Thanks so much! That really means a lot.

really?? wow,,

Thanks so much! Ya. Sorry we didn’t do a full review on that feature. Based on the great experience with their other smart flight modes, I bet the flight plan mode is awesome.

of course, I use the flight plan with the bebop 2 power and sent the drone on 25 minutes courses around islands, rocks, over the sea without constant wifi connections and made great videos - unpossible without the flight plan app. Today I understood, that dji removed the waypoint function again from their dji go app for the new mavic 2. This function was available in the beta app but the waypoints were only able to plan with connection to the drone. Till the plan was created the akku was under 70%. Parrot flight plan works offline - you can plan your flight whereever, whenever on your mobile - also without your drone.

@@TurboVisionSlovensko If it only would be able to do some tricks like setting a waypoint where the drone is right now for example or fix the waypoint in the flight plan so that you dont move it around on a small handy display..that would be nice..review itself was very fair indeed - thx for the effort to compare...I was surprised to be honest about the differences you discovered !

Hmm

I think anyone who has ever owned a Mavic Air all thought the same exact thing when he said "a little less noisy". "A LITTLE!?!?!!?"....lol. I NEVER thought noise would make a big difference to me...but man was I wrong! :-)

THAT is great to hear. They app is so pleasant to use. 👍🏽

I can see that. It just didn’t feel natural for my finger movement.

every single review of the anafi has someone say "probably the best review ive seen on this drone"

He did sound like a DJI fanboy.. Like the rest who own a DJI, won't confess better qualities. I get it.

To be honest, I thought it was just a mistake with my computer, but now that you mention it, I did come across some “broken” dng files. However, the files still performed as usual albeit that pop up error saying the files wasn’t working properly.

9th Ave Studio yes, this seems to be an issue for many people. Another issue I have is jello effect in low light (golden-blue hour), especially in HDR (« Eartquake effect » is more appropriate in my case..). Did you have this issue ?

Thanks dude!

Thanks so much! I’ll definitely check out your page! 🤙🏽

Thanks so much! That really means a lot.

Nothing scientific about it. It flat out feels kinda flimsy and cheep. Not saying it is, but it feels that way.

@@9thavestudio11 did you ever think it was engineered that way to be light, and fly longer,, no, you just wanted the DJI product to look better, again, clear where your pointing, yeah, were done, no need to respond, I'll look elsewhere for a NON BIAS comparison, good attempt though

Someone clearly bought an Anafi and had their feeling hurt when I said that it wasn’t perfect in every way. Hehe.

@@9thavestudio11 actually Einstein, I have 4 DJI products, 2 Yunnec and 3 Parrot,, I just get tired of all you DJI fan boys, getting on the band wagon, thats all,

Haha. Well there clearly something deeper set with you causing you to be so hostile to the fact that I think something feels cheep. Opinions are opinions my friend. You’re certainly entitled to yours. Btw, I’ve owned probably 8-10 drones starting from when Zenmuse was its own company making GoPro gimbals for the Phantom 1. There’s a difference between fanboys and experience.

We didn't notice any significant difference in range. Its hard to measure in the real world because of varying weather conditions and interference. For all intensive purposes, Id say they were basically the same. As far as wind and stability, the original Mavic Pro as well as the Phantom 4 Pro are much less susceptible to drifting. The Anafi tends to drift a bit more, but not as bad as the GoPro Karma. Stability-wise, the gimbal on the Anafi is very good. In normal wind conditions, it compares similarly to the original Mavic Pro. You wouldn't notice any major difference. The Phantom 4 has a bit more weight to it giving it a little more stability than the other two if the winds get a little stronger.

@@9thavestudio11 hey, I will be a first time buyer of a drone. And I'm between the mav air or the anafi, which one would be more user friendly?I love the camera on the annafi. Thx.

I wasn’t able to change the units of measurement to the imperial system. Not sure if there is an options. As far as the button to the left of the return home button, if you mean the little cross hair looking icon, it’s to switch orientation from aircraft to controller or visa versa.

Thanks for the quick reply. Have you noticed on your video your speed is in metres per second your height is in metres and your distance is in feet. I only noticed the distance when I first viewed your video that's why I asked if you had changed it in settings. As for the cross hair icon changing orientation between controller or drone, can you explain it in more detail please? Thanks Mick.

Ah! No. I hadn’t noticed that. So strange. But ya, we couldn’t find any way to change it. 🤷🏽‍♂️

I never even noticed a difference. The horizontal electronic stabilization is pretty good. Granted I didn’t do any extreme testing for shaking, but under normal conditions, it’s great.

@@9thavestudio11 ok thanks, great to hear this :)

Hi Euron. During our review we didn’t come across any bracketing features. It also wasn’t specified in the list of specs, however it is possible that it could be added in the future with a firmware update.

I'm sure there is bracketing.

Isn't that what HDR is?

Now the last firmware added Bracketing of 3/5/7 ev... both in jpeg and DNG Raw files !! HDR is for video mode, Bracketing is a delight in photo mode !!

Maybe cuz DJI is the industry leader that most people are familiar with? If I compared it to something like Autel Robotics, nobody would have any frame of reference. Also, I take that as a compliment. Twilight Zone was legit and I have an old soul.

@@9thavestudio11 good, as I did not intend to insult you, and its very clear who your going to bat for,, so,, got it

OMG, I was thinking EXACTLY the same think. Listen to the end of his sentences for the best effect. Rod Serling for sure. That's just to funny.

That seems like a silly interpretation. There is no competition. Only comparison. Many find great value in seeing the relative quality to a very popular drone that a lot of people are familiar with. Three data points are always better than two in order to really understand the relative comparisons here.

@@9thavestudio11 thanks for your response, I will overlook the connotation of "silly" since you are right, this was not a competition, and I apologize for the wording of my comment since you obviously worked hard in making a great video, as the p4pro was offered just for comparison I definitely should have payed attention to the video. thanks for offering a very clear comparison of drones in the same class. it made my decision to buy an anafi as an upgrade from my hubsan zino a no brainer as it perfectly fit my budget

P-Log was very impressive. In 1080 it performed much better than the other two. I just wish it retained a little more detail. But I guess that’s just because I’m now spoiled by the 4K quality that I expect the 1080 quality to be absolutely mind blowing as well. So that might not be a fair judgment. Hehe.

If you are talking about the Mavic Pro, the over-sharpened footage is strait out of camera and is therefor not post processing. Only in log or custom modes are you given an image without sharpening right out of camera. The point of the image quality comparison was to compare default image quality of each drone.

yeah but the iso, shutter speed, exposure, resolution or even filters you choose are all tweakable and different,, meaning comparison of things like details, shadows are quite pointless. Even the sharpening can be added further or softened in post, while what you did is comparing them like smartphone cameras pictures

I disagree. Core image quality factors such as detail, dynamic range and compression put a limit on the potential final image. For instance, you cannot add detail or dynamic range in post. Additionally, I conducted tests for each drone at their best possible setting, including log modes. These tests are meant to give an idea of how well each drones footage responds to color grading and file compression. Experienced videographers will and have found these test very useful. To say the tests are pointless is a bit aggressive.

sorry for my careless wording, well did you do it all under the same ISO, shutter speed, etc? and yes like you said, the bitrate, sensor size, etc etc all will factor into the final result, but theyre things already listed on the spec sheet, To me tho honestly youre still merely comparing software processing than camera hardware/quality, just my opinions tho, for ppl rarely change their camera settings this indeed could be helpful or at least informative (then again, i dont think these ppl will care about the differences only visible after several times digital zoomed in)

No problem. Yes. All of the side by side comparisons were done at the exact same settings the only difference being that the Mavic has a wider fixed aperture, so it was shot at 1/3 stop faster shutter speed to compensate, which shouldn’t make any difference as they were all above 1/1000. I see your point that those not changing setting may not care about camera quality as much. However, for others, the spec sheet only tell you basic information but does not show you how this translates to the real world because any image that is captures by a camera sensor must go through software processing done by the manufacturer which is out of the consumers control. This includes any camera that doesn’t shoot uncompressed raw, which doesn’t go through software encoding or compression. Any camera that produces a viewable video file must be compressed and encoded. The methods of compressions and encoding are designed by the manufacturer and are out of the control of the consumer. This includes techniques like oversampling and pixel binning. This is the reason cameras with the exact same sensor can produce a different image (Sony A7R II and Sony A7R III).

I don't think so. But he looks like a DJI fanboy. Very obvious when he says "I wish DJI will have that feature at some point". As if he will always buy DJI. Anyway Anafi is a clear winner here.