That’s fine. It’ll win at the Oscars.

No, I don't think so. Which other award should it have won? Because I believe ther are more worthy contenders. Even Editing I think it should have gone to Tár.

@@RCC_1 Tár for editing? Nooooooooopeeeee

@@richardlugali2690 Is beetwen Top Gun Maverick or Everything Everywhere for Editing now because both will win ACE

@@Sharpe1502 Yes of course, 4 wins for Picture, Director, Supporting Actor and Editing because got 11 nominations

Go cry about it 😂

​@@alejandromangieri1495 It's not about creativity but about quailty. When will people understand it? Tár and Top Gun Maverick had much more intelligent and effective editing.

@@alejandromangieri1495 EEAAO is a fine movie with great editing, and it’s flashier than Maverick and calls more attention to itself. But any professional editor can edit a scene well, but the pacing of TG:M is so good it’s unreal. Hope the academy recognizes this.

@@steele8280you guys are high as kites… TGM is a film that reproduces well well known patterns. It does it extremely well but there is nothing groundbreaking about it. EEAAO’s editing is out of this world. And it’s not about the flashy, music video like ornaments (which are absolutely fantastic on their own) but about the monumental task of finding a structure where all those different worlds, characters, genres and stylistic choices would coexist in perfect balance and a coherent story that evokes all emotions from histeric laughter to heartfelt tears. Paul Rogers’ editing made it happen. He is in a class of his own with this work. This is what editing is all about.

@@DarkWildSaison I never said anything about it not being good, just that it was more evident, by the very nature of the film of course.