Thank you so much

Thank you so much.

Glad it helped!

Thank you too

Thanks a lot

Thank you too

Watch it here kzfaq.info/get/bejne/g89dd8uWu62qdKc.html

Thank you too

Thank you too

Sure . Will post it.

Yes. of course

@@PEEPALLAB thank you so much madam

Am is the verb in this sentence

Yes. He is to leave this Friday. Question: Is he to leave this Friday?

Tq

Yes you can say ' He is going to leave' instead of He is to leave

when we say 'He is about to speak ' it means he is going to speak very soon(in hours, minutes) We can say, 'He is to speak at the meeting' even a week or a month before the meeting

sure. Will post a video on this topic

Yes.remove 'on' . I am to play cricket tomorrow But, the sentence sounds too serious and formal. Instead, you can say, I am going to play cricket tomorrow

Sure. That's a nice suggestion

You can only use past participle after have/has/had like have been, has been, and had been

Both are grammatically correct நான் நாளை அங்கு செல்லப் போகிறேன் I am going to go there tomorrow (or simply I am going there tomorrow) நான் நாளை அங்கு செல்ல வேண்டும் - I am to go there tomorrow (commitment) Itdepends upon the situation

@@PEEPALLAB Thank you so much mam. It's really helpful. Be + to - "Should" "Have to" da meaning la ya mam apa varuthu? I am to go there tomorrow - na nalaiku anga poha vendum. Should Must Have to / Has to Need to Got to Supposed to Ought to Be + to These are same meaning mam? I mean 'vendum' - Be + to

@@PEEPALLAB I am to go there tomorrow - na nalai angu poha vendum/irukiren. Vendum and irukiren these two are same meaning mam??? (Be + to)

@@nusair_noushad We use 'be to' when you are talking about official responsibility / capacity. When you say ' I am to attend the meeting' என்று நீங்கள் கூறும்போது, ​​உங்கள் பொறுப்பைப் பற்றி பேசுகிறீர்கள்

@@PEEPALLAB ok mam

I posted a video on future tense in which I have included 'going to'. Here is the link kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gq6peJlpyMnFgYk.html

Yes, it is