@j wilkins Booo! Aren't all shows about music interpretation? What about these two Ezio Bosso tunes is unique, and relates to the RYB color model? This music uses a template of sixteenth notes. How does that inform the rule of three? The expression "The Rule of Three" is used in comedy writing circles. Is this a comedy? The music has a serious, contemplative tone that isn't comedic. The expression "Things happen in threes" is a contemporary expression about life events occurring in clusters. How do those expressions relate to the three primary colors selected? What is the range of moods in this show? How are the characters, if any, defined in this production? How do the three color clusters move differently from one another? Are their movement styles the same in all three color groups? Why is the dictionary of contemporary dance movements in this production the same as many of the other productions by these choreographers? Why do they use the same movements in every piece with only slight variations? How is the end different from the beginning? What does the shoulder standing pose at the end signify? How is this show related to Paramount's other shows? What is the unique point of view in this production that separates it from other similar productions using an etude or solo piano composition?

@j wilkins That one simple question completely exposes this activity as a fraud. What is your show about? It's a one-question survey that reveals the content of the show. How many participants in this activity know what they're performing? How many participants care about the content of the show they're dedicating themselves to? Do they care about the meaning behind what they're performing? Do they just want attention? Do they want to just throw quads and quints and stand-on-one-leg tricks and get applause? How many viewers of this video know the designer's original intent in creating this show? How many can identify the lack of depth in these show concepts, and that they're being fed a line of vague, esoteric bullshit? How many young performers understand that the meaning underneath the show lasts for generations, far longer than the thrill of performance? How many young performers are hypnotized into the WGI machine of equipment handling and off-the-shelf choreography and have not a care in the world that their productions lack professional content and depth? When will the medium of dance develop a responsibility of interpretation, where their productions are explainable and justifiable, well-reasoned artistic expressions with real-world points of view that impact society? When will WGI recognize that movement without meaning does not meet a professional standard of production?

​@j wilkins You are literally running through the street with a leotard on, and you have abso-fucking lutely no idea why. What. Is. Your. Show. About? It's a simple question. If your parents (or in your case adopted parents) asked you, what was your show about, and how did you spend your winter, and how did you spend all that money, what would you respond? Would you say "I don't know, it means different things to different people"? And after they slapped you to the curb and asked you for their money back, would you come to your senses and think, wow, what is the meaning of this show? How is this show different from all the other shows? What does the composer say, or what do the lyrics say? Why are we wearing these colors? What's the deeper meaning? How is the end different from the beginning? Or no. You'd just call your adopted dad a stupid queen and leave it at that.

@@jesuspectre9883 bruh as someone who participates in this, we have a meeting about what the show is about so we can express properly. It’s not that deep

@@samfielder8789 Why not? :)