Amen

You're of bad will. You care more about the opinion of man than of God. This priest's analysis of the heresies of the Vatican II antipopes are correct and utterly fallacious to conclude that they are popes.

Can you explain what specifically made you reunite with the current pope?

You don't reunite with the current pope but with the office and the holy and apostolic church @@nickstanley396

Bishop Sandborn’s sedeprivationist theory is the only thing that makes sense to me

1917 Code of Canon Law 188.4 says that a public heretic automatically loses his office. It’s codified.

That the last Dogma proclaimed by him in 1950 was about The Holy Mother says a lot about what is needed to be continued in an age of universal deceit. I too was Christened into a church that is not found now because of the Modernist changes to Practice, the prayers, the Sacraments and the Liturgy. Satan is fine to move very slowly to persuade in small increments because he in not confined by time and contests what is Infinite in the Divine Providence.

Ditto. I was desololate when he died. And was unhappy with every pope since then, except for Pope Ratzinger which gave a bit of a respite. I was in Rome when the Peccorelli list came out and was deeply shocked. Nothing has surprised me since.

I think our spiritual life was much simpler and we were guided by the priest. The second Vatican council did not promote piety but a complete new church.

Berhoglio is a fraud through and through.

I thank God that I was catachised by the good Sisters of Mercy during the 1950s before the bombshell Second Vatican Council exploded leading to the shambles the Church finds herself in today.

What matters is what a Pope says EX CATHEDRA: all else, you can take with a grain of salt - especially if it contradicts prior teachings of thhe Church.

If anyone, including the pope, preach a doctrine different from the one taught by our holy Church, let him be anathema....

There was no declaration from Him in that manner... Though his works comprise the new Testament, they aren't the gospels... Also Paul may have corrected Peter but, he didn't go as far as to declare his primacy and papacy invalid.

God never said followers need to accept false teachings. We are to turn away from false teachers. We are to stay true to the word.

Only excathedra do we 'have' to listen too

The Holy Ghost is promised to the successor of Peter to keep deposit of faith not to create new doctrine to

@@fredswart1815 Yes, so Francis can't be the successor and that puts SSPX in a spot of bother also.

John Pauls 2 statements seem clear to me in that he means that all people have that potential if they find the true path that leads to the eternal way!

Why does the Trinity not appear in the Bible?peace,

@@lufhopespeacefully2037 It does. Just not the word "Trinity". Purgatory is also in the Bible. However, it just doesn't say the word "purgatory"

There's a really good book printed by tan publishers.... Called Pope's against modern errors

Brilliant and True❤

Hey I was in the same situation, really consider moving. Be willing to find a new job and move. If you have to live in poverty temporarily in order to uproot and go then do it. These times calls for it. It’s worth it. I moved after years of filling like I was in a barren wasteland, and not I finally have access to an SSPX. GOD BLESS

Unfortunately I am in no position to move at this time. Thank you for reaching out and I’m so glad you were able to relocate. God Bless

I do hope you find one. Many People have to drive a great distance to go to Mass, I would not put my faith in danger by going to the novus ordo, my husband as a child, stayed home, read the mass prayers and prayed their rosary out of necessity until they received a traditional priest. Ring the nearest sspx chapel and ask the priest for advice as to what to do may I suggest

@@michaelspeyrer1264 Can you be more precise about your meaning? What proposition do you maintain is only opinion? How does it contradict Vatican I?

what are your books called? i would like to give them a read.

This is so confusing, and Pope Francis is not helping , actualy making it much more confusing, is he the king of confusion as far as pope history goes? I'm 70, catholic at birth, and boy, the Vaticans, all lead us to perdition.

Lay people can’t excumunicate people, If privet individuals could judge for them selfs who the Pope is , the Church would shatter in to a million sects over night

What a great question is!

Exactly!!

Obey the Council of Trent instead of the supporters of Vatican II and its Popes. Council of Trent says that if clergy (priests,bishops or Pope) defected from faith avoid them to save your soul. Look at what St. Athanasius did.. he left the hierarchy to fight for the Faith. St. Hermenegild (feast day,April 13th on your Missal) refused Communion from a heretic Bishop. You cannot receive the Blessed Sacrament from compromisers, heretics or praying the Canon together with a Pope who is teaching heresies. He is a traitor to God. Fight for your Faith! Stay with God and His saints.

There is no question, he is ipso facto deposed.

I love the Bible The book the Catholic Church refuses to teach from. If the Catholic Church taught directly even from the New Testament My opinion is less Protestants more Catholics. Vatican11 has fooled them because of ignorance of Scripture. Cursed are you who follow men and abandon knowledge. Hirelings, Apostates, and Imposters will takeover the Vineyard.

John Pauls 2 statements seem clear to me in that he means that all people have that potential if they find the true path that leads to the eternal way!

Why does the Trinity not appear in the Bible?peace,

So it is ok for SSPX not to follow Francis? What else SSPX does to recognize him as the Pope besides mention his name in the Mass and hang his picture on the wall?

@@danpan001 She quoted Pius X, she is not the voice and official decider for SSPX

Blessed Pope Pius IX said that. (not by the sspx)

Yes Daniel Pan , do not follow anyone in their Heresy.

That's good enough for me. I honestly don't care whether his heresy remains "occult" or "juridically manifest" - I hear his words. I see his actions. He is teaching evil and I guard my mind/heart from it - let the Lord of history sort out the rest.

'Question: So if there is a priest, Bishop, Pope who during their homilies proclaim that there is no Holy Trinity and that Jesus is not the Son of God, we are to ignore those statements and continue to allow our family to attend those homilies and be subjected to false teachings because The Church has not declared that person a heretic?' No, you can attend an SSPX service and be taught proper doctrine. 'Are we to ignore the fact of what is being taught goes against Sacred Scripture and what the Church has always taught? That doesn’t really seem prudent to me.' No, you are supposed to pray for the Pope and the hierarchy - believe it or not, prayer does work. 'Similarly, like a parent would not allow their children to be catechized or participate in a mass with a priest that is a known pedophile, that The Church has not removed from their office and has ignored. Again to ignore something that is known is a lack of prudence.' So what is your solution?

Solution: Do not attend that chapel to receive Sacraments. And if they have a portrait of Bergolio, do not enter that chapel.

Lord have mercy!

The teaching of the Church was the Catechism. That dealt with right and wrong. The Catechism needs to extend teaching to specify sins of this era.

Yes, we are basically 'stuck' with a possibly heretical Pope. No one is asking you to 'follow his destruction of (your) church' - you can go to an SSPX church and be taught proper doctrine.

Can it be that what you say is in fact correct and this pope will be Gods tool to bring about the purification as Our Lady of the Good Event of the Purification has said?! We get the leaders we deserve and God allows Satan his reign to bring about the purification of His church. I like the way you put your comment, frank and to the point, for some reason we can’t get clergy to speak in the same way😞

THEY remove comments that they don't like.

For years I didn't go any church. We were having so many catholic churches around us, but none offers the Latin mass.

I have been in sspx since 1996, No doubt I was going to hell. I'm so grateful to them

Reincarnation is false and who would in their right mind believe in it

Notwithstanding if Bergoglio is a heretic or not, the goal of this pope is to eliminate THE MOST POWERFUL prayer on Earth--- Holy Mass, the "Tridentine Mass", from the face of the Earth. That exposes Pope Francis' true colours. The second-most powerful prayer on Earth is The Rosary. Thank God for Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X !

That is not for us, as the laity, to formally declare and charge the Pope with. Saying material heresy is one thing, being formally declared a heretic is another matter entirely

But the people have a right to shout ‘malfeasance’. If the leader of the people is abusing his position, and changing things that he has no business changing.

@@alexanderthegreat2678 That's exactly right!

@@alexanderthegreat2678 So IF he is truly not the pope can he be Judged? Can we not judge the others that claim to be pope? Can we judge their actions and/or their teachings. Are popes above the dogmas of The Church the dogmas that would excommunicate you or I? Can you be the head/leader of any group to which you do not belong? Can a former council judge a future pope? I concede the fact that he is pope of the New Order Mason Sect

I’m on the Jersey Shore, I drive the hour up to North Caldwell.

Amen…agreed!

Great questions!

Pray for him

@melmckenna4599 oh I do and i pray for our deliverance "from him".

Why does the Trinity not appear in the Bible?peace,

It shouldn't be surprising. The surest way to avoid martyrdom is to say that everyone is saved.

They need to read of Jesus speaking about Judas. It is NOT favorable. It is in one of the Gospels… and Judas is not alone! I can not judge who else as that is GOD’S WILL. I hope people realize that ALL WILL BE JUDGED. Presently souls go to Heaven ( few directly), to Purgatory or to hell. COME HOLY SPIRIT ENKINDLE ALL SOULS TO YOUR KNOWLEDGE, YOUR ❤️

Invincible ignorance is not a saving grace...

My only argument would be that worshiping Traditionally (the same way the Church has taught for over a thousand years) would be a very safe bet for your soul. Follow the words of Christ regarding Salvation, and it doesn't matter what The Vatican says or does(I don't recall Christ mentioning Pachemama). Being Excommunicated by a Heretic isn't REALLY Excommunication.....is it? ;-)

I've heard it say that people get the rulers they truly deserve. Perhaps His Holiness is the ruler we deserve for submitting so meekly to the errors of our time

The narrow path is looking at us in the face,hold the hand of Jesus Christ,honour his Mother Mary,St Joseph Patriarch of the church Jesus founded....The Holy family.....The wide road is narrowing...O angel of God my guardian dear. To whom Gods love commits us here, forever this day be at my side to light and guard To rule and guide . Amen... We have the truths ...Jesus is in control...Our homes with Sacred Heart and Immaculate Heart pictures honour and protect ....pray and implore mercy, Love God with all your heart and love one another As I have loved you.....Stand firm,correct error ...the truth will set us free.......May the joy of The Lord fill our souls with gentle kindness.....Amen....

@@mikemcchesney2555if any religion is as good as the next, no need to convert, no need to teach dogmas, why would/should anyone care about being excommunicated? Gaslight city

Remember that every ruler gets power from God. Evil monarch or pope God allows as a punishment for the nation, country , etc and as a tool to wake up people and change the ways

This pope was allowed for the purification of the Mother Church.

You are right

I love the papacy, but no matter how you try to explain it, the True Catholic Religion has had no true pope on the Seat of St. Peter since Pope Pius XII! The conciliar popes have all been heretics and influenced by luciferian freemasonry! Bergoglio is the final straw. He has converted to luciferianism and is a Freemason, himself. He does not even try to hide that he is an Idolator, heretic, and best friend to Sodomites!! He cannot be pope as he has doubtless renounced his Catholic faith by his wicked deeds in using his office to lead trusting Catholics down the wide road to Perdition. I pray for his immortal soul, as well as the rest of the Vatican 2 popes.

@@eileenmurray737 It seems you have not listened to any of the compelling facts presented in this video.

Very well said... My thoughts, exactly!

Regarding the comments of Mr. Barker: I do not see a great difference between holding that a “manifest heretic” loses office automatically and saying that he is ineligible to be elected in the first place. Both opinions rest on the same foundation, namely, an alleged metaphysical impossibility for the “manifest heretic” to hold office. This is true regarding one who is a manifest heretic in the judgment of the Church, but not prior to that judgment. Christ the Lord can sustain jurisdiction in one who holds heretical opinions, even with malice, and preaches them publicly. Such a one is deserving of being removed from office-removendus, but not yet remotus. I am not denying that Pope Francis may be severed from the Catholic Church according to the internal bonds of faith and charity. Nor do I affirm it; it is not my place to judge. What is of interest here is whether he still belongs to the Church juridically as its head; and there I affirm that he does. I thank Dean for pointing out canon 2265, which is an important complement to canon 2264, and specifies that someone who has been excommunicated but without a declaratory or condemnatory sentence can still validly be elected and take possession of an ecclesiastical office. There is an important distinction between jurisdiction tacitly given to Orthodox priests for hearing confessions (which is the opinion of many theologians) and the jurisdiction given by Christ the Lord to a heretical pope prior to separation from the Church. In the first case, the Orthodox do not hold office in the Church, and they receive a kind of supplied jurisdiction that is transient and only given for the act itself of hearing confessions. But in the case of a heretical pope (or heretical bishops), before they depart from the Church of their own accord or are juridically declared to be heretics, they retain their office in the Church and possess what is known as ordinary jurisdiction. This jurisdiction is stable or habitual, and not merely transient. Furthermore, the retroactive effect of canon 2232 §2 does not invalidate acts which were validly placed prior to the declaratory sentence. Such a concept (a truly retroactive effect, undoing the past) is metaphysically impossible. When a canon stipulates a retroactive effect this must be understood as a “fiction of law”, fictio iuris, such as occurs in the healing of a marriage in the root (sanatio in radice, canon 1138 §1) or the legitimation of children born out of wedlock (canons 1116-1117). Such retroactive legislation has regard only to certain canonical effects, without being in any way able to overturn the past and make it not to have happened. In other words, if a subsequent pope or ecumenical council were to declare invalid all the previous papacies, this could only be because they were in fact invalid to begin with, independently of any declaratory sentence. It would be the mere recognition of a fait accompli. If, on the other hand, loss of office is impossible prior to a declaratory sentence, then the acts of the heretical pope were valid and nothing can change that as a historical reality, even if by a fiction of law certain acts might later be regarded as if they had never taken place. Finally, to address the last point, it would not seem helpful at all for the laity, or some scattered groups of priests and a handful of bishops, to assume power to judge the pope a heretic on the basis of epikeia, and subsequently to regard him as an antipope and his adherents as heretics or schismatics. This is precisely the danger of schism of which I am warning. As long as the Pope continues to be recognized by the Church at large, there is no question of regarding him as a manifest heretic, no matter which theological opinion one follows (Bellarmine, Cajetan). In Christ, Fr. William MacGillivray | FSSPX

@@SSPX It's good to know the SSPX isn't falling for Vigano's views.

thank you, that was a very interesting response. as an inquiring sede, why did you stoo being sedevacantist? did you assume this pseudo vacante position? what is your opinion on la sallette and the third secret of Fatima?

I think your worst fears may be unfounded. The Society is trying to stay a bit above the fray. I sense the Vatican is now simply trying to ignore them out of existence so to speak. Which may be a calculated strategy to avoid having to confront all the troubling doctrinal issues raised by the Council and its promoters.

They have connections with Rome. They ask the approval of Novus Ordo Bishop regarding the Sacrament of Matrimony. We are bound to avoid those who defected from the Catholic Faith.

The Thesis of Cassiciacum

@@dariusclovis1374 It has absolutely nothing to do with it... I can't believe it... Whenever some people hear of the distinction between 'material' and 'formal' they immediately think of Cassiciacum... It is not the Papacy which is in question here but the supposed heresy of the Pope - can you see the difference? Do you do this on purpose? Might you be 'Protestant', by any chance?

That's not "judging th Pope", that's refusing to compromise the faith on a personal basis. I'm not going to go out and buy a Pachamama idol and parade it around on top of my Missal at Mass. That does not put me in the position of "judging the Pope". It just means that I am Catholic and I will not knowingly apostatize.

Why does the Trinity not appear in the Bible?peace,

I think Siri either just outright refused election (didn't want it) or taking all things into consideration (geopolitics wise) willingly stepped aside. All he ever said in an interview was "the secret" which tells you something got discussed in the conclave. But for the notion a validly elected pope was removed or intimidated into resignation you either have to believe everyone else in the conclave was in on it; or that you had a room full of cowards. I personally cannot believe that if it were true someone would have gone running to the news media to tell the whole world (with no regard for being excommunicated) all h&ll would have then broken loose and deservedly so. But the fact such a tale never came to light until almost 20 years later seems more a fabrication to rationalize the sede / trad movement

Isn't Holy mother church the bride of Christ ? She too must go through her crucifixion just as Jesus did....... She will be resurrected to her former glory as Our Lady is going to triumph over evil. God is in charge

That's because it would be inappropriate for him to make judgements regarding matters that may be apparent, but are not necessarily proven or certain.

Exactly it was obviously a matter of discipline made by a paranoid pope which was disregarded almost immediately. Leo XIII appointed John Henry Newman as a Cardinal. Now Newman was obviously a heretic before his conversion. But being made a Cardinal he could have been elected pope. I.e. Leo XIII clearly disregarded Paul IV's bull.

Code of Canon 1917 - This was under the reign of Pope Benedict V, a spiritual son of Cardinal Rampola, a Freemason..

@@bobbie8059 The 1917 Code was compiled by Pope Pius X and Pope Benedict XV. In any case, James Holm has made a big mistake because Cum Ex is in the code of canon law in the footnotes everywhere, and those canons in the code are not abrogated or derogated but are in force by virtue of canon 6. Fr McG made many big mistakes as SSPX always does on these things and James Holm only looked at one line of Cum Ex and took it out of context of the rest of the document which is quite clear if any honest person reads it.

Yes he did but he is in retirement i.e no longer an active Archbishop!

He has said we have a "non Catholic" Pope .... which is an oxymoron.

Archbishop Vigano may be in retirement but he's still a Catholic.

SSPX is not outside the church. Having irregular canonical status doesn’t mean at all that they are outside the Church. Even Pope Francis stated that they are not schismatic.

Is there a difference between sspx and fsspx?

They would just keep doing what they are doing......

"Pope" 🤮 Francis 👹 said that? Maybe I should reconsider the legitimacy of his papacy... Nope. He's still an antipope