PDJ Weekly Livestream # 15

  Рет қаралды 628

Harrison Low

Harrison Low

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 31
@jonbeno9926
@jonbeno9926 5 ай бұрын
Have you considered using a weak link in the line made from a smaller cross section string, such as monofilament fishing line? It's available in many sizes. The test strength is typically a bit under the actual strength but by how much varies by manufacturer. Knots reduce the strength, using a wrap around something with a reasonable radius keeps most of the strength and would keep things more consistent. The 3D printed weak link is a cool idea, but I suspect you may get some inconsistent annoying fatigue failures using the out of plane tensile strength of the material with such small section.
@harrisonlow
@harrisonlow 5 ай бұрын
This is a great idea! I could use the string that I was originally using for all my actuators (kevlar kite string) as it has a breaking strength of ~70N which is exactly what I'm after. I think for now I'll stick with the printed fuses and see if I have any issues with them. If I do, I reckon I'll swap to your idea. This is the best fuse idea I've seen yet!
@yeroca
@yeroca 4 ай бұрын
For quick power connect/disconnect, you might consider barrel connectors. There are wireable female and male versions of these.
@harrisonlow
@harrisonlow 4 ай бұрын
Do you mean banana connectors? My cursory search suggests they're not rated for the full power I'm currently using (45 V @ up to 12.5 A), and I like having plugs that are overspecced for everything I might be doing. As it happens, the XT60s have been really easy to modify to make them more separable, just using a pair of pliers! I'll explain in the next stream 😊
@yeroca
@yeroca 4 ай бұрын
@@harrisonlowNot banana plugs. Barrel connectors are coaxial, but yeah a 12.5A one would have to be a pretty large diameter. I'll look around a bit.
@yeroca
@yeroca 4 ай бұрын
@@harrisonlowIt seems quick connect in this voltage/current range aren't common. I know it sounds lame, but one possibility would be to use standard AC electrical connectors, at least until you get out of the prototype stage. Those can typically handle 240V at 15A.
@yeroca
@yeroca 4 ай бұрын
You might get finer control of the breaking strength by using a smaller nozzle, like 0.2mm, which would double the number lines to needed to make the same diameter.
@harrisonlow
@harrisonlow 4 ай бұрын
Very interesting! I don't think I'll try this myself though; I rue having to change the nozzle on my printer and haven't changed it from 0.6 in years. Such a pain to do! Someone on Zulip suggested trying lower print temps to allow a large diameter (and hence more perimeters) at the same breaking strength. In theory, more perimeters = more repeatability, so I wonder if this might achieve the same effect? 🤔 Cheers for the idea!
@joewalp
@joewalp 5 ай бұрын
Soldering larger wires requires delivering power quickly to the weld. Lots of electronics soldering irons can't deliver sufficient heat flux. In that case, a mechanical connection is the way to go. Roughly in the order of increasing price for connecting stranded copper, your options include: (1) twist together; connect via a copper split bolt; wrap with electrical tape .. (2) crimp ring terminals or lugs; connect via a bolt or a bus bar .. (3) attach mechanical lugs; connect via a bolt or a bus bar .. (4) (for marine applications) apply Noalox; connect via an insulated multitap wire connector. All of this hardware can be purchased at an electrical supply store or an online industrial supply retailer. In the US, Grainger tends to be convenient. For reference, see the following path in their online catalog: Electrical > Electrical Connectors & Wiring Devices > Wire Connectors, Terminals & Terminal Blocks.
@harrisonlow
@harrisonlow 5 ай бұрын
Wow, thanks for writing this up! I had no idea some of things things existed and it's very helpful to have this all spelled out for me. I think I'll give a busbar a go and hopefully that fixes these issues (or at least makes it easier to see what might be going wrong). Cheers 😊
@joewalp
@joewalp 5 ай бұрын
@@harrisonlow Glad to help. I admire your relentlessness.
@hankb7725
@hankb7725 5 ай бұрын
It reminds me of how Carlos Alcaraz or Roger Federer catch the ball with the racket. Sounds like that's what you were looking to do. It looks like they move to meet the ball and once they make contact, they quickly slow down. so you probably never have to be going faster than the ball, only be going the same speed as it makes contact.
@fox25_fpv19
@fox25_fpv19 5 ай бұрын
XT-60 advice: you could try to compress the pins in the male side with plyers. There are slits in the pins that you can stick a screwdriver into to expand the pins if its to loose, and you can make them more loose by just compressing them
@harrisonlow
@harrisonlow 5 ай бұрын
I'll give this a go - thanks!
@harrisonlow
@harrisonlow 4 ай бұрын
Just tried this and it worked a treat! I wasn't expecting so much of the grip force to be from the pins but tweaking the pins has made this much better. Cheers for this suggestion 😊
@jonbeno9926
@jonbeno9926 5 ай бұрын
I'd be interested in seeing the physics simulation. I'll get over to Zulip and reach out. I've done some system modeling but have an interest in doing more of this. The compliant hand is definitely a cool thought, though the impedance of the hand is something to consider. If you can get the hand impedance (reflected linear inertia) close to the ball, then this would work great. Depending on the hand gear ratio, you may have quite a bit more inertia in the hand, and the ball will want to bounce off before it can accelerate the hand. Some damping will be very helpful in getting stable catches, I'm thinking bean bags vs rubber bouncy balls. It's a fun problem, perhaps a 1 DOF test stand to toss vertically would be helpful to test ideas. Assuming the hand impedance is low enough, then trying some ideas with controller gains to improve catching would be good. I think gain scheduling through the catch to the throw should be sufficient to avoid mode transition.
@harrisonlow
@harrisonlow 5 ай бұрын
Nice! Definitely message us on Zulip. The best place for this would probably just be General > Random and that way Josh will see your messages as well and will be able to help with any debugging necessary. All the code can be found on github (link in this stream's description) 😊 I agree a 1 DOF test will be critical in getting this system tuned well. Also thanks for this writeup! You've used some useful terminology here that I wasn't familiar with so now I have a better idea of what to Google / ChatGPT 😁 Cheers!
@Ziraya0
@Ziraya0 5 ай бұрын
Instead of having beefy wires joined in a big harness, it would be more reliable and flexible to have a couple of bus bars, or bridged terminal blocks, with separate wires for each destination as well as the source
@harrisonlow
@harrisonlow 5 ай бұрын
Yep, I think you're right here. Now just to re-do that wiring for the nth time! 😂
@frollard
@frollard 5 ай бұрын
58:00 xt connectors are a little stiff, but should easily come apart by hand. That seems to be a cheap-choice problem.
@harrisonlow
@harrisonlow 5 ай бұрын
Good to know! I'll put "not cheap xt60s" on my shopping list. Cheers for the confirmation!
@DMSparky
@DMSparky 5 ай бұрын
Nice lash splice 😄 were you inspired by the NASA wiring guide? Since I’m a lazy electrician I probably would have just used a terminal strip.
@harrisonlow
@harrisonlow 5 ай бұрын
Haha I had no idea this type of connection had a name! You might be on to something with the terminal strip idea... That seems a lot easier to work with 🤔
@DMSparky
@DMSparky 5 ай бұрын
@@harrisonlow Yes, its a method I have only read about. It's found in section 19 of the NASA document "Workmanship Standard for Crimping, Interconnecting Cables, Harnesses, and Wiring"... Which is the kind thing I like to read in my spare time hahah. So its good enough for NASA!
@hankb7725
@hankb7725 5 ай бұрын
maybe instead of movement compliance you can create friction to slow down the ball to catch it. what about some kind of funnel with a fabric surface? the funnel can be flexible or a bit springy so it has give as it enters and is also getting slowed down by the fabric friction. as it enters it gets tighter since it's a funnel shape. to throw you can relax the funnel and expose a harder rounded surface below like what you had before to throw it
@harrisonlow
@harrisonlow 5 ай бұрын
Interesting idea! I'm not a huge fan of the 'funnel hand' idea as it feels a little bit like cheating to me, but I'll have a think about how friction might be useful here. Very creative idea!
@hankb7725
@hankb7725 4 ай бұрын
Ok. I'm a big fan of the "simplest thing that can possibly work" approach. So I was thinking of whats the easiest way to grab the ball since all we care about is capturing it and throwing it. If you don't like the funnel idea, maybe consider the mousetrap approach that instantly clamps down, maybe with 3 to 4 fingers around the ball. Then no need to do complicated compliance calculations... just grab it! :) Love your videos man! very cool. @@harrisonlow
@harrisonlow
@harrisonlow 4 ай бұрын
@@hankb7725 Yeah, I agree with that general mentality, and it's not quite true that I'm dismissing the funnel idea just for aesthetic taste, it's just tricky to verbalise all the contributing factors in a YT comment 😅 I really like the idea of a 'trap' to hold the ball, and this is something I think I might include in a future version of Jugglebot, especially one that does aggressive moves while holding the ball. Baby steps, though, and I think the compliant hand is a more robust way to solve the problem than having the ball slam into a trap each time. Smoothness = good form 😊 Cheers!
@hankb7725
@hankb7725 4 ай бұрын
@@harrisonlow I’ll excited to see it become a reality asap. So after tossing a ball and catching it a few times I realized I was just mostly grabbing it on the spot, not really moving down. But I agree to be more robust and support much higher throws and possibly heavier balls, it would be good to be able to slow it down. Either way I’m sure you will make it work. Since I don’t understand the compliance calculation, for me it seemed easier to grab it on contact :) but you have the expertise as an engineer so you have more options. Thanks for the engagement. I’m on the chat platform too. I can chat there going forward.
@harrisonlow
@harrisonlow 4 ай бұрын
@@hankb7725 Yeah the compliance is something that doesn't really become obvious (or necessary) until you're juggling more balls, or higher throws I agree - I'm very excited for this to finally start working! It feels so close 😁
PDJ Weekly Livestream # 16
56:21
Harrison Low
Рет қаралды 678
PDJ Weekly Livestream # 20 - Weekly Update
39:51
Harrison Low
Рет қаралды 358
👨‍🔧📐
00:43
Kan Andrey
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Кадр сыртындағы қызықтар | Келінжан
00:16
Running With Bigger And Bigger Feastables
00:17
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 131 МЛН
КАКУЮ ДВЕРЬ ВЫБРАТЬ? 😂 #Shorts
00:45
НУБАСТЕР
Рет қаралды 3,1 МЛН
How Brushless Motor and ESC Work and How To Control them using Arduino
12:45
How To Mechatronics
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
Apollo Core Rope Memory (Apollo Guidance Computer Part 30)
49:03
CuriousMarc
Рет қаралды 532 М.
PDJ Weekly Livestream # 22 - Update + Chat with Jon
1:35:12
Harrison Low
Рет қаралды 466
The Clever Way to Count Tanks - Numberphile
16:45
Numberphile
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Linear Motors are under test!
2:01
Tallman Robotics Limited
Рет қаралды 7 М.
Pringle Can Rockets! - My best worst idea yet
19:41
Turnah81
Рет қаралды 350 М.
How to achieve nanometer precision in space?
11:07
Breaking Taps
Рет қаралды 714 М.
Arduino Projects - 12 GREAT Ideas for you!!!
9:00
ToP Projects Compilation
Рет қаралды 361 М.
Слетела прошивка на LiXiang L7
1:01
Настя ЧПЕК Туман
Рет қаралды 3,9 МЛН
Худший iPhone 16. #apple #iphone
1:01
Не шарю!
Рет қаралды 203 М.
Мой новый мега монитор!🤯
1:00
Корнеич
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН