Alhamdulillah..may ALLAH rahmah be with and ur family you always..

@@kronos01ful go do your own research? Salvation is important but you don't make effort to make sure your are on the right path.

@@kronos01ful because Christian prince himself have no knowledge about islam that's why he is stupid. I challenge you to asked christian prince to recite the Quran in arabic and explain in English and see how smart he is about Islam. He cannot lied because million of Muslims all over the world can memories the whole Quran.

@@kronos01ful look what happened to most Christians in majority Christian countries. Prostitution, Drug, Alcohol, Gambling, Gansterism and so on. Is that what Jesus teaching. Do you have solution to solve these problem. Your Bible is weak because people can add and destroy God words just like rubbish.

Alhamdulillah. Welcome Brother to the religion of justice and truth.

😂😂😂😂🤣

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

bwahahahaha..all of sudden the plane diverted to uganda

🤣🤣🤣

LOL

"Defence mechanism mode" to be exact..😂

lol

Smashing mode khabib’s way

Smesh brother

Does anyone know the name of the nasheed at the end of the video

@@mysteriousx3258 what does that even mean? A comment like that will only confuse Christians further .

@@mysteriousx3258 MasALLAH bro, Islam is the truth!

@@mysteriousx3258 and efdawah and scdawah

Epstein havent death yet

@@rafitohornero3850 I know, he is hiding in tRumps house .

why do they exist then? why not substitute them with knowledge from islam?

I wish I could thumbs up this 2×.

@@Anmxlegend94 Why are Christians led to believe Jesus (pbuh) is God or the son of God?!?! Mankind can be deceived very easily. Allah mentions in his final scripture, this world is nothing but a Mirage!

@@Anmxlegend94 that why he called preacher, he just preaching and ypu must listen not ask question, ridiculous right

One word, “DELUSION”

They know it! But Allah (SWT) has put a seal on their hearts. As Muslims we are blessed to have the ability to put our head down to ground for our Creator. These christian preachers just want to play god on earth by claiming to forgive thier church members and bless them with municipality’s tap water on their foreheads... they are just playing gods. Their followers are just blind to see it

@@Onemessagefoundationismyfav I love your channel name lol I guess we’re doppelgängers

The arrogant make so many strawman arguments it's so pitiful.

@@thomas123tony6 congratulations 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@thomas123tony6 as salamu alaykum brother. what does it say in luke about Judas give it to me please.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣❤️

😂😂😂😂

This comment is legendary

💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀

😂😂😂😂 best one 👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿

I think if some are born in a certain religion, he/she are bound to their beliefs. Unless they study it, compare it and maybe perhaps looking for the One true God (not 3 Gods as one), they might see what's missing, otherwise they just become a blind believer. Like myself I was born a Muslim, I never once question my beliefs, luckily Islam is the right path, so Alhamdulillah to that. May Allah SWT guide this pastor to the truth and may he revert to Islam like his brother soon.

Matthew mentions the actual cause of death, and Luke focuses more on the horror surrounding it

The KJV follows the Masoretic reading. Most modern translators speculate that the Masoretic text is in error, seeing that 2 Kings 24:8 says Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he began to reign. However, there is no error in the Masoretic text. Jehoiachin became co-regent with his father Jehoiakim over Judah at age eight (2 Chronicles 36:9) and became the ruler “in Jerusalem” at age eighteen (2 Kings 24:8). The young age at which Jehoiachim became co-regent is not surprising, since his father’s interest would have been to secure an heir in the face of imminent Babylonian invasion. Jehoiachin’s co-regency of ten years corresponds perfectly with his father Jehoiakim’s reign of eleven years (2 Chronicles 36:5). Moreover, as soon as the Babylonian invasion looms into the picture, Chronicles begins to use the phrase, “king over Judah and Jerusalem” (2 Chronicles 36:4, 10). The phrase is never used in Kings or in Chronicles prior to the Babylonian invasion. Prior to the Babylonian invasion, there was no need to differentiate the king of Jerusalem from the king of Judah. However, as the Babylonians came and instituted their rule, the king of Jerusalem was no longer the default king of the rest of Judah. Thus, Chronicles begins to use the phrase “king over Judah and Jerusalem” to indicate a ruler who reigned over both Jerusalem and Judah. This point is significant in regards to ascertaining the total length of Jehoiachin’s time in office. Although 2 Kings 24:8 and 2 Chronicles 36:9 say that he reigned “in Jerusalem” for three months, that does not exclude the possibility of him co-reigning over Judah for the past ten years. Since his father was the sole regent over Jerusalem under Nebuchadnezzar’s regime (2 Kings 24:1), Jehoiachin did not have authority over Jerusalem despite having co-regency over Judah. The seeming contradiction between 2 Kings 24:8 and 2 Chronicles 36:9 is a testament of the confusing political scene of the time rather than an error in the Masoretic text.

@@kronos01ful I wish that you would be more researched and thoughtful in your response. It's really easy to make claims like these and to be offensive. Most people tend to behave in ways that aren't so great because doing the right thing is usually more difficult.

@@kronos01ful Are you sure it's my responsibility to put your claim to the test? I doubt that. We are each responsible for what comes out of our own mouth, not someone else's. So a responsible person would be certain about what they are saying otherwise not speak about it at all.

@Carlo Pontiac Owh..so all christian were false christian?

@Carlo Pontiac good christians eventually their way lead to islam.... fact

@Carlo Pontiac exactly! He will come to break the cross and kill the swine and lead by what God has commanded in the Quran which is a continuing law from Torah and Ingeel... not the year book of so called Paul and John and the mysterious people with contradictions

@George B lol you think people are guna read all that 🤣😂

@George B it took you this whole list to get a point??? Christianity: GOD died Me : No thank you 😂 you see very easy

You did ❤️

May God keep us guided sister

❤️❤️❤️

Alhamdulillah...

@@kronos01ful Amanda can not accept a circumseid god.. What? God circumseid?

May Allah help you brother. Its hard when everybody has another belief then yourself but after a while they will understand.

Sorry bro.. just for a reminder... if your parent upset for your convert just be patient and remember to always be loving and respectful toward them as long as it is not breaking islamic law. Take care your parent eventhough they are not muslim. Make dua for them to accept islam.

May Allah increase you, in Religion, in character, in dunya and akhira

When you follow the truth, it will always be like that that People will stand against you! Be steadfast akhi!

Just treat them right and pray you born alone die alone i m here as brother

Yes that's a pastor for you they don't know their bible..

@@numbers6246 you will horrible regret what you said if you didn't repent and wipe that shit you wrote here i am warning you 😳😳 be open minded and Qur'an which is guidance for all mankind

@@numbers6246 judah fell HEADLONG( after running a distance) and according to every sensible man(a non christian) dead bodies hanging on a tree cant run

@@numbers6246 bro you dont talk about deceiving when your holy spirit (satan) told two people different things in bible 🤣😂

@@numbers6246 you know what, unlike your claim Judah was never sacrificed by God instead of jesus. God just preserved jesus because he knew that there will be a religion of people who will worship him and to show the non divine nature of jesus to their own eyes by terminating his life infront of them

@George B lol no wonder people even consider cow as god .. you just no different

@George B Let us first look at the translation of the Hadith mentioned in the Sahih of Imam Muslim and elsewhere: Sayyida A’isha (Allāh be pleased with her) reports that Sahla bint Suhayl came to the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) and said: “O Messenger of Allah! I see on the face of Abu Hudhayfa (signs of dislike) on the entering of Salim, who is an ally, (into our house). The Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) said: “Suckle him.” She said: “How can I suckle him as he is a grown-up man? The Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) smiled and said: “I already know that he is a young man.” (Sahih Muslim, no: 1453) Another version of this Hadith is as follows: Sayyida A’isha (may Allah be pleased with her) reports that Salim, the freed-slave of Abu Hudhayfa, lived with him and his family in their house. She (i.e. the daughter of Suhayl and wife of Abu Hudhayfa) came to the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) and said: “Salim has attained (puberty) as men attain, and he has began to understand what they understand, and he enters our house freely, I, however, think that Abu Hudhayfa feels uncomfortable with this. The Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) said to her: “Suckle him and you would become unlawful for him, and (the dislike) which Abu Hudhayfa feels in his heart will disappear.” She returned and said: “I have suckled him and what (was there) in the heart of Abu Hudhayfa has disappeared.” (Sahih Muslim) Before coming to any sort of conclusion, we need to first understand the background and context of this incident. Imam Abu al-Abbas al-Qurtubi (Allah have mercy on him) states in his commentary of Sahih Muslim: “Salim (in this Hadith) is Salim ibn Ma’qal…Abu Hudhayfa had adopted him in accordance with the customs of the Arabs. He (Salim) had been brought up and raised by Abu Hudhayfa and his wife as their own son. When the verse of the Qur’an “Call them (your adopted children) by (the names of) their (real) fathers….”Surah al-Ahzab, V: 5) was revealed, the ruling of adopting children was abrogated (in that one can no longer consider an adopted son to be one’s own). However, Salim continued to reside and enter the house of Sahla (the wife of Abu Hudhayfa) as he was a minor. When he grew old and came close to puberty, both Abu Hudhayfa and Sahla disliked the idea of him entering freely upon Sahla, but they found it difficult to mention this to him, given the fact that he had lived with them (and was brought up by them), hence they asked the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) regarding this. The Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) said to Sahla: “Suckle him and you would become unlawful for him, and (the dislike) which Abu Hudhayfa feels in his heart will disappear” hence she suckled him and it so happened (i.e. the dislike of Abu Hudhayfa disappeared)…” (al-Mufhim lima Ashkal min talkhis Kitab Muslim, 4/186, Dar Ibn Kathir print) The above clearly illustrates that Salim was adopted by Abu Hudhayfa and his wife Sahla. He had lived with them and was raised and brought up by them since childhood. However, Islam does not recognize legal adoption and a adopted child is not considered a real child, hence after reaching puberty, the rules of Hijab are applicable. It became very difficult for Salim to live with his adoptive mother due to this rule, thus the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) advised Sahla to make Salim drink her breast-milk, whereby the rules of Hijab would be lifted. It is narrated in the Tabaqat of Ibn Sa’d and elsewhere that Sahla would pour her breast-milk into a utensil each day for five continuous days and Salim would drink from it. He did not directly drink from the breast of Sahla, as it is not permitted to expose one’s awra in front of a non-Mahram adult let alone have him suckled. Thus, the objection raised by some non-Muslims that this was an immoral act has no significance, for Sahla did not directly suckle Salim, as he had reached puberty. Imam Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani (Allah have mercy on him) has also mentioned this in his al-Isaba fi tamiz al-Sahaba. (See: Tabaqat Ibn Sa’d, 8/271 & al-Isaba, 4/337) This leaves us with the question whether is it allowed for an adult to drink breast-milk, and what implications would that hold? It is a well-known and recognised fact amongst the majority of the Muslim jurists (fuqaha) that suckling is not permitted after two (or 2 and a half) years, neither does it affect the rules of Hijab and marriage. The Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) quite clearly mentioned this in one Hadith where he said: “…suckling is only valid if it takes place in the suckling period.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, no. 2504 & Sahih Muslim, no. 1455) The Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) also said: “Suckling (radha’a) does not prohibit (i.e. marriage) except which penetrates the intestines (m: meaning which serves as a nourishment for the child) from the breasts, and it is prior to weaning.” (Recorded by Imam al-Tirmidhi in his Sunan, no. 1152) Due to the above narrations, all four Sunni schools of Islamic law are in agreement that suckling and breastfeeding will only be considered (i.e. in effecting the rules of marriage and Hijab) if it takes place in the period designated for it, and it is of no significance after that period. Thus, scholars mention that the permission given by the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) for Sahla to give her milk to Salim was a special dispensation and an isolated case, and it cannot be generalized. Imam Abu al-Abbas al-Qurtubi (Allah have mercy on him) states that all of the Prophet’s wives with the exception of A’isha (Allah be pleased with them all) considered this to be a special dispensation, and this is the view taken by the majority of early (salaf) and late (khalaf) scholars. They considered the Hadith to be specific with Salim and Sahla, and are of the opinion that it is not permitted for an adult to drink breast-milk. If an adult did drink breast-milk, it will be of no consequence with regards to marriage and the rules of Hijab. (See: al-Mufhim, 4/186-187 & I’la al-Sunan, 11/119) Moreover, Umm Salama, the wife of the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) used to say: “All the wives of the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) rejected the idea that one can come to them (without observing the rules of Hijab) with this type of breastfeeding (i.e. the suckling of an adult), hence they said to A’isha (Allah be pleased with her): “By Allah, we do not consider this but a dispensation given by the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) for Salim. No one is to be allowed to enter (our houses) with this type of fosterage and we do not subscribe to this view.” (Sahih Muslim, no: 1454) Thus, in conclusion, it is not permitted for an adult to intentionally drink breast-milk; neither will it have any bearing on the rules of Hijab and marriage. The companion Salim (Allah be pleased with him) was given a special dispensation by the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) to drink the milk of Sahla, the wife of Abu Hudhayfa, due to the special circumstances of their case. However, Salim did not directly drink the milk from the breast of Sahla, rather, she would pour the milk in a utensil and he would drink from it.

5 minutes of research would completely dismantle your claims....

@George B Jesus can not save you. He couldn’t safe himself. He cried and asked god why have you forsaken me, does this sound like a god who manifest as a man and came to die for you. He is asking to be saved. Please stop with your madness.

All religious belief is delusional. The creator either made a catastrophic mistake with its creation or worse it deliberately created suffering for its own entertainment. This makes it delusional to believe in something that can never be trusted.

That pastor is struck by the permission of Allah may he be guided to the truth..

@@TheFullscoop I wish he is guided. It don’t look like he wants to be.

He’s a Pashtun I believe

@@MohammadAliKhalil He is from KPK, Pakistan but he doesn't look like a Pashtoon. It is weird.

@@maquacr7014 He looks Pashtun, I had a friend who looked like him when I was young. That’s what I thought he was as well, a Pakistani. Pakistanis on the west coat mostly speak Pashto. So it’s not uncommon

Hurled** Not "heard".

@@aceb250 whose said that , from which book that make that answer

@@aceb250 what about the numerics and lineage

@@tyronprinsloo3575 well according to Christian theology, father son and holy Ghost these 3 persons are one, then according to their belief Jesus impregnated his own mother. What kind of 🐂💩belief is this. Hence according to church theology incest and inbreeding is allowed. 🤮🤮🤮

​@Tyron Prinsloo Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’ Mathew 7:22-23 I also myself drove away and burned a demon with the Quran, so....

Period 😎

What did oothman do whit the islam? Did he burn it. Well if he did you cant know what your ‘Allah’ wants to tell you

@@paulodybala8423 the normal Christian reaction: when you get cornered and don’t have answer, quickly change the subject to an unrelated topic.

@@paulodybala8423 question for you does the christian memorized their bible like the islam did ???? answer is NO and the evidence of your origin old scripture was also written in aramaic not in ancient hebrew , so how can you say that it was real or not then ?

The KJV follows the Masoretic reading. Most modern translators speculate that the Masoretic text is in error, seeing that 2 Kings 24:8 says Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he began to reign. However, there is no error in the Masoretic text. Jehoiachin became co-regent with his father Jehoiakim over Judah at age eight (2 Chronicles 36:9) and became the ruler “in Jerusalem” at age eighteen (2 Kings 24:8). The young age at which Jehoiachim became co-regent is not surprising, since his father’s interest would have been to secure an heir in the face of imminent Babylonian invasion. Jehoiachin’s co-regency of ten years corresponds perfectly with his father Jehoiakim’s reign of eleven years (2 Chronicles 36:5). Moreover, as soon as the Babylonian invasion looms into the picture, Chronicles begins to use the phrase, “king over Judah and Jerusalem” (2 Chronicles 36:4, 10). The phrase is never used in Kings or in Chronicles prior to the Babylonian invasion. Prior to the Babylonian invasion, there was no need to differentiate the king of Jerusalem from the king of Judah. However, as the Babylonians came and instituted their rule, the king of Jerusalem was no longer the default king of the rest of Judah. Thus, Chronicles begins to use the phrase “king over Judah and Jerusalem” to indicate a ruler who reigned over both Jerusalem and Judah. This point is significant in regards to ascertaining the total length of Jehoiachin’s time in office. Although 2 Kings 24:8 and 2 Chronicles 36:9 say that he reigned “in Jerusalem” for three months, that does not exclude the possibility of him co-reigning over Judah for the past ten years. Since his father was the sole regent over Jerusalem under Nebuchadnezzar’s regime (2 Kings 24:1), Jehoiachin did not have authority over Jerusalem despite having co-regency over Judah. The seeming contradiction between 2 Kings 24:8 and 2 Chronicles 36:9 is a testament of the confusing political scene of the time rather than an error in the Masoretic text.

Hahaha😂😂

Lol the guy was pointing out the fact it's highlighted like that's a bad thing 😂😂 what planet is this guy on!!

Heaven yes😂😂😂

shaykh uthman is a Savage , his sarcasm level is just Different

@@javonturner83 Haha

And diversion...

Wan Khairul anuar when did Jesus of the gospels borne!!?? 1-year 6BC ACCORDING TO MATHEW 2- YEAR 6 CE ACCORDING TO LUKE

I wouldnt call them friends. Only believers are friends of each other

@George B My friend, after all that you have written, I'm sorry I couldn't catch your question. But can I ask you my question, let's start from the bible and Quran which we both belive they are from God. Are there contradictions in the bible? Yes is my answer. Are there contradictions in Quran? No is my answer. Whats your answer to those two questions?

@George B Sorry, I don't see a place where Quran talks about bible. Enlighten me.

It is the sunnah.

Its also healthier

Yeah brother because its a SUNNAH.

Yes 🥰

@@MrStyle-sr1yv to be more precise it is the Sunnah because it's healthier.

All of them are liars

This pastor only cares about the collection plate Probably screams power of the Holy Ghost for two hours each sermon to get peopl to donate

Matthew mentions the actual cause of death, and Luke focuses more on the horror surrounding it

The KJV follows the Masoretic reading. Most modern translators speculate that the Masoretic text is in error, seeing that 2 Kings 24:8 says Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he began to reign. However, there is no error in the Masoretic text. Jehoiachin became co-regent with his father Jehoiakim over Judah at age eight (2 Chronicles 36:9) and became the ruler “in Jerusalem” at age eighteen (2 Kings 24:8). The young age at which Jehoiachim became co-regent is not surprising, since his father’s interest would have been to secure an heir in the face of imminent Babylonian invasion. Jehoiachin’s co-regency of ten years corresponds perfectly with his father Jehoiakim’s reign of eleven years (2 Chronicles 36:5). Moreover, as soon as the Babylonian invasion looms into the picture, Chronicles begins to use the phrase, “king over Judah and Jerusalem” (2 Chronicles 36:4, 10). The phrase is never used in Kings or in Chronicles prior to the Babylonian invasion. Prior to the Babylonian invasion, there was no need to differentiate the king of Jerusalem from the king of Judah. However, as the Babylonians came and instituted their rule, the king of Jerusalem was no longer the default king of the rest of Judah. Thus, Chronicles begins to use the phrase “king over Judah and Jerusalem” to indicate a ruler who reigned over both Jerusalem and Judah. This point is significant in regards to ascertaining the total length of Jehoiachin’s time in office. Although 2 Kings 24:8 and 2 Chronicles 36:9 say that he reigned “in Jerusalem” for three months, that does not exclude the possibility of him co-reigning over Judah for the past ten years. Since his father was the sole regent over Jerusalem under Nebuchadnezzar’s regime (2 Kings 24:1), Jehoiachin did not have authority over Jerusalem despite having co-regency over Judah. The seeming contradiction between 2 Kings 24:8 and 2 Chronicles 36:9 is a testament of the confusing political scene of the time rather than an error in the Masoretic text.

Lol. He’s hilarious

He got so excited 😂

The pastor got what he asked for.

😁😁

@@djambu And he went on preaching mode..😂

One of the more intellectual things he said lol

I thought he said “Izlamb”? 🤔

maybe the Islamabad guy

@@busufyan I think so 🤣🤣🤣

4:10 😂 I was laughing with that and than saw this comment 😹😹

Ameen🤲

Another Christian missionary lie caught on camera

geography 101 👍

Pretty hilarious

Assalamu Alaikum . Bear In mind my brothers that you have the White and Blue Nile. The White Nile does run through parts of Uganda.

May Allāh bless you for your kind words

@Mariam Couldn't agree more, completely closed all the gates of logic, reasoning and intellect. Yet on the day if judgement they will be asking to get another chance

Allah (SWT) rightly said, khatamallahu ala kulu bihim.

indeed..

They’ll just say “this is just Sorcery! A mind trick!”

@@anonymoususer8286 thats another part somewhere else but there are many wallah

SubxanAllah how exactly Allah describes them is beyond 😢😢😢

@@Asiyah2000 Allah is THE ONE TRUE GOD infinite IQ GOD KNOWS EVERYTHING SUBHAN ALLAH ALLAHU AKBAR

pastor show me another contradiction sheikh uthman say less😎

Matthew mentions the actual cause of death, and Luke focuses more on the horror surrounding it

@@aceb250 it doesn't work. Both what he does with the money and how he dies is contradicting. Suicide VS falling head first.

@@aceb250 Well unlike the preacher you gave an explanation. However it doesn't hold up here's why, one part says he hung himself the other he fell headlong and his entrails burst out. As you can see its impossible the two events to be connected causes both cases would lead to death on their own merit cause it didn't say after he fell headlong and his entrails burst out then later hung himself and it is impossible for someone to hang himself after someone fell on their head, falling headlong will definitely make it difficult to focus let alone walking, while his entrails are out and the natural action would be is that he'd start using his hands to hold the entrails to apply pressure cause the loss of blood alone will also lead to death therefore making it impossible to hold a rope or anything. Which leads back to the question is that "which one is it then?" as the preacher couldn't answer that Cause it will lead to the conclusion that someone is not telling the truth or made a mistake therefore the bible was man made & has clear errors as such it can not be from God cause God doesn't make mistakes.

Christmas. lmao

@@kashmirwillwin3124 hahaha

hahahaha,,, thank you for the laugh

@@kashmirwillwin3124 you make me notice that.. Hehe funny..

Guys, sorry about the typo. l was typing without my glasses . lol

Me 333333333333😍

@@ambiyomaalim3817 Me and the toooooooo many people out there 🤗❤ love 💜 Our beloved cheikh uthman may Allah grant him aljanah alfardaws aela insha Allah أسأل الله العظيم رب العرش العظيم أن يحفظ شيخنا الحبيب عثمان ❤

me 4

May Allah guide you to the truth brother

You are a very honest and sincere person! Come to the truth Brother! Read the Quran

❤️ read the Quran … give it a chance!

@@jayd4ever you can't even name one or supply a link. LOL

May Allah guild you to the truth

🤣🤣🤣🍟

Dis time not a Rabbit,its Trump..😂🤣

Zulkiflie Bin Jaffar. ZulkiflieJaffar 😂😂

😀😀😀😀😀😀😃😃😃😃😃

And money

ALLAH mean God in ISLAM bro

@@josephvictor3245 lol cp(child pedophile) ain't shit he already been destroyed and made fun of and mocked and exposed by Muhammad hijab and ali dawah

@@josephvictor3245 you mean your fourth God(due to the addition of Cp, now trinity will be quadrinity and will be corrected in the new update of bible)😂😂 now cp will be known as the begotten nephew of God

@@josephvictor3245 Could you please ask ur CP to dare and face any Muslim Scholar face to face ? CP is a very good voice call editor LoL.

Only braindeads believe the coward princess.

victor tell him to face Mohamad hijab face to face and stop hiding behind cameras he is coward nothing else 🤷‍♂️

You mean *the answer* right? 😂

Alhamdulillah, you're 💯 on point.

May Allah SWT guide us all and keep us firm on Islam. Ameen

Does anyone know the name of the nasheed at the end of the video?

Hahahahahaha!!

😂😂😂

Outclassed him too much bro

ALLAH mean God

Maybe some more will decide to revert. 🙂

@@Warda25 InshaAllah!

Ikr

Matthew mentions the actual cause of death, and Luke focuses more on the horror surrounding it

The KJV follows the Masoretic reading. Most modern translators speculate that the Masoretic text is in error, seeing that 2 Kings 24:8 says Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he began to reign. However, there is no error in the Masoretic text. Jehoiachin became co-regent with his father Jehoiakim over Judah at age eight (2 Chronicles 36:9) and became the ruler “in Jerusalem” at age eighteen (2 Kings 24:8). The young age at which Jehoiachim became co-regent is not surprising, since his father’s interest would have been to secure an heir in the face of imminent Babylonian invasion. Jehoiachin’s co-regency of ten years corresponds perfectly with his father Jehoiakim’s reign of eleven years (2 Chronicles 36:5). Moreover, as soon as the Babylonian invasion looms into the picture, Chronicles begins to use the phrase, “king over Judah and Jerusalem” (2 Chronicles 36:4, 10). The phrase is never used in Kings or in Chronicles prior to the Babylonian invasion. Prior to the Babylonian invasion, there was no need to differentiate the king of Jerusalem from the king of Judah. However, as the Babylonians came and instituted their rule, the king of Jerusalem was no longer the default king of the rest of Judah. Thus, Chronicles begins to use the phrase “king over Judah and Jerusalem” to indicate a ruler who reigned over both Jerusalem and Judah. This point is significant in regards to ascertaining the total length of Jehoiachin’s time in office. Although 2 Kings 24:8 and 2 Chronicles 36:9 say that he reigned “in Jerusalem” for three months, that does not exclude the possibility of him co-reigning over Judah for the past ten years. Since his father was the sole regent over Jerusalem under Nebuchadnezzar’s regime (2 Kings 24:1), Jehoiachin did not have authority over Jerusalem despite having co-regency over Judah. The seeming contradiction between 2 Kings 24:8 and 2 Chronicles 36:9 is a testament of the confusing political scene of the time rather than an error in the Masoretic text.

@@aceb250 Christian had 2000 year to choose which one is the truth, don't you said you have holy spirit to guide you, why are so many contradiction, why are they not standardized into only one version

But why in sitting? What’s the difference?

@@mlepi5217 Like the brother said, it is scientifically proven that it is healthier, you can research it.

@@mlepi5217 not just about it scientifically being healthier, it’s more about how humble of a person our prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was. Although eating while your standing seems as something so insignificant, our prophet would do the smallest things to humble himself because he knows that Allah is watching. He is the definition of having no ego and and being humble. Hopefully you understand it a little better now

🤣

Assalamoalikum No swear Word.. Akhi

@@sayedabdullah95 You're right, my apologies.

@@thewallcometh1444 Jazakallah khairan

He had no answers so he had no choice but to mumble and waffle just to change the topic.

Is your name. Michael? If. So in Arabic it should be ميكائيل أو ميكال not ميشائيل

@@callmeismael no, my name is Misael

Agreed

his gear started to broken the moment Sheikh said about Joseph XD

@George B Just watch the video man 😂 why asking others while you can watch the video yourself? Are you too embarrass to watch it yourself? No matter how many times you quote about the truth in Christianity, all the proofs is against you!

Does it matter ?

Ameen...🤲

آمِيـنْ آمِيـنْ يَآ رَبّ الْعَالَمِينَ

Asalaam Aleykum warahma tullahi wabarakatuhu. Don't be amazed bro. They have compounded ignorance and they will be amongst the losers in the hereafter. This foolishness is exactly what to expect from a defective and illogical belief.

Matthew mentions the actual cause of death, and Luke focuses more on the horror surrounding it

The KJV follows the Masoretic reading. Most modern translators speculate that the Masoretic text is in error, seeing that 2 Kings 24:8 says Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he began to reign. However, there is no error in the Masoretic text. Jehoiachin became co-regent with his father Jehoiakim over Judah at age eight (2 Chronicles 36:9) and became the ruler “in Jerusalem” at age eighteen (2 Kings 24:8). The young age at which Jehoiachim became co-regent is not surprising, since his father’s interest would have been to secure an heir in the face of imminent Babylonian invasion. Jehoiachin’s co-regency of ten years corresponds perfectly with his father Jehoiakim’s reign of eleven years (2 Chronicles 36:5). Moreover, as soon as the Babylonian invasion looms into the picture, Chronicles begins to use the phrase, “king over Judah and Jerusalem” (2 Chronicles 36:4, 10). The phrase is never used in Kings or in Chronicles prior to the Babylonian invasion. Prior to the Babylonian invasion, there was no need to differentiate the king of Jerusalem from the king of Judah. However, as the Babylonians came and instituted their rule, the king of Jerusalem was no longer the default king of the rest of Judah. Thus, Chronicles begins to use the phrase “king over Judah and Jerusalem” to indicate a ruler who reigned over both Jerusalem and Judah. This point is significant in regards to ascertaining the total length of Jehoiachin’s time in office. Although 2 Kings 24:8 and 2 Chronicles 36:9 say that he reigned “in Jerusalem” for three months, that does not exclude the possibility of him co-reigning over Judah for the past ten years. Since his father was the sole regent over Jerusalem under Nebuchadnezzar’s regime (2 Kings 24:1), Jehoiachin did not have authority over Jerusalem despite having co-regency over Judah. The seeming contradiction between 2 Kings 24:8 and 2 Chronicles 36:9 is a testament of the confusing political scene of the time rather than an error in the Masoretic text.

Much love for our brothers and sisters watching from Bangladesh 🇧🇩❤️

They are not brothers

@@akramnimer6755 they are brother in hispanic.. and actually, we are indeed, brother in humanity..

Imagine the mental gymnastics they must go through everyday of their life knowing of these contradictions.

@@AbuFarouq the sad reality is that I come across this kind of dogma not just with Christians but across many beliefs

@@The_Angry_BeEconomist what can I say? Allah guides whom he wills.

@Fan of Japan we don't believe in the old testament

It's the money..

will do..which brother?...LOL

@@khairulzaj4855 she talking about me bro. And I prefer low carb btw.

Make sure is halal

Agreed. 'Salvadore' got roasted so bad

do u read quran

Allah always with those who has patience

Ameen 🤲🏿🤲🏿🤲🏿