A Muslim one yes.

so? theres plenty of muslim politicians who dont say half of what galloway does

Hes a scumbag

ok but you must admit at least he stands for something

Kingdom Wessex take a look at yourself goon

... and his income from various media sources for spouting his partisan poison.

Henry Page Oh sorry Henry. George Galloway is the only one who receives money from media sources? And Jeremy Paxman giving Rupert Murdoch the OK to go ahead aand monopolise UK news ws motivated by objectivity and compassion? George Galloway is the only one whose views are poisonous? The day after the House of Commons voted for the freedom to frack under our homes? Only evil George Galloway is partisan? Frankly, whether you agree with his principles and whether you side with his party, he's one of the last MPs to be motivated by either. The rest of them are motivated by simple financial greed. Tell me anything the tories or labour did which improved the economy at all? If it did so it was an accident. Tell me anything they did which failed to make the rich richer and the poor poorer? That is the only objective they have. But no. Let's blame it on George.

***** Galloway supports Assad, Putin, Hamas and did support Saddam Husein. He enriches himself by using his contentious notoriety as a dictator's stooge. Does Paxman support dictators and tyrants? No! Does Murdoch (a man whose business methods are deplorable) support evil despots? No! Sorry, where is the common ground between Paxman/Murdoch and Galloway. Our politicians are another matter, but even they don't support tyrants like Saddam and Assad. Galloway is devoted to improving his stock in the political out-on-a-limb domain because that is why the media money rolls in for him, but he doesn't care about the victims of these brutal autocrats. Don't waste my time please!

I think Galloway has variously supported a number of Arab leaders on specific issues, not so much because they are all-around nice guys, but because, on the specific issues in hand, they seemed to be more in line with international law or ordinary standards of justice than the west. Naom Chomsky would agree with this on a range of issues. Paxman, to be fair, never supported Saddam. But he never mentioned much about the UK government supporting Saddam throughout his reign. Indeed he could not have done so without the support of the UK and the US. Murdoch has spent most of his career trying to become an evil dictator, but never worked out how to make the jump from media dominance to political dominance. He made a pretty good attempt at it in the UK by bugging the phones of everybody who was anyone from the Royal Family down until he was appropriately kicked out of the country. In the US, the UK and his native Australia, he has always used his media network to steer elections, and he has only supported MPs who allow him to expand his network. His bold resolve to inform the public and support democracy? An expert opinion on his FOX News channel yesterday taught America that 80% of Londoners are actually gay. But no. Let's go after George.

***** Galloway praised Saddam in 1994: "I thought the President would appreciate to know that even today, three years after the war, I still meet families who are calling their newborn sons Saddam ... Sir, I salute your courage, your strength your indefatigability. And I want you to know that we are with you until victory, until victory, until Jerusalem." less than 6 years after Saddam had annihilated thousands of people with a chemical gas attack at Halabja. Where was his 'His bold resolve to inform' Saddam about the Halabja atrocity when he stood before him in 1994. Spineless.

spunk?

@@TehDawg (guts)

@@TehDawg (guts)

@@badmouserising9859 spunk means something entirely different in the uk my friend haha

@@TehDawg cum I know lol, I'm english too, my grandad would be like "that lads got spunk" n im like 🤣🤣

+Bilal Shah Which end of a leg is he? The end standing in the shit or the end by the shit hole?

+VaucluseVanguard the leg thats up your ass

+Bilal Shah He is a legend in HIS OWN mind!

Now how many of London's around six million voters gave him their vote? 31,000 I think.

Kris Here The UK--and all of Europe, for that matter--is much further to the left than the U.S. and even with that, Galloway is overwhelmingly loathed in the UK. He may have a few university hangers on here in the U.S., but he'd have as much chance as succeeding in American politics as that nutjob outside the liquor store who thinks that the government stole his brain.

Kris Here "Israeli-occupied USA," really? You buy into that conspiratorial bullshit? Americans don't need some invisible Jewish illuminati or "Rothschild Zionists" to convince them to support a genuine liberal democracy in Israel over racist, Islamic, Jew-hating fascists in "Palestine."

Kris Here I'm not a bigot; I can't stand leftists who hold genuine Islamic fascists in such high regard and then slander liberal democracies--anywhere in the west including Israel--for committing "war crimes" against said fascistic regimes. This is why Galloway is a fucking joke and why--thankfully--his audience is small.

Kris Here Have fun in your Islamic fantasy world, where all of the world's problems are caused by the invisible hand of the Jews (sorry, "Zionists) and Israel, and that the religion of peace is entirely blameless.

Kris Here If I were a Jew in Israel, they would indeed be coming for me, as the heads of ISIS, Hamas, and Hezbollah have made painfully clear.

He was on the attack but lost the battle to the consummate debater. You should watch the senate enquiry where Galloway tore two senators to pieces, which made him a millionaire. After that hundreds of tv stations in America wanted him on their shows.

And then feigns innocence.

Walter Dianne Abbot is merely a distraction. She's the intellectual equivalent of the suicide bomber. Whenever a debate that she's involved in, begins to agree on the subject being discussed, she can be relied upon to detonate herself into an explosion of paranoid accusations against the panel and the audience simultaneously; in an attempt to lead them off on another wild goose chase. How Has she survived so many successful suicide missions? Could she be Georges' forbidden fifth wife?

And that paradigm change bolstered by the Scottish vote for independence, which can only serve positively for UK politics.

Paul Spittle You mean that is kosher

Galloway classic. Going into my reportoi

He says that all the while , he also says" two cheeks of the same arse" ,,,amusing when you hear it for the first time but not the twenty first !

+housecar16 Even less amusing when he says these for the 100th time.

***** What you don't understand is that Hussein was involved and got his hands dirty, Blair and Bush got others to do it for them. Together they have killed hundreds of thousands of people. Ask yourself, was Hussein worse than Hitler? So it's YOU who doesn't know what he's talking about actually.

***** Far more many Iraqis died in 10 years of invasion than in 30 years of Saddam's tyranny. At least 650,000 by 2008, who knows how many now. 500,000 excess deaths by US sanctions on Iraq from 1992-2003. Hundreds tortured in prisons by coalition forces without a trial. Thousands of soldiers died. All for what? Fuel for the military industrial complex. Western leaders are the biggest threat to world peace, not the 'islamic terrorists.'

***** Stability through despotism. Probably yes. You'll find there's more in that Kurdish incident than you may realise, so don't just believe MSM. But the Middle East was better then than it is now. Read about mass graves etc...? Who wrote what? Was it true? Many things get written, do you believe it all? There is such a thing as propaganda. Our govts use it all the time just like the other tyrants do. Yes Bush, Obama, Blair, Cmaeron - all tyrants, killing thousands of innocent Muslim civilians. And for what exactly? Power and Oil. Don't believe they are the saviours, they are certainly not. We are not the good guys. Did they attack us? No. They want the Middle East for themselves and are using our young men to do their dirty work and die. And do they care? No.

***** Didn't the west support Saddam through most of that time? Also, he said Saddam was a Tyrant. But sanctions and the invasion resulted in over a million Iraqi deaths. Way more than Saddam managed.

***** Hussein didn't do it on his own. He has always been supported by the US. Until Kuwait? Iraq invaded Kuwait because they were stealing their oil by slant drilling their fields and wouldn't stop. Stop believing MSM and the govt and research the real issues.

Hahaha haha haha!!!! That comment actually made me laugh out loud!!! Hahaha!!! I'm using that!

Loool

Dinnae hold back.

Disagree....

You won the internet 😂

No. He was just preparing in case he has to fight back again, and he did not have to. This is not a backward country like India, where every single debate is a mere shouting match, nothing more.

If i remember correctly,PAXO, was the ingredient ,one stuffed up a chickens arse

If only that could be done with God-damned Gorgeous George as well... Although come to think of it, that's likely how he spends a Friday night...you know...stuffing a chicken... :O

Alan Yates him and paxman have respect for each other. But they also have a history

Alan Yates I don't agree with you what so ever

Your mind is so ignorant

But he lost to one of the greatest debaters of all time. You just don’t like his politics. The only thing Paxman has in his arsenal is insults but no brains to go with it and Galloway pick him off right away. I was in Australia when Galloway was interviewed by a journalist very much like Paxman. He started off insulting Galloway but George just sat quietly listening to these disgraceful insults. George then said are you finished? Then left him destroyed. I can never see that journalist without remembering the drubbing he got, his name is Sheridan and was considered to be one of their top journalists

David Cross I don't think it matters when it existed, the main point is that he opposes privatisation, if that's the case he can go live in North Korea, in fact we'll offload most of Scotland to North Korea, give people like me peace.

David Cross Yes David, thank God for privatisation, who can forget Allende who Nationalised Chile's industry and by 1973 ended up in hyperinflation. Then we have Great Britain who Nationalised all its industry in 1945, and by the year 1974 was known as the sick man of Europe, then by 1979 Britain was heading under. Add to this Labour government in the 1970's ended up bankrupt. Yeah, who can forget that? Oh that's right, a Socialist can, because after all, Socialists are, well in the nicest possible way, economic degenerates. I mean to show how economically degenerate Socialists are, the Communists realised Nationalisation isn't sustainable, so now they aim for a mixed economy between their Socialist ideology called Communism and their other Socialist ideology called Fascism, whereby using Privatisation instead into the hands of the few whilst government manages it. Oh but that's right David, I forgot, economically degenerate people like you don't realise that Fascism is a Collectivist ideology and Capitalism is an Individualist ideology and that Individualism is the opposite of Collectivism. Oh dear, did I let the cat out of the bag? But here's the special part, this is where we give you Socialists a showing up: *_"I am a Socialist, and a very different kind of Socialist to your rich friend Count Reventlow"_* ~ Adolf Hitler Oh dear! all that time you thought Hitler was a Capitalist, I wonder why? Maybe because stupid people like you don't realise that there is no such thing as *a)* Centrally planned Capitalist economics *b)* Bailouts under Capitalism. Oh but that's right, you're not just economically degenerate, your historically degenerate. I mean after all, you don't realise that Alexander Hamilton was a Socialist banker, who not only founded America's first National Bank, but was the one who founded _'Crony Capitalism'_, oh diddums. And who was Alexander 'Socialist' Hamilton's main enemy? Ah that's right, the Classical Liberal, the Capitalist himself, Thomas Jefferson, the man who ended the first national bank. Then we had the second Capitalist president to name, which was President Andrew Jackson, the same Capitalist who put an end to the second National Bank, oh dear, looks like you don't like the fact Socialists were setting up National Banks. Then we have the same Socialists that went on the path to create the Federal Reserve Private Bank, and the funny part is, stupid people like you think just because the name has 'private' in it, you're that dumb, you think the bankers are Capitalist hahaha no surprise from economically and historically degenerate people such as yourself, the type of daft bastards that don't realise who the Fabian Society were. So let's educate you, shall we? Yes! *THE FABIAN SOCIETY* This was created and founded in 1884 by a man called George Bernard Shaw, a psychopath. The name Fabian derives from Fabius Maximus, that's where the ideology of the Fabian Socialists comes from. What did George Bernard Shaw quote saying? *_"Socialism is the same as Communism, only better English."_* Not only was he an admirer of the Soviet Union, he founded your beloved Labour Party in 1900. Which by the year 1945 they came to power. They also had a big part to play in the 'London School of Economics' where one of them in the Fabian Society circle who was very close to a man called 'George Orwell', oh, who was he again? Oh never mind, all you need to know is that the Fabian Socialists told George Orwell about their plans for a New World Order, the one world Communist government, a surveillance state. YES that's right, your Globalist elite Socialist movement with your SOCIALIST Commie Labour Party. And what did George Orwell write as a result of this warning? 1984. Fitting this up your arse yet son? After all, stupid bastards like you tried to blame Capitalism, no surprise though. *NATIONALISATION* Your nationalisation was so successful that by the year 1979, Great Britain was heading under. Who was it that reversed the economy, saved it and made your economy last to this very day? Margaret Thatcher, oh that's right, I forgot, the same Margaret Thatcher all you stupid bastards loved to hate. So let's debunk your little Coal Mining Mythology, after all, you Socialists are filled with mythology. *COAL MINING INDUSTRY COLLAPSE* *_"She destroyed Britain's coal industry."_* Britain's coal industry had been in decline for decades. Many more pits were closed under Harold Wilson's Labour governments than under Margaret Thatcher's Conservative ones. One reason was the rise of oil and then gas and nuclear as cleaner alternative sources of power. Another was the decline of heavy industries that depended on coal. Domestic heating moved away from coal, and North Sea gas replaced coal gas. Added to this was lower cost foreign coal. All of these ultimately doomed loss-making subsidized coal mines, and the year-long miners' strike helped reinforce the case for alternatives. *OH DEAR* You wanted to waste tax payers money by bailing that out as well, that's because after all, you don't understand economics. You don't understand the importance of why you allow room for failure in the economy, because well, let's face it, who in Scotland understands economics? About 1% of the population, which is why your country is doomed! *PRIVATISATION* Oh look, the only form of Socialism that ever worked but regarded as a failure for what it's caused by so many people being killed was Nazi Germany's wonderful Fascism, and what did that involve? Privatisation. Funny isn't it, that no matter where you look where economic growth is coming from, comes from less regulated based economies where privatisation is, that's because stupid people like you confuse Capitalism with Fascism, you don't understand the differences between true private ownership and privatisation under Fascism, one is government managed, the other isn't. That's why you are clueless about economics David. So yes, nice try on the sarcasm! ha!

David Cross Oh and last but not least, since when was Nationalisation free?

Scotty M You should watch the documentary The War on Democracy and find out just how much the CIA raped South America's economy for refusing to bow down to privatisation .

David Cross First of all, I think there is a very strong difference between true private ownership and what you may call privatisation. Perhaps you maybe right, although I'm more Laissez-Faire minded, so I would find that very odd to support Nationalisation. I see nothing wrong with having a Minarchist government and pushing towards a more laissez-faire based economy by technological advances, but I certainly do not believe in Nationalisation. And no, I'm not a fan of that, I'm a classical liberal, Socialism is the same as Communism and Communism is the same as Fascism, what point are you getting at?

Aaron, I lived in the US. while working for Dell in Texas, and loved the people I met, but your media are bought and paid for. While it is going that way here, the Beeb, still has a few giants like Jeremy Paxman, and John Humphries, et-al, but people like them are being forced out, by the Liberal elite who are taking over the world. Also, the media are not reporters any more, they are infotainment pure and simple. Battling for the female eyeballs, and their perspective because it is she who spends the bulk of household income. Advertising leads us ultimately into a media grey soup, where strong opinions are not voiced because it would upset one segment or other of the paying audience.

Anton K what is multiculturalism

Yes apparently money renders you unable to speak or represent. Dumbass

22grena Galloway supports kleptocracies such as Russia and Palestine, where not just millions, but billions are siphoned off -especially in Russia. Galloway has supported every brutal dictator going: Assad, Kadyrov, Saddam etc. Putin clearly wans to see dictators running Muslim countries because it aids his massive larceny in Russia, Putin: the man who cannot retire from power as he would likely be thrown into prison. In light of that, let's return to your insulting comment. You indicate say that my comment means that "apparently money renders you unable to speak or represent" and you then call me "Dumbass" Mr. Galloway is paid hundreds of thousands of pounds a year, comprising his lowly £68,000 salary as an MP and the remainder comes from Press TV, RT etc. Apparently you are incapable of seeing that Mr. Galloway 'feathers his own nest' with earnings most people would envy because he is a sycophant to dictators and thieves. He supports Hamas, who murder their opposition and journalists who step out of line. He supports Putin, who steals the wealth of his country and who was responsible for the apartment bombings in Russia in September 1999, which killed three hundred people and wounded hundreds of others. Putin then blamed this on Chechnyan separatists in order to garner fervent support for entrenching his nationalist agenda. It killed as many as 200,000 people.This is the man that Galloway supports. He supports Assad, a dynastic dictator that has killed hundreds of thousands of his own people. This is the man that Galloway supports. Galloway earns from it. To be rude (unusually) it appears that you is the 'dumbass'. www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/nov/22/finally-we-know-about-moscow-bombings/

Sonof Richard So he doesn't support the Russian oligarchs? Sorry but he is a fervent supporter of Russia and Putin and that's why he has a show on RT. I am not too biased towards Islam, I am biased against ALL religions. I love the way you say 'Galloway is a thinking man's politician' - it's just an absurd observation. So expressed another way, all thinking men agree with his support of Assad, Kadyrov and Saddam? Sorry, but it is difficult to take that seriously.

Sonof Richard Galloway to the butcher Saddam Hussein in 1994: "I thought the President would appreciate to know that even today, three years after the war, I still meet families who are calling their newborn sons Saddam ... Sir, I salute your courage, your strength your indefatigability. And I want you to know that we are with you until victory, until victory, until Jerusalem." Just to inform you, this speech was made AFTER 1988, when thousands died in Saddam's Halabja gas attack

Sonof Richard And coming from the man that was arrogant enough to make the statement that the man he defends and follows is 'the thinking man's politician' I would say it is you that has the closed mind. I do not subscribe to polarised politics rather I form my views case by case. I don't support Hamas, it is a terrorist organisation, but so are the Zionists running Israel. If you took the blinkers off for a minute you would also realise that there are many Jews who don't beleive in Zionism. Zionists and their mega-rich supporters are to global financial control what Islam is to suicide bombing, beheading, dictatorships and butchery. Consider this: More Muslims (many more) have been killed in the last 50 years by fellow Muslims than they have been over the same period by the Christian West.