Sounds like spiritual orphancy to me

You said it yourself perfectly. "3D relativity". This world is merely relatively true, in "relation" to the ultimate truth. That is that, there is no world in ultimate truth. It is a passing phase. A blip on the screen of eternal perfection. In truth, away from this passing illusion, there is no such thing as east and west, as there is no such thing as the world. Our ever present true existence is always here, and will always be. It is the enduring, the lasting, the final reality. Ask those in the graveyard whether the world exists. Ask the dreamer which world exists - the material one, or the one with no solidity. Ask the deep sleeper..... if the world is real. Although we feel that the world is the ultimate reality, we say this from a position of ignorance or not knowing. We have been blinded by the world and its seeming problems and anguish inside our own heads. But we forget, that the head does not truly exist, it is non enduring and so will perish. Anything that perishes can never be truly real. Namaste.

@@PaulMcDonagh-rv6vc But we (the living) know the world still goes on after people have died. Just like 'does a tree in the forest make a sound' if nobody is here? And I say the answer is yes, because we WERE HERE and knew by our auditory senses that it made a sound. But that boom will still make a sound when we're gone. The "Everything" will always co- exist (inseparable) or actually IS ONE with the No-thing. Duality exists within the No-thing and Vice versa. Each one never having a beginning or end.

​@@yvonnepeters1914 I see the angle you are coming from clearly, because I myself had the same view. But it is a limited view, based on conditioning, and not knowing anything else to compare our experience to. Like....when a fish is born in water. He knows nothing about the outside environment, and the concept of water. That is his sole reality, and it cannot comprehend something outside its experience. He may jump out of the water and experience "non water" but this is a fleeting experience, much like the out of body experiences some people have. Our experiential experience is highly limited and wrapped in dogma. Your viewpoint, assumes one main fallacy: And that is that the world or universe pre-exists to that of consciousness. Mainstream thought says that the universe came about in a bang, and then material beings somehow managed to climb through evolution and came about via mere biology and matter, and at the last moment "sprung forth" consciousness. This is an erroneous belief, and puts the horse before the cart. It also is at total odds with our own verifiable experience. we experience the world via our 5 senses. Those experiences are interpreted and shown to us in our own mind via (conciousness). Consciousness reads the lay of the land, it is not a mind made of matter that does this. Therefore matter springs forth from consciousness, not the other way around. Also, saying that because other people live after we die, and that confirms the world is enduring and real is totally wrong. Its like saying that if I strike a match, and it is about to go out, bringing an end to the experience of a flame, the flame doesnt ever extinguish because I strike another match, and therefore the flame never ceases and it truly exists. Or a more apt example, and one i think may change your viewpoint is the one you mentioned, the forest and a tree falling. Ok. Lets first agree that both humans and all sentient life (animals etc) have conscious awareness. Now, if that tree fell, and an animal was there to hear it, the animals perception confirms the relative reality of that happening. And same if an animal and a human was there, both detect the crash, and relatively speaking the event happened. But its only relatively true if there was a conscious observer present. What if no one was there. No conscious awareness of the tree felling. WHO WOULD BE THERE TO HEAR IT? Rocks cant hear, water cannot hear, the tree cannot hear, so if there is no one there to observe or detect that tree falling, who is left to verify the tree/forest is in existence? Without sentient conscious beings, there is no tree to hear, no forest to see, no noises to hear, so how does it exist outside of an observer? You may now think....."yeah but its all still there"! Really?......says who? Who can verify this to be a true statement? It is an ignorant assumption to say it exists outside of a sentient conscious beings awareness. It is not our experience, at all. And its the same with the world, and indeed universe. How could it possibly pre-date an observer! How could it truly exist if no one is there to experience it? You may again say...."It is still there if we arnt here". Yeah? Says who? We simply cannot know this to be true. Also....what is this world we think we see, hear, taste, touch and smell. Lets take the example of sight. Many people wrongly believe that there is a "me" in the head which sees through eyes. Seems reasonable. But even science says the following: Light bounces off objects outside of us, and hits light cell receptors in the eye. This light then stops completely, a mere 1 inch from the front of our eyes. This light is converted into an electro-chemical signal and sent down the optic nerve into the brain. No light enters the pitch blackness of the head, and yet that same electro-chemical signal is converted into an image via our consciousness. Science calls this "the hard problem of consciousness" and they cannot explain this final process. Consciousness is the dream weaver, it displays the image, and is highly questionable in regards to its accuracy or reality. How do we know, what we see, is really what is there? Or if it is seeing what is there, how do we know it corresponds with its true appearance? You may say...."well i can verify it is an accurate image, because i can touch it, smell it, and hear it. Really? Thats funny, because all the other senses are interpreted via the same "mysterious consciousness". We know from dream sleep, that the mind has a habit of creating illusions. It is its nature to create false illusions. This whole world is based on assumptions. Assumptions made via an erroneous materialist world view. A mindset that says consciousness came after matter, and that we are mere observers of a real world. Whereas experientially we know what we see, hear taste and touch is interpreted via consciousness, and without that consciousness, we would know nothing of nothing and be totally unaware of a world and all its beliefs.

@@PaulMcDonagh-rv6vc Both are failures. Because it's something we can't talk about. It's BEYOND WORDS AND THOUGHTS. I keep wanting to stop cuz I know intellectually it is futile. But I guess it'll stop when it's supposed to. Silence is proof of the pudding. I end here. 🙏