Paul von Hindenburg - President of Germany Documentary

Рет қаралды 85,331

Ай бұрын

For early access to our videos, discounted merch and many other exclusive perks please support us as a Patron or Member...
Patreon: / thepeopleprofiles
Buy me a Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/peoplepr...
KZfaq Membership: / @peopleprofiles
or follow us on Twitter! / tpprofiles
Check out our new channel People Profiles Shorts, on which we will be uploading 15 minute versions of all our documentaries, KZfaq Shorts, as well as interviews with historians and extra videos. / @peopleprofilesshorts
All People Profiles scripts are researched and written by qualified Historians. The script for this video has been checked with Plagiarism and AI Detector software and scored 1% on Grammarly. In academia, a score of below 15% is considered good or acceptable. Please email us for script references and citations.
All footage, images and music used in People Profiles Documentaries are sourced from free media websites or are purchased with commercial rights from online media archives.
Video editing Zachary Bowd.
#Biography #History #Documentary

Пікірлер: 158

@PeopleProfiles Ай бұрын

For early access to our videos, discounted merch and many other exclusive perks please support us as a Patron or Member... Patreon: www.patreon.com/thepeopleprofiles Buy me a Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/peopleprofiles KZfaq Membership: kzfaq.info/love/D6TPU-PvTMvqgzC_AM7_uAjoin or follow us on Twitter! twitter.com/tpprofiles

@danielsantiagourtado3430 Ай бұрын

Love your content guys! You're the Best 😊😊😊❤❤

@SweetChicagoGator Ай бұрын

Fascinating military strategist & political leader ! Big kudos to you Mr Hindenburg ! 🤠

@rennor3498 Ай бұрын

He lived for so long and was fortunate to see so much; unfortunately his final weeks and moments must have been filled with dread and anxienty at the thought of just what kind of people he was obliged to intrust the fate of Germany to. And interesting fun little fact about Paul von Hindenburg is that through his father's side he was a direct descendant of the protestant reformer Martin Luther.

@douglasschliewen4302 Ай бұрын

And Ludendorff criticized him harshly for appointing Hitler to be chancellor. He told him he had committed a fatal blunder in doing so, and that Germany's reputation in history would be forever blackened and stained by what Hitler and the Nazis would ultimately do. Well, we need not say anything further when it comes to that subject matter now, can we?!

@theotherohlourdespadua1131 Ай бұрын

@@douglasschliewen4302 Kind of hard to believe Luddendorf when he himself lay a lot of the ideological groundwork for Nazi rhetoric such as the "Stab-in-the-back" BS...

@princedetenebres Ай бұрын

He wasn't obliged to entrust it to them, he was complicit just like the other conservatives who would rather align themselves with the NSDP than make common cause with other democratic parties to maintain the republic. It's almost like authoritarian takeovers are made possible in democratic systems by the acquiesence of powerful actors and parties within it who let their blind hatred of opposition parties enable them to believe naive things about the extremists on their own side. What was it that von Papen said of Hitler? "You are mistaken, we have hired him." and how within six months he'd have him in a corner squeaking. It is a very important lesson for right-wing parties today, GOP are you f*cking listening? I hate the democrats too, but it's better to lose an election than the republic itself.

@tml721 Ай бұрын

YES I do think Hindenburg was partially to blame for Hitler's rise. I think he could've stopped it but failed to do anything.

@str.77 Ай бұрын

He took an active part in it.

@Kruppt808 16 күн бұрын

He's a major part of the blame pie 🥧

@arcofspira Ай бұрын

Thanks for another great documentary

@trexfamily7264 Ай бұрын

I suggest you sometime do A video on Kaiser Wilhelm II

@ColdR3av3r Ай бұрын

I am playing as Holland in EU4 right now and man, this documentary hits the spot. This is exactly what you think as a player in a game like EU4, its amazing. The author of this video is basically narrating my run as the Emperor of the troubled HRE (barely manage to establish the religion to Catholicism and keep it together), while maintaining colonies in Brazil, controlling the Panama and annexing some territory in the Ivory coast vs local nations to keep my trading power higher that the Portugal and Spanish. Right now I am on the verge of another religious war inside the HRE vs Landshut who annexed Inglostadt and I asked to return the province. Bohemia and Switzerland joined on the aggressor side but one of them already regrets that decision. Religious unity enforcer as a Dutch Emperor. One thing I would recommend to make this even better for the not so deep into history people - maps - use maps and location for the people to have an understanding where are the location you mention. Those would be a next step into this video quality. Maybe some battles in a simple presentation would also make this amazing. Good job!

@JangianTV Ай бұрын

Excellent features as always! Hopefully two features for Kaiser Wilhelm II and Otto Van Bismarck someday. 🙂

@birdgette0124 22 күн бұрын

People Profiles PLEASE PLEASE make a documentary on Otto von Bismarck. A key historical figure who played a large part in shaping pre-WWI Europe. Keep up the great work!

@Kruppt808 16 күн бұрын

Von Roon and not just because it's part of my name but Alfred Krupp or his grandson Alfried Krupp. The war Minister in Roon who built the infrastructure for the Army or Krupp who was the main armaments manufacturing/ industrial resources in Prussia then Germany.

@danielsantiagourtado3430 Ай бұрын

Thanks For another AMAZING work guys! You're the Best 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

@ethanramos4441 Ай бұрын

“In spite of certain distressing but isolated occurrence in the last battle, I certainly hoped that the Army would be in a position to continue to hold out.” Paul von Hindenburg

@evancoker194 Ай бұрын

Ive been critical here, somewhat, but, the guy fought in the Franco- Prussian war of 1870, for Christs' sake. The creation of the German Empire at Versailles.. he was there. Unlike Wilhelm II, he WAS Germany. What can anyone expect from a seasoned German Field Marshal in his 80s. Most people dont even live that long. What was really left by then ? To be fair. At 68 i cant imagine the middle 80s. Can we spell 'tired' ?

@str.77 Ай бұрын

Well, he should have stayed retired in 1914. Hindenburg gave a respectable face to a lot of bad stuff.

@Kruppt808 16 күн бұрын

A tale as old as time. Nations that don't have consistent line of succession hold on to relics of the past to long for short term gain but long term loss.

@noneyourbiz8886 Ай бұрын

That’s one helluva name.

@aaronhrynyk Ай бұрын

Reminds me of the evil guy that Perry the platipus was always fighting on Phineas and Ferb.

@noneyourbiz8886 Ай бұрын

@@aaronhrynyk Doofenshmirtz evil incorporated!

@danielsantiagourtado3430 Ай бұрын

Happy Easter guys! May god bless You! 🙏🙏🙏🙏🐇🐇🐇

@spike_-ry1se Ай бұрын

God isn't real

@christophermarriott1681 Ай бұрын

@@spike_-ry1se Yeah he is. Look at the judgement he is allowing to happen in the world. You clearly like being lost.

@spike_-ry1se Ай бұрын

@christophermarriott1681 if he is real then why isnt there peace in the world

@Fairlight53 Ай бұрын

Thank you. I hope you had a blessed Easter.

@RuthvenMurgatroyd Ай бұрын

@@spike_-ry1se If he's not, why does the world exist at all? Matter cannot create itself and it is finite not infinite in nature, correct?

@geraldjampol3120 Ай бұрын

That Hindenburg allowed the Enabling Act to become the terrible law that it was is a stain on his reputation.

@BobSmith-dk8nw Ай бұрын

A few things ... First - Ludendorff merely took the existing plans to attack the Russians and took credit for them. The Staff Officers that had drawn them up - who were dedicated military men without political ambitions - thought it was funny. Second - it was NOT the Nazi's that started the Reichstag fire - it was the Anarchist who said he did it. The Nazi's - always quick to seize an opportunity - took advantage of the fire but they didn't start it. Ludendorff was not a military genius. His 1918 offensive should have been against the French who had never gotten over Verdun and in fact mutinied - willing to defend but not to attack. When he did attack the French he plunged into a section of the line where there were no rails so he could not supply the troops he sent in there. The French - who held the shoulders of the penetration where the rail lines were - were laughing at the Germans for doing that. Unrestricted Submarine Warfare brought in the Americans - and after that the Germans were doomed. So it was monumentally stupid. The German Army was not in as bad a state as Ludendorff said. They were still in other peoples territory and could have fought on. They did not need to give in to the terms of the French and the British ... at least not yet. Ludendorff was one of these people who would strut around like they were God's Gift To The World - until they got punched in the mouth - who would then fold up like a pack of cards. It was Hindenberg who gave credence to Ludendorff. Without Hindenberg - Ludendorff would have been nothing. .

@samuellaird5184 Ай бұрын

Hindenburg would also be awarded the Star of the Grand Cross of the Iron Cross. The only other person in history to receive that honor would be Gebhard Von Blucher.

@str.77 Ай бұрын

So what?

@EverydayWisdom Ай бұрын

Great 👍

@MysticChronicles712 Ай бұрын

The fact that Hindenburg did nothing to stop the Enabling Act from becoming the horrible statute it was a disgrace to his name.

@HistorywithHannibal Ай бұрын

Can you do a video on PM Robert Mebzies?

@Croatian-Knight. Ай бұрын

You mean the Bosnian Serbs were causing tensions in the Balkans. Not Germany.

@zowdie6355 Ай бұрын

Anutha one!

@katherinecollins4685 27 күн бұрын

Great documentary

@Sebastian-pr8kz Ай бұрын

One interesting factor not mentioned is the so called "Osthilfe-Scandal". This scandal around a government subsidy scheme for rural estates broke end of 1932 / early 1933. Hindenburg was entangled in it via some questionable tax avoidance and a supposed quid-pro-quo deal (he got his childhood estate Neudeck gifted in the late 1920s, but assigned posession to his son to avoid inheritance tax later on). The pressure Hindenburg was under potentially contributed to him giving in to demands to appoint Hitler. The Nazis later on cancelled all taxes on the Neudeck estate and let this scandal disappear...

@Sebastian-pr8kz Ай бұрын

Good historical example why you shouldnt put people in office who can be pressured over private real estate business.

@str.77 Ай бұрын

Matthias Erzberger (of blessed memory) did not sign the 1919 Treaty of Versailles but the armistice of November 1918. Gustav Stresemann was Chancellor for a short time in 1923 but he remained foreign minister until his death in 1929.

@victortan9086 Ай бұрын

Leaving my like and this comment to feed the youtube algorithm

@MrMuppetLover Ай бұрын

This man preceded Hitler as leader of Germany?

@StephenLuke Ай бұрын

Yes, Paul von Hindenburg led Germany before Adolf Hitler. Hitler assumed the position of Chancellor in 1933 and solidified his position of authority to become the Führer in 1934 following Hindenburg's passing. Hindenburg presided over the Weimar Republic from 1925 until he died in 1934.

@ThomasSmithThomas Ай бұрын

Watch the video?

@Croatian-Knight. Ай бұрын

@@StephenLuke That's because Von Hidenburg was going senile. He had been called out of retirement in Aug 1914 for the battle of Tannenburg. East Prussia.

@str.77 Ай бұрын

@@StephenLuke Actually, Hindenburg was President 1925-1934 (not leader). Htler became Chancellor in 1933 and after Hindenburg died (not passed) Htler illegally* merged the President's powers with his office of Chancellor and adopted the title "Führer and Reichskanzler", in which the first part referred to him being leader of the Nzi Party, the second being head of the German government. Htler did not "become the Führer in 1934". *Illegally because he did so under the Enabling Act, which gave the government legislative powers but explicitely excepted changing anything about the Reichstag, Reichsrat or the President.

@str.77 Ай бұрын

@@Croatian-Knight. Tannenberg, not Tannenburg.

@nolove857 Ай бұрын

Good facts!!

@imsisig Ай бұрын

This is an interaction made to boost the algorithm

@alexlents4689 Ай бұрын

This guy deserves much more criticism than I think he gets. Even before H!tler became chancellor, Weimar Germany was already starting to backslide into authoritarianism with some of his policies. Most of all though, as President of a parliamentary republic, *he* was the one responsible for actually putting H!tler in office. He was pressured to do so by others, but if he really disagreed with his ideas that much, he likely still would’ve refused. Based of that and the aforementioned oppressive policies, it’s pretty clear that he really wasn’t that much better than the N@zis

@Stg44guy Ай бұрын

Well, considering that the Nazis began the war that led to 70 million deaths and a Holocaust that killed 11 million people alone, I would have to say that Hindenburg was at least a tad bit better than that huh /s/

@Ghreinos Ай бұрын

He wasn't better than the Nazis?! Yeah, that's some real bs. You said yourself that he was pressured to appoint H!tler as chancellor. The Weimar republic was in a big crises, before that Schleicher and Brüning (the hunger-chancellor) abdicated earlier. In addition Schleicher was already an authoritarian, but again, only because of the crises and to try to split the NSDAP. Would you say that FDR was like the Nazis?!, he was one of the most authoritarian leaders of the USA!

@JohnJohnson27-cs6ix Ай бұрын

@@GhreinosHindenburg was anti-democratic even before his successor came to power. Hi successor just did what Hindenburg and many others of the German elite back then wished

@JohnJohnson27-cs6ix Ай бұрын

@@Ghreinos He was barely better. He was anti-democratic and his successor just did many things that most people wished for

@Ghreinos Ай бұрын

@@JohnJohnson27-cs6ix What does antidemocratic mean? Everything he did was constitutional. Also the NSDAP never reached a majority in the election, so that's basically crap again.

@jameswatts573 Ай бұрын

Do Baldur von schirach

@str.77 Ай бұрын

A small mind with a long live causing disaster for many.

@ligayamatira2293 Ай бұрын

I Wish wound do King Manuel II of Portugal

@Everydayfunguy Ай бұрын

Can someone provide me w some primary sources to prove Hindinburg could trace his military lineage to the 13th century. I heard that Hindenburg's family could trace it's military background to the Teutonic knights.

@str.77 Ай бұрын

I don't know whether the family (spelled Hindenburg, not Hindinburg) goes back to the 13th century but it's possible. But definitely not to the Teutonic Knights as these were monks, hence without any family. In any case, any Teutonic Knights that stayed in Prussia after 1525 did so by betraying their vows.

@briansandford614 Ай бұрын

There’s no point in having the power to deny other’s power if you don’t use it at the appropriate time !

@PaulVonHindenburg844 21 сағат бұрын

i am afraid of stalking

@JoeKerr420 Ай бұрын

What happened to alot of your Nazi documentaries? They're gone

@christophermarriott1681 Ай бұрын

Fun fact: The German blimp that blew up into an inferno whle flying up in the air that went down as one of most disasterous events in history that killed everyone on board was called The Hindenburg.

@Karl-nv5ok Ай бұрын

Everyone knows that.

@alexlents4689 Ай бұрын

@@Karl-nv5ok I think he was subtly pointing out that the blimp that catastrophically failed was named after this guy, whose decisions coincidentally also led to massive crimes against humanity.

@Croatian-Knight. Ай бұрын

While coming down in New Jersey. Actually landing.

@donnieboughton1730 Ай бұрын

You know what's a "fun fact"? Only idiots say "fun fact" about something everyone with a brain can understand...

@RuthvenMurgatroyd Ай бұрын

@@alexlents4689 Clearly. Not especially clever nor even subtle however.

@herbertvonsauerkrautunterh2513 Ай бұрын

Hitler didn't care or start WWII. Look into the details.

@kaiserwilly4234 Ай бұрын

Cristo Rey !

@ThomasSmithThomas Ай бұрын

I think on the next few, worth making it abit more about the actual subject, rather than background info/military details of other battles.

@delgraven3624 Ай бұрын

I don't like your "either...or" questions. As a historian, I see patriots in many countries vilified by political or military opponents. Hindenburg did what he needed to do, to fulfill the duties of his station in life, or office, at several times during his lifetime, and he did well. My analysis (as an honest historian) is that he was a responsible patriot, who saw his duties clearly and did his best to discharge them faithfully.

@marksmale827 Ай бұрын

I think Hindenburg deserves more credit than he is usually given because he loyally served a constitution (Weimar) which he personally did not believe in. I think if Germany had been sensible enough to crown the new republic with a constitutional sovereign along Scandinavian lines (and they had ample choices amongst their royal families!), a "crowned republic", it would have been more acceptable to Hindenburg and certainly would have had a better chance of being supported by the powerful sectors of society which never liked Weimar and effectively undermined it by their lack of support. The other huge mistake which led ultimately to the Nazi catastrophe, government by a lawless gang of criminals, was the vengeance demanded by some of the victors (I believe chiefly France) at Versailles, those huge reparation payments which bankrupted Germany after the war and allowed political extremism of all shades to take root.

@AlsosprachZarathustra-mg4jg 3 күн бұрын

The reason why the powerfull society sectors never liked the weimarer republic is because of its inability to hold the public order. Thats also the reason why the nazis got more support. They "stopped" making trouble themselves and instead fighting it, together with the police. Hindenburg is overrated as a crucial part and definitly nobody deserves respect for serving a rotten system, you never believed in. That would be absurd

@Kruppt808 16 күн бұрын

When a great leader is in power to long and outlived all the viable successors and you get a Tiberius to Caligula or a Hindenburg to Hitler Oy vey😢

@iwatchDVDsonXbox360 Ай бұрын

I think "the only president who was directly chosen by german people" is way too long of a title, but maybe you should add "1st" at the beginning?

@AlsosprachZarathustra-mg4jg 3 күн бұрын

He wasnt the first.

@lucianasalles7272 26 күн бұрын

👔✒🇩🇪

@brunolima7402 Ай бұрын

47:16 turns out he was right about this

@fritzbasset8645 Ай бұрын

von Hindenburg really wanted to restore the Hohenzollerns, which is what he should have done, particularly in 1933. Anything would have been preferable to Hitler and the imperial family had certainly learned their lessons. It's much like the foolish "regent"Admiral Horthy who would not allow the sainted Karl IV back to his legitimate throne in Hungary; one always ends up with something worse - in both cases Nazism.

@RogueSabre Ай бұрын

Remember, the powers that were "in charge, I guess" formed a government with Hitler in the hope that the Hitler government would very quickly fall. This was a clear act of desperation I guess.

@TheToolnut 8 күн бұрын

A.H predicted in his speeches from the early 1920's what we are seeing now.