрын

Another episode of "inside the mind of Pak" nice

@zikra5901 5 ай бұрын

27:20 Why didn't the opponent activate the I:P effect against ttt?

@nickching3128 5 ай бұрын

Kern to see the list for this. Or is it just ocg list minus maxx c

@randydupre5874 5 ай бұрын

How do you make salamangreat link 4 with a dharc?

@jamesragsdale 5 ай бұрын

This format is gonna be so skill testing OH MY GOF

@AngryAyrab 5 ай бұрын

More content like this!

@tensa1166 5 ай бұрын

31:15 raging phoenix with a dark monster?

@dkphame 5 ай бұрын

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

@gianlucacutrale106 5 ай бұрын

At 16:11 how did he summon phoenix? She works like garunix even if it is not worded the same?

@alphalumoss 5 ай бұрын

How can you summon ponix at 16:13? Chain resolved apo destroyed, kirin summon pop ash, THEN ponix search, so ponix was not in hand for destruction of ash so cannot trigger because its got different wording to garunix

@babrad 5 ай бұрын

It's like Cynet Mining getting Gazelle by discarding a Salad. At the resolution of a chain where you added X (x being a monster with a trigger effect in hand) and its activation requirement was met in that same chain (regardless of which chain link both happened) you may activate X in the following chain. This rule is to prevent cases like "this is a 2nd ponix i had already in hand" since that player would have to reveal private information at this point. This is also the reason Garunix has and works when you add it with Island, unlike the since GY is public knowledge and your opponent is free to verify that Garunix isn't there (if it wasn't that way, then you could just pop Garunix in hand with Kirin, then Garunix would trigger in GY despite being in hand when the destruction happened.. this can go out of hand with older non-HOPT cards with similar effect)

@gabrieljimenez4329 5 ай бұрын

You guys know where I can see this list?

@A_Family_Mann_TCG 5 ай бұрын

Ayo, Show the deck list Pak ! I wana see the gu

@tonynguyen8166 5 ай бұрын

16:23 you use ponix to search which is legal, but when you said could have activate the eff with no legal searches that would be a ruling issue.

@IndiSeeEm 5 ай бұрын

He has fire king island he could search with Ponix so there’s no ruling issue, just a wording issue on Paks side

@user-pj3fw6in8p 5 ай бұрын

So ok, theres a little illegal interaction that is pretty hard to catch that happened here:in g2 a chain ends up resolving thats is CL 1 ash to add CL 2 contain CL 3 kirin and CL 4 ewtinguish. On the resolution of the chain pak triggers ponix to summon, which is illegal. The reason is that ponixs summon effect actually works differently than garunixs, the card has to see the actual destryction taking place, since it doesnt have an (even if not ) clause, and since ash is cl1, it cant trigger

@theatrociousgod2929 5 ай бұрын

cool vid

@babrad 5 ай бұрын

In the first duel, you stole Apo that was Extinguished with Hydrant on the field so if you made a 2nd Apo it would be less useful than a Blue-Eyes White Dragon.

@joeynass6997 5 ай бұрын

I love this content

@deanoxd968 5 ай бұрын

Is he not locked into fire when made princess ? He made kuriboh after and reborned little knight ? Or am I missing something..game 1

@alexandrubragari1537 5 ай бұрын

Prometean locks you into fire only when she is on the field

@deanoxd968 5 ай бұрын

@@alexandrubragari1537 yeah seen that after my g but thank you

@hypnotist1200 5 ай бұрын

Where has Susu been?

@jhovanyesquivel2013 5 ай бұрын

Deck profile?

@kurtalaimo9390 5 ай бұрын

we got a decklist?

@TheyCallMeVenom27 5 ай бұрын

X2 😢

@ducky36F 5 ай бұрын

Why are we running reborn now?

@donaxygo 5 ай бұрын

cause it's really good going first and second. going first for obvious reasons, but going second you can take opponent's princess to take out one interruption and get a +1 yourself, take opponent's snake eye ash/populus, take black witch. There's a ton of good targets to take when both are playing a snake eye deck. And even if your opponent is not doing it, there aren't many combo heavy decks in the format other than snake eyes, so it can still help you pushing against random boards

@CocTheElf 5 ай бұрын

bepis

@Venusora123 5 ай бұрын

PAK at 17:17 you can’t chain block Ghost belle with Kirin and Garunix. Kirin would activate then your opponent would get a chance to respond then you can activate Garunix from hand. The play would work in the way you intended if Garunix was Already in Grave then Kirin and Garunix would trigger at the same time

@alexandrubragari1537 5 ай бұрын

Why? Isnt garunix effect still a trigger both in hand and gy? I dont think in hand it becomea an ignition

@Venusora123 5 ай бұрын

trust me its doesn't become an ignition but it it an if effect that happens on resolution@@alexandrubragari1537