The division of the world into three parts, according to the Book of Jubilees, is not determined by a human but by a heavenly factor. A sent angel brings with him three books, in each of which a different part of the world is sketched and verses 0 and 2. 1 The boys, each in turn, pick up a book from Noah's lap without knowing what is written inside. When they open the obituaries, it becomes clear to the reader that the division of the sons' network is according to the three continents that the ancient world knew: Europe, Asia and Africa. More details in this chapter and the following chapter teach that in the division of the land between the three sons of Noah, the second author weaves in information. The first is the Bible, and especially the book of Genesis, which teaches us about the offspring of a daughter. The second is the map of the world that was accepted in the Hellenistic world and was called the Ionian map ^ The Ionian map was known to the author of the book from the outer scroll of Genesis which he edited. At the same time, it is clear that the map drawn in Yuval is more up-to-date than the one drawn as a scroll,'' and it is possible that the author had another source. The Ionian map presented the world as a disk centered on Delphi, the sea at its circumference and three continents - Asia, Europe and Africa - at its center. In the updated edition of the map, an equator is drawn that passes through the pillars of the Declas (the eastern part of the transition... to the book Yad Yitzhak Ben-Zvi

It is recorded in your book that God said that the land of Israel of the Jews is what he said to Moses our Lord: from the border of Lebanon to the desert of Netzer and the great sea until the coming of the desert

we jews live in Israel Judah kingdom 5000 years from jeusha Ben nun time till today Rome empire conquer us jews 2000 years ago and changed the name of the land from Israel Judah kingdom to Syria palashtina and exile us Jews by force

You Gazan Arabs participated in the murder on October 7th, we saw on the cameras of the Arabs that you Gazans also entered Israel, you murdered Jews, stole from their homes and kidnapped people, you elected Hamas in a democratic siege in 2006 and carried out your goal, they want to kill all the Jews in Israel and you elected them, you are collaborating with them like the Germans The Nazi Germans who elected Hitler and whistled about Jews are collaborators in the genocide of Israel like Hitler

Why are all the soups of the Gazans from Shebai in October red like blood, it's a huge pot, dozens of pots, they say they have no food and a tomato can't make the soup so red, it's red like blood. They drink the blood of the corpses of the Israelis. They themselves said that they also ate a donkey

That’s true

Or the Turkish occupation of the land they are currently living on

​​@@timesup6302we fought for it and got the land.

@@melissalana8187 Exactly my point. So what's the problem with America or Israel?

@@timesup6302the arrival of turk in Anatolia was not planned in some conventions by millionaires. It was history in the making.

He did a video on a similar topic, asking if people support Kurdish independence kzfaq.info/get/bejne/lbmDmcaW26nQkmQ.htmlsi=WAe4E_DnaRC5B-GP

they dont

@@dotz2641why?

​@@yansideabacoa6257 hypocrisy 😂

@@dotz2641why they are the grandchildren of slahdin

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@@docorwhatever2168 very insightful 🤦‍♂ your contribution is just sad. Meanwhile @sameharayes I am with you

@hiooxkrmagkis9323 no peace with islamNazim arabs demons invaders

خائن عبيط مصر تتبرا منك

God bless you, from Israel!

It's crazy, but that's because Kashmir's occupation doesn't get the attention it deserves. India has done a lot of work to hide their bloody occupation of Kashmir to the world. Free Kashmir!

Kaeshraen chu ni kah kaema kaara

It's Israeli propaganda doesn't matter Palestinians we are with you. After wind comes breeze

​@@Xmagneto11 And at the end the God of Israël wins.

@@dodleymortune4312 let's see my brother from Abrahamic religion. Don't come to conclusion early. You are most intelligent people created by Allah don't show this foolishness

Hmmmm... I wonder why

I live 5 min walk from the Indian embassy in Brussels. Every now and then, there will be a small demonstration outside the embassy chanting "Free Kashmir" "stop the occupation" etc. Like 20-40 people. They all look like Kashmiri/Pakistani. In other words, there is never a single white college student or the like chanting, or staging 'die-ins' or pouring fake blood on their hands. No media. No energy. Absolutely NOBODY gives a toss about this issue.

it's a religious conflict, over land that is perceived to be holy, kashmir isn't, neither is Myanmar, Xinjiang, darfur or any place where atrocities against muslims or other people are committed, it doesn't mean outrage over this isn't justified it just means the world is too big, and they'd rather be blissfully unaware if it's something that doesn't directly affect them physically or religiously, it's hypocrisy yes, but usual human behaviour given there's billions of us now

but I don't think they're blissfully unaware certainly not those whose ancestry is in Kashmir which is a fair few. Kashmir is exceptional in your list in being highly comparable historically to Gaza, dereliction at the collapse of Empire, random lines in the sand, on the map; coupled with the fact that the actual Diaspora from or aroundKashmir is overrepresented in demonising Israel which is not true of the others. Life expectancy in Gaza is actually higher than in J & K and it would be a good deal higher still if our aid had not been funding their hospitals to be named for arch terrorists, to function as terror command centres equipped with torture dungeons for Israeli babies & grannies!

UK is impotent and has no leverage over India anymore

The European occupation of the native American’s lands

Turks aren't Islamic anymore

Islam is India Pakistan ​@@AKAK-WiQ

Exactly

It was an independent state.

Exactly with the same logic the "palestinians" are under "occupation" although they live in the LAND OF ISRAEL. There is no logic when it comes to Islamic occupation

There was no India before 1947🤡

@@Seize07 Yes there was. India has always been one of the oldest continuously surviving civilizations. I bet that according to you there was no Indian Ocean before 1947 as well, right?

Do you want us to die...?!😅 This is the interpreter, we asked what happens when Abu Mazen dies, but i said "when he's no longer president "

Yo do know that there is active conlfict there everyday do you?

It's because Oslo accords

@@samuelgotthard4166 Not to the extent of the second intifada or 2008, 2014 gaza incursions. There is an occupation yes as well as influences from both sides but its not 1971 again.

@@fatimasaksouk What does oslo have to do with this?

@@Hadeed20 it's the reason why there hasn't been a full war between 2 sides for decades

Hi Magsie

@@SydPat Hiiiiii hell, what happened to make you focus on me again 😅

@@maghi218 I was never focused on you. You disappeared. Now you’re back. I said hello.

@@SydPat 🤪❤️

How could anyone not

@mwran54 ty, im learning both MSA with a course and dialect with books and friends. as soon as i get to an intermediate level i will start with hebrew too :D

Corey's videos are the best source for anyone learning Palestinian Arabic 🥰

I learn from Gospel music. Both Hebrew and Arabic. Much much easier 😊❤.

I'm so happy to hear that, this is the interpreter. Good luck!

True

because our economies and our safety is tied to it. stop playing stupid. You know what happens in palestine effects the world. Also the palestinians have called out to the world for help. good try though.

I don't know about the Kashmir conflict. But why do you seem against the idea of ppl knowing about the Israel/Palestine conflict and having opinions about it? Israel is about European Zionists invading local ppl in another continent and occupying their lands, it's not a complicated issue whatsoever. Even a kid can have an opinion about it.

@@yuzan3607 you proved my point. You dont know history, dont understand the conflict and still write your opinions. Why not about kashmir? You can lie about that conflict also 🤷‍♂️

​@yuzan3607 They arent European

@@umints What makes me "not understand the history" and makes you do? Saying that "you just don't understand" is a defective argument only a child would use. What's "your" version of history? The version of history I know is true is that European Zionists are the origin of establishing the state of Israel. Do you deny that? So what do I not know or "understand" in history that you do?

now ur making stuff up lmao

Thier history started at 1948

we jews live in Israel Judah kingdom 5000 years from jeusha Ben nun time till today Rome empire conquer us jews 2000 years ago and changed the name of the land from Israel Judah kingdom to Syria palashtina and exile us Jews by force

@@maorzehavi4731true 😂

@@IsraelJew-ou5cb You're European. Stop trying so hard to be middle eastern.

@@yuzan3607 no I am not you islamNazim arabs European you whiter than me

we jews live in Israel Judah kingdom 5000 years from jeusha Ben nun time till today Rome empire conquer us jews 2000 years ago and changed the name of the land from Israel Judah kingdom to Syria palashtina and exile us Jews by force

We Jews live in Jerusalem 5000 years before you islamNazim exists

​@IsraelJew-ou5cb Jews did yes. Not Ashkanzim Khazarian Nazi Zionsists. Go back to Russia/Ukraine/Poland where you're from.

​@@IsraelJew-ou5cbfirst thing is that there is no religion which is Judah , Judah is a tribe 😂 ,you read your Torah and full history also .

Kashmir belong to hindus and India. Muslim should leave Kashmir and india

The indigenous people of the Kashmir Valley are the Kashmiri Pandits, not those who practice an Arabian culture

@coginito8365 The only indigenous people in the Kashmir Valley are the Kashmiri Pandits, whose culture and religion have been in the Kashmir Valley well before the religion of Islam was founded. Those who came in the 14th century with Arabian thinking are the invaders.

@coginito8365 said neo nazi 😂

See dna results of kashmiri please ​@@dee74raz

you sound more indian than indians themselves

Noah's world was destroyed for a reason.

Chews creating thier own happiness 😂😂😂

It would be strange if Jews collaborated with pagans to maintain the Noah's laws.. 🤔

Indians worship a cow and Jewish want to scarify the Indian God lol

I'm pro-Palestine who no knows nothing about Kashmir occupation. What's your point?

@@yuzan3607 you occupied us jews you islamNazim

@@yuzan3607 we jews live in Israel Judah kingdom 5000 years from jeusha Ben nun time till today Rome empire conquer us jews 2000 years ago and changed the name of the land from Israel Judah kingdom to Syria palashtina and exile us Jews by force

@@IsraelJew-ou5cb I've never met a jew in my life. Never been to Israel nor Palestine, but suddenly "I" occupied you? wow.

@@yuzan3607 you have arab name and you pro fakestine so you support the occupation of us Jews

Gaza was in better shape before 2005, when 8000 Israelis were forced from Gaza by Ariel Sharon and the Palestinians there allowed to elect their own government. After 2005, ZERO Israelis remained in Gaza. In 2007, Gaza Palestinians chose Hamas and it went downhill for them as well as security for Israel.

Gaza should be nicer considering the billions they received in aid. But they chose to build tunnels and rockets instead of improving their lives, and Hamas pockets a lot of it.

@@user-ne9su4mt2f That is true

@@user-ne9su4mt2fthat’s not the reason for Gaza. Gaza became an open air prison. Everything was still controlled by Israel before October 7th. From trade to aviation. They were not allowed to have their own airport. Even Land border with Egypt was also controlled by Israel including Rafah crossing.

@@Pointzero7714 It was an open sir prison with posh hotels, mansions, country clubs, mega malls as well as an amusement park and a zoo. People drove expensive cars. That the wealth of Gaza i.e. foreign aid wasn’t shared is on Hamas. The bay was too shallow to support a major port. Israel offered to build them one further out to sea with transportation to the shore. There was also once a landing pad for small aircraft. Gazans were using the waterways to bring in weapons. Building port and expanding the landing pad were off the table once the vi0 lence escalated. With American money to pay for it, the Egyptians did a fine job of controlling that border all by themselves. They’re doing a fine job of fortifying it RIGHT NOW.

we jews live in Israel Judah kingdom 5000 years from jeusha Ben nun time till today Rome empire conquer us jews 2000 years ago and changed the name of the land from Israel Judah kingdom to Syria palashtina and exile us Jews by force

The "palestinians" stole a land that belongs to the Jews long before Islam ever existed. They should go back to Saudi Arabia

@@dani-ks9cgtrue

@@IsraelJew-ou5cb 5000 years ago.. 2000 years ago..

doesn't stop anyone from taking 30 mins or an hour to read some articles about the situation elsewhere

phull sapport

Thnk bro ❤❤

Fascist party 😅

@@effervescentevanescenttran6331 you islamNazim demons fascistic

@@effervescentevanescenttran6331 said islamNazi

well now lemme teach you some history, "Indus" name itself was coined by the word "Hindu" and word Hindu itself was coined by the word "Sind" Secondaly just coz a state was illegally established by some colonizers wouldn't make Pakistan and Bangladesh some licit states, Secondaly Indus civilization was a Hindu civilization, with cheif diety of proto Shiva, and the creation of Pakistan's was solely on the basis of "freedom from Hindus" then what makes Pakistanis to stoop in order to claim the Hindu Indian history, Third, India is just the official name of the country along with "Bharata" India has numerous other names, India in UK Indica in Greece Hindistan in Turkey Al-Hind in Egypt Hindustan in Arabia Hudu in Israel Hind in Iran Yindu in China Tianzhu in Japan Aryavarta in Tibet Bharat or Bharatvarsha in the Indian subcontinet, The word "Hindustan" itself has "Hind" in it's name, this is Indian Hindu heritage, it would be better for Pakistamis and Bangladeshis to stop claiming Indian heritage, And if they can't stop this Indian obesession they should get merge with India and should accept Hinduism, LOL pakistan name was never made on that basis of if that'a the case then qhy there isn't any B for Bengal, since once Bangladesh used to be a part of Pakistan if any sort of artificial nation of Pakiatan and Bangladesh wouldn't had been formed by carving India, then they could had claim their heritage but after all the civil war, unrest and migrations they shouldn't really expect Hindus to welcome them with open arms, Hindu civilization of Indus was one of the most crucial places for the vedic Hinduism and after the incindent of the Hinglaj Temple in Pakiatan and Bhuddha statue of Aghanistan , they ahould stay away from the Hindu civilization, Religion and ethnicity don't determine history, I agree qith that, but according to the historian, William Dalryample, a nation like India, whose entire hiatory was determined by the invading religious groups, Religion here would surely determine the history of the 1.6 billion people of the Indian subcontinent, Indonesia could surely claim it's Hindu history, I am retareating again and again, the main independnace slogan of AIML for the Pakistani liberation from India was the "Freedom from Hindus", thus you got your independance, good, now stay away from the Indian indentity and what makes Pakistan not an occupation??? India and Palestine both were the British colonies, while Israel and Pakistan both were created by the colonizers, creation of both these lead to chaos, migrations and unrest, just coz Pakistan( and Bangladesh) is a muslim nation and it's suits your agenda thus you gonna reveal your double standards??? Huh??? Just by using words like "yapping" wouldn't justify Pakistan's existance Get educated! what is your defination of an occupation wouldn't change the narravative of what you want to portray, We have seen what Syrians had did with the Yazidis or better what Pakistani had themsleves did with the native Hindus and Sikhs of Pakistani occupied Punjab or Hindus of east Bengal(Bangladesh) during the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971, so better don't preach that as if you really care about the DNA ancestry and all, Pakistan is an occupation since it was made on the land of Hindus, creation of Pakistan lead to choas, unrest and unwanted migrations, 14th Augast is an establishment day of Pakistan( and Bangladesh), or we can say that an independence day of Pakistan from India what is your defination of an occupation wouldn't change the narravative of what you want to portray, We have seen what Syrians had did with the Yazidis or better what Pakistani had themsleves did with the native Hindus and Sikhs of Pakistani occupied Punjab or Hindus of east Bengal(Bangladesh) during the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971, so better don't preach that as if you really care about the DNA ancestry and all, Pakistan is an occupation since it was made on the land of Hindus, creation of Pakistan lead to choas, unrest and unwanted migrations, 14th Augast is an establishment day of Pakistan( and Bangladesh), or we can say that an independence day of Pakistan from India Maharaj was a nemesis of India coz he was an arch rival of Shiekh Abdullah, and shiekh abdullah was one of biggest ally of Nehru, this is the reason why initially he wasn't acceding Kashmir to India 2.) Gilgit rebels had attavked the vale even before when Indian forces had airlifted to Kashmir, this itself proove that Gilgit rebels had defeated the forces of Maharaja but not the Indian forces, India had finally invaded Kashmir from the south by 26th of oct, and Pakistan had already invaded Kashmir by 22nd of october, this proove that it was India, which had defeated Gilgit rebels and Pakitani forces and had moved them out of the vale, 3.) I agree India took the matter to UN, coz A.) India had the support of Shikh abdullah B.) Case of Junagarh was still pending C.) India was always the biggest regional power D.) India was overconfident about her position in Kashmir, India was already defeating Pakistan, it was a diplomatic failure of India, if India had not took this matter to the UN, then it was just the matter of time, and whole Kahsmir would had been a part of India, your histrory lessons needs to be checked, Jinnah had stooped at unimaginable levels , he had wanted to to establish the illegal state of Pakistan quite entirely over the Hindu India , his ill intentions were not just limited to the the 6 states, case of Junagarh and Hyderabad prooves that, and also if Pakistan could had the audacity of claiming Hindu majority Hyderabad and Hindu majority Junagrah on the basis of so-called IOA ,then why not India?India is way more powerfull and influentiol than Pakistan, if Pakistan can dare to provoke India, then the regional superpower India would surely retaliate and also the people of Kashmir had never wanted to join Pakistan, they just had wanted to get rid of the Dogra ruler, and for that they had been supporting Shiekh abdullah, shiekh abdullah was pro-India, coz of that jinnah had even referred Abdullah as a traitor, which had offended the Kashmiri people, and also we are talking about the 1940' sat that time, Hindus of kashmir used to make about 30 percent of the population( before the forcefull exodus of Hindus by the Muslims of Kashmir), and the Hindus of Kashmir(including Bhuddists and Sikhs)were and are still highly pro-India, so your arguments are quite baseless And for the record, Pakistan wasn't really supporting a plebscide in Kashmir initially coz it knew that the peope would vote for Shiekj abdullah and he was sponsoring the legallity of the Instrument of Accession of Kashmir with India ,coz of this Pakistan voilated the UN resolution and din't vacate the occupied terretories,Dogra ruler was Hindu, but still his ties with the Indian government were quite bad(that's the reason why din't signed the IOA with the Indian government initially, but only after the Pakistani invasion of Kashmir) The misleading info which is being spread by the Pakistani media has deeply infiltrated into the minds of Pakistanis! Pakistan is purely at the fault, it's Pakistan, which is instigating this issue even after losing all the wars and conflicts against India, India is, was, will always be on the morally right side,

Israel 🇮🇱 is a great nation 😊

But they’re idol worshippers!

​@@JPVillalobos27😂😂😂

@@JPVillalobos27 So what, at least they’re not killing Jews like you Muslims

Many Israelis are seculars and don't care about religion. Also, many among the religious ones believe in freedom of religion@@JPVillalobos27

Who are you to decree that? Don't match the Israelites with the Israelis. Ancestry doesn't mean anything if you don't agree with what your ancestors believed.

​@@DANGARJOR😂😂😂 you can try and rewrite and deny a history all you f****** want mate but our history is that the we are alive we are the history we are the living history mate our families came from the area like what the f*** are you talking about and when it comes to the partition West bank and Gaza we're all part of Israel and your people was meant to be part of Jordan and instead of becoming citizens you decided that the whole Muslim world would wage a war because this land once was yours but it wasn't anymore but in the korana says it will always be yours and therefore you must have a war that says it's always yours so don't pretend like we don't know what's going on you cannot rewrite history we are the living history of the people that came b4

ok so the ancestry of palestinians dates back to the israelites so u agree they should have astate?

Dude India has been a Muslim majority country for the last 800 years, and the president of India is a Muslim hating Hindu, I repeat Muslim hating, what do you think this is democracy?!!!!!!!

Dude India is a Muslim majority country and the president is Muslim hating Hindu, I repeat Muslim hating, what do you think this is democracy?

Iranians online mock palestinians, I doubt they care about them.

@@hijazlander lol 😂 nice joke

@@hijazlander Iran work with fakestine why you lie 🤭

We Jews were in force exile by the Rome empire 2000 years

There’s always been a presence, but most have been exiled over multiple empires. So what’s your point?

@@IsraelJew-ou5cbBut the question is why? Manipulating the commandments. Why did the attempt to slaughter and slaughter Prophets (John) and saints, why did they reject Jesus. Why did they disobey GOD? Why are these questions never answered.

​@@IsraelJew-ou5cb no you weren't. You were khazarian Turks that bred with Slavs and Goths. That's why you look European. Turks have stealing in their DNA so no wonder you're stealing Palestinian lands 😂. Mizrakhi Jews are real Jews not Ashkenazi

Let Kurds take over your country.

@@IsraelJew-qs7ql America is a rightful Kurdistan. Americans should allow Kurdistan to be built on their soil.

No. Since October 1947 when Pakistan invaded the sovereign territory of the king of erstwhile princely state of Jammu and Kashmir with its army and tribal irregulars.

​@wassuphomies263 after the Hindu ruler signed it over to India when Kashmir was Muslim majority so should have gone to Pakistan.

​@@Madmarkhoroh I agree to but only every single Muslim in India goes to either Pakistan or Bangladesh. The Partition is incomplete and if Kashmir leaves because its Muslim then India should complete the Partition and do a complete population transfer. India is a country of non-Muslims according t your logic. So not ONE Muslim should be its citizen.

@didd2810 Let me preface my comment by saying this: the Sanghis of India are only interested in the monetary gain of Kashmir not its people. The Partition is very much Incomplete and a complete shambles: there were Muslim majority states in India that voted to join Pakistan but were denied. Hindu India has the historical mosques and Muslim Pakistan has the historical mandir and gudwaras. My comment isn't saying India is a country of non muslims: Pakistans sole purpose of its creation was for the Muslims. And you can look up the stats India is a Hindu country: 80% of its population is Hindu. What we're talking about here is a people's human right to choose, to decide being denied. If a Muslim chooses to live in India thats their choice. If Muslims CHOOSE not to they should be allowed to make that decision.

​@@MadmarkhorMaharaj was a nemesis of India coz he was an arch rival of Shiekh Abdullah, and shiekh abdullah was one of biggest ally of Nehru, this is the reason why initially he wasn't acceding Kashmir to India 2.) Gilgit rebels had attavked the vale even before when Indian forces had airlifted to Kashmir, this itself proove that Gilgit rebels had defeated the forces of Maharaja but not the Indian forces, India had finally invaded Kashmir from the south by 26th of oct, and Pakistan had already invaded Kashmir by 22nd of october, this proove that it was India, which had defeated Gilgit rebels and Pakitani forces and had moved them out of the vale, 3.) I agree India took the matter to UN, coz A.) India had the support of Shikh abdullah B.) Case of Junagarh was still pending C.) India was always the biggest regional power D.) India was overconfident about her position in Kashmir, India was already defeating Pakistan, it was a diplomatic failure of India, if India had not took this matter to the UN, then it was just the matter of time, and whole Kahsmir would had been a part of India, your histrory lessons needs to be checked, Jinnah had stooped at unimaginable levels , he had wanted to to establish the illegal state of Pakistan quite entirely over the Hindu India , his ill intentions were not just limited to the the 6 states, case of Junagarh and Hyderabad prooves that, and also if Pakistan could had the audacity of claiming Hindu majority Hyderabad and Hindu majority Junagrah on the basis of so-called IOA ,then why not India?India is way more powerfull and influentiol than Pakistan, if Pakistan can dare to provoke India, then the regional superpower India would surely retaliate and also the people of Kashmir had never wanted to join Pakistan, they just had wanted to get rid of the Dogra ruler, and for that they had been supporting Shiekh abdullah, shiekh abdullah was pro-India, coz of that jinnah had even referred Abdullah as a traitor, which had offended the Kashmiri people, and also we are talking about the 1940' sat that time, Hindus of kashmir used to make about 30 percent of the population( before the forcefull exodus of Hindus by the Muslims of Kashmir), and the Hindus of Kashmir(including Bhuddists and Sikhs)were and are still highly pro-India, so your arguments are quite baseless And for the record, Pakistan wasn't really supporting a plebscide in Kashmir initially coz it knew that the peope would vote for Shiekj abdullah and he was sponsoring the legallity of the Instrument of Accession of Kashmir with India ,coz of this Pakistan voilated the UN resolution and din't vacate the occupied terretories,Dogra ruler was Hindu, but still his ties with the Indian government were quite bad(that's the reason why din't signed the IOA with the Indian government initially, but only after the Pakistani invasion of Kashmir) The misleading info which is being spread by the Pakistani media has deeply infiltrated into the minds of Pakistanis! Pakistan is purely at the fault, it's Pakistan, which is instigating this issue even after losing all the wars and conflicts against India, India is, was, will always be on the morally right side,

I believe so too

Yes. The question is not who it belongs to, since Kashmir seeks to be independent.

@@sammymohamad1250 there are 7000+ languages and ethnicity but the world cannot afford to have 7000 plus countries. Kashmir's location makes it impossible for it to be a neutral independent country

@@bharatyaswaraj5641 That's for the Kashmiri people to decide, even the UN recognizes the right of people for self determination. There is no justification for the atrocious militarization of India in Kashmir. And FYI, not every ethnicity in the world is looking for independence. So your example doesn't add anything of value to this conversation, you're just an occupation apologetic.

@@sammymohamad1250 i would love to know which UN law abiding country you are from and what kind of clean bloodless hand you use to show fingers at others as occupation. No country in the world will let any part of it to secede as it would cause a domino effect. It is not about opinions its about what you stand for. we stand for unity and cooperation instead of seperatism. UN Laws written on paper is very hard to implement practically considering it doesnt take many factors into account before calling something legal or illegal. Pakistan has successful instigated hatred in the minds of kashmiris since 1980s and by funding religious extremist they created a situation well suited for military intervention then these extremists use this the crossfire victims to recruit more towards armed struggle and thus cementing the need for india to have troops in the region. So it would be naive if anyone think india would just leave a part of it to seperate as a result of pakistani actions. Its indeed sad that Kashmiri muslims suffer much in recent decades but unfortunatly many of them were no saints when kicking out and killing kashmiri hindus before the military was deployed. So anyways thank you for your opinion and God bless you

Bro PALESTINE has a very controlled media and social media by p!ssr4el. Don't be sad ! They have not heard about it....if they did they would have always supported you🌙

Bro 🇵🇸 has a very controlled media and social media by PISR4EL Don't be sad ! They have not heard about it....if they did they would have always supported you🌙

The Palestinians dont care about anyone but themselves

Yeah so? How is that an "irony"? Kashmiris are not oppressed anywhere near as badly as the Palestinians are so🤫🤫

Its because of Al Quds and why shouldnt we "cry" every human with a heart would

​@@hasinarian6711don't say that when you don't know the truth.Its Palestinians who will understand the pain of our occupation not you. Regards an occupied kashmiri.

​@hasinarian6711 stop lieng ..palasinian not oppressed.... you just spreading propoganda . Muslim propoganda. your media choose to show just the bed things that israli do to the plastelinas but never what those monsters do to Israel.

You are the occupier. You are not indigenous to the land. The Kashmiri Pandits are the indigenous people of the Kashmir Valley

@@dee74raz bro is a PhD from the whatsapp uni

@@dee74raz 😂 is that your new cope? Kashmiri Muslims are just indigenous as pandits. The only difference being we are converts

@@zakariamattu8613 Many practicing the Islamic faith came to Kashmir during Muslim rule. So it’s not true that all were converted from Kashmiri Pandits.

I don't aggree to that India is all ready for the settler colonial project in Kashmir. With aim to vipe out indigenous Kashmiris or turn them into an insignificant minority.Believe it or not you are living in a state of denial.

Turn off the CC in the settings of the video..

Huh lindu Even Hindu is an arabic pronounciation And hindi/urdu u speak is 90℅ arabic

India's name is derived from Sindhu ghati which is in Pakistan today. so according to your logic, all of India is a part of Pakistan?

@@jostnamane3951 Even a Whole Pakistan is land of Hindus, part of bharata Chakrvarthi , land of Ashoka, even your lahore city got its name from the son of Lord Rama , don't try to be a smart arse

@@BdBoy-ie7tf chuslam is a new religion arrived, so you don't have a right to speak on our Santhana dharma

@@hinduswastika9754 Adam as ka naam suna ha pagal admi Abrahamic religion ka naam suna hai? And hinduism is not a religion , it's just a culture Only 3 religions exist on earth and one is perfect

Which terror😂

Dude nothing in the US belongs to Mexico. Nothing

we jews live in Israel Judah kingdom 5000 years from jeusha Ben nun time till today Rome empire conquer us jews 2000 years ago and changed the name of the land from Israel Judah kingdom to Syria palashtina and exile us Jews by force

It’s not your home lol 😂 you islamNazim occupied us jews Israeli you invaders from Egypt and arbia

@@IsraelJew-ou5cb Yes i know, enough problems of your own to be worried about others!

​@@helenb6399obesity is a serious problem in the PA and GAZA

@@IsraelJew-ou5cbPropaganda machine never misses a chance

What's your point? Many Palestinians simply aren't aware of the Kashmir dispute, but their lack of awareness doesn't justify the suffering they are going through.

​​@@jostnamane3951the point is, subcontinent muslims are overtly obsessed with a conflict that they aren't involved in (Israel/Palestine) as they consider it as a struggle for all muslim brotherhood/ummah. This stems from their belief that muslims all across the globe feel each others' pain & suffering, regardless of their geographic location. And in this video, we learn that Palestinians are mostly uninformed about Kashmir. And even upon getting to know about that conflict, they refused to pick sides. Muslims from Pakistan & Kashmir tuned into this video hoping that Palestinians would show solidarity with Kashmiris based on religious affiliation. Instead, they got to know that their so called "muslim brotherhood/ummah" is just a facade.

Before October 7th

who said we are happy? Even if you buld our roads of gold and our bridges of silver we will still never accept the occupation

@@Kashmirimuslimakhi speak for yourself. Majority are happy in India. Give proof otherwise, and I mean proof not propaganda.

@@dankseid3793 oh really? what proof you want govt stats? Go ask any kashmiri

@@Kashmirimuslimakhi I did, they say otherwise. And they were those who live in Kashmir not in their 4 BHK in South Delhi.

@@dankseid3793 calm down &sell this manjan elsewhere

Who do you think lives in pakistan? Muslims were there as well

​@@User_29765By that logic Jews have also been living for centuries in Palestine. But as Zionism is a foreign ideology that was employed to demand a Jewish state so is Islamism, a mid eastern ideology, employed to demand a state of Pakistan. Also, the founders of Pakistan and the people themselves consider themselves to be descendants of Arabs and not natives.

Pakistan is full of natives. Get over it@@hindugramsci

we jews live in Israel Judah kingdom 5000 years from jeusha Ben nun time till today Rome empire conquer us jews 2000 years ago and changed the name of the land from Israel Judah kingdom to Syria palashtina and exile us Jews by force

The Israelis do not belong ethnically to the ancient Jews or to the Middle East region, while the Palestinians belong to the region. Religion does not give you the right to steal land that is not yours. Palestine (the land of Canaan) will return to us.

How did Bangladesh become like another Palestine?

Maharaj was a nemesis of India coz he was an arch rival of Shiekh Abdullah, and shiekh abdullah was one of biggest ally of Nehru, this is the reason why initially he wasn't acceding Kashmir to India 2.) Gilgit rebels had attavked the vale even before when Indian forces had airlifted to Kashmir, this itself proove that Gilgit rebels had defeated the forces of Maharaja but not the Indian forces, India had finally invaded Kashmir from the south by 26th of oct, and Pakistan had already invaded Kashmir by 22nd of october, this proove that it was India, which had defeated Gilgit rebels and Pakitani forces and had moved them out of the vale, 3.) I agree India took the matter to UN, coz A.) India had the support of Shikh abdullah B.) Case of Junagarh was still pending C.) India was always the biggest regional power D.) India was overconfident about her position in Kashmir, India was already defeating Pakistan, it was a diplomatic failure of India, if India had not took this matter to the UN, then it was just the matter of time, and whole Kahsmir would had been a part of India, your histrory lessons needs to be checked, Jinnah had stooped at unimaginable levels , he had wanted to to establish the illegal state of Pakistan quite entirely over the Hindu India , his ill intentions were not just limited to the the 6 states, case of Junagarh and Hyderabad prooves that, and also if Pakistan could had the audacity of claiming Hindu majority Hyderabad and Hindu majority Junagrah on the basis of so-called IOA ,then why not India?India is way more powerfull and influentiol than Pakistan, if Pakistan can dare to provoke India, then the regional superpower India would surely retaliate and also the people of Kashmir had never wanted to join Pakistan, they just had wanted to get rid of the Dogra ruler, and for that they had been supporting Shiekh abdullah, shiekh abdullah was pro-India, coz of that jinnah had even referred Abdullah as a traitor, which had offended the Kashmiri people, and also we are talking about the 1940' sat that time, Hindus of kashmir used to make about 30 percent of the population( before the forcefull exodus of Hindus by the Muslims of Kashmir), and the Hindus of Kashmir(including Bhuddists and Sikhs)were and are still highly pro-India, so your arguments are quite baseless And for the record, Pakistan wasn't really supporting a plebscide in Kashmir initially coz it knew that the peope would vote for Shiekj abdullah and he was sponsoring the legallity of the Instrument of Accession of Kashmir with India ,coz of this Pakistan voilated the UN resolution and din't vacate the occupied terretories,Dogra ruler was Hindu, but still his ties with the Indian government were quite bad(that's the reason why din't signed the IOA with the Indian government initially, but only after the Pakistani invasion of Kashmir) The misleading info which is being spread by the Pakistani media has deeply infiltrated into the minds of Pakistanis! Pakistan is purely at the fault, it's Pakistan, which is instigating this issue even after losing all the wars and conflicts against India, India is, was, will always be on the morally right side,

Kashmir was is and will always be a part of India it is the truth and Kashmir is a major part of Indian history

​@@Ok-up7ty All these Palestinians support Pakistan because of Islam

@@Peter-jo6yu fakestine *

@@IsraelJews-dg2dvThat’s why there will never be peace in the region because of individuals with your views. You can’t deny Palestinian identity, you wouldn’t want someone to say you don’t exist. Give what you want to receive

Kashmir voted in 1947 to join the Indian union. Now they forgot about 🤦‍♂️. The word occupation is completely wrong.

Kashmir is not the North West frontier. Thats closer to peshawar

@@imizee9189 North-West Frontier Province. noun. a province in N Pakistan between Afghanistan and Jammu and Kashmir: part of British India from 1901 until 1947; of strategic importance, esp for the Khyber Pass. Capital: Peshawar.

NWFP is nowhere near Kashmir it's not the sane thing at all. NWFP Are Pathans. Tribal. Historically and today.

Northwest frontier still exists to this day. Google it. Kashmir is different from NW frontier.

Bhutan 🇧🇹 is great 😊

lol still crying about aya sophia buddy ?, its okay talk to the turks about it tell them we want it back iam sure they will listen to you and give you aya sophia back haha

@@samalzid1560 if I want something, the last thing I will do is to cry. I don't know where in my comment you found something about turks or Agia Sophia. You see illusions probably.

Greece was Islamic and will return to Islam, as will Cyprus

@@software2700 You need to cut down on your alcohol and start eating pork

we jews live in Israel Judah kingdom 5000 years from jeusha Ben nun time till today Rome empire conquer us jews 2000 years ago and changed the name of the land from Israel Judah kingdom to Syria palashtina and exile us Jews by force

Free Israel Judah kingdom 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🕎✡️ From islamNazim arabs invaders

Why you put moon in Indian flag you make it look pagan Baal idolaty 🤮🤮🤮☪️🤮🤮🤮

Thats why you have the indian flag in your profile? 😂😂😂😂

​@IsraelJew-ou5cb nothing matters here kid,islam will win one day

I support India and Hindus.

Indian is a nationality, not an ethnicity. Moreover, nationality is a social construct therefore it has nothing to do with your ancestral origins. Indigenous Kashmiris (not government subsidized Hindi immigrants) are Dardic people who have more in common with Nuristanis, Pashayis, Shina and other Northern Pakistani and Northeastern Afghan people than with Indians. This is objectively true.

@@jostnamane3951 What is objectively true is that Pakistan is a failed state. Neither Pakistan or Bangladesh would even exist if it were not for the Islamists never integrating like they always do. They are lucky that Hindustan and Sikh has a better moral compass than they ever would. Btw even in ethnicity they are still Indian. No debate about it.

@@jostnamane3951 Indian is an ethnicity. You couldn't be more wrong there. What is objectively true is that Pakistan and Bangladesh would never have existed if it weren't for the ungrateful Islamist. Never integrated like they always do. It's all Indian! They are lucky Hindustan and Sikh have a better moral standard.

@@jostnamane3951 Nope it's all ethnicity India. Pakistan and Bangladesh would not even exist if it was not for ungrateful Islamists. Never assimilating like they always do.

@@jostnamane3951 Indigenous Kashmir are Indians. All of those lands are Indian lands. That is the objective truth.

Great another racist asshole who know 0 about israel

What...

Yes we jews are now you can cry

we jews live in Israel Judah kingdom 5000 years from jeusha Ben nun time till today Rome empire conquer us jews 2000 years ago and changed the name of the land from Israel Judah kingdom to Syria palashtina and exile us Jews by force

You write Not Good GOD name

Maharaj was a nemesis of India coz he was an arch rival of Shiekh Abdullah, and shiekh abdullah was one of biggest ally of Nehru, this is the reason why initially he wasn't acceding Kashmir to India 2.) Gilgit rebels had attavked the vale even before when Indian forces had airlifted to Kashmir, this itself proove that Gilgit rebels had defeated the forces of Maharaja but not the Indian forces, India had finally invaded Kashmir from the south by 26th of oct, and Pakistan had already invaded Kashmir by 22nd of october, this proove that it was India, which had defeated Gilgit rebels and Pakitani forces and had moved them out of the vale, 3.) I agree India took the matter to UN, coz A.) India had the support of Shikh abdullah B.) Case of Junagarh was still pending C.) India was always the biggest regional power D.) India was overconfident about her position in Kashmir, India was already defeating Pakistan, it was a diplomatic failure of India, if India had not took this matter to the UN, then it was just the matter of time, and whole Kahsmir would had been a part of India, your histrory lessons needs to be checked, Jinnah had stooped at unimaginable levels , he had wanted to to establish the illegal state of Pakistan quite entirely over the Hindu India , his ill intentions were not just limited to the the 6 states, case of Junagarh and Hyderabad prooves that, and also if Pakistan could had the audacity of claiming Hindu majority Hyderabad and Hindu majority Junagrah on the basis of so-called IOA ,then why not India?India is way more powerfull and influentiol than Pakistan, if Pakistan can dare to provoke India, then the regional superpower India would surely retaliate and also the people of Kashmir had never wanted to join Pakistan, they just had wanted to get rid of the Dogra ruler, and for that they had been supporting Shiekh abdullah, shiekh abdullah was pro-India, coz of that jinnah had even referred Abdullah as a traitor, which had offended the Kashmiri people, and also we are talking about the 1940' sat that time, Hindus of kashmir used to make about 30 percent of the population( before the forcefull exodus of Hindus by the Muslims of Kashmir), and the Hindus of Kashmir(including Bhuddists and Sikhs)were and are still highly pro-India, so your arguments are quite baseless And for the record, Pakistan wasn't really supporting a plebscide in Kashmir initially coz it knew that the peope would vote for Shiekj abdullah and he was sponsoring the legallity of the Instrument of Accession of Kashmir with India ,coz of this Pakistan voilated the UN resolution and din't vacate the occupied terretories,Dogra ruler was Hindu, but still his ties with the Indian government were quite bad(that's the reason why din't signed the IOA with the Indian government initially, but only after the Pakistani invasion of Kashmir) The misleading info which is being spread by the Pakistani media has deeply infiltrated into the minds of Pakistanis! Pakistan is purely at the fault, it's Pakistan, which is instigating this issue even after losing all the wars and conflicts against India, India is, was, will always be on the morally right side,

​@@ilmakhanafridi9396 I think your flawed argument boils down to your last sentence. So by that logic, Kashmir is living under a siege due to their own fault?? Then you would apply the same to the Palestinians then, that it is the Palestinian's fault that they are getting bombed not Israel?? Also I am talking about the situation now, and that is why I said that Kashmir is for Kashmiris first (hindus and muslims both) not for mainland India or Pakistan!

​@@the-architect7789 1.) You can't gave any counter arguements to the points that I had raised, A.) Pakistani claims over Junagarh and then Hyderabad, ofc then Kashmir issue was bound to happen B.) It's more the fault of Kashmiries themselves since this fight was never about the indpendence, this fight was always about the Sultan-E-Kashmir, if Kashmiries would had accepted the secular rule irresepcted with the obession of Shiekh Abdullah, just to counter Hari singh, then neither Kashmir would have been a part of India and nither Pakuisan would had invaded it, but the atttacks on Hindus in Mirpur, Neelum, and Gilgit proovs that it was always about the "independance from Kufr" they got what they deserved 3.) Why to compare Palestine with Kashmir?? Why not compare Palestine with India itsself?? and what makes Pakistan not an occupation??? India and Palestine both were the British colonies, while Israel and Pakistan both were created by the colonizers, creation of both these lead to chaos, migrations and unrest, just coz Pakistan( and Bangladesh) is a muslim nation and it's suits your agenda thus you gonna reveal your double standards??? Huh??? Bordrrs of the Israeli state and Palestinian state were made by the UN while the borders and the illegal establishment of Pakistan was made solely by the British, what is your defination of an occupation wouldn't change the narravative of what you want to portray, We have seen what Syrians had did with the Yazidis or better what Pakistani had themsleves did with the native Hindus and Sikhs of Pakistani occupied Punjab or Hindus of east Bengal(Bangladesh) during the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971, so better don't act that as if you really care about the DNA ancestry and all, Pakistan is an occupation since it was made on the land of Hindus, creation of Pakistan lead to choas, unrest and unwanted migrations, 14th Augast is an establishment day of Pakistan( and Bangladesh), or we can say that an independence day of Pakistan from India Current situation wouldn't be considered, remember during the onset of the war?? Just coz the people and thier ruler, Shiekh abdullah had been the vocal supporters of India and Nehru( who himself was a Kashmiri Hindu) and since the politics of Kashmir wasn't really in favour of Pakistan, Pakustan had voilated the UN resoluations and had waited patiently till the agenda was in their favour that was in 1989, when the this struggle was not just a "territorial dispute of Kashmir" but was suddenly transformed to more of a "freedom struggle of Kashmir spevifically from the Indian rule" thanks to Pakistan for the religious divide, and and too specifically after the Bangladeshi liberation from Pakistan with the Indian assistance, after the infamous Hindu exodus and the entry of JKLF, now all of a sudden Pakistan wants a plebiscite in Kashmir, no it wouldn't happen, now India will wait patienlty till the political narravitive of Kashmir is in the Indian favour, untill the large numbers of Hindu Pandits are re-established in Indian Kashmir, till then India should make sure that there should be no plebicite in Kashmir

There is a difference... Before the intrusion of mughals these were hindu kingdoms just like arab world or European Union .... So either critisize the muslim acts.... Or accept what israel is doing to be correct

Pakistan aside, Kashmiris reflext the Palestinians, and India the Israelis. India and Israel actually uses various similar occupation mechanisms like demonizing the people they occupy, calling them violent animals and so on, to justify their occupation. The main difference is that India has annexed Kashmir completely, so Kashmiris are like Palestinain-Israelis, holding the occupier's nationality but at the same time knowing they're not part of the nation (they understand they're occupied). The Indian occupation of Kashmir nowadays mainly consists on controlling them military and economically, with the goal of making them forget their desire of independence, so they will never rise again.

@@sammymohamad1250 lol.... Intruders are complaining... You guys praising intruders terrorists like mughals.... But if Israel does the same to others... you have pain in your ass...... Btw you have written a nice story but it is still a story....like your jihadi book... Situation is clearly visible in kashmir post article 370...so interpretation of dumbass community is rejected... Lol

​@@sammymohamad1250Muslims in Kashmir reflect the Israelis and Kashmiri Hindus reflect the Palestinians. It's the Muslims that have occupied and ethnically cleansed the native Kashmiri Hindus from their own homeland similar to what Israel is doing in Gaza.

​@@sammymohamad1250B.S. Even the most ardent Palestinian nationalists like Arafat and Habash have said Palestine and Kashmir are nothing alike. Unlike Palestine, the Indian govt does not want to settle anybody on that land. The deal is simple, the land belong to ALL Kashmiris, regardless of religion, but WITHIN the borders of India.

The Pakistani occupied part of Kashmir is a basket case economically. But then what would you expect from a failed Islamic terrorist state (where Osama found refuge) ? There is no comparison between Indian Kashmir and Pakistani Kashmir (which looks more like Afghanistan, full of illiterate dirt poor radical Islamists).

I think you meant Pakistan.

@@flyingluftwaffe9617 no India

@@flyingluftwaffe9617fakestine not real like fakestine not real

Says a paje*t...

@@Seize07 said the islamNazim that work Satan SmaL

@ Ajju: Thank You Sir. In early 70s, Zia Ul Haque , as a Brigadier stationed in Jordan, killed 28000 Palestinians. One must take your word.

we jews live in Israel Judah kingdom 5000 years from jeusha Ben nun time till today Rome empire conquer us jews 2000 years ago and changed the name of the land from Israel Judah kingdom to Syria palashtina and exile us Jews by force

@@venkatraman9699 On the flip side , Pakistani pilot who shot down Israelis. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saiful_Azam

@@hijazlander what has this to do with what I wrote? We in Bharat know really well how great your defence force is.

Hope you say the same thing about Balochistan

Why would Israelis agree to that? There is no point in asking Israelis this.

Why ?

Terrible writing. man. You need to learn how to write sentences that end with full-stops (period).

Kya bol raha bhai?

How will u like if al aqsa is made synagogue. Ram mandir is just taking back our rights. A Indian Muslim who supports the foreign invaders to india due to religion is as much as a stealer as Israeli jews who stole arab lands. Hindus deserve justice so do Palestinians. Only difference is that for Hindus the occupier were Afgahns, Turks in the past and for arab muslim the occupier is zionist jews. Both Hindus and Palestinian should support each other as both lands were stolen as Pakistan and Israel.

Fuck allah he is Satan smaL

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p9Wdf5Ci3a2bo2Q.htmlsi=tSNzvLIZej-r9DYs

​​@@IsraelJew-ou5cb hasbara bot got no chills

Fakestine arabs invaders *

And you says that😂

All of the questions are questions that people sent him..

Occupation over a land that is LITERALLY called JUDEA? This land belongs to the Jews and the Arabs invaded it

Maharaj was a nemesis of India coz he was an arch rival of Shiekh Abdullah, and shiekh abdullah was one of biggest ally of Nehru, this is the reason why initially he wasn't acceding Kashmir to India 2.) Gilgit rebels had attavked the vale even before when Indian forces had airlifted to Kashmir, this itself proove that Gilgit rebels had defeated the forces of Maharaja but not the Indian forces, India had finally invaded Kashmir from the south by 26th of oct, and Pakistan had already invaded Kashmir by 22nd of october, this proove that it was India, which had defeated Gilgit rebels and Pakitani forces and had moved them out of the vale, 3.) I agree India took the matter to UN, coz A.) India had the support of Shikh abdullah B.) Case of Junagarh was still pending C.) India was always the biggest regional power D.) India was overconfident about her position in Kashmir, India was already defeating Pakistan, it was a diplomatic failure of India, if India had not took this matter to the UN, then it was just the matter of time, and whole Kahsmir would had been a part of India, your histrory lessons needs to be checked, Jinnah had stooped at unimaginable levels , he had wanted to to establish the illegal state of Pakistan quite entirely over the Hindu India , his ill intentions were not just limited to the the 6 states, case of Junagarh and Hyderabad prooves that, and also if Pakistan could had the audacity of claiming Hindu majority Hyderabad and Hindu majority Junagrah on the basis of so-called IOA ,then why not India?India is way more powerfull and influentiol than Pakistan, if Pakistan can dare to provoke India, then the regional superpower India would surely retaliate and also the people of Kashmir had never wanted to join Pakistan, they just had wanted to get rid of the Dogra ruler, and for that they had been supporting Shiekh abdullah, shiekh abdullah was pro-India, coz of that jinnah had even referred Abdullah as a traitor, which had offended the Kashmiri people, and also we are talking about the 1940' sat that time, Hindus of kashmir used to make about 30 percent of the population( before the forcefull exodus of Hindus by the Muslims of Kashmir), and the Hindus of Kashmir(including Bhuddists and Sikhs)were and are still highly pro-India, so your arguments are quite baseless And for the record, Pakistan wasn't really supporting a plebscide in Kashmir initially coz it knew that the peope would vote for Shiekj abdullah and he was sponsoring the legallity of the Instrument of Accession of Kashmir with India ,coz of this Pakistan voilated the UN resolution and din't vacate the occupied terretories,Dogra ruler was Hindu, but still his ties with the Indian government were quite bad(that's the reason why din't signed the IOA with the Indian government initially, but only after the Pakistani invasion of Kashmir) The misleading info which is being spread by the Pakistani media has deeply infiltrated into the minds of Pakistanis! Pakistan is purely at the fault, it's Pakistan, which is instigating this issue even after losing all the wars and conflicts against India, India is, was, will always be on the morally right side,

Don't even utter BS if you don't know even an ounce of about the ground reality If Kashmir is Pakistan then Egypt should be Israel

admit it, Muslims had nothing to do with the Indian Subcontinent, it was only after the Gaznavids, Sultanates and Mughal when Islam was established in India(and that too aftertge numerous genocides of the Hindus that were committed by the invading Islamists), Indian National Congress was the secular government, they were following the principles of the western backed democracratic values, it was Jinnah and All India Muslim league which had created this havoc along with British in order to counter Hindus, if AIML was having this rift with the INC or with the secular Hindu dominated India, then there was something seriouslly wrong with the Indian Muslims(modern day Pakistanis and Bangladeshis and India's Muslim population) Jinnah had dreamed of this greater Pakistan over the Hindu India in which he had wished to include Hyderabad, Junagrah, Kashmir, Bengal, Punjab, Lakshdweed , Kerala, but fortunetly, Jinnah was partially unsuccessfull in his sinister plans, as Hindu India continues to rule over the majority of land, but still by this time Islamists had occupied Half of Punjab, half of Bengal, Khyber, Boluchistan and Sindh from India, and also Pakistani ideology of Pan-Islamism was a disaster which was witnessed globally by the world,(1970 Pakistani civil war, 1971 Indo-Pakistani war and Bangladeshi liberation along with the Pakistani surrender to the Indian forces), this only prooves that Pakistan and Bangladesh were better off with India, and Pan-Islamism is a disaster ideology

@@ilmakhanafridi9396 When I said that Pakistan is a state of Muslims of India I didn't made it up from my own, it's a known fact. Britain is who divided it and gave Muslims and Hindus a state. Saying Egypt is Israel is The real BS, Because Egypt predates kingdom of Israel by 6000 years and modern Israel by 9000 years. Muslims has nothing to do with India, so if a Chinese person converts to Islam he has nothing to do with China? What if an American became Buddhist? Does the 99% population of Iran today has nothing to do with Persia? You compare a religion to a nation, it's different.

@@user-uy4kn2gr5l and what makes Pakistan not an occupation??? India and Palestine both were the British colonies, while Israel and Pakistan both were created by the colonizers, creation of both these lead to chaos, migrations and unrest, just coz Pakistan( and Bangladesh) is a muslim nation and it's suits your agenda thus you gonna reveal your double standards??? Huh??? what is your defination of an occupation wouldn't change the narravative of what you want to portray, We have seen what Syrians had did with the Yazidis or better what Pakistani had themsleves did with the native Hindus and Sikhs of Pakistani occupied Punjab or Hindus of east Bengal(Bangladesh) during the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971, so better don't act as that as if you really care about the DNA ancestry and all, Pakistan is an occupation since it was made on the land of Hindus, creation of Pakistan lead to choas, unrest and unwanted migrations, 14th Augast is an establishment day of Pakistan( and Bangladesh), or we can say that an independence day of Pakistan from India if any sort of artificial nation of Pakiatan and Bangladesh wouldn't had been formed by carving India, then they could had claim their heritage but after all the civil war, unrest and migrations they shouldn't really expect Hindus to welcome them with open arms, Hindu civilization of Indus was one of the most crucial places for the vedic Hinduism and after the incindent of the Hinglaj Temple in Pakiatan and Bhuddha statue of Aghanistan , they ahould stay away from the Hindu civilization, Religion and ethnicity don't determine history, I agree qith that, but according to the historian, William Dalryample, a nation like India, whose entire hiatory was determined by the invading religious groups, Religion here would surely determine the history of the 1.6 billion people of the Indian subcontinent, Indonesia could surely claim it's Hindu history, I am retareating again and again, the main independnace slogan of AIML for the Pakistani liberation from India was the "Freedom from Hindus", thus you got your independance, good, now stay away from the Indian identity

As an Indian, I think the people of the Kashmir valley and Jammu region should be given the choice to join India, Pakistan, or remain independent, considering their shared ethnicity but differing religious affiliations. Under the condition that the voting would be separate for the people of the Kashmir valley and Jammu region. Then only we can resolve the Kashmir dispute. What do you think about this as an ethnic Kashmiri?

@@jostnamane3951 We people Of Kashmir know the pain of being occupied. I am all for people of jammu or anywhere else for that matter to be able to decide their own future.

​​@@jostnamane3951Lol your ignorance is quacking. The elected constituent assembly of Jammu and Kashmir, exercising the popular will of the electorate, in the preamble of its erstwhile constitution of 1956 itself had declared J&K to be an integral part of the Indian Union. The question of people being given a choice now is out of the window. The King of Kashmir decided to join India in Oct. 1947, the people elected constituent assembly decided to be an integral part in 1956. That's it, the issue is done and dusted. The only thing that remains is to reclaim the territory occupied by Pakistan. May the gods make it happen soon.

@@hindugramsci I am emphasizing the present, not the past. The people of the Kashmir Valley and the Jammu region should be given the choice to join India, Pakistan, or remain independent. It is crucial to conduct separate voting for the Kashmir Valley and the Jammu region due to demographic differences (Kashmir Valley being predominantly Muslim, while Jammu region is mostly Hindu). The outcomes in one region should not influence the outcomes of the other region. For instance, if 90% of the Kashmir Valley opts for Pakistan, then the Jammu region would be ceded to Pakistan. Which is unfair, considering the Kashmir Valley's larger population. because 90% of people in the Kashmir valley opting for Pakistan equals 7,716,600 people which is more than the total population of the Jammu region at 6,640,000 people. This would only create further tensions for people of the Jammu region who are majority Hindus and Sikhs. And we DON'T want that to happen.

​@@jostnamane3951What in the world are you even saying man? Did you even read what I wrote? The constituent assembly, elected by the people of J&K, in its preamble in 1956 itself had declared J&K to be an integral part of India. That Constitution had been in force for 63 years until 2019 with no attempt to amend the preamble and ask for a plebiscite. Even the CJI of the Supreme court had recently made the oral observation that in a representative democracy like India, there is no constitutional provision of a plebiscite and the will of the people is exercised by the elected institutions (in this case the constituent assembly of J&K). There is no question of a plebiscite left anymore and your argument for a plebiscite won't stand any ground in any court of law in this country. Keep wishing.

Maharaj was a nemesis of India coz he was an arch rival of Shiekh Abdullah, and shiekh abdullah was one of biggest ally of Nehru, this is the reason why initially he wasn't acceding Kashmir to India 2.) Gilgit rebels had attavked the vale even before when Indian forces had airlifted to Kashmir, this itself proove that Gilgit rebels had defeated the forces of Maharaja but not the Indian forces, India had finally invaded Kashmir from the south by 26th of oct, and Pakistan had already invaded Kashmir by 22nd of october, this proove that it was India, which had defeated Gilgit rebels and Pakitani forces and had moved them out of the vale, 3.) I agree India took the matter to UN, coz A.) India had the support of Shikh abdullah B.) Case of Junagarh was still pending C.) India was always the biggest regional power D.) India was overconfident about her position in Kashmir, India was already defeating Pakistan, it was a diplomatic failure of India, if India had not took this matter to the UN, then it was just the matter of time, and whole Kahsmir would had been a part of India, your histrory lessons needs to be checked, Jinnah had stooped at unimaginable levels , he had wanted to to establish the illegal state of Pakistan quite entirely over the Hindu India , his ill intentions were not just limited to the the 6 states, case of Junagarh and Hyderabad prooves that, and also if Pakistan could had the audacity of claiming Hindu majority Hyderabad and Hindu majority Junagrah on the basis of so-called IOA ,then why not India?India is way more powerfull and influentiol than Pakistan, if Pakistan can dare to provoke India, then the regional superpower India would surely retaliate and also the people of Kashmir had never wanted to join Pakistan, they just had wanted to get rid of the Dogra ruler, and for that they had been supporting Shiekh abdullah, shiekh abdullah was pro-India, coz of that jinnah had even referred Abdullah as a traitor, which had offended the Kashmiri people, and also we are talking about the 1940' sat that time, Hindus of kashmir used to make about 30 percent of the population( before the forcefull exodus of Hindus by the Muslims of Kashmir), and the Hindus of Kashmir(including Bhuddists and Sikhs)were and are still highly pro-India, so your arguments are quite baseless And for the record, Pakistan wasn't really supporting a plebscide in Kashmir initially coz it knew that the peope would vote for Shiekj abdullah and he was sponsoring the legallity of the Instrument of Accession of Kashmir with India ,coz of this Pakistan voilated the UN resolution and din't vacate the occupied terretories,Dogra ruler was Hindu, but still his ties with the Indian government were quite bad(that's the reason why din't signed the IOA with the Indian government initially, but only after the Pakistani invasion of Kashmir) The misleading info which is being spread by the Pakistani media has deeply infiltrated into the minds of Pakistanis! Pakistan is purely at the fault, it's Pakistan, which is instigating this issue even after losing all the wars and conflicts against India, India is, was, will always be on the morally right side,

Kashmir belongs to Kashmiri hindus not Muslim colonizers from Arabia. Free kashmiri hindu land from illegal Islamic occupation.

Thank You!