PASTOR T CONVINCES MWAFREEKA THAT GOD IS REAL.

No video

PASTOR T CONVINCES MWAFREEKA THAT GOD IS REAL.

Рет қаралды 3,006

Күн бұрын

BUY RAPCHA STAND UP TICKETS
mookh.com/event/rapcha-the-sa...
SUPPORT IKO NINI THROUGH CASHAPP
$IKONINI
BECOME A MEMBER FOR EARLY ACCESS & EXCLUSIVE CONTENT:
/ @ikonini

Пікірлер: 53

@GeePraizer024FINEST 8 ай бұрын

Uwa natambua Mr T Sana,this guy is vey knowledgeable on matters religion and science

@patoostarman 8 ай бұрын

Am really appreciated to have this pst in our country.....by best preacher 🎉🎉🎉

@bryxn4328 8 ай бұрын

7:46 stratosphere is a part of a layer that makes up the earths atmosphere and they make up the earth's weather -(they are: troposphere, stratosphere, mesosphere, thermosphere and so on)... I believe hapo umetu misinform Mr.T

@uptotimeservices 8 ай бұрын

Facts

@eastpaceaj 8 ай бұрын

Also it claims that humans shouldn't think they are so special that they're the first to inhabit the earth

@soifarm5783 8 ай бұрын

It would be good someday such conversations utufanyie live .. ndio "engagement" iwe live

@hutiangoige3586 8 ай бұрын

I agree more with scientific theories on science-based topics. Faith-based beliefs should be about salvation. That's why early churches used to persecute people when they said the earth was a sphere and not a flat disk. Because they believed while others were thinking.

@IkoNini 8 ай бұрын

💯

@deniswxyz 8 ай бұрын

Deep conversation. But religion and science will never agree with each other. Let’s agree to disagree it’s like conservatives vs liberals

@kinara5365 8 ай бұрын

Theory is not speculation

@IkoNini 8 ай бұрын

💯

@ChavoRoJa 8 ай бұрын

So a big bang theory in geography is a fact??Nope I disagree

@kinara5365 8 ай бұрын

@@ChavoRoJa with the evidence we have, we fail to reject the alternative hypothesis (big bang theory is not a fact), with some degree of confidence that is always less than a 100. This means that, the evidence that is available so far, supports the theory. Therefore big bang theory is not fiction because there is enough evidence to prove it though not 100 percents certain.

@mrmwa5061 8 ай бұрын

What i will say is ,respect everyone s opinion

@kinara5365 8 ай бұрын

@@mrmwa5061 science is not based on opinions for your information.

@_martin_oduor_ 8 ай бұрын

I have tried to download to avoid ads but inakataa😢😢

@wycliffepoet5201 8 ай бұрын

Watch ads. Advertisement is the major source of revenue for KZfaqrs . Do research.

@_martin_oduor_ 8 ай бұрын

@@wycliffepoet5201 eti Ni watch ads

@Ownace1 8 ай бұрын

Huku sisi tunawatch the whole ad and ads bila kuskip to reward the hard crew. Halafu kuna mpesa number hapo ya sadaka

@eastpaceaj 8 ай бұрын

Funny thing ni the Muslim theory of creation ina coincide na big bang theory, just throwing it out there

@derrick_blak_ 8 ай бұрын

Jaymo Ule Msee!

@kinara5365 8 ай бұрын

He is not

@gango_beatz 8 ай бұрын

😂😂aii

@Dan_Uchiha 8 ай бұрын

According to me the best arguments against religion or God are the Problem of Evil Argument and the Hiddenness Argument... And the best argument against what Pastor T is describing here as "having faith in science" are science depends on the human brain for comprehension, which is inherently bounded, and it relies on human senses to experience the world and reality, which also have inherent limitations. The limitations of our scientific knowledge will become evident when we encounter an extraterrestrial civilization possessing more advanced brains and highly developed senses than our own.

@Dan_Uchiha 8 ай бұрын

So, which side do I belong to? 😁... A careful observation of nature reveals a pervasive force actively working towards a defined objective. This force is dedicated to sustaining life, evident in behaviors like the instinct to escape danger, the pursuit of food to stave off hunger, and a powerful drive for reproduction and nurturing of offspring. My spiritual philosophy aligns with pantheism, asserting that the universe is a living entity, and all existence is interconnected within the One. Whether referred to as God, the universe, or nature, it encapsulates the divine essence I perceive.

@Dan_Uchiha 8 ай бұрын

I've come to understand that separateness and individualism are illusions. Having explored both atheism and the church, I encountered dissatisfaction in their respective explanations of the world and how we experience it.

@wycliffepoet5201 8 ай бұрын

@@Dan_Uchihaso long story short what's your take

@Dan_Uchiha 8 ай бұрын

@@wycliffepoet5201 Nimeexplain kwa replies on this comment. Unaweza cheki

@kennethmwaura9879 8 ай бұрын

A theory is not a fact, but to come up with a theory, facts are used

@kinara5365 8 ай бұрын

Theory is a fact (with a certain level of confidence, usually less than 100 per cent) as of that time. If new evidence comes up later, then that fact can be discarded and the new one adopted. Sometimes we are limited by information.

@kennethmwaura9879 8 ай бұрын

@kinara5365 facts can not be changed, but theories can be changed. As more facts are discovered, a developed theory can change. Hence, theories can not be classified as fact

@kinara5365 8 ай бұрын

@@kennethmwaura9879 in science, of an observation has been repeatedly confirmed, it maybe regarded as a fact as of upto that point in time. Facts can change over time as new sophisticated evidence is discovered or developed. In science, what is accepted today as a fact maybe be modified or discarded tomorrow. That's how science works. I think you are being general, am purely in the realms of science as a discipline. Just like mwaf said, a theory in every day English is not the same theory in science. A theory is science is something that has repeatedly been confirmed and can be regarded as truth/fact. That's theory for you in science terms. Don't mix it with the everyday definition of theory in English dictionaries.

@kinara5365 8 ай бұрын

@@kennethmwaura9879 take PLUTO for example. It was classified as one of the NINE planets. It was a fact that Pluto was a planet according to scientific evidence by that time. However, as technology advanced and became more sophisticated, it has been phased out as a planet. Pluto turns out to be not a planet. That's a fact that changed over time as it's now a fact that Pluto is not a planet. A theory is science is a CONFIRMED observation, which makes it a fact as of that particular period in time.

@kennethmwaura9879 8 ай бұрын

@@kinara5365 let me give u a simple task. Google " is theory a fact?" Then reply

@IamngugiN 8 ай бұрын

In science kuna difference kubwa Sana between a hypothesis and a theory. Mr T ana confuse the two

@IkoNini 8 ай бұрын

💯

@princetuito4889 8 ай бұрын

@Iko Nini Mwafreeka kidogo anachukuaa scientific presuppositions(theory) as Facts yet for something to be declared as Factual it must under go Tests and reproducible results attained( according to science).From Science own tenets, the Evolution theory false apart because Humans are not evolving further neither are animals and birds instead certain organisms are becoming extinct. Secondly, earth being a billion years old or not is a stand alone issue; it neither proves a point or discredit biblical narration. Reason is simple, the biblical narration is attributed to what happens to A man? , how man should behave , Who created A man? , what's the relationship between Man and His creator among others?.Any knowledge that man discovers in the course of His life time simply means He's finding what His Creator had Created; Advance in Research unveils God perfect Design.

@mikemogoi2 8 ай бұрын

I don't agree with Pastor T when he says the world could have been billions of years in age. "There was morning and evening, first day" and so on and so forth. That makes it 24 hours. So the world was created in 6 literal days

@wycliffepoet5201 8 ай бұрын

I don't think umeelewa what he meant. Re listen

@billjames1216 8 ай бұрын

Scientist ukiwapea pesa they will just push your narrative hakuna kitu apo

@edwinhaunwa8172 8 ай бұрын

As an atheist myself, Mwafreeka unatuangusha. Mr T. doesn't know what he's talking about and it would be very easy to obliterate any argument he brings forth. Watch and listen to the late Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins. Plenty of material from those individuals to put any religious person to shame.

@_martin_oduor_ 8 ай бұрын

😂😂

@ianwaithaka4697 8 ай бұрын

All it takes is just one sentence to put your whole atheism to shame

@edwinhaunwa8172 8 ай бұрын

@@ianwaithaka4697 and what sentence is that? Most atheists, unlike religious folk - note that I didn't single out Christians only - DO NOT force their ideologies on other people, neither do we HATE 'God' or religious people. Our position simply put is, we DO NOT BELIEVE in the existence of deities, nor do we believe we get our morals from them. We believe the evidence presented to support the claim that gods do exist is simply not good enough, and in this day and age, we know a whole lot about the nature of reality compared to the Bronze age goat herders who authored the Bible and other religious books.

@billjames1216 8 ай бұрын

Neil de grass huyo jamaa hajui what a woman is ????aiiii apana