Ram 😂😂

i'm freaking howling here ahahahahaha

Lol. It does seem to be the case though.

Most agreed

I think it´s a payed promotion for both artickels because you can buy those things from other branding for half of the price.

Man and we still get to see people who disliked the video. Something wrong with them. I just saw this vid today and it was super helpful

hahah

and walk and talk!?!?!?

i knew i was missing one

Talking to himself? I mean who can do that???!

You should have seen the dancing clips that didn’t make it in here 😉

I hear what your saying Parker, of course, I agree most of your scenarios each one had its pros and cons. But overall the crane is better. The glidecam is more natural but less professional looking.

Lefycoast . what are your settings on your Crane 2 so it cont be so robotic? Have been changing mine but I can´t nail it. Any thoughts?

my experience with the crane 2, is not smooth in panning or tilt, and yes i had big problems to balance a blackmagic camera, i found teh Moza air works more smooth and i can hold a blackmagic, ah is cheaper and come with a dual handle to use with heavy setups , same payload than crane 2, much better deal to compare with the glide cam

Jake Kamensky Sled type of stabilizer has been used for ages, for example Steadicam, I don't know what you're talking about regarding less professional looking. Crane/Electronic Gimbal is great for ease of use and overall comfort, less worrying about stuff, but I found the footage it produce mostly a little bit bouncy and lacking in natural panning, I'm pretty sure in future they will address this issue and come up with the solution.

ages ago i worked with big steadicam setups, then for my own projects i got a glidecam about 7 years ago, then 3 years ago started to work in my professional projects with Movi, then to a similar but cheaper DJI ronin, then to zhiyun crane, and then moved to Moza Air, working more smooth than zhiuyun crane gimbals and more features was a real upgrade from zhiyun , i do not miss that steadicam expensive and big setups or even the DJI ronin, with a mirrorless camera i get same results(much more options) than with older systems but now i bring in my backpack everywhere (this is a big big plus) you can check on my channel some of my work done with moza air

Well, 2 years later they finally released it

Hanap ka na ni alinh cely kuya kevin

Nandito ka pala Valdo HAHAHAHAHA

2 years ago na pala master layo na ng inabot mo .. God bless!

Ang galing!

korek

it's exactly that

PRIVATE PRIMATE so would you recommend me NOT to get the Crane 2 if i already got the Glidecam ??? Plz

He started learning boxing

It's from his team supertramp days.

ChaoticMatters lol

haha lol

and spitting while doing so 😁

PRIVATE PRIMATE You have no idea what you're talking about!

PRIVATE PRIMATE it's true that how it's used is more important than the tools itself, but the tool does impose limitations on what is possible for the user. Look at the race at the beginning of fate of the furious, it's oversensationalized action shots but still conveys a good message about the importance of the driver and not the car, but if you took the car Dom was in and placed it against a Koenigsegg one:1 in a straight line race for 2 miles then Dom would probably lose. You can't exceed what the tool is capable of, even if you're using it in ways nobody ever imagined before, and gimbals and manual steadies have a greater tendency to give certain kinds of shots. Even taking into account incredibly skilled users who can create unheard of great shots with either one, how many people do you think there are that have the skill to get rid of that robotic look of the gimbal shots, and how many people do you think take the time to learn all the tips and tricks to using a glidecam? Just because one is capable of exceeding expectations does not mean it is the norm or what everyone should be trying to do. That's why even though yes it is a tool, it's also a look that the tool gives each shot.

@PRIVATE I disagree, it is a look. There is a distinct look to shots taken on a gimbal.

The reason the glide cam looks more natural isn't because the gimbal is stabilizing the footage too much, it's because the manning and changes in angle look more robotic and aren't smooth like it is on the glide cam.

me too

Talking about this set-up (1dx + crane), could you add a quick remove plate or it would be simply too tall ?

I know this was a while ago. Could you plz share some settings

Glidecam definitely allows more creativity from the handheld perspective!

😂

lol I noticed that too!

Lmao

I mean.. you watched the video right? He says it right at the start while he's holding them right infront of us...

Wow, no way!!! I totally didn't notice. Thanks for pointing it out.

Those cameras are absolute 🔥

Yes! We'd love to see that comparison as well!

You are negative asf

@@raven_visuals I was only joking, I enjoyed the video!

PunkBrian There are glidecam copies that are just as good just a little bit above 100$. And you don't really need a 6K$ camera to get cinematic look, 1-2K would get you great results as well.

Better to get a good lens and a bad body then a good body and crap lens like i did

Prequel name some $100 ones then

Macmittens411 type "hd2000" in Aliexpress.

Get a cheap DSLR off ebay, some cheap lenses there too; and then even a used glidecam. You could have a cheap set up of this for $1000 easily

Parker Walbeck ahh okay fair enough :)

I only hav one problem with the video's from iphonedo. (Look at all his video's) The tests are always very positive when he recieved a a new toy for free from a company. When he had to buy one himself he has much more critisisme. Look at his "tests" from the DJI Osmo's mobile (1 and 2) he never ONCE mentions the problems there are when using an Iphone!

Don't do it! I bought the crane and regret it so much :( Go glidecam! The batteries, the robotic motion, and the fragility of it just sucks, also yeah the price! Glidecam is way more versatile!

true..

Better get both

true.

Except all the shots where the Glidecam looked better.

Utah.

Mark Keady thanks

Looks like heaven. very safe looking, mountains, beautiful

Los Santos

You don’t have to kill him man. He’s just saying his opinion 😂

adithya shukapuri only if you’re rigging your camera out. Adding a mic, light, extra power option, etc.

А спустя два года?

Eric Knorpp I got your point,but for me,the Glidecam is easier to hold and operate and the crane makes me tired quickly and makes my hand very inflexible .. I don't know why .. even the DJI Osmo is pain in the "hand" for me .. I love my Glidecam HD4000

Eric Knorpp Witch one would be better for the cannon 80D? I'm worried about the camera and lenses to be to heavy as it's right around the max payload for the crane

THANK YOU! I mean you hit it right on the head!

I understand your point, but I feel like when beginners struggle through the outdated/obsolete/manual gear, they stop to think about what they're doing more often than with newer gear that thinks for them. Here's an example; give a newbie a gimbal and tell them to film a short action sequence. They run around after the talent and get average results instantly. Now give another newbie a steadicam and repeat. They would notice that the steadicam itself does a pretty shitty job (after around an hour of setup) if they just run after the talent. So they find a different route to follow that gives them the right results while giving a better feel to the shot they did not expect. My point; By using old gear you learn to work things the hard way which is commonly slower and more tedious. However it also forces you to think about your shot in more depth than most young filmmakers and photographers do. Not planning ahead gets amateur results, and with tools that do the thinking for you the creativity plummets to cliches. By all means once you know your stuff use the easier/faster gear to get the desired results quicker, but I think learning the hard way is the best way.

The look of the Crane and Glidecam are different. It's up to the person.

it also looks more natural and flows better in my oppinion

Fuck me he couldn't have tried to be more objective

Anyone can become experienced with the glidecam. It's not the products fault that people may not chose to use it properly and that is something he addresses indirectly in the video when he talks about which is easier to use and requires less skill.

Thanos Skillet you're not alone

Probably not the only one.... but I would say that steadicams have been used for decades in cinema so your perception of what is cinematic will be based off movies that use traditional steadicams that provide a fluid natural motion.

Robotic movement is not cinematic.... It feels like drone or I don't know

I completely agree, depends on what you are going for though

Disagree. Motorized gimbals obviously seem very mechanical. Film movement is almost always more organic.