As an SR22 owner, I am clearly a BIG fan of BRS. I also fly other aircraft without CAPS. CAPS does not make the pilot. As you said, It is simply another option in the toolbox. I have never once taken a flights because I have CAPs. I will also say, when the defecation hits the rotation and you have a change of underwear moment, having EVERY possible option is truly life altering. I had an 'almost CAPS' moment taking off, at night, with my wife, over the water, when I thought I had a massive control failure. Before pulling (and pulling DID cross my mind), I worked the problem as trained, stayed safe, gained control and returned to the field .. all in under 90 seconds. CAPS would be justified, BUT not needed in my specific case. If I was unable to regain control, I was ready to pull. Simple as that. I have no shame saying the original problem was pilot induced (most issues are!), but hindsight is 20/20 .. at the FBO with coffee and cookies. I am really glad I did not have to pull. I am also grateful that CAP was an option if needed so my wife and I would walk away had no other option been available.. I regularly ask the anti-BRS folks if they fly with weather, Foreflight, GPS, dual radio, dual mags, extra fuel, etc. Why? They must not be a real pilots (using their own logic). Aviation is always an exercise in managing risk. CAPS is just another tool in the toolbox for that, and we need to focus on saving lives versus pride.

i am pro-chute with single engine - all planes really nice to have an alternative when your engine quits...2 options are wayyyyyy better than 1.

Everyone can afford a parachute once a life or death situation comes around

I opted for a chute in the Bristell I purchased in 2020 for two reasons. It helped my wife feel more comfortable flying with me and my home airport, as well as destinations, are in the Smoky Mountains with few, if any, open/flat fields for emergency landings.

This gentleman has such a calm wonderful voice I could listen to him all day

I was enlisted Air Force for 20 years and always dreamt of getting my pilots license - but I never seemed to have the money or time to invest in the hobby. Now I'm in my 50s and teach high school - so I'm still too poor to fly, but at least I can live vicariously through videos.

Very well explained, thank you. I had a partial engine failure at night in a Cessna 150 while instructing. I would never fly a single engine airplane at night again without a parachute.

Great aircraft. I've only flown in the VisionJet twice, but I felt incredibly safe with the parachute system and auto-return feature. Still have to watch crosswinds because it's a light aircraft, but man that thing cooks with speed/climb and also fairly spacious. I'm a fan.

One reason why I want to invest in a chute. Aerobatic flying for the win 😆.

Most airplane crashes are caused by pilot error and not mechanical failure. If your airplane is well maintained, the chances of having mechanical failures are low. I’m pro parachute too, but the best way to reduce your chances of a crash is to get good training and to stay current. When I say training, I don’t just mean learning how to use the parachute. I’m talking about learning how to avoid emergency situations in the first place and how to recover from emergency situations. I do believe that you should get a parachute if you have the option to do so. There is no such thing as being too safe or having too many safety features.

Thank You, Amen

Absolutely a great feature.

Thnk god he survived. I can't wait to attend tha US aviation expo @ KTTA this April & get a tour of Cirrus. Hope to see u there as well. Enjoy yur weekend. #salute my gud brotha!!!!!

Emergency parachutes are the PERFECT product to make! Why? Because if it fails, you can't complain. And if it works, you will never stop singing its praises!

You absolutely want to ballistic parachute. I am a tow pilot, towing hang gliders, and sale planes and I have seen several parachute deployments that saved lives.

I have a 172 with Air Plains 180 and have a BRS 172 parachute for a last resort/night flight or structural failure type situation.

Your humble opinion is absolutely correct. You can’t buy a car without an air bag, thus all planes should be required to have a parachute.

Awesome video. Thank you for this video.

Parachute is good as long as it isn't used to make up for bad or panicked pilot. I would definitely want to see some training in using one before I fly with the option. Things like planes initial problem, altitude, terrain have to be considered before using it. If you pop the chute over water when you had the ability to glide over ground would cause greater problems.

My only issue with the chute is not having any steering. There are a lot of powerlines down there. I want to be able to avoid them! (I'm a retired power line man so maybe I think more about that...) Over all the chute is just an additional layer of safety. I would just be cautious when to use it. Obviously a midair collision is a fantastic example of how a chute is the last best option.

Many new students will only consider the SR22 because of the caps.

Thank you for sharing this! When will we get parachute systems for larger aircraft?

Amen to what you said..

I think I heard that the visionjet experienced control problems which is where you are out of options. I'm certainly also a believer in parachutes, I have a crude LSA so I just bought a personal reserve chute that weighs 1.5kg so I can jump out. Handy in a pinch. I don't like the lines in the skin of the plane though, they should just be attached where they come out, the plane doesn't have to come down level, it's not a luxury ride where you are served caviar, it just has to step between you and death. It could even be extremely uncomfortable if that was advantageous to the design. Nose hanging 45 degrees down is perfectly fine, might even soften the impact. Typically the planes don't survive the landing but a light weight single piece carbon bird could well handle it which is a nice feature, not to have to scrap an expensive plane. Of course flawless operation is preferable. Water tight hull is also nice in an ocean landing. In a frigid atlantic, it's the difference between comfy bobbing and certain death. Two engines are handy two.

I 100% agree with this I don't care what anybody says if you can get a parachute with ur plane get it. It could save ur life if ur wing breaks off your dead without it

I really don't get why folks would ever hate on a parachute for a simple and cheap layer of safety.

I’m looking at getting into GA and getting my pilots license soon. When I do, it will be a brand new Cirrus SR22T. I like the option of having a parachute! You don’t have to use it in every emergency but there are some where you would. Why have less safety and preparedness?

Trevor Jacob has entered the chat..... Seriously though, for certain types of incidents, I can definitely see the benefit of having a parachute. Things like an engine out on takeoff, at extremely low altitude, in a single engine aircraft; complete failure of all control surfaces, a midair collision, or pilot incapacitation could all benefit from a BRS. That being said, a parachute will never replace a very high standard of pilot training and proficiency.

Well said, Great video! Thank you. When I went for my first introductory flight in an Aerotrek A240. We went through the check list and the last item was to pull the parachute lockout pin … my instructor said something to the effect of “this is so if another plane hits us and we survive that, we pull the parachute so we can hopefully survive hitting the ground!” We both laughed … but I loved the idea of a parachute on the plane and it was actually one of the things that made me more comfortable about considering learning to fly, that there were planes that had a back up/one last option if all else fails :)

Exactly, apparently engine out is part of the deal buying one.

I own a Cirrus SR 22 and I’ll tell you, you wouldn’t find me in the sky single engine piston at night unless I had the parachute option at my disposal.

hI mOJO, I am totally i line with your way of thinking, and whenever I can, I give myself and people I embarqued with me a second to survive...

Personally if there is an option to up the safety of the aircraft and all on board then I'm taking that option

For me it's safety first! Twin engines and a parachute for me is crucial. I have a DA 62 and it's converted to carry 4 people in total only and I never surpassed 70% of total carry weight ever.

Ultralights and hang gliders is where BRS really got their start. Cirrus saw this and did the heavy lifting of certifying it as part of a 3,000 lb aircraft.

It's like seatbelts in a car or truck I rather have and not need than need and not have

That cirrus midair at KAPA in Colorado occurred below pattern altitude, they were turning to final when that occurred, and still executed the BRS landing safely. Putting one in my RV-10. If the useful load is the issue, you need a bigger airplane. Building the 10 for the 2 of us and pups. Not worried about the extra 85 lbs for my model in the baggage area. Will actually help address the nose heavy default design.

Having a parachute can only add value to the aircraft. It gives you another option, might not always be the best, but another option nonetheless. Where it becomes not so great is when you use the parachute as a crutch against solving other more serious issues like spin and stall characteristics of the plane.

I'm a fan. As an experimental builder I plan on adding a parachute at some point.

Cirrus 141 failures where the parachute was deployed since 2002. Is cirrus a good manufacturer?

Parachute is essential in case of engine failure over places you can’t glide land like open bodies of water, mountains or Forrest, heavy traffic areas

I just wear a parachute and prepared to jump out.

I am exploring buying a plane. For me the parachute is a Must. I feel like it makes all the sense in the world to have one more safety option. Thanks for the video Mike. Love your channel(s).

2:12 Before Cirrus they were and are standard in ultra lights, at least in Europe.

Great video.

The sr22 genuinely needs the chute. but a chute is a piece of security that I would gladly sacrifice useful load for. I totally respect pilots who aren't willing go compromise their useful loads..that's what she said

Yes for para! They have to use in the big airplane too for passengers safe!

You're an asset to us pilots. Thanks

I’m not a pilot but I’ve been up in a small plane a few times years ago. I loved the experience but I’ve never forgotten how vulnerable I felt. Good video, Mike, but I’m kinda disappointed that you didn’t tell me how much the chutes weigh.

As a frequent flier since the early sixties, I have, since the space capsules and the shuttles, wondered and wondered why the 'chute wasn't a fixed safety feature on aircraft. It was therefore with some incredulity that I came across the Cirrus and its progressive adoption and adaptation. I don't think it's a debatable issue, whether or not safety 'chutes should be a mandatory part of an aircraft and very much appreciate the views of professionals below and in the video. What the industry needs to get on with is how to improve the facility, pretty much like the auto industry has. Automatic - under what conditions - sensors etc. etc. It's the best news the airlines can offer passengers, who would, I am sure, happily give away a few kilos of luggage weight and perhaps even accept a small reduction of seats for the almost guaranteed safety of never having to end up in a crash. -

I'm with you Mike I'd have a parachute too! To me it's a common Sense answer it would not be logical to fly without a chute. But some people are very set in their ways and you can't convince them otherwise.

they have had 140 failure where the parachute was deployed since 2002.

Why are these cirrus constantly falling out of the sky is the question

You get a gun and hope you never need to use it. This is the exact same argument with chutes. If I get to build an RV 10 in the future, I will definitely be buying and installing a chute.

let me ask you some questions... which one is good quaitly and safe in cirrus jet or da62?

As long as the parachute isn’t used as a replacement for proper training so pilot’s don’t get into stall conditions. Poor training and pulling the chute instead is going to damage the plane and insurance costs are already high.

first crash of that flying minivan.

man i did not even know there were parachutes for airplanes and i am an airplane FANATIC. of COURSE pro-parachute! that is such a no-brainer. i can't believe it's a point of discussion.

in earlier days of aviation pilots had parachute behind their backs. in case of emergency the pilot supposed to open cockpit canopy and jump out safely

It is always have more than one option to save your life other people life to thank you

Isn’t it crazy that there’s this amazing option for a parachute, but rather than spend extra fuel and air speed, we trust the man made engine. I think the advice should be, if you can’t afford it, hold off until you can, it will save you and your passengers.

Very Nice Bro! Get Good People/Pilots!

CAPs saved my life last weekend 8000 HR CFI

They had Parachutes on UL Aircraft before!

After the jet stalls, isn’t it possible to nose the plane over to regain gliding speed, and to glide to a landings area?……..or do these jets just fall down like a brink?

I would opt for one

Once a shoot deployed.. does the airplane a complete write off ?orccould they be rebuilt for service

Only my opinion… A parachute isn’t something that should be an option if someone can afford it. They should be integral to every aircraft, even large airliners! This technology has been around since the 1950’s and has only improved. Aircraft frames, engines and power should be adjusted to incorporate these parachute systems so as to not affect load rating. Anyhoo, just my opinion… Love your channel Mojo!!!

Pilots don't hate the idea of a parachute they hate the idea of using parachutes in cases were it was unnecessary. Pilots save lives, good pilots, The parachutes should be your last option but people are using them as the first option which puts lives at risk. Once you pull that shut you lose all control of where that plane lands. That can be very dangerous.

Anyone know of charter/private companies that use planes with chutes? I’m interested in hiring pilots to fly me but only if I can find a company that offers a chute

Not me. I got no pride about parachutes. lol Ill gladly take a plane with them.

Not having a parachute when it’s available, makes no sense. I have a GRS in my Pipistrel, deployment can be as low as around 300ft. Peace of mind as a last resort esp. If there is a structural failure (mid-air, iced frame) or if the pilot is incapacitated or disoriented etc. Weight added is minimal. What’s your/PAX life worth?

How much does the parachute add in weight?

I would like to have a second life parachute card !

What is your pilot rating and logs?

Our 150L doesn’t have one considered it though

Better to have a parachute and not need it than to need it and not have it.

It is better to have it and not need it, then to need it and not have it.

When air bags in car are required. So are parachutes for plane. Whoever is not in favour of parachutes for plane will certainly wish for parachute when he is in and crash becomes inevitable. Parachute should be standard fitment like car airbag.

That vision jet looked like he was at a pretty good altitude. But I know video can be deceiving. And as far as the useful load, what about that time when you do need that? You can't just take the parachute off. If somebody wants a chute that's fine. But maybe make it an option for everyone else.

Awesome Video! Thx.

all commercial airlines should have it and as a passenger i would pay more for a flight if its a cost thing. Safety over anything . So overdue , it just shows profit over anything for them companies

very cool. I think they are weird airplanes, but that's a good use of that tool. I think a parachute is good, but training is most important. Let's Go!

As a full time skydiver for 28 years I gotta say, "Parachutes Work and The Ground Hurts". just 99 more and you can get your basic A Licenses lol....

I've been watching reports about this incident. Why is the engine askew? From the pilots reports there is a possibility of the engine breaking loose causing the accident.

Here's three second clip of the aircraft accident. Meanwhile, 95 percent of the video is my big fat face talking because looking at ME is the whole point. The aircraft crash story is just bait so I can make you watch my face for 8 minutes straight.

I'd still rather take my chances gliding down, maybe if I lose an actual wing I'll pull the chute.

Parachutes should be installed on all aircraft

I dont know who in their right mind would fly that nurf football looking jet.

Apesar de ter casos na AMERICA DO SUL de uso dos paraquedas mas o problema é cabos eletricos por todos os paises deste continente espalhados e expostos em postes milhões de km então o uso do paraqueda que não tem controle direcional será apenas sorte se não tocar em um cabo eletricon destes vai virar uma bola de fogo ou morrer eletrocutado.

Good info and fully agree with you.

Human errors are inevitable, we need cyborg pilots designed by Gucci , and made by Boston Scientific to pilot slow brain civilians crafts

My only issue with parachutes is the lack of control. When flying a light plane, you assume the risk, by popping a chute, you transfer that risk to innocents below.

my thinking is either a parachute.... or at least 2 engines. as a mechanic, i've seen engines die even though you have done everything to keep it in good maintenance.

That would be my luck, land right in the only body of water nearby

Jet is so underpowered

Well, why didn't you do two or four combustion turbine engines on the wings, or do two turbine engines in the back on the sides of the rear rudder, and they have a special system so that if a problem occurs in the main engine, the turbine works

Here’s the thing: JET ENGINES DON’T SPUTTER. PERIOD. Airplanes don’t ‘nose up’ when they lose power. The pilot may need a trip back through Cirrus school.

Agree to disagree on this topic. Both need to happen Train the pilot to land and master stalls, AND pull the parachute early. I would argue that Cirrus trains the pilot in the second only. 4:30 “No proper time, if you think you’re in trouble just pull it…” I would never chose a parachute in order to save myself in the case of a midair, that’s ridiculous.

#an emergancy landing well planned with enough time is safer than a parchute.