All good! Thanks for watching.

Got to keep up the Kiwi understatement :)

@@AndrewJacksonDesignStudio I didn't know that was a thing, but now I do. Keep rocking man!

Yep, can be a little like the Monty Python ‘just a scratch’ thing 😉

All good, thanks for watching Liam

All good!

Hi there, that is a good question. Quite often when using boundary surfaces, if the boundaries and any cross section curves are CC, then the resulting surface appears to be CC as well, even though the boundary condition is set to tangent. Lots of times in these situations setting the boundary to CC results in no improvement in the surface flow and sometimes ends up with SW forcing a small wrinkle along the affected boundary. I'm waiting for Dassault to add a G3 constraint to the boundary surface, as it seems a bit lacking to have G3 for sketches but not surfaces. Also, Solidworks has no native tools to check whether a boundary is actually CC, so I have been running surfaces through Rhino and using the Global Edge Continuity tool, which can check boundaries for G0, G1 and G2 and lets you know the tolerance on those edges. Thanks for watching and commenting!

Hi Phil, good question. I've worked on very few projects where something has been built in Rhino then imported into SW for further modelling. Clients would always prefer to have everything in one package if possible. Especially in the later design phases. The pebble surfaces would be much leaner and cleaner in Rhino, with the trade off being having to rebuild and rematch surfaces if you make alterations, vs SW (hopefully) updating and being quicker to test things out. Rhino does have history on some functions and seeing as the pebble is pretty simple from a layout POV, you could probably make this and tweak things fairly easily without fully rebuilding. Cheers, AJ